The real world you created by forcing "consensus" with the illusion of democracy. In the real world those votes get thrown out. Look what has happened here.
No, the real world where sometimes you don't get it your way. The non-fork did not have enough support. Get over it. Enjoy the new alt.
The real world where sometimes you don't get your way goes the same for you as it does me.
The "non-fork" vote obviously has more support than you guys are willing to admit to.
If the vote was done in a fair and democratic way then this chain wouldn't have survived long enough to get added to Poloniex in the first place.
ETC is literally the exact same coin that had a billion dollar market cap a week ago. With developers saying they are going to support it still. If you want to dump yours, then dump. None of us care. We'll just buy it and profit later. If you're so convinced that ETC isn't going to survive then stop spamming the thread whining about us. Go do something more productive. I know I am. lol
Yes, I was surprised to see BTCDrak, Samson Mow and Barry Silbert suddenly take an interest in the lowly world of non-btc smart contracts. Beyond that it's not much that surprised me about it. Maybe that Poloniex decided to take on a dying chain, but they will have to explain themselves to the regulatory authorities if things go awry. Not me.
My whole point of engaging in this discussion was to prevent bitpop and a couple of others from wrecking the thread. I don't mind if you discuss etc news and price movements on this thread, but don't come here and try to disrupt the one place at bct where I can find some stuff and talk about Ethereum. This should not be a Ethereum Classic only thread. Bitpop has one of those. Whether or not it should be an Ethereum only thread will have to be up to the mods or thread starter.
Also, if you come to any thread with screaming inaccuracies you shouldn't be surprised if those are addressed.
So, address them then. I posted many links verifying everything I said. I don't speak from a position of ignorance.
Nothing I have "screamed" has been inaccurate. I have linked the reporting and you can easily follow the links to see the source in every situation.
Major mining pools have said they did not support it. Exchanges have said they did not support it. Pools said they were forced. exchanges said they were forced.
Where is you addressing these so-called inaccuracies? Nowhere. You've just shilled ETH and tried to discredit ETC, but you can't discredit ETC without discrediting ETH. It's developed by the same damn people.