Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] ICO Hamster Marketplace - Decentralized marketplace for electronics - page 70. (Read 14966 times)

full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
Sure, it's great that the company offers the final redeem of tokens to investors to let them get a guaranteed income. But I guess they would have already received some income when the token rate would grow to a good level. That’s why I don’t consider Hamster strategy to be the best one.

Who can guarantee that the token cost will grow? This is a market, the risks is a common thing. The owners of Hamster offer investors to get rid of the speculative playing and receive a guaranteed profit in a couple of years.

If the company develops as fast as it is described in its white paper, the value of coins will inevitably grow, and in the next few years it will be bigger by tens of times.

Anyway, it’s a market, the risks are great. Moreover, the founders offer to buy back tokens not for $5-10 per unit. They’ll sell the company and spend all the money on a buy-back. With luck a coin will cost at least $50 at the time of the final redemption. The investor's capital will grow by 25 times!! Not bad, isn’t it?
Wow, that much! Listen, well, I couldn’t know that the company will offer such a cost at the time of the final buy-back. In this case it’s cool, yeah. But still, who can guarantee that the founders won’t change their minds and will redeem all the tokens after the company is sold?

The founders’ and the Hamster Marketplace team’ profit will be provided by the possession of HMT tokens due to the non-commercial nature of the project. So the fact that the founders and the team are interested in the success of HMT token will protect the interests of regular token holders not only in the course of the ICO, but also when it’s over - until the very final buy-back of HMT.

I have the following question: if a vendor is a token holder, will he be able to use tokens to pay for buying a marketplace at the ICO-2020?
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
Sure, it's great that the company offers the final redeem of tokens to investors to let them get a guaranteed income. But I guess they would have already received some income when the token rate would grow to a good level. That’s why I don’t consider Hamster strategy to be the best one.

Who can guarantee that the token cost will grow? This is a market, the risks is a common thing. The owners of Hamster offer investors to get rid of the speculative playing and receive a guaranteed profit in a couple of years.

If the company develops as fast as it is described in its white paper, the value of coins will inevitably grow, and in the next few years it will be bigger by tens of times.

Anyway, it’s a market, the risks are great. Moreover, the founders offer to buy back tokens not for $5-10 per unit. They’ll sell the company and spend all the money on a buy-back. With luck a coin will cost at least $50 at the time of the final redemption. The investor's capital will grow by 25 times!! Not bad, isn’t it?
Wow, that much! Listen, well, I couldn’t know that the company will offer such a cost at the time of the final buy-back. In this case it’s cool, yeah. But still, who can guarantee that the founders won’t change their minds and will redeem all the tokens after the company is sold?

The founders’ and the Hamster Marketplace team’ profit will be provided by the possession of HMT tokens due to the non-commercial nature of the project. So the fact that the founders and the team are interested in the success of HMT token will protect the interests of regular token holders not only in the course of the ICO, but also when it’s over - until the very final buy-back of HMT.
member
Activity: 392
Merit: 10
Sure, it's great that the company offers the final redeem of tokens to investors to let them get a guaranteed income. But I guess they would have already received some income when the token rate would grow to a good level. That’s why I don’t consider Hamster strategy to be the best one.

Who can guarantee that the token cost will grow? This is a market, the risks is a common thing. The owners of Hamster offer investors to get rid of the speculative playing and receive a guaranteed profit in a couple of years.

If the company develops as fast as it is described in its white paper, the value of coins will inevitably grow, and in the next few years it will be bigger by tens of times.

Anyway, it’s a market, the risks are great. Moreover, the founders offer to buy back tokens not for $5-10 per unit. They’ll sell the company and spend all the money on a buy-back. With luck a coin will cost at least $50 at the time of the final redemption. The investor's capital will grow by 25 times!! Not bad, isn’t it?
Wow, that much! Listen, well, I couldn’t know that the company will offer such a cost at the time of the final buy-back. In this case it’s cool, yeah. But still, who can guarantee that the founders won’t change their minds and will redeem all the tokens after the company is sold?
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 100
Sure, it's great that the company offers the final redeem of tokens to investors to let them get a guaranteed income. But I guess they would have already received some income when the token rate would grow to a good level. That’s why I don’t consider Hamster strategy to be the best one.

