I think, at least it's safe to say that it won't be boring.
Another interesting article about a great potential use case:
The Future of Medical Records: Two Blockchain Experts Weigh In
(...)
Peter Kirby, CEO of Factom, a company that employs blockchain technology to change how businesses manage data and keep records, describes the medical records space as “one of the biggest, hairiest record keeping problems on earth, especially in the U.S.” In fact, Factom just brought in a VP of Products who is a former medical records professional.....etc
https://btcmanager.com/news/the-future-of-medical-records-two-blockchain-experts-weigh-in/This would be even more relevant to the UK. There is a big problem with the medical records system and there was a scandal a few years ago with a new NHS computer system having to be scrapped after spending several hundred million pounds when it failed to meet expectations.
The NHS is still crying out for a modernised (single) system which is both secure and standardised - at the moment each hospital trust has it's own completely different system with incompatibilities between hospitals, primary care and different regions being a daily hurdle.
With a centralised NHS and a government that is highly enthusiastic about the blockchain Factom would be a perfect fit here. I suspect it is only a matter of time before some blockchain company (even if it isn't Factom) wins that contract and it would dwarf (in monetary and adoption size) any previous blockchain achievements.
This kind of stuff is part of the reason I'm so enthusiastic about Factom. They seem to be talking directly to the big players and doing the big deals already, whereas other blockchain companies/cryptocurrencies are just making great pronouncements about the future - including Ethereum and especially those involved with Bitcoin development who seem to be big on making speeches but seem to bring very little to actual fruition.
I would not be surprised if in a year's time Factom is more valuable than Ether.