Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN ICO+Bounty] [REA] REALISTO - Real Estate Investing For Everyone, Everywhere - page 9. (Read 17462 times)

member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
The idea of the project is not new, so I would like to know about the motivational part as much as possible. How will managers earn money from this project?
full member
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
Super idea! Excellent all planned and well laid out. How to learn more about the startup team?
full member
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
A good plan is presented by the team, I really enjoy working out. Can I find out more about how 10% of the operating fund will be distributed?
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
The project developed a really cool token. Documents is understandable. Can you get these tokens "on your pocket"? I want to show my friends)
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 102
Read the project's VP. A little confused due to the hard cap did not begin to limit. All the block-funds do this, at least the ones I saw. And here they decided to neglect it, didn’t they?

No neglect, as you put it. This is a deliberate decision. REALISTO chose the ICO format without the hard cap limitation, as there is no reason to limit the ability of investors to purchase high-yield real estate. In real estate, the more capital you can use, the more diversified and stable your investment portfolio will be
Ok! It became clearer. But why then did most of the rest restrict the hard cap?

Do you seriously think that someone is ready to answer for these "other funds" that you have studied?) Look again: 90% of the capital will be used to finance portfolios of the Main Pool and the Pool of Opportunities. This choice of format for the sale of tokens without capping on the hard cap is entirely aimed at sending the maximum amount of funds raised for the intended purpose.
Well, then would it be more logical to not install soft and hard cap at all? They are only confusing. You have found a niche with almost unlimited possibilities

No, it's not logical! This is due to the fact that the tokens are provided with assets, and the more REA tokens will be distributed free of charge in the form of pre-sale bonuses, the less funds (in relation to the released tokens) will be directed to the purchase of assets. That's so logical, isn’t it?
Thank you, then put everything on the shelves. And how will the cost of tokens be formed in the implementation of the project? From what to depend?


The token price will depend on two things:

1) value of the underlying real estate
2} progress on attracting new real estate experts to launch their own investments on the platform
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 102
Read the project's VP. A little confused due to the hard cap did not begin to limit. All the block-funds do this, at least the ones I saw. And here they decided to neglect it, didn’t they?

No neglect, as you put it. This is a deliberate decision. REALISTO chose the ICO format without the hard cap limitation, as there is no reason to limit the ability of investors to purchase high-yield real estate. In real estate, the more capital you can use, the more diversified and stable your investment portfolio will be
Ok! It became clearer. But why then did most of the rest restrict the hard cap?


Most other tokens aren't backed by real assets, so a cap is more important.

This article explains it in more detail:

https://medium.com/@crypto_dax/asset-backed-token-icos-how-important-is-a-hard-cap-7294253112ed
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
If I participated in the ICO, then what did I gain compared to those who buy REA tokens after the ICO?
Some kind of discount, as far as I know. It is a pretty good deal!
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
Read the project's VP. A little confused due to the hard cap did not begin to limit. All the block-funds do this, at least the ones I saw. And here they decided to neglect it, didn’t they?

No neglect, as you put it. This is a deliberate decision. REALISTO chose the ICO format without the hard cap limitation, as there is no reason to limit the ability of investors to purchase high-yield real estate. In real estate, the more capital you can use, the more diversified and stable your investment portfolio will be
Ok! It became clearer. But why then did most of the rest restrict the hard cap?

Do you seriously think that someone is ready to answer for these "other funds" that you have studied?) Look again: 90% of the capital will be used to finance portfolios of the Main Pool and the Pool of Opportunities. This choice of format for the sale of tokens without capping on the hard cap is entirely aimed at sending the maximum amount of funds raised for the intended purpose.
Well, then would it be more logical to not install soft and hard cap at all? They are only confusing. You have found a niche with almost unlimited possibilities

No, it's not logical! This is due to the fact that the tokens are provided with assets, and the more REA tokens will be distributed free of charge in the form of pre-sale bonuses, the less funds (in relation to the released tokens) will be directed to the purchase of assets. That's so logical, isn’t it?
Thank you, then put everything on the shelves. And how will the cost of tokens be formed in the implementation of the project? From what to depend?
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
Read the project's VP. A little confused due to the hard cap did not begin to limit. All the block-funds do this, at least the ones I saw. And here they decided to neglect it, didn’t they?

No neglect, as you put it. This is a deliberate decision. REALISTO chose the ICO format without the hard cap limitation, as there is no reason to limit the ability of investors to purchase high-yield real estate. In real estate, the more capital you can use, the more diversified and stable your investment portfolio will be
Ok! It became clearer. But why then did most of the rest restrict the hard cap?

Do you seriously think that someone is ready to answer for these "other funds" that you have studied?) Look again: 90% of the capital will be used to finance portfolios of the Main Pool and the Pool of Opportunities. This choice of format for the sale of tokens without capping on the hard cap is entirely aimed at sending the maximum amount of funds raised for the intended purpose.
Well, then would it be more logical to not install soft and hard cap at all? They are only confusing. You have found a niche with almost unlimited possibilities

No, it's not logical! This is due to the fact that the tokens are provided with assets, and the more REA tokens will be distributed free of charge in the form of pre-sale bonuses, the less funds (in relation to the released tokens) will be directed to the purchase of assets. That's so logical, isn’t it?
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
How will the income received during the ICO be distributed?
In the EP it is declared to direct 90% for the acquisition of assets (investments), 10% - for the provision of operating activities.
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
If I participated in the ICO, then what did I gain compared to those who buy REA tokens after the ICO?
ICO participants always have advantages. In addition to discounts, during the project they receive privileged conditions.
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
Read the project's VP. A little confused due to the hard cap did not begin to limit. All the block-funds do this, at least the ones I saw. And here they decided to neglect it, didn’t they?

No neglect, as you put it. This is a deliberate decision. REALISTO chose the ICO format without the hard cap limitation, as there is no reason to limit the ability of investors to purchase high-yield real estate. In real estate, the more capital you can use, the more diversified and stable your investment portfolio will be
Ok! It became clearer. But why then did most of the rest restrict the hard cap?

Do you seriously think that someone is ready to answer for these "other funds" that you have studied?) Look again: 90% of the capital will be used to finance portfolios of the Main Pool and the Pool of Opportunities. This choice of format for the sale of tokens without capping on the hard cap is entirely aimed at sending the maximum amount of funds raised for the intended purpose.
Well, then would it be more logical to not install soft and hard cap at all? They are only confusing. You have found a niche with almost unlimited possibilities
member
Activity: 294
Merit: 10
How will the income received during the ICO be distributed?
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
Read the project's VP. A little confused due to the hard cap did not begin to limit. All the block-funds do this, at least the ones I saw. And here they decided to neglect it, didn’t they?

No neglect, as you put it. This is a deliberate decision. REALISTO chose the ICO format without the hard cap limitation, as there is no reason to limit the ability of investors to purchase high-yield real estate. In real estate, the more capital you can use, the more diversified and stable your investment portfolio will be
Ok! It became clearer. But why then did most of the rest restrict the hard cap?

Do you seriously think that someone is ready to answer for these "other funds" that you have studied?) Look again: 90% of the capital will be used to finance portfolios of the Main Pool and the Pool of Opportunities. This choice of format for the sale of tokens without capping on the hard cap is entirely aimed at sending the maximum amount of funds raised for the intended purpose.
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
If I participated in the ICO, then what did I gain compared to those who buy REA tokens after the ICO?
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
Read the project's VP. A little confused due to the hard cap did not begin to limit. All the block-funds do this, at least the ones I saw. And here they decided to neglect it, didn’t they?

No neglect, as you put it. This is a deliberate decision. REALISTO chose the ICO format without the hard cap limitation, as there is no reason to limit the ability of investors to purchase high-yield real estate. In real estate, the more capital you can use, the more diversified and stable your investment portfolio will be
Ok! It became clearer. But why then did most of the rest restrict the hard cap?
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
Read the project's VP. A little confused due to the hard cap did not begin to limit. All the block-funds do this, at least the ones I saw. And here they decided to neglect it, didn’t they?

No neglect, as you put it. This is a deliberate decision. REALISTO chose the ICO format without the hard cap limitation, as there is no reason to limit the ability of investors to purchase high-yield real estate. In real estate, the more capital you can use, the more diversified and stable your investment portfolio will be
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
Read the project's VP. A little confused due to the hard cap did not begin to limit. All the block-funds do this, at least the ones I saw. And here they decided to neglect it, didn’t they?
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 15
Where can I find information on Bounty for social networks - FB, Twitter?
Pages:
Jump to: