[ANN] Fantom | CPU Mineable | DarkSend | Masternode | Tor+I2P | sMP Releasing Sn - page 12.

quantumgravity

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: DuckYeah! on November 25, 2015, 10:38:52 PM

This is to inform that to use Birthday Hash Collisions, the block has to be entirely restructured (a.k.a. When validating, invalidating the previous blocks thus holding the client useless to validate older blocks).

A Swap may be imminent, what is your say if a swap were to take place

Would a swap be necessary? Couldn't you just release a mandatory wallet update that forks the code with the upgraded algorithm? It might be easier and less messy than a swap.

DuckYeah!

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

This is to inform that to use Birthday Hash Collisions, the block has to be entirely restructured (a.k.a. When validating, invalidating the previous blocks thus holding the client useless to validate older blocks).

A Swap may be imminent, what is your say if a swap were to take place

joshafest

sr. member

Activity: 374

Merit: 250

ok give me some time ...to look.

quantumgravity

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: joshafest on November 25, 2015, 10:17:54 PM

Quote from: quantumgravity on November 25, 2015, 10:03:19 PM

Quote from: joshafest on November 25, 2015, 09:39:32 PM

Quote from: quantumgravity on November 25, 2015, 05:55:10 PM

I am getting a ton of orphans staking - like 60% or more. Is it a problem with the difficulty or what? Or is it because the block times are so quick? Probably a bit of both? DuckYeah! I remember you mentioning switching to 90 second blocks if you decide to implement a more robust algorithm. That may be a good solution.

have you updated wallet?

Yes I have the latest release.

still have issue....is connection to internet alright? ....i mean to say it will reject block because of internet not working properly .
if it is all well then will have a look over sorce.
i think some tests still left over new pos schem pherhaps.
please let me know if internet working properly.

It must be something with the pos in the code. My internet connection is consistent and hardwired up to 120 Mbps download and 25 Mbps upload speeds.

joshafest

sr. member

Activity: 374

Merit: 250

Quote from: quantumgravity on November 25, 2015, 10:03:19 PM

Quote from: joshafest on November 25, 2015, 09:39:32 PM

Quote from: quantumgravity on November 25, 2015, 05:55:10 PM

I am getting a ton of orphans staking - like 60% or more. Is it a problem with the difficulty or what? Or is it because the block times are so quick? Probably a bit of both? DuckYeah! I remember you mentioning switching to 90 second blocks if you decide to implement a more robust algorithm. That may be a good solution.

have you updated wallet?

Yes I have the latest release.

still have issue....is connection to internet alright? ....i mean to say it will reject block because of internet not working properly .
if it is all well then will have a look over sorce.
i think some tests still left over new pos schem pherhaps.
please let me know if internet working properly.

quantumgravity

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: ethought on November 25, 2015, 04:56:39 AM

Fantom has been added to blocktree.io block explorer

http://www.blocktree.io/e/FNX

Rich List: http://www.blocktree.io/richlist/FNX

Nodes (with addnodes): http://www.blocktree.io/peers/FNX/

Donations welcome to:

FnHMySHDZxvp2qDv7pQ6eUifBq1YZtRLho

Great job, thanks! I sent a small donation for your efforts.

quantumgravity

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: joshafest on November 25, 2015, 09:39:32 PM

Quote from: quantumgravity on November 25, 2015, 05:55:10 PM

I am getting a ton of orphans staking - like 60% or more. Is it a problem with the difficulty or what? Or is it because the block times are so quick? Probably a bit of both? DuckYeah! I remember you mentioning switching to 90 second blocks if you decide to implement a more robust algorithm. That may be a good solution.

have you updated wallet?

Yes I have the latest release.

MisO69

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1005

My mule don't like people laughing

Quote from: maccaspacca on November 25, 2015, 03:03:29 PM

Has someone got a GPU miner already?

One miner on coinspool running at 10x the hash of everyone else with quite a few invalid shares

Either they are running multiple cpu miners (160 cores equivalent by my estimate) or they have created a gpu miner and are not sharing

Just asking as that one address has quite a large % of the network hash

Nobody would bother making a GPU miner for this coin. There is no volume and hardly any buy orders on c-cex. Seems to be the general state of crypto at the moment.

joshafest

sr. member

Activity: 374

Merit: 250

Quote from: quantumgravity on November 25, 2015, 05:55:10 PM

I am getting a ton of orphans staking - like 60% or more. Is it a problem with the difficulty or what? Or is it because the block times are so quick? Probably a bit of both? DuckYeah! I remember you mentioning switching to 90 second blocks if you decide to implement a more robust algorithm. That may be a good solution.

have you updated wallet?

quantumgravity

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Okay, so I went on a fork for like two hours. I think it was because my weight was too high so I've split my balance between a few computers to try and stop that problem from happening again.

quantumgravity

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

I am getting a ton of orphans staking - like 60% or more. Is it a problem with the difficulty or what? Or is it because the block times are so quick? Probably a bit of both? DuckYeah! I remember you mentioning switching to 90 second blocks if you decide to implement a more robust algorithm. That may be a good solution.

maccaspacca

sr. member

Activity: 278

Merit: 258

Twitter: @maccaspacca1

Spun up an azure ubuntu server - again 16 cores etc. and getting 8khs

drizzle2405

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1000

Quote from: maccaspacca on November 25, 2015, 03:12:10 PM

Quote from: drizzle2405 on November 25, 2015, 03:08:45 PM

Quote from: maccaspacca on November 25, 2015, 03:03:29 PM

Has someone got a GPU miner already?

One miner on coinspool running at 10x the hash of everyone else with quite a few invalid shares

Either they are running multiple cpu miners (160 cores equivalent by my estimate) or they have created a gpu miner and are not sharing

Just asking as that one address has quite a large % of the network hash

Probably running virtual machines on Microsoft Azure using the CPU miner...

Yep, that would explain it - more worried about the amount of hash in single hand

Panic over maybe

If he's not using the free money they give you, then quite frankly he is losing out with the current exchange price... Unless he is holding long term...

maccaspacca

sr. member

Activity: 278

Merit: 258

Twitter: @maccaspacca1

Quote from: maccaspacca on November 25, 2015, 03:12:10 PM

Quote from: drizzle2405 on November 25, 2015, 03:08:45 PM

Quote from: maccaspacca on November 25, 2015, 03:03:29 PM

Has someone got a GPU miner already?

One miner on coinspool running at 10x the hash of everyone else with quite a few invalid shares

Either they are running multiple cpu miners (160 cores equivalent by my estimate) or they have created a gpu miner and are not sharing

Just asking as that one address has quite a large % of the network hash

Probably running virtual machines on Microsoft Azure using the CPU miner...

Yep, that would explain it - more worried about the amount of hash in single hand

Panic over maybe

Just spun up an azure machine with 16 cores, 128GB ram and I am getting 5.6khs - so 75khs say around 10 top level azure servers !!! - wow !!

maccaspacca

sr. member

Activity: 278

Merit: 258

Twitter: @maccaspacca1

Quote from: drizzle2405 on November 25, 2015, 03:08:45 PM

Quote from: maccaspacca on November 25, 2015, 03:03:29 PM

Has someone got a GPU miner already?

One miner on coinspool running at 10x the hash of everyone else with quite a few invalid shares

Either they are running multiple cpu miners (160 cores equivalent by my estimate) or they have created a gpu miner and are not sharing

Just asking as that one address has quite a large % of the network hash

Probably running virtual machines on Microsoft Azure using the CPU miner...

Yep, that would explain it - more worried about the amount of hash in single hand

Panic over maybe

drizzle2405

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1000

Quote from: maccaspacca on November 25, 2015, 03:03:29 PM

Has someone got a GPU miner already?

One miner on coinspool running at 10x the hash of everyone else with quite a few invalid shares

Either they are running multiple cpu miners (160 cores equivalent by my estimate) or they have created a gpu miner and are not sharing

Just asking as that one address has quite a large % of the network hash

Probably running virtual machines on Microsoft Azure using the CPU miner...

maccaspacca

sr. member

Activity: 278

Merit: 258

Twitter: @maccaspacca1

Has someone got a GPU miner already?

One miner on coinspool running at 10x the hash of everyone else with quite a few invalid shares

Either they are running multiple cpu miners (160 cores equivalent by my estimate) or they have created a gpu miner and are not sharing

Just asking as that one address has quite a large % of the network hash

DuckYeah!

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Sorry for the mess, out of town using a shittastic crapberry

Bitdonator

legendary

Activity: 1223

Merit: 1002

Bobekko

full member

Activity: 137

Merit: 100

FNX is clearer, there's no C in Fantom. Maybe ask C-Cex to change it too.

Topic: [ANN] Fantom | CPU Mineable | DarkSend | Masternode | Tor+I2P | sMP Releasing Sn - page 12. (Read 77921 times)