Who can guarantee that the token cost will grow? This is a market, the risks is a common thing. The owners of Hamster offer investors to get rid of the speculative playing and receive a guaranteed profit in a couple of years.

If the company develops as fast as it is described in its white paper, the value of coins will inevitably grow, and in the next few years it will be bigger by tens of times.

Anyway, it’s a market, the risks are great. Moreover, the founders offer to buy back tokens not for $5-10 per unit. They’ll sell the company and spend all the money on a buy-back. With luck a coin will cost at least $50 at the time of the final redemption. The investor's capital will grow by 25 times!! Not bad, isn’t it?
member
Activity: 392
Merit: 10
Sure, it's great that the company offers the final redeem of tokens to investors to let them get a guaranteed income. But I guess they would have already received some income when the token rate would grow to a good level. That’s why I don’t consider Hamster strategy to be the best one.

Who can guarantee that the token cost will grow? This is a market, the risks is a common thing. The owners of Hamster offer investors to get rid of the speculative playing and receive a guaranteed profit in a couple of years.

If the company develops as fast as it is described in its white paper, the value of coins will inevitably grow, and in the next few years it will be bigger by tens of times.
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
Sure, it's great that the company offers the final redeem of tokens to investors to let them get a guaranteed income. But I guess they would have already received some income when the token rate would grow to a good level. That’s why I don’t consider Hamster strategy to be the best one.

Who can guarantee that the token cost will grow? This is a market, the risks is a common thing. The owners of Hamster offer investors to get rid of the speculative playing and receive a guaranteed profit in a couple of years.
member
Activity: 392
Merit: 10
Sure, it's great that the company offers the final redeem of tokens to investors to let them get a guaranteed income. But I guess they would have already received some income when the token rate would grow to a good level. That’s why I don’t consider Hamster strategy to be the best one.
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 101
I still don’t understand why should HMT tokens be completely eliminated? Investors could continue to make profit on the differences of exchange rates on the exchange, and the project would have developed after the sale in 2020. In brief, I can’t find any reason to invest in the project, if the asset will still be sold irretrievably.
It’s necessary ‘cause the company won’t be able to develop steadily in case it needs to fulfill a promise giben to investors, the essence of which was a constant stimulation of the growth of the coin’s rate.
So what’s the problem? Why not stimulate it and go on?
One day the course would have hit an iron ceiling and would begin to fall. In such a case the company would have to sacrifice its own interests to facilitate the return of the value of the coins to a new maximum level. This would definitely slow the development of the marketplace.
Why did you make such a conclusion? It seems to me that it wouldn’t affect the development of the marketplace.

Look, there’re no fools in Hamster. They’ve carefully studied examples of foreign ICOs in which there was a conflict between the owners of the company and the token holders in the long term. I mean, it wasn’t just pull out of a hat, it's a real experience of other projects.
I’m wondering why could conflicts arise ‘cause of this. Perhaps, they aren’t that critical and it isn’t necessary to eliminate HMT?
member
Activity: 378
Merit: 10
I still don’t understand why should HMT tokens be completely eliminated? Investors could continue to make profit on the differences of exchange rates on the exchange, and the project would have developed after the sale in 2020. In brief, I can’t find any reason to invest in the project, if the asset will still be sold irretrievably.
It’s necessary ‘cause the company won’t be able to develop steadily in case it needs to fulfill a promise giben to investors, the essence of which was a constant stimulation of the growth of the coin’s rate.
So what’s the problem? Why not stimulate it and go on?
One day the course would have hit an iron ceiling and would begin to fall. In such a case the company would have to sacrifice its own interests to facilitate the return of the value of the coins to a new maximum level. This would definitely slow the development of the marketplace.
Why did you make such a conclusion? It seems to me that it wouldn’t affect the development of the marketplace.

Look, there’re no fools in Hamster. They’ve carefully studied examples of foreign ICOs in which there was a conflict between the owners of the company and the token holders in the long term. I mean, it wasn’t just pull out of a hat, it's a real experience of other projects.
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 12
I still don’t understand why should HMT tokens be completely eliminated? Investors could continue to make profit on the differences of exchange rates on the exchange, and the project would have developed after the sale in 2020. In brief, I can’t find any reason to invest in the project, if the asset will still be sold irretrievably.
It’s necessary ‘cause the company won’t be able to develop steadily in case it needs to fulfill a promise giben to investors, the essence of which was a constant stimulation of the growth of the coin’s rate.
So what’s the problem? Why not stimulate it and go on?
One day the course would have hit an iron ceiling and would begin to fall. In such a case the company would have to sacrifice its own interests to facilitate the return of the value of the coins to a new maximum level. This would definitely slow the development of the marketplace.
Why did you make such a conclusion? It seems to me that it wouldn’t affect the development of the marketplace.
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 100
I still don’t understand why should HMT tokens be completely eliminated? Investors could continue to make profit on the differences of exchange rates on the exchange, and the project would have developed after the sale in 2020. In brief, I can’t find any reason to invest in the project, if the asset will still be sold irretrievably.
It’s necessary ‘cause the company won’t be able to develop steadily in case it needs to fulfill a promise giben to investors, the essence of which was a constant stimulation of the growth of the coin’s rate.
So what’s the problem? Why not stimulate it and go on?
One day the course would have hit an iron ceiling and would begin to fall. In such a case the company would have to sacrifice its own interests to facilitate the return of the value of the coins to a new maximum level. This would definitely slow the development of the marketplace.
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 12
I still don’t understand why should HMT tokens be completely eliminated? Investors could continue to make profit on the differences of exchange rates on the exchange, and the project would have developed after the sale in 2020. In brief, I can’t find any reason to invest in the project, if the asset will still be sold irretrievably.
It’s necessary ‘cause the company won’t be able to develop steadily in case it needs to fulfill a promise giben to investors, the essence of which was a constant stimulation of the growth of the coin’s rate.
So what’s the problem? Why not stimulate it and go on?
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 100
I still don’t understand why should HMT tokens be completely eliminated? Investors could continue to make profit on the differences of exchange rates on the exchange, and the project would have developed after the sale in 2020. In brief, I can’t find any reason to invest in the project, if the asset will still be sold irretrievably.
It’s necessary ‘cause the company won’t be able to develop steadily in case it needs to fulfill a promise giben to investors, the essence of which was a constant stimulation of the growth of the coin’s rate.
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 12
I still don’t understand why should HMT tokens be completely eliminated? Investors could continue to make profit on the differences of exchange rates on the exchange, and the project would have developed after the sale in 2020. In brief, I can’t find any reason to invest in the project, if the asset will still be sold irretrievably.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
Hello. Can you elaborate on what will the blockchain mechanism of budgeting and cost control be? I just haven’t heard of anything like this, so I got interested.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
You’ve written that the decentralized mechanism of self-management of the site will operate basing on blockchain-voting. Who will be able to vote?
member
Activity: 406
Merit: 10
Greetings to all the users of this forum. I'm interested in the following point: will there be any communication channels inside the platform for communication of vendors and their potential buyers?
member
Activity: 266
Merit: 10
Do you plan to add any rating system for vendors, besides customers’ feedback?
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
Hi there. Does anyone know the maximum period of inactivity of the vendor on the site, after which his store is closed by the administration of the project?
member
Activity: 406
Merit: 10
Good afternoon. Are you going to add a referral program to Hamster system to accelerate project’s promotion?
Pages:
Jump to: