The updated post looks much better. Are there any wallet updates or is it the same release as before?
The new version is on my AuxRepo, and I'm gonna release the client tommorrow
Topic: [ANN] Fantom | CPU Mineable | DarkSend | Masternode | Tor+I2P | sMP Releasing Sn - page 16. (Read 77911 times)
November 22, 2015, 07:51:15 AM
The new version is on my AuxRepo, and I'm gonna release the client tommorrow
November 22, 2015, 07:32:04 AM
The updated post looks much better. Are there any wallet updates or is it the same release as before?
November 22, 2015, 07:29:59 AM
The clean, green and 0% Charlie Sheen (or his HIV - got nothing against him) OP which is very clean
EDIT: I'm friggin tired, good night, also shout out to dfkjdsf - chill - I am working to make it a reality, inital tests were not suggestive but there is a scope
EDIT: That scope is _______________________________________________________________________________ ________ being worked on
EDIT: dfkjdsf, good luck on the impl.
EDIT: I'm friggin tired, good night, also shout out to dfkjdsf - chill - I am working to make it a reality, inital tests were not suggestive but there is a scope
EDIT: That scope is _______________________________________________________________________________ ________ being worked on
EDIT: dfkjdsf, good luck on the impl.
Great work dev, Fantom have a professional and attractive looking OP.
Thank You
November 22, 2015, 07:15:37 AM
The clean, green and 0% Charlie Sheen (or his HIV - got nothing against him) OP which is very clean
EDIT: I'm friggin tired, good night, also shout out to dfkjdsf - chill - I am working to make it a reality, inital tests were not suggestive but there is a scope
EDIT: That scope is _______________________________________________________________________________ ________ being worked on
EDIT: dfkjdsf, good luck on the impl.
EDIT: I'm friggin tired, good night, also shout out to dfkjdsf - chill - I am working to make it a reality, inital tests were not suggestive but there is a scope
EDIT: That scope is _______________________________________________________________________________ ________ being worked on
EDIT: dfkjdsf, good luck on the impl.
Great work dev, Fantom have a professional and attractive looking OP.
November 21, 2015, 01:35:27 PM
does not the entropy increases of blockchain after adding a lot features to a coin?
The features are not direct to the chain, but rather it's modulation protocols - e.x. the MQW Fork will reduce block times which will have a slight* difference and Tor is PEER and chain anonymity
* - 28 ----> 90
So block time is tripling for the next release? I like that. It will slow inflation and 1.5 minutes is plenty fast anyway.
November 21, 2015, 01:10:09 PM
The clean, green and 0% Charlie Sheen (or his HIV - got nothing against him) OP which is very clean
EDIT: I'm friggin tired, good night, also shout out to dfkjdsf - chill - I am working to make it a reality, inital tests were not suggestive but there is a scope
EDIT: That scope is _______________________________________________________________________________ ________ being worked on
EDIT: dfkjdsf, good luck on the impl.
EDIT: I'm friggin tired, good night, also shout out to dfkjdsf - chill - I am working to make it a reality, inital tests were not suggestive but there is a scope
EDIT: That scope is _______________________________________________________________________________ ________ being worked on
EDIT: dfkjdsf, good luck on the impl.
November 21, 2015, 11:51:38 AM
does not the entropy increases of blockchain after adding a lot features to a coin?
The features are not direct to the chain, but rather it's modulation protocols - e.x. the MQW Fork will reduce block times which will have a slight* difference and Tor is PEER and chain anonymity
* - 28 ----> 90
ok..but txt typed messages? everything one send will store on blockchain the only diffrence b/w transaction and message is transaction encrypt and decrypt by hashing algo but message is by xxhash algo very fast but also take space.......and ..moreover+ instanx+ darksilk in future this became heavy....we need some solution to it.
The solution is in the Mini Blockchain Project - but it's kinda too late to implement that now
November 21, 2015, 11:46:10 AM
does not the entropy increases of blockchain after adding a lot features to a coin?
The features are not direct to the chain, but rather it's modulation protocols - e.x. the MQW Fork will reduce block times which will have a slight* difference and Tor is PEER and chain anonymity
* - 28 ----> 90
ok..but txt typed messages? everything one send will store on blockchain the only diffrence b/w transaction and message is transaction encrypt and decrypt by hashing algo but message is by xxhash algo very fast but also take space.......and ..moreover+ instanx+ darksilk in future this became heavy....we need some solution to it.
November 21, 2015, 11:40:56 AM
does not the entropy increases of blockchain after adding a lot features to a coin?
The features are not direct to the chain, but rather it's modulation protocols - e.x. the MQW Fork will reduce block times which will have a slight* difference and Tor is PEER and chain anonymity
* - 28 ----> 90
November 21, 2015, 11:39:21 AM
does not the entropy increases of blockchain after adding a lot features to a coin?
November 21, 2015, 11:29:17 AM
Thank You So Much!
November 21, 2015, 11:22:07 AM
November 21, 2015, 08:01:47 AM
Mostly*, but I can't wait forever, so whenever a good stable major commit takes place in the first week on a month, I imidiately download, rebrand, push changes to my *normal* repo and let people use that as the current version.
So, first week of December, one way or the other, the new version is gonna come
* - I will MERGE their changes, I can't just reinject my changes on every commit, that would be exhausting
Speaking of which, I might try to create another altcoin and that is for those WHO GOT SCAMMED, just like BARR but not an NXT Asset. Do you think it's a good idea I shuttle between two coins, and by all means - your PERSONAL opinion
I think you should focus on developing this coin. You are doing great work and I cannot wait until the new wallet comes out. Stay focused on Fantom. It is still just the beginning! Put more work into this coin and expand the community further. Maybe some Proof of Mining like Magi does? Or some other sort of marketing campaign like a sig campaign maybe?
It is, next is porting Sapiencie's Psudo-AI (That's right, right now - there is no such thing as true AI, at least for the general public) and Ring Sigs and lots' more....
November 21, 2015, 07:57:17 AM
Mostly*, but I can't wait forever, so whenever a good stable major commit takes place in the first week on a month, I imidiately download, rebrand, push changes to my *normal* repo and let people use that as the current version.
So, first week of December, one way or the other, the new version is gonna come
* - I will MERGE their changes, I can't just reinject my changes on every commit, that would be exhausting
Speaking of which, I might try to create another altcoin and that is for those WHO GOT SCAMMED, just like BARR but not an NXT Asset. Do you think it's a good idea I shuttle between two coins, and by all means - your PERSONAL opinion
I think you should focus on developing this coin. You are doing great work and I cannot wait until the new wallet comes out. Stay focused on Fantom. It is still just the beginning! Put more work into this coin and expand the community further. Maybe some Proof of Mining like Magi does? Or some other sort of marketing campaign like a sig campaign maybe?
November 21, 2015, 07:45:09 AM
- Why haven't I renamed/rebranded it to Fantom?
Ans: Because DarkSilk is still being developed and after full Transaction Coding is complete, shall I rebrand
Ans: Because DarkSilk is still being developed and after full Transaction Coding is complete, shall I rebrand
What do you mean with this? Does it mean you are waiting for the DarkSilk devs to finish their code and then you will copy that finished code and rebrand it to Fantom? Or do you mean with this that you are developing and finishing the code separate from the DarkSilk devs on your own fork but still under the DarkSilk name and when you have finished the coding you will rebrand to Fantom?
I am still developing my code, for example. see the code yourself and you will see Tor Integeration and FantomText, two things which DarkSilk does not have, and I am still adding features.
Also, you will see MQW (Magi Quantum Wave) in main.cpp
Ok, so for the main code you will wait for the DarkSilk devs to finish their code, but there are some new features you are working on in the current release candidate code. Once DarkSilk finishes their code as final you will take that code as the base and put back in the code you are currently developing in the release candidate code.
Is this understanding correct?
Mostly*, but I can't wait forever, so whenever a good stable major commit takes place in the first week on a month, I imidiately download, rebrand, push changes to my *normal* repo and let people use that as the current version.
So, first week of December, one way or the other, the new version is gonna come
* - I will MERGE their changes, I can't just reinject my changes on every commit, that would be exhausting
Speaking of which, I might try to create another altcoin and that is for those WHO GOT SCAMMED, just like BARR but not an NXT Asset. Do you think it's a good idea I shuttle between two coins, and by all means - your PERSONAL opinion
November 21, 2015, 07:29:21 AM
- Why haven't I renamed/rebranded it to Fantom?
Ans: Because DarkSilk is still being developed and after full Transaction Coding is complete, shall I rebrand
Ans: Because DarkSilk is still being developed and after full Transaction Coding is complete, shall I rebrand
What do you mean with this? Does it mean you are waiting for the DarkSilk devs to finish their code and then you will copy that finished code and rebrand it to Fantom? Or do you mean with this that you are developing and finishing the code separate from the DarkSilk devs on your own fork but still under the DarkSilk name and when you have finished the coding you will rebrand to Fantom?
I am still developing my code, for example. see the code yourself and you will see Tor Integeration and FantomText, two things which DarkSilk does not have, and I am still adding features.
Also, you will see MQW (Magi Quantum Wave) in main.cpp
Ok, so for the main code you will wait for the DarkSilk devs to finish their code, but there are some new features you are working on in the current release candidate code. Once DarkSilk finishes their code as final you will take that code as the base and put back in the code you are currently developing in the release candidate code.
Is this understanding correct?
November 21, 2015, 07:24:21 AM
- Why haven't I renamed/rebranded it to Fantom?
Ans: Because DarkSilk is still being developed and after full Transaction Coding is complete, shall I rebrand
Ans: Because DarkSilk is still being developed and after full Transaction Coding is complete, shall I rebrand
What do you mean with this? Does it mean you are waiting for the DarkSilk devs to finish their code and then you will copy that finished code and rebrand it to Fantom? Or do you mean with this that you are developing and finishing the code separate from the DarkSilk devs on your own fork but still under the DarkSilk name and when you have finished the coding you will rebrand to Fantom?
I am still developing my code, for example. see the code yourself and you will see Tor Integeration and FantomText, two things which DarkSilk does not have, and I am still adding features.
Also, you will see MQW (Magi Quantum Wave) in main.cpp
November 21, 2015, 06:52:21 AM
- Why haven't I renamed/rebranded it to Fantom?
Ans: Because DarkSilk is still being developed and after full Transaction Coding is complete, shall I rebrand
Ans: Because DarkSilk is still being developed and after full Transaction Coding is complete, shall I rebrand
What do you mean with this? Does it mean you are waiting for the DarkSilk devs to finish their code and then you will copy that finished code and rebrand it to Fantom? Or do you mean with this that you are developing and finishing the code separate from the DarkSilk devs on your own fork but still under the DarkSilk name and when you have finished the coding you will rebrand to Fantom?
November 21, 2015, 06:22:14 AM
I just filled coin request form on Poloniex, to add FCX.
I suggest to everyone to do this
https://poloniex.com/coinRequest
I suggest to everyone to do this
https://poloniex.com/coinRequest
Done well before
How about coding the stuff you promise all the time instead of wasting time on exchange requests? Even if Fantom is listed right now on 10 exchanges, it is still the same coin with the same code you copied a couple weeks back. Price follows performance and the current price is a reflection of the performance / non-performance.
If you deliver the stuff you promise, I will be surprised if exchanges don't add the coin out of their own because of the demand that will be created.
I have already coded it and uploaded onto a seperate repo:
https://github.com/hypenics/DarkSilk-Release-Candidate (Yes, didn't rename)
FAQ:
- Why haven't I renamed/rebranded it to Fantom?
Ans: Because DarkSilk is still being developed and after full Transaction Coding is complete, shall I rebrand
- Does it work
Ans: it does - If you want you can try it now
- Have I removed the warning text
Ans: No, not yet
- Will it fork?
Ans: Absolutely, NOT
November 21, 2015, 05:48:09 AM
I just filled coin request form on Poloniex, to add FCX.
I suggest to everyone to do this
https://poloniex.com/coinRequest
I suggest to everyone to do this
https://poloniex.com/coinRequest
Done well before
How about coding the stuff you promise all the time instead of wasting time on exchange requests? Even if Fantom is listed right now on 10 exchanges, it is still the same coin with the same code you copied a couple weeks back. Price follows performance and the current price is a reflection of the performance / non-performance.
If you deliver the stuff you promise, I will be surprised if exchanges don't add the coin out of their own because of the demand that will be created. The logner you wait and there is no performance, the lower the price will go as lagging indicator.
Jump to: