[ANN] [ICO is complete!] Market.space - Decentralized Host Aggregator - page 12.

akramali

member

Activity: 145

Merit: 10

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: hazenyc on April 16, 2018, 02:00:05 PM

Quote from: fulcare on April 09, 2018, 06:45:46 AM

Quote from: btcapparel on April 05, 2018, 02:36:44 AM

Quote from: aryan7980 on April 05, 2018, 02:16:59 AM

Quote from: apmapm12 on April 05, 2018, 02:08:22 AM

Quote from: biplobmbhr on April 05, 2018, 01:55:37 AM

Quote from: fulcare on April 04, 2018, 10:53:43 AM

I didn't know that and it is also impossible to verify whether they are independent or not. We all know how the three big ratings agencies did their job right before the financial crisis Wink

They claimed to be independent, but obviously they weren't.

The one thing I really don't like and don't understand in ICObench is rating. There are several of so-called "experts" who have no idea about the tech behind blockchain and ICO. So they review projects and making grades for each project, but some of this experts are obviously don't know what these projects are about.

Yeah, this rating system is ridiculous, some great projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings

As for my opinion, every "expert" should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the numbers.

I do agree with you guys, there should be a kind of explanation or the way to discuss ay least, but both of those experts haven't answered on LinkedIn.
But don't you worry, ICObench rating is one of preliminary ratings and having 5.0 is much more suspicious than say 3.8 or 4.3 as it's a result of some work done.
The final mark comes from the market anyway )

They have also been bad with their ratings at times when high quality of the project was very obvious. In that case they probably did an independent rating. Question remains whether they take money from some projects or not but I doubt that we will ever find out.

Definitely questionable and the biggest issue is that you should always assume they bought the coins they are talking positively about to then sell them after you read their ratings. Not very good.

I personally look through some sites with ratings from time to time. But I don't completely focus on them because not all ICOs with high ratings are guaranteed to be successful. I rely more on the team, the telegram, wp and so on

Team is everything as I learned from my experience. If you can meet them face to face that is the best situation as you can see in real time whether they are able to answer questions and provide explanations about their project without any hassle.

Agree
It's always better to communicate with someone personally, in any field. Unfortunately that was not always possible

That is to some degree the disadvantage of global fundraising through ICOs. There is no face to face conversation with the teams anymore and that is why you should at least demand a video conference if you are about to invest a large amount of money.

I think a video about team, about their experience, thoughts, vision of poject would also be nice

akramali

member

Activity: 145

Merit: 10

Quote from: I-Love-BTCD on May 03, 2018, 11:43:17 AM

Guys, I have some problems with registration. Can somebody help me?

What kind of problem? I think its quite easy

I-Love-BTCD

newbie

Activity: 64

Merit: 0

Guys, I have some problems with registration. Can somebody help me?

Ireson

member

Activity: 308

Merit: 10

Could I buy your tokens for fiat? It is not convenient for me to use crypto

minhanhtran0708

newbie

Activity: 65

Merit: 0

btcapparel

sr. member

Activity: 568

Merit: 255

Quote from: kaicrypzen on May 03, 2018, 08:12:57 AM

Quote from: btcapparel on May 03, 2018, 06:56:26 AM

If the raised sum is gonna be quite close to the soft cap we'll launch a voting among our community.
Also we may consider on extending of the ICO period.

Voting to launch the project anyway or to refund the participants? Or do you mean something else?
Is a refund and not launching the project a possibility if the soft cap is not reached, or in other terms, what is the soft cap actually for?

I mean voting for either extention of ICO period to reach the soft cap or refund.
Launching of the project is the most important thing. And yes, say we've raised $14.5M, there would one more voting probably.

kaicrypzen

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 656

Quote from: btcapparel on May 03, 2018, 06:56:26 AM

If the raised sum is gonna be quite close to the soft cap we'll launch a voting among our community.
Also we may consider on extending of the ICO period.

Voting to launch the project anyway or to refund the participants? Or do you mean something else?
Is a refund and not launching the project a possibility if the soft cap is not reached, or in other terms, what is the soft cap actually for?

btcapparel

sr. member

Activity: 568

Merit: 255

Quote from: Abbie Hoffman on May 02, 2018, 01:08:03 PM

what happens if you couldn't reach your softcap?

Hello!
We all hope it won't happen, though you never know )
If the raised sum is gonna be quite close to the soft cap we'll launch a voting among our community.
Also we may consider on extending of the ICO period.

Abbie Hoffman

newbie

Activity: 53

Merit: 0

what happens if you couldn't reach your softcap?

murat131

newbie

Activity: 73

Merit: 0

Hello guys, do you have some video about your team? maybe where you talk about your project and vision of it?

Dogeshop_eu

member

Activity: 148

Merit: 10

Quote from: larus on May 02, 2018, 09:39:04 AM

When and where will you post a report from the event in Singapore?

Already posted, check the medium

bulldogtattoo

newbie

Activity: 54

Merit: 0

Quote from: microsurfer on May 02, 2018, 09:17:16 AM

Do U have any restrictions for participants? Max/min amount of contribution or smth like this?

There are restricted countries (USA, China and some more)
As for contribution, min is $35, max is unlimited

btcapparel

sr. member

Activity: 568

Merit: 255

Quote from: fulcare on May 01, 2018, 02:47:26 PM

Quote from: btcapparel on May 01, 2018, 01:17:48 AM

Quote from: fulcare on April 30, 2018, 06:09:36 PM

Quote from: haufranco on April 17, 2018, 12:00:34 PM

Quote from: fulcare on April 17, 2018, 09:24:16 AM

Quote from: btcapparel on April 09, 2018, 07:00:40 AM

Quote from: fulcare on April 09, 2018, 06:45:46 AM

Quote from: btcapparel on April 05, 2018, 02:36:44 AM

Quote from: aryan7980 on April 05, 2018, 02:16:59 AM

Quote from: apmapm12 on April 05, 2018, 02:08:22 AM

Quote from: biplobmbhr on April 05, 2018, 01:55:37 AM

Quote from: fulcare on April 04, 2018, 10:53:43 AM

I didn't know that and it is also impossible to verify whether they are independent or not. We all know how the three big ratings agencies did their job right before the financial crisis Wink

They claimed to be independent, but obviously they weren't.

The one thing I really don't like and don't understand in ICObench is rating. There are several of so-called "experts" who have no idea about the tech behind blockchain and ICO. So they review projects and making grades for each project, but some of this experts are obviously don't know what these projects are about.

Yeah, this rating system is ridiculous, some great projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings

As for my opinion, every "expert" should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the numbers.

I do agree with you guys, there should be a kind of explanation or the way to discuss ay least, but both of those experts haven't answered on LinkedIn.
But don't you worry, ICObench rating is one of preliminary ratings and having 5.0 is much more suspicious than say 3.8 or 4.3 as it's a result of some work done.
The final mark comes from the market anyway )

They have also been bad with their ratings at times when high quality of the project was very obvious. In that case they probably did an independent rating. Question remains whether they take money from some projects or not but I doubt that we will ever find out.

We won't unless someone enrolled an independent expert tells the world

Having a whistleblower would be great. An enrolled expert might not have the info we are looking for though. Payments could still be made in the background without some of the experts even knowing.

I always say- trust none other than yourself. Why not invest some time in doing the research yourself? Personally I don't trust anyone else with my money.

The minority of investors in crypto does the due diligence thoroughly. The large majority only listens to some crazy Youtube video producer.

Even YouTube has become less reasonable.
Each blogger now has a number or dissappointed who trusted, but it did't work out.
And of course, an incredible number or scammers/spammers who ping us on Telegram every minute.

It's all about your own research guys, the market today has a lot of cases to be compared.

Less reasonable is a negative exaggeration. It is a joke what most Youtubers do and they simply get paid to talk positively about scams.

Well some of them are taking your promo video and use it as about the half of their "review" )

fulcare

sr. member

Activity: 588

Merit: 254