[ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping - page 337.

cryptonit

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1053

bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds

Quote from: crazyivan on May 13, 2016, 12:17:30 PM

Quote from: YoyodyneSystems on May 13, 2016, 03:04:20 AM

Just a comment on price :

Bitcoin is in a cooling phase now for at least the next 3-4 weeks. Probably staying in the 440-460 range for up to the next month.
There is an opportunity for alt coin prices to take advantage of this window.

You may see Factom rise in this time frame

As well as some other alts.

I dont think we ll see any major movement in the next month or so of any coin. After that, halving starts to kick in. BTC goes up for sure, the rest, well, we ll see.

most alts did lower in price already as preparation of what will come

i expect in fact a glorious rise of alts after bitcoin halving

and i expect the halving to have much less impact than people belive

that BTC did recover from like 250 to 500$ will be the halving effect

it could spike up to 800 but it wont stay there

500-600$ is what i expect BTC price 2 months after halving

and the guys who shift their BTC towards alts at the halving spike will smile a lot

crazyivan

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1007

DMD Diamond Making Money 4+ years! Join us!

Quote from: YoyodyneSystems on May 13, 2016, 03:04:20 AM

Just a comment on price :

Bitcoin is in a cooling phase now for at least the next 3-4 weeks. Probably staying in the 440-460 range for up to the next month.
There is an opportunity for alt coin prices to take advantage of this window.

You may see Factom rise in this time frame

As well as some other alts.

I dont think we ll see any major movement in the next month or so of any coin. After that, halving starts to kick in. BTC goes up for sure, the rest, well, we ll see.

tempus

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1128

Quote from: GetVisaCoin on May 13, 2016, 04:20:18 AM

Quote from: tempus on May 12, 2016, 08:06:19 PM

Quote from: GetVisaCoin on May 12, 2016, 07:10:19 PM

Quote from: crazyivan on May 12, 2016, 01:22:04 AM

Quote from: Soul_eater_123 on May 11, 2016, 05:40:46 PM

Quote from: crazyivan on May 11, 2016, 11:49:32 AM

This is all very nice and dandy but there s still only one question on the table. M2?

I think you should just sell your Factom as you obviously no longer believe in the project.

It s not that I do not believe in the project. All my other project I m involved with, I get to have a daily or at least weekly communication with the DEV team. With Factom team, it s once a month, maybe, if they feel like it. This makes me feel they care more about end users then Factoid holders which s also acceptable from business point of view.

However, this is not ACCEPTABLE from my point of view. Still, no point in polluting the thread with this argument, I understand I am not relevant for Factom at all so let s drop it.

crazyivan has a valid point, the interests of Factoid speculative holders is different to Factoid users now, so there is some conflict of interests here. I am a speculator too as I bought in the ico before everything was known, like everyone else, and I don't see myself using factoids anytime soon for their intended purpose. I want Factoids to moon so I make some returns, but the dev team probably don't care about that. Factoid users probaby want stable price.

There is no conflict of interest because between Investors in Factoids and User of Factom. User don't need to care about the price of Factoids. For them it's always about the price of Entry Credits which are fixed: $0.001 They don't even need to know about the existence of Factoids. They can buy EC's with Dollar - Credit-Card etc.

If there is a conflict, than it's about short- and longterm-investors. Short-term-speculation needs news, as much attention as possible, "hype" and "soon". For them it's about the communication of a team. Often enough they buy the announcement of an announcement to sell into the real release (buy the rumor, sell the news). Longterm-Investors want to see the real value increase: The use of the system. So, the system is priority. Second: Business side... partnerships.

And kind of funny but also kind of weird is how Crypto changed/changes the feeling of time. A month is a year, so there should be something to celebrate at least once a month (exchange-christmas). I know that feeling. But for those who do all the work, a month is still a month.

Good post! I didn't realise entry credits had a fixed price, and I agree that crypto time is accelerated to ridiculous extremes now where days feel like months in other industries. I consider myself a long term speculator, so I'm holding factoids for at least 1-2 years. I suppose anyone who doesn't day trade is thinking something similar now, hold until crypto is mainstream, then sell a % for a life changing return

My strategy is nearly always the same: I buy into a project that I see as promising and then I watch the development over time. And that's never boring, because I highly focus on "context". Every piece of information, even if it doesn't seem to be directly relevant for a specific project, can be helpful to get a bigger picture, which is needed to evaluate correctly what is relevant. And over time it all together becomes clearer. In some projects I believe to see more negative than positive signs and I sell. In some it's the other way around and I buy more.

In Factom I bought nearly to all prices. Most of my FCT's in the first three months after launch, but I also bought in early January and I bought the last weeks after the "pump-n-dump" in march.

I still believe that a lot of ppl come to wrong conclusions about Factom because they try to understand and evaluate it out of a wrong context. But Crypto has already changed and Factom is one of the projects that are different, not just the system but also the team. Exactly that is good and not bad.

2c0de

full member

Activity: 138

Merit: 102

As a developer, I feel that Factom has a huge potential.

From record keeping to a trustless certification authority, the future is now.

GetVisaCoin

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: tempus on May 12, 2016, 08:06:19 PM

Quote from: GetVisaCoin on May 12, 2016, 07:10:19 PM

Quote from: crazyivan on May 12, 2016, 01:22:04 AM

Quote from: Soul_eater_123 on May 11, 2016, 05:40:46 PM

Quote from: crazyivan on May 11, 2016, 11:49:32 AM

This is all very nice and dandy but there s still only one question on the table. M2?

I think you should just sell your Factom as you obviously no longer believe in the project.

It s not that I do not believe in the project. All my other project I m involved with, I get to have a daily or at least weekly communication with the DEV team. With Factom team, it s once a month, maybe, if they feel like it. This makes me feel they care more about end users then Factoid holders which s also acceptable from business point of view.

However, this is not ACCEPTABLE from my point of view. Still, no point in polluting the thread with this argument, I understand I am not relevant for Factom at all so let s drop it.

crazyivan has a valid point, the interests of Factoid speculative holders is different to Factoid users now, so there is some conflict of interests here. I am a speculator too as I bought in the ico before everything was known, like everyone else, and I don't see myself using factoids anytime soon for their intended purpose. I want Factoids to moon so I make some returns, but the dev team probably don't care about that. Factoid users probaby want stable price.

There is no conflict of interest because between Investors in Factoids and User of Factom. User don't need to care about the price of Factoids. For them it's always about the price of Entry Credits which are fixed: $0.001 They don't even need to know about the existence of Factoids. They can buy EC's with Dollar - Credit-Card etc.

If there is a conflict, than it's about short- and longterm-investors. Short-term-speculation needs news, as much attention as possible, "hype" and "soon". For them it's about the communication of a team. Often enough they buy the announcement of an announcement to sell into the real release (buy the rumor, sell the news). Longterm-Investors want to see the real value increase: The use of the system. So, the system is priority. Second: Business side... partnerships.

And kind of funny but also kind of weird is how Crypto changed/changes the feeling of time. A month is a year, so there should be something to celebrate at least once a month (exchange-christmas). I know that feeling. But for those who do all the work, a month is still a month.

Good post! I didn't realise entry credits had a fixed price, and I agree that crypto time is accelerated to ridiculous extremes now where days feel like months in other industries. I consider myself a long term speculator, so I'm holding factoids for at least 1-2 years. I suppose anyone who doesn't day trade is thinking something similar now, hold until crypto is mainstream, then sell a % for a life changing return

YoyodyneSystems

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1023

Just a comment on price :

Bitcoin is in a cooling phase now for at least the next 3-4 weeks. Probably staying in the 440-460 range for up to the next month.
There is an opportunity for alt coin prices to take advantage of this window.

You may see Factom rise in this time frame

As well as some other alts.

tempus

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1128

Quote from: GetVisaCoin on May 12, 2016, 07:10:19 PM

Quote from: crazyivan on May 12, 2016, 01:22:04 AM

Quote from: Soul_eater_123 on May 11, 2016, 05:40:46 PM

Quote from: crazyivan on May 11, 2016, 11:49:32 AM

This is all very nice and dandy but there s still only one question on the table. M2?

I think you should just sell your Factom as you obviously no longer believe in the project.

It s not that I do not believe in the project. All my other project I m involved with, I get to have a daily or at least weekly communication with the DEV team. With Factom team, it s once a month, maybe, if they feel like it. This makes me feel they care more about end users then Factoid holders which s also acceptable from business point of view.

However, this is not ACCEPTABLE from my point of view. Still, no point in polluting the thread with this argument, I understand I am not relevant for Factom at all so let s drop it.

crazyivan has a valid point, the interests of Factoid speculative holders is different to Factoid users now, so there is some conflict of interests here. I am a speculator too as I bought in the ico before everything was known, like everyone else, and I don't see myself using factoids anytime soon for their intended purpose. I want Factoids to moon so I make some returns, but the dev team probably don't care about that. Factoid users probaby want stable price.

There is no conflict of interest because between Investors in Factoids and User of Factom. User don't need to care about the price of Factoids. For them it's always about the price of Entry Credits which are fixed: $0.001 They don't even need to know about the existence of Factoids. They can buy EC's with Dollar - Credit-Card etc.

If there is a conflict, than it's about short- and longterm-investors. Short-term-speculation needs news, as much attention as possible, "hype" and "soon". For them it's about the communication of a team. Often enough they buy the announcement of an announcement to sell into the real release (buy the rumor, sell the news). Longterm-Investors want to see the real value increase: The use of the system. So, the system is priority. Second: Business side... partnerships.

And kind of funny but also kind of weird is how Crypto changed/changes the feeling of time. A month is a year, so there should be something to celebrate at least once a month (exchange-christmas). I know that feeling. But for those who do all the work, a month is still a month.

GetVisaCoin

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: crazyivan on May 12, 2016, 01:22:04 AM

Quote from: Soul_eater_123 on May 11, 2016, 05:40:46 PM

Quote from: crazyivan on May 11, 2016, 11:49:32 AM

This is all very nice and dandy but there s still only one question on the table. M2?

I think you should just sell your Factom as you obviously no longer believe in the project.

It s not that I do not believe in the project. All my other project I m involved with, I get to have a daily or at least weekly communication with the DEV team. With Factom team, it s once a month, maybe, if they feel like it. This makes me feel they care more about end users then Factoid holders which s also acceptable from business point of view.

However, this is not ACCEPTABLE from my point of view. Still, no point in polluting the thread with this argument, I understand I am not relevant for Factom at all so let s drop it.

crazyivan has a valid point, the interests of Factoid speculative holders is different to Factoid users now, so there is some conflict of interests here. I am a speculator too as I bought in the ico before everything was known, like everyone else, and I don't see myself using factoids anytime soon for their intended purpose. I want Factoids to moon so I make some returns, but the dev team probably don't care about that. Factoid users probaby want stable price.

whiteorg72

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

On MyABJ: "Meet 12 Austin startups with breakout potential”.
http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/blog/techflash/2016/05/meet-12-austin-startups-with-breakout-potential.html

whiteorg72

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

The ATXalist (AUSTIN A-LIST 2016) “emerging” startup winners are embarkvet, Factom project, theIdealSpot and re_3D.
http://austinalist2016.splashthat.com/twitter
https://twitter.com/hashtag/ATXalist
https://twitter.com/factomproject

Factom made the A-List AustinChamber: 12 innovative companies named the Hottest Startups.
http://www.austinchamber.com/monkeewrench/files/news_items/A-List_Awards_Release-FINAL_2016.pdf

tempus

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1128

Quote from: CocoLibre on May 11, 2016, 03:59:51 PM

Usage chart was updated with two new user application entries, Synapse and Aliyun. Looks like just a few test entries so far

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RUZLxxoAfT3C5jIJ144DLYdztYe_sqrKqbTlZuD05-s/edit#gid=445871101

Wow, that are good news! It's presumably just testing at the moment, but definitely promising.

Not sure if it's about those two companies, but if, it would be great:

http://www.thesynapses.com/home

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yun_OS (....also called Aliyun OS)

crazyivan

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1007

DMD Diamond Making Money 4+ years! Join us!

Quote from: Soul_eater_123 on May 11, 2016, 05:40:46 PM

Quote from: crazyivan on May 11, 2016, 11:49:32 AM

This is all very nice and dandy but there s still only one question on the table. M2?

I think you should just sell your Factom as you obviously no longer believe in the project.

It s not that I do not believe in the project. All my other project I m involved with, I get to have a daily or at least weekly communication with the DEV team. With Factom team, it s once a month, maybe, if they feel like it. This makes me feel they care more about end users then Factoid holders which s also acceptable from business point of view.

However, this is not ACCEPTABLE from my point of view. Still, no point in polluting the thread with this argument, I understand I am not relevant for Factom at all so let s drop it.

Soul_eater_123

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: crazyivan on May 11, 2016, 11:49:32 AM

This is all very nice and dandy but there s still only one question on the table. M2?

I think you should just sell your Factom as you obviously no longer believe in the project.

CocoLibre

full member

Activity: 129

Merit: 100

Usage chart was updated with two new user application entries, Synapse and Aliyun. Looks like just a few test entries so far

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RUZLxxoAfT3C5jIJ144DLYdztYe_sqrKqbTlZuD05-s/edit#gid=445871101

crazyivan

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1007

DMD Diamond Making Money 4+ years! Join us!

This is all very nice and dandy but there s still only one question on the table. M2?

whiteorg72

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

State of Blockchain Q1 2016: Blockchain Funding Overtakes Bitcoin.
http://www.coindesk.com/state-of-blockchain-q1-2016/

GetVisaCoin

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: whiteorg72 on May 10, 2016, 09:43:51 PM

Happy Bday to Factom Senior QA Analyst Veena Gondkar, thanks for all your hard work!
https://twitter.com/factomproject
https://twitter.com/veenagondkar

If you look at the photo, it can be seen in the Factom team has become more and more people.
I hope the celebration of birthdays and various anniversaries will not affect the basic work above M2. Wink

happy people, nice

whiteorg72

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Happy Bday to Factom Senior QA Analyst Veena Gondkar, thanks for all your hard work!
https://twitter.com/factomproject
https://twitter.com/veenagondkar

If you look at the photo, it can be seen in the Factom team has become more and more people.
I hope the celebration of birthdays and various anniversaries will not affect the basic work above M2. Wink

whiteorg72

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Quote from: CocoLibre on May 10, 2016, 12:39:24 PM

Keep the FUD up, I need some cheap FCT around $1 before the barrage of news hits. For those who forget go back in the thread to mid dec 2015 and look at the despondency and complete capitulation into the lows; smart money scooped up their fear and once again smart money is buying from the fear/impatient at a discount.

All right. I bought last year factoids at an average price of 11 cents per factoid when many despaired and sold below the price ICO. Grin

CocoLibre

full member

Activity: 129

Merit: 100

Keep the FUD up, I need some cheap FCT around $1 before the barrage of news hits. For those who forget go back in the thread to mid dec 2015 and look at the despondency and complete capitulation into the lows; smart money scooped up their fear and once again smart money is buying from the fear/impatient at a discount.

Topic: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping - page 337. (Read 2115935 times)