Good project can be invested on the stock exchange great price
The price on the stock exchange is high, it is very good for those who went to the presale. We need to see how stable it is. 
Topic: [ANN] EXPI 🔥 POS/MN 🔥 Application for Payment of Your Knowledge 🔥 - page 23. (Read 4521 times)
I'm happy to anounce to you about our great partnership with the MNRANK.com. Thank you MNRANK team for your support and so fast listing!
EXPI Investors and community can use this link to receive more information about their profits
https://mnrank.com/coin/EXPI
Good project can be invested on the stock exchange great price
How much is the return on Masternodes??
Hey. Could you write the bounty rules more clearly? Many of them did not understand how to make a report, you need a screen, the address of the wallet.
EXPi (EXPI) has been listed on MNRank.com
EXPi (EXPI) stats here: https://mnrank.com/coin/EXPI/
MNRank.com - masternode ranking, stats and monitoring service.
Today is a good day to announce the start of trading on Crypto-Bridge
EXPI is already available for deposit and withdrawal
Happy trading!
https://wallet.crypto-bridge.org/market/BRIDGE.EXPI_BRIDGE.BTC
Three things happen here, patiently waiting for you to "realize" that you missed my post that's literally sandwiched between your posts, marveled at how tiring this is to keep pushing you to reply to my inquiries, and trying to ignore the implications of what inquiry-evasions usually lead to
You will receive Your answers during the development of our application.
Translated as: we don't have any answer for you yet, because we didn't realize when we built the poject that such problem is very likely to happen, so we will delay answering while hoping you'll forget. Do bear in mind that these questions I asked are also read by other people and being point of considerarions for investors. How do you suggest people start to believe investing on your MN when you don't even know possible bad scenarios on the corner or can't give good details?
Ok, let's get easy, where is details about your team?
Three things happen here, patiently waiting for you to "realize" that you missed my post that's literally sandwiched between your posts, marveled at how tiring this is to keep pushing you to reply to my inquiries, and trying to ignore the implications of what inquiry-evasions usually lead to
You will receive Your answers during the development of our application.
Three things happen here, patiently waiting for you to "realize" that you missed my post that's literally sandwiched between your posts, marveled at how tiring this is to keep pushing you to reply to my inquiries, and trying to ignore the implications of what inquiry-evasions usually lead to
We want to tell you good news
Tomorrow our coin EXPI will be added at the Crypto-Bridge exchange
Do not miss!
https://discord.gg/2wTsbjq
Today we start Bitcointalk translation bounty campaign
10 EXPI will be paid for every translation our topic
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-expi-posmn-application-for-payment-of-your-knowledge-5142574
https://discord.gg/2wTsbjq
Again, you have an unanswered question from me on previous page
Each specialist will indicate in his / her profile the languages he / she speaks.And in case the user is a, let's say, Chinese non-english speaker and the specialists existed for inquiry are only available on Russian, English, and French, you wil do what exactly? Indicating the language they speak doesn't really mean breaking the language barrier at all. And for instance of every users happen to speak English, it's the univeral language afterall, you still failed to explain how will you break accent barrier. What's your solution for people with thick and heavy accents, again? Like maybe a French user was on line with a Japanese specialist, that happen to both speak English, but each with their own accents? Of course, we are assuming the translatlantic connection or the internet speed on both sides, as well as your server are not making problems, because we'll entirely speak whole new cases if that happen.
Again, you have an unanswered question from me on previous page
Each specialist will indicate in his / her profile the languages he / she speaks.
Again, you have an unanswered question from me on previous page
Today we start Twitter bounty campaign
Follow the next simple rules:
Follow EXPI coin twitter
1. https://twitter.com/EXPICOIN
2. Retweet this tweet, make :heart: like and any comment
https://twitter.com/EXPICOIN/status/1132919158595883008
3. Post your retweet link and wallet address in #twitter channel
The first 150 participants will receive their awards depending on your followers count:
20 - 50 followers = 0.5
50 - 100 followers = 0.7
100 - 300 followers = 1
300 + followers = 1.5
https://discord.gg/2wTsbjq
Well, that's interesting, worldwide? If we can hold into your words, how do you plan on performing such? Contacting by emails? How about if they don't have emails? Phone numbers? World wide? Thousands of thousands of entities? How about the informal ones? The one that don't have formal organization structure? Or ones that, formal or informal, were out of business prior to the specialist's enlisting on you?
"We will find a way to prevent" right, how? That's the point we're currently discussing. Previously you just give an argument that merely due to their "certification", they won't cheat, and now you give an even more baseless answer.
We are working on this issue. We have a long and difficult way.
There may be a downside to this. The user can not correctly formulate their questions. You understand that we will not be able to record a conversation between a user and a specialist, it is illegal. I think that can be will to leave a complaint for poor-quality provision consultation. But here again the other side of the coin. Maybe the client himself is not so competent in the matter to perceive the information that gives a specialist. I understand your concern in this matter, we are concerned too. And we will look for a solution. If You have any ideas, you can give them to us.
I would assume your earlier post was to reply the first paragraph of my question, and the latter for the second. Let's begin with clarifying the first one,
"We are working on this issue. We have a long and difficult way", so you're working on the issue, which translates as you currently don't have one working method to check credibility of certification worldwide, or you have a long and difficult way, which translates as you already have one that's working in a long and difficult way?
Into the second paragraph, yes I may have a possible solution, but I'd like to hold that for a moment as I find it surprising that developer team failed to foresee such crucial aspect when they initially build the project. Let me ask you another thing, still related to your so called proposal of phone-call-paid-knowledge-sharing, how do you overcome language barrier? And following right behind that question, accent and dialect barrier?
There may be a downside to this. The user can not correctly formulate their questions. You understand that we will not be able to record a conversation between a user and a specialist, it is illegal. I think that can be will to leave a complaint for poor-quality provision consultation. But here again the other side of the coin. Maybe the client himself is not so competent in the matter to perceive the information that gives a specialist. I understand your concern in this matter, we are concerned too. And we will look for a solution. If You have any ideas, you can give them to us.
In addition, you will be required to provide a photo holding a document
Is that translated as a "yes, we'll confirm the legality of certification of each of our specialist up to the issuing agency/institution/organization"?
By the way, I still don't get a good and reasonable answer for your way to keep your specialist from stalling. Arguing that just because they're certified specialist would ensure they'll cease from cheating or doing anything frowned upon --while the method itself is still being in discussion-- is rather naive.
Yes it is. We will find a way to prevent
Well, that's interesting, worldwide? If we can hold into your words, how do you plan on performing such? Contacting by emails? How about if they don't have emails? Phone numbers? World wide? Thousands of thousands of entities? How about the informal ones? The one that don't have formal organization structure? Or ones that, formal or informal, were out of business prior to the specialist's enlisting on you?
"We will find a way to prevent" right, how? That's the point we're currently discussing. Previously you just give an argument that merely due to their "certification", they won't cheat, and now you give an even more baseless answer.
We are working on this issue. We have a long and difficult way.
Jump to: