Topic: [ANN] [ICO is complete!] Market.space - Decentralized Host Aggregator - page 11. (Read 6883 times)
May 09, 2018, 10:13:17 AM
Don´t you think that your soft cap is pretty high? You already raised $3 mln, but you have to raise another $12 mln, it seems impossible
May 09, 2018, 10:11:16 AM
Please just quote the part that you are replying to. Over quoting just clogs up the thread and makes it difficult to read and follow, and nobody reads all the quoted posts anyway.
Hi!
Reasonable, but sometimes it's important to know what the dialogue started with.
I agree that it's important to know what started the dialogue but when someone quotes 13 posts, something is definitely wrong. Especially when the last handful of messages are the same quotes over and over again. I'm not reading them and I assume that a lot of people are not reading them either (maybe I'm wrong). A common ground should be found between trying to make what started the dialogue visible and quoting everything without a second thought.
May 09, 2018, 07:28:45 AM
Please just quote the part that you are replying to. Over quoting just clogs up the thread and makes it difficult to read and follow, and nobody reads all the quoted posts anyway.
Hi!Reasonable, but sometimes it's important to know what the dialogue started with.
May 08, 2018, 04:08:15 PM
Please just quote the part that you are replying to. Over quoting just clogs up the thread and makes it difficult to read and follow, and nobody reads all the quoted posts anyway.
May 08, 2018, 03:40:49 PM
I didn't know that and it is also impossible to verify whether they are independent or not. We all know how the three big ratings agencies did their job right before the financial crisis
They claimed to be independent, but obviously they weren't.The one thing I really don't like and don't understand in ICObench is rating. There are several of so-called "experts" who have no idea about the tech behind blockchain and ICO. So they review projects and making grades for each project, but some of this experts are obviously don't know what these projects are about.
Yeah, this rating system is ridiculous, some great projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings
As for my opinion, every "expert" should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the numbers.
But don't you worry, ICObench rating is one of preliminary ratings and having 5.0 is much more suspicious than say 3.8 or 4.3 as it's a result of some work done.
The final mark comes from the market anyway )
They have also been bad with their ratings at times when high quality of the project was very obvious. In that case they probably did an independent rating. Question remains whether they take money from some projects or not but I doubt that we will ever find out.
Definitely questionable and the biggest issue is that you should always assume they bought the coins they are talking positively about to then sell them after you read their ratings. Not very good.
Team is everything as I learned from my experience. If you can meet them face to face that is the best situation as you can see in real time whether they are able to answer questions and provide explanations about their project without any hassle.
It's always better to communicate with someone personally, in any field. Unfortunately that was not always possible
That is to some degree the disadvantage of global fundraising through ICOs. There is no face to face conversation with the teams anymore and that is why you should at least demand a video conference if you are about to invest a large amount of money.
Maybe they recognize this and do it. And beforehand collect some questions from the community and answer them.
Sure so something like Q&A or AMA style on a live stream would be the best option to get the most out of a conversation between the community and the team.
May 06, 2018, 02:42:08 PM
I didn't know that and it is also impossible to verify whether they are independent or not. We all know how the three big ratings agencies did their job right before the financial crisis
They claimed to be independent, but obviously they weren't.The one thing I really don't like and don't understand in ICObench is rating. There are several of so-called "experts" who have no idea about the tech behind blockchain and ICO. So they review projects and making grades for each project, but some of this experts are obviously don't know what these projects are about.
Yeah, this rating system is ridiculous, some great projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings
As for my opinion, every "expert" should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the numbers.
But don't you worry, ICObench rating is one of preliminary ratings and having 5.0 is much more suspicious than say 3.8 or 4.3 as it's a result of some work done.
The final mark comes from the market anyway )
They have also been bad with their ratings at times when high quality of the project was very obvious. In that case they probably did an independent rating. Question remains whether they take money from some projects or not but I doubt that we will ever find out.
Definitely questionable and the biggest issue is that you should always assume they bought the coins they are talking positively about to then sell them after you read their ratings. Not very good.
Team is everything as I learned from my experience. If you can meet them face to face that is the best situation as you can see in real time whether they are able to answer questions and provide explanations about their project without any hassle.
It's always better to communicate with someone personally, in any field. Unfortunately that was not always possible
That is to some degree the disadvantage of global fundraising through ICOs. There is no face to face conversation with the teams anymore and that is why you should at least demand a video conference if you are about to invest a large amount of money.
Maybe they recognize this and do it. And beforehand collect some questions from the community and answer them.
May 06, 2018, 01:58:26 PM
Maybe someone can clear this up for me (I think this question has been asked over and over again in every thread regarding every ICO) – what's the difference between your project and all the others? Like, what's your main selling point here?
Hi. If you take other decentralized storage projects like Sia, Storj, Geens, the main difference is that we engage hosting professionals while they rely on ordinary PCs, laptops or other devices that are not made for 24/7 work and high load. This approach allows us to deliver a way more reliable storage.
The unfettered marketplace where customers and contractors (hosts, proxies, miners, insurers etc) interact underpins affordability. For example, if you are a host who just entered the system, you are free to charge zero or close to zero fee just to earn some rate, which is hardly allowed in other systems
May 06, 2018, 12:19:20 PM
I didn't know that and it is also impossible to verify whether they are independent or not. We all know how the three big ratings agencies did their job right before the financial crisis
They claimed to be independent, but obviously they weren't.The one thing I really don't like and don't understand in ICObench is rating. There are several of so-called "experts" who have no idea about the tech behind blockchain and ICO. So they review projects and making grades for each project, but some of this experts are obviously don't know what these projects are about.
Yeah, this rating system is ridiculous, some great projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings
As for my opinion, every "expert" should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the numbers.
But don't you worry, ICObench rating is one of preliminary ratings and having 5.0 is much more suspicious than say 3.8 or 4.3 as it's a result of some work done.
The final mark comes from the market anyway )
They have also been bad with their ratings at times when high quality of the project was very obvious. In that case they probably did an independent rating. Question remains whether they take money from some projects or not but I doubt that we will ever find out.
We won't unless someone enrolled an independent expert tells the world
Having a whistleblower would be great. An enrolled expert might not have the info we are looking for though. Payments could still be made in the background without some of the experts even knowing.
The minority of investors in crypto does the due diligence thoroughly. The large majority only listens to some crazy Youtube video producer.
Each blogger now has a number or dissappointed who trusted, but it did't work out.
And of course, an incredible number or scammers/spammers who ping us on Telegram every minute.
It's all about your own research guys, the market today has a lot of cases to be compared.
Less reasonable is a negative exaggeration. It is a joke what most Youtubers do and they simply get paid to talk positively about scams.
Lol man that's even worse. But you know it's the audience that decides about their rise and fall. If they want to watch copied content, then there is a right for those youtubers to exist.
May 06, 2018, 09:48:40 AM
Maybe someone can clear this up for me (I think this question has been asked over and over again in every thread regarding every ICO) – what's the difference between your project and all the others? Like, what's your main selling point here?
May 05, 2018, 04:53:25 AM
I have participated in this project, I advise everyone to join because I find this project has good team and good mentor will help the project achieve the goals that the project put forward.
May 04, 2018, 05:16:30 PM
I'm not sure if ethereum is scalable enough for all these new tokens, especially for decentralized storage. Perhaps a new platform/coin is needed to build out a platoform for only decentralized storage.
May 04, 2018, 12:24:36 PM
Do you have an email newslatter?I wanna subscribe to not miss any updates here
Sure!
You can subscribe to our newsletter while creating a user account on the website.
May 04, 2018, 12:16:07 PM
Could I buy your tokens for fiat? It is not convenient for me to use crypto
You can purchase tokens using your bank card (VISA/MC).
May 04, 2018, 12:13:15 PM
Guys, I have some problems with registration. Can somebody help me?
What kind of problem? I think its quite easy
Hello!
We had some technical difficulties, the problem has been successfully fixed.
Please try again and sorry for the inconvenience.
May 04, 2018, 10:37:03 AM
Guys, I have some problems with registration. Can somebody help me?
What kind of problem? I think its quite easy May 04, 2018, 10:35:10 AM
Guys, I have some problems with registration. Can somebody help me?
What kind of problem? I think its quite easy May 04, 2018, 06:58:23 AM
Do you you use smart contract in your platform?
Hello!If I'm right to understand your question, yes, the systems we're building will use its internal blockchain and smart-contracts in it for each transaction and deal.
May 04, 2018, 06:49:42 AM
Hello guys, do you have some video about your team? maybe where you talk about your project and vision of it?
Hello!Yes, you can find several videos with presentation of Market.space at number of conferences by Ivan and Yuri on our YT channel.
Here's the link, enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgyfNFctRvXfuyCG4Yh1Vsg
May 04, 2018, 06:47:57 AM
When and where will you post a report from the event in Singapore?
Hi!It's on our web page already and we have an album on our FB profile
https://www.facebook.com/pg/Market.space.system/photos/?tab=album&album_id=995533437269770
May 04, 2018, 06:46:29 AM
Do U have any restrictions for participants? Max/min amount of contribution or smth like this?
There are restricted countries (USA, China and some more)As for contribution, min is $35, max is unlimited
Yes, that is correct.
We do not accept funds from US, China and South Korea and any other countries where participation in ICOs is forbidden by law.
Jump to: