Topic: [ANN] Ethereum: Welcome to the Beginning - page 830. (Read 2007101 times)
Who is barry silbert???
last chance to board the bus. Don't be left behind.
loosing respect for that guy...he kind of like fox news with cointelegraph (that is his organization isn't it)
all ive been seeing past two days are articles about etc...90% from them.
talk about stirring the pot (#rogerailesofcrypto lol)
lol he paid for etc lol
These are the same guys that wouldnt pay for ETH when it was that price 7months ago, but now pay it for a dying noob trap coin...sad times for these guys are they are all being exposed and damaging the whole crypto scene in general.
He was trolling for ETH use case last week...i guess he thinks etc is more useful ...lolol idiot is ruining the little rep he had
last chance to board the bus. Don't be left behind.
loosing respect for that guy...he kind of like fox news with cointelegraph (that is his organization isn't it)
all ive been seeing past two days are articles about etc...90% from them.
talk about stirring the pot (#rogerailesofcrypto lol)
last chance to board the bus. Don't be left behind.
So etc trolls....heres when the fun begins...
How long will you bag hold before you dump your dying shitcoin? ( no pressure on us to sell as we got em free
only those that paid are under pressure )
Those mining etc...how long will you mine an unprofitable coin...
This is like stabbing yourselfs and slowly killing yourself to prove a point...how long can you last lol
Right now there is no profit in mining etc...the race is on..either you guys buy up or your finished....FACT
How long will you bag hold before you dump your dying shitcoin? ( no pressure on us to sell as we got em free
only those that paid are under pressure )Those mining etc...how long will you mine an unprofitable coin...
This is like stabbing yourselfs and slowly killing yourself to prove a point...how long can you last lol
Right now there is no profit in mining etc...the race is on..either you guys buy up or your finished....FACT
Yes but this thread is about the immutable chain which is ETC
Vitaliks team wanted to take Ethereum in a different direction than you. They got the miners, users and exchanges to follow them. So you created an alt.
How do I create something that is already there?
How do I create something that is already present and I guard it from being killed?
Hi becoin
Have you bought some ETC now?
Have you bought non-forked ETH as well?
lol wow you PAID FOR ETC LOLOLOLOL... wow m8 ....
im sure fatman already said he got them for free...just like most of us here.
where is the etc thread?
Number of retweets and likes on these kind of tweets talk their very own languange
question...if blockchain for eth is 4,143 4181 blocks ahead of etc does that make it the longest chain? thought I read here that the longer chain would prove better for some reason.
and does it matter that the difference has been growing?...when I looked yesterday it was only 3989 blocks ahead
and does it matter that the difference has been growing?...when I looked yesterday it was only 3989 blocks ahead
But how can a dev support 2 competing chains and "take care of them equally"? This is a blatant case of what the law defines as 'conflict of interest'.
No it isn't.
Ask your legal advisor!
A couple of the ETC guys here admitted they sold all their ETH before the fork.
It STILL looks like they are butthurt because it wasnt a fail like they thought... it actually went up 15% the same day.
Shorting fails too, i guess.
The only thing annoying me is their constant nagging, whining and spamming of this thread.
The choice given was fork or not. A majority of the aforementioned groups chose the proposed HF, including F2Pool. I guess they found that they had to, as they themselves suggested. I am sure there are people who disagree with how "democratic" it was, but the existence of Ethereum Classic shows that there was a choice. And, ironically, they're the ones who have decided not to respect this choice.
You're contradicting yourself here. If there is a choice, and some choose one way and others choose another way - which part of this you're having a problem with?
That's how crypto forks work. Even a single dissenter with a CPU miner could keep the original chain alive. Should have thought about that BEFORE supporting a hard fork instead of expecting "respect" after the fact.
No, there is no contradiction. The community as a whole chose the proposed HF. That does not mean that every single person chose or was in favor of the HF. That isn't a requirement either. But if you're going to remain in the community you have to at least act as if you've accepted the decision.
What ETC has done is to ignore this. They've decided to not respect the choice of the community and create an altcoin. Which is fine in crypto. But what isn't fine is them running around spamming Ethereum threads with misinformation about Ethereum and their new altcoin.
Otoh it does show their lack of seriousness and will accelerate their decline into insignificance.
If you have a problem with someone spamming you should report it to moderators.
Part of the debate is what is Ethereum. It would be sort of weird to report it to the mods before these questions are laid to rest, or at least discussed.
Quote
I get the appeal to emotion. You're doing the same thing though. "misinformation", "altcoin", etc. The fact is - some people clicked "No" in Mist and are now on a different chain. Calling it names isn't any more serious than anyone else spamming this thread.
Do you disagree that there are two chains and two coins now? If so, we need to contact all these exchanges and get them to withdraw the latest addition. And they both are altcoins, btw. Regardless of your emotional life.
Quote
I'm still failing to understand what exactly is the issue here for the pro-forkers. Everything seems to be happening EXACTLY as it was supposed to happen after a hard fork. Misplaced expectations perhaps?
People disagree. The world is not all rainbows and unicorns.
Huh? You're the one expecting "respect" for the "chosen" fork. I'm perfectly fine with the disagreement and letting the blockchains live or die on their own.
I'm getting a feeling you just want to stir shit up so I'll leave you to it.
Ok, you've misunderstood the word "respect" in this context. I tried to make it more clear in my first reply to you.
The choice given was fork or not. A majority of the aforementioned groups chose the proposed HF, including F2Pool. I guess they found that they had to, as they themselves suggested. I am sure there are people who disagree with how "democratic" it was, but the existence of Ethereum Classic shows that there was a choice. And, ironically, they're the ones who have decided not to respect this choice.
You're contradicting yourself here. If there is a choice, and some choose one way and others choose another way - which part of this you're having a problem with?
That's how crypto forks work. Even a single dissenter with a CPU miner could keep the original chain alive. Should have thought about that BEFORE supporting a hard fork instead of expecting "respect" after the fact.
No, there is no contradiction. The community as a whole chose the proposed HF. That does not mean that every single person chose or was in favor of the HF. That isn't a requirement either. But if you're going to remain in the community you have to at least act as if you've accepted the decision.
What ETC has done is to ignore this. They've decided to not respect the choice of the community and create an altcoin. Which is fine in crypto. But what isn't fine is them running around spamming Ethereum threads with misinformation about Ethereum and their new altcoin.
Otoh it does show their lack of seriousness and will accelerate their decline into insignificance.
If you have a problem with someone spamming you should report it to moderators.
Part of the debate is what is Ethereum. It would be sort of weird to report it to the mods before these questions are laid to rest, or at least discussed.
Quote
I get the appeal to emotion. You're doing the same thing though. "misinformation", "altcoin", etc. The fact is - some people clicked "No" in Mist and are now on a different chain. Calling it names isn't any more serious than anyone else spamming this thread.
Do you disagree that there are two chains and two coins now? If so, we need to contact all these exchanges and get them to withdraw the latest addition. And they both are altcoins, btw. Regardless of your emotional life.
Quote
I'm still failing to understand what exactly is the issue here for the pro-forkers. Everything seems to be happening EXACTLY as it was supposed to happen after a hard fork. Misplaced expectations perhaps?
People disagree. The world is not all rainbows and unicorns.
Huh? You're the one expecting "respect" for the "chosen" fork. I'm perfectly fine with the disagreement and letting the blockchains live or die on their own.
I'm getting a feeling you just want to stir shit up so I'll leave you to it.
The choice given was fork or not. A majority of the aforementioned groups chose the proposed HF, including F2Pool. I guess they found that they had to, as they themselves suggested. I am sure there are people who disagree with how "democratic" it was, but the existence of Ethereum Classic shows that there was a choice. And, ironically, they're the ones who have decided not to respect this choice.
You're contradicting yourself here. If there is a choice, and some choose one way and others choose another way - which part of this you're having a problem with?
That's how crypto forks work. Even a single dissenter with a CPU miner could keep the original chain alive. Should have thought about that BEFORE supporting a hard fork instead of expecting "respect" after the fact.
No, there is no contradiction. The community as a whole chose the proposed HF. That does not mean that every single person chose or was in favor of the HF. That isn't a requirement either. But if you're going to remain in the community you have to at least act as if you've accepted the decision.
What ETC has done is to ignore this. They've decided to not respect the choice of the community and create an altcoin. Which is fine in crypto. But what isn't fine is them running around spamming Ethereum threads with misinformation about Ethereum and their new altcoin.
Otoh it does show their lack of seriousness and will accelerate their decline into insignificance.
If you have a problem with someone spamming you should report it to moderators.
Part of the debate is what is Ethereum. It would be sort of weird to report it to the mods before these questions are laid to rest, or at least discussed.
The choice given was fork or not. A majority of the aforementioned groups chose the proposed HF, including F2Pool. I guess they found that they had to, as they themselves suggested. I am sure there are people who disagree with how "democratic" it was, but the existence of Ethereum Classic shows that there was a choice. And, ironically, they're the ones who have decided not to respect this choice.
You're contradicting yourself here. If there is a choice, and some choose one way and others choose another way - which part of this you're having a problem with?
That's how crypto forks work. Even a single dissenter with a CPU miner could keep the original chain alive. Should have thought about that BEFORE supporting a hard fork instead of expecting "respect" after the fact.
No, there is no contradiction. The community as a whole chose the proposed HF. That does not mean that every single person chose or was in favor of the HF. That isn't a requirement either. But if you're going to remain in the community you have to at least act as if you've accepted the decision.
What ETC has done is to ignore this. They've decided to not respect the choice of the community and create an altcoin. Which is fine in crypto. But what isn't fine is them running around spamming Ethereum threads with misinformation about Ethereum and their new altcoin.
Otoh it does show their lack of seriousness and will accelerate their decline into insignificance.
The community as a whole, except for all those people that were opposed to it.
But fuck them, right?
Welcome to the real world, buddy!
But how can a dev support 2 competing chains and "take care of them equally"? This is a blatant case of what the law defines as 'conflict of interest'.
No it isn't.
is this project (Ethereum Classic) in relation with ETH ? i am confused please let us know the different between the two if not ?
Ethereum Classic is original ethereum before they did a centralized fork.
In other words: it's a new altcoin without the backing of The Ethereum Team, without the backing of The Ethereum Foundation, and with their own tokens called ETC at exchanges.
They have their own thread too: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15702715
But for some reason mr.bitpop has decided to hang in this thread just to confuse people.
is this project (Ethereum Classic) in relation with ETH ? i am confused please let us know the different between the two if not ?
Ethereum Classic is original ethereum before they did a centralized fork.
In other words: it's a new altcoin without the backing of The Ethereum Team, without the backing of The Ethereum Foundation, and with their own tokens called ETC at exchanges.
They have their own thread too: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15702715
But for some reason mr.bitpop has decided to hang in this thread just to confuse people.
If the Ethereum Classic is hacked to death, sold short to death, will the developers still support the coin?
The choice given was fork or not. A majority of the aforementioned groups chose the proposed HF, including F2Pool. I guess they found that they had to, as they themselves suggested. I am sure there are people who disagree with how "democratic" it was, but the existence of Ethereum Classic shows that there was a choice. And, ironically, they're the ones who have decided not to respect this choice.
You're contradicting yourself here. If there is a choice, and some choose one way and others choose another way - which part of this you're having a problem with?
That's how crypto forks work. Even a single dissenter with a CPU miner could keep the original chain alive. Should have thought about that BEFORE supporting a hard fork instead of expecting "respect" after the fact.
No, there is no contradiction. The community as a whole chose the proposed HF. That does not mean that every single person chose or was in favor of the HF. That isn't a requirement either. But if you're going to remain in the community you have to at least act as if you've accepted the decision.
What ETC has done is to ignore this. They've decided to not respect the choice of the community and create an altcoin. Which is fine in crypto. But what isn't fine is them running around spamming Ethereum threads with misinformation about Ethereum and their new altcoin.
Otoh it does show their lack of seriousness and will accelerate their decline into insignificance.
The community as a whole, except for all those people that were opposed to it.
But fuck them, right?
is this project (Ethereum Classic) in relation with ETH ? i am confused please let us know the different between the two if not ?
Ethereum Classic is original ethereum before they did a centralized fork.
In other words: it's a new altcoin without the backing of The Ethereum Team, without the backing of The Ethereum Foundation, and with their own tokens called ETC at exchanges.
They have their own thread too: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15702715
But for some reason mr.bitpop has decided to hang in this thread just to confuse people.
The choice given was fork or not. A majority of the aforementioned groups chose the proposed HF, including F2Pool. I guess they found that they had to, as they themselves suggested. I am sure there are people who disagree with how "democratic" it was, but the existence of Ethereum Classic shows that there was a choice. And, ironically, they're the ones who have decided not to respect this choice.
You're contradicting yourself here. If there is a choice, and some choose one way and others choose another way - which part of this you're having a problem with?
That's how crypto forks work. Even a single dissenter with a CPU miner could keep the original chain alive. Should have thought about that BEFORE supporting a hard fork instead of expecting "respect" after the fact.
No, there is no contradiction. The community as a whole chose the proposed HF. That does not mean that every single person chose or was in favor of the HF. That isn't a requirement either. But if you're going to remain in the community you have to at least act as if you've accepted the decision.
What ETC has done is to ignore this. They've decided to not respect the choice of the community and create an altcoin. Which is fine in crypto. But what isn't fine is them running around spamming Ethereum threads with misinformation about Ethereum and their new altcoin.
Otoh it does show their lack of seriousness and will accelerate their decline into insignificance.
If you have a problem with someone spamming you should report it to moderators.
I get the appeal to emotion. You're doing the same thing though. "misinformation", "altcoin", etc. The fact is - some people clicked "No" in Mist and are now on a different chain. Calling it names isn't any more serious than anyone else spamming this thread.
I'm still failing to understand what exactly is the issue here for the pro-forkers. Everything seems to be happening EXACTLY as it was supposed to happen after a hard fork. Misplaced expectations perhaps?
Jump to: