Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Futourist - travel review platform where you get paid for your content - page 22. (Read 16056 times)

jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 1
In which countries will the platform start. After all, I can make video reviews of those places where I live for example if it is someone who is interested.
jr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 1
How does this compete with Steemit?
I think the competition is not here. In social networks spread different videos that do not bind to anything. The Futourist application guarantees video binding to tourist points. Nothing superfluous here should not be-only tourism and all that is connected with it.
yes it's all just fine. A good chance to help other people and return some money from the trip, such conditions motivate tourists to make quality content. And people who are going to travel will receive quality reviews about the future location of the trip.
jr. member
Activity: 172
Merit: 1
How does this compete with Steemit?
I think the competition is not here. In social networks spread different videos that do not bind to anything. The Futourist application guarantees video binding to tourist points. Nothing superfluous here should not be-only tourism and all that is connected with it.
jr. member
Activity: 126
Merit: 1
When you connect your app to the main OpenHours platform, do you plan to use video-reviews that may offer some tourist points at this time without participating in the contest?
I do not really understand what the proposed video reviews are? Users will do video reviews and add them to the platform and receive a reward for it.
I'm inclined to agree with you. He's probably wrong. But right after the launch, everything will be empty. Perhaps some of the tourist sites will want to add their videos for free. Is this option possible? Or Futourist insists that all video reviews were brought only through the contest? Huh
If the application contains exact rules, then I agree with you. The video review will be given to the voting community, which has the right to vote. Everything is transparent and democratic, as previously discussed here. If this is true, then application will be interesting.

But the world of reviews - even though there is also a lot of fake  has become much more transparent through things like Instagram and many other media sources. They are not reviews per se, but many people share authentic stuff there. Having it aggregated on one platform can't hurt though.
Here I agree with you but it will be the system is focused specifically on reviews and reviews. For this I think the tool set will be better here.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
I see this project very relevant at this time. No journey takes place without video footage. Will there be a separate competition for vehicles or the  video be composed of all the stages of the journey?
Community manager wrote that It will be short reviews just like stories in instagram, video from a car isn't interesting to see, I can watch the road on GMaps.
Well, it's great that it's informative and useful for people. Will these be just video reviews? articles and blogs will not be?
I don't know about this, he said that their target it's video reviews, but this words are not exepting text reviews on my opinion it can be, but it will be less interesting to community, so if you want become popular then make video.
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 251
When you connect your app to the main OpenHours platform, do you plan to use video-reviews that may offer some tourist points at this time without participating in the contest?
I do not really understand what the proposed video reviews are? Users will do video reviews and add them to the platform and receive a reward for it.
I'm inclined to agree with you. He's probably wrong. But right after the launch, everything will be empty. Perhaps some of the tourist sites will want to add their videos for free. Is this option possible? Or Futourist insists that all video reviews were brought only through the contest? Huh
If the application contains exact rules, then I agree with you. The video review will be given to the voting community, which has the right to vote. Everything is transparent and democratic, as previously discussed here. If this is true, then application will be interesting.

But the world of reviews - even though there is also a lot of fake  has become much more transparent through things like Instagram and many other media sources. They are not reviews per se, but many people share authentic stuff there. Having it aggregated on one platform can't hurt though.
jr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 1
I see this project very relevant at this time. No journey takes place without video footage. Will there be a separate competition for vehicles or the  video be composed of all the stages of the journey?
Community manager wrote that It will be short reviews just like stories in instagram, video from a car isn't interesting to see, I can watch the road on GMaps.
Well, it's great that it's informative and useful for people. Will these be just video reviews? articles and blogs will not be?
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
I see this project very relevant at this time. No journey takes place without video footage. Will there be a separate competition for vehicles or the  video be composed of all the stages of the journey?
Community manager wrote that It will be short reviews just like stories in instagram, video from a car isn't interesting to see, I can watch the road on GMaps.
member
Activity: 448
Merit: 10
If the quality of content is determined by the vote of all members of the community, who will do the selection of videos to participate in the contest? The number of participants is unlimited?
newbie
Activity: 83
Merit: 0
I see this project very relevant at this time. No journey takes place without video footage. Will there be a separate competition for vehicles or the  video be composed of all the stages of the journey?
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
A good project. But tell me if the business will create many fraudulent accounts in order to generate positive reviews about how this will be fought on the platform?
This is an interesting question. I think the platform will be attended by moderators who will react to this or will be gutted by neural networks like that of the YouTube.
I think they haven't powerful like in youtube so it's ridiculous to compare. Somewhere on this thread community manager already answered this question. They use formulae that not allow to get big reward if you haven't really big part of upvotes, if you make many fake upvotes they will see it.

Maybe they are not so strong but it should work without fraud and cheating. Therefore, it will be necessary to take measures and it is desirable that all these functions are performed by the community.
Of course they should and I think they will. But by community... how on your opinion it should work? If really shit video get big amount of upvotes it clear, but if it contest of two reviews and both of them are good, how you can know where fake votes. I think admins shou do this, they have technical tools for this.

Technically, I do not understand how this will all work, but I think if the video does not violate the law, then it has the right to life. And then let the community decide. If the video shit then it gains a rating, then the community wants to watch shit
I don't know, you are absolutely right but how to check that video isn't against a law? admins should watch all reviews to check it? It will be unreal hard.
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
I think in some way this can turn the market reviews and change it for the better. Of course, if the developers do what they promised.
Especially I like the fact that you can return some of the money from the trip if you go on vacation. Or save tokens and pay for different services on the next trips.
jr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 1
I think in some way this can turn the market reviews and change it for the better. Of course, if the developers do what they promised.
member
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
When you connect your app to the main OpenHours platform, do you plan to use video-reviews that may offer some tourist points at this time without participating in the contest?
I do not really understand what the proposed video reviews are? Users will do video reviews and add them to the platform and receive a reward for it.
I'm inclined to agree with you. He's probably wrong. But right after the launch, everything will be empty. Perhaps some of the tourist sites will want to add their videos for free. Is this option possible? Or Futourist insists that all video reviews were brought only through the contest? Huh
If the application contains exact rules, then I agree with you. The video review will be given to the voting community, which has the right to vote. Everything is transparent and democratic, as previously discussed here. If this is true, then application will be interesting.
What decision do you see to be under the control of society? Certainly some tourists will be able to determine the truth, but those participants who only want to visit this tourist point, will not be able to know for sure.
sr. member
Activity: 292
Merit: 252
I miss when crypto was about decentralisation.
How does this compete with Steemit?
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
A good project. But tell me if the business will create many fraudulent accounts in order to generate positive reviews about how this will be fought on the platform?
This is an interesting question. I think the platform will be attended by moderators who will react to this or will be gutted by neural networks like that of the YouTube.
I think they haven't powerful like in youtube so it's ridiculous to compare. Somewhere on this thread community manager already answered this question. They use formulae that not allow to get big reward if you haven't really big part of upvotes, if you make many fake upvotes they will see it.

Maybe they are not so strong but it should work without fraud and cheating. Therefore, it will be necessary to take measures and it is desirable that all these functions are performed by the community.
Of course they should and I think they will. But by community... how on your opinion it should work? If really shit video get big amount of upvotes it clear, but if it contest of two reviews and both of them are good, how you can know where fake votes. I think admins shou do this, they have technical tools for this.

Technically, I do not understand how this will all work, but I think if the video does not violate the law, then it has the right to life. And then let the community decide. If the video shit then it gains a rating, then the community wants to watch shit
Well, the main thing is that it does not spoil the platform rating for new users. On this I think all the same the quality of content should be moderated even if it is a human factor
jr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 1
A good project. But tell me if the business will create many fraudulent accounts in order to generate positive reviews about how this will be fought on the platform?
This is an interesting question. I think the platform will be attended by moderators who will react to this or will be gutted by neural networks like that of the YouTube.
I think they haven't powerful like in youtube so it's ridiculous to compare. Somewhere on this thread community manager already answered this question. They use formulae that not allow to get big reward if you haven't really big part of upvotes, if you make many fake upvotes they will see it.

Maybe they are not so strong but it should work without fraud and cheating. Therefore, it will be necessary to take measures and it is desirable that all these functions are performed by the community.
Of course they should and I think they will. But by community... how on your opinion it should work? If really shit video get big amount of upvotes it clear, but if it contest of two reviews and both of them are good, how you can know where fake votes. I think admins shou do this, they have technical tools for this.

Technically, I do not understand how this will all work, but I think if the video does not violate the law, then it has the right to life. And then let the community decide. If the video shit then it gains a rating, then the community wants to watch shit
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
A good project. But tell me if the business will create many fraudulent accounts in order to generate positive reviews about how this will be fought on the platform?
This is an interesting question. I think the platform will be attended by moderators who will react to this or will be gutted by neural networks like that of the YouTube.
I think they haven't powerful like in youtube so it's ridiculous to compare. Somewhere on this thread community manager already answered this question. They use formulae that not allow to get big reward if you haven't really big part of upvotes, if you make many fake upvotes they will see it.

Maybe they are not so strong but it should work without fraud and cheating. Therefore, it will be necessary to take measures and it is desirable that all these functions are performed by the community.
Of course they should and I think they will. But by community... how on your opinion it should work? If really shit video get big amount of upvotes it clear, but if it contest of two reviews and both of them are good, how you can know where fake votes. I think admins shou do this, they have technical tools for this.
jr. member
Activity: 172
Merit: 1
I did not understand how the issue of plagiarism will be solved. If someone to participate in the competition uses someone else's video. Does the owner of the video review need to prove his right to present it? In the video-review should be seen who was shooting this video?
member
Activity: 172
Merit: 10
Hello friends. Tell me if the moderators on the platform? Or there will be users with a higher priority who already deserve it.
We arent thinking about moderators at the moment. Idea is to build self sustaining community where users are motivated with rewards to help and keep the platform clean. In order to help them with that job AI will be put in place and advanced proof of stake system.
Pages:
Jump to: