words
Don't flatter yourself. My only interest in you is your lies, so as long as you keep doing that you'll have my attention.
Some classy slack arguing going on, good showing for new investors. If you don't agree with the core 10 or so people they bully and gang up on you. And they sit and complain cause BitcoinTalk is harsh. News flash, ION slack is the same damn thing. I'm no wall of awesomeness, but it's pretty pitiful they think they are high and mighty and nice but treat users, ahem, potential customers, like dicks if they don't agree that ION is awesome.
I now have seen rdewilde ask two rather important questions, go ignored so he pinned it and it is still unaddressed, to my knowledge. Folks, they straight up ignore and blow off some of their most loyal followers/contributors, there's no chance they will ever be transparent to anyone outside the Ionomy.
I now have seen rdewilde ask two rather important questions, go ignored so he pinned it and it is still unaddressed, to my knowledge. Folks, they straight up ignore and blow off some of their most loyal followers/contributors, there's no chance they will ever be transparent to anyone outside the Ionomy.
I was browsing around ionomy slack too, had a good laugh at this bizarre fight between some random dude and some other dude's wife, and also he-who-must-not-be-named bragging about taking bitcointalk down. Not quite the level of hashtalk entertainment but funny nonetheless.
No useful info to put on the FAQ sadly. And activity seems to be down from what it was a couple of months ago.
Arrogant as well such a nice character trait..... anyway..... what lies are you talking about you
? What lies have I posted that have aroused your interest
you must have something so please share it with everyone.... oh I know it's because I don't answer your questions I'm part of a scam..... what a joke... what a lame sad inbred reason to accuse something or someone of being a scam !!!!A small indie developer like Supergiant (they developed a great game called Bastion), ask them what their next game is gonna be about and what their plans are to monetize it.... don't be surprised if they ignore you !!! AT A COMMERCIAL LEVEL TO BE A SUCCESS YOU DON'T DO STUFF WHICH YOU KNOW THE RETURN IS GONNA MINIMAL AND COMMERCIAL DANGERS ARE EVER PRESENT TOO.
If you don't feel conformable then don't invest that's great
Tell everyone of your concerns & fears that's great too
But please don't call me, anyone or anything a lie without facts to backup your views..... then your just being a dick.... a clever dick
Supergiant is a poor example as from what i can see they didn't solicit funds from the public to make a game. When you self fund you have that option. Any investors always have updates and transparent information. Do you think big companies would invest without info and accept being told give us money but go away if you don't like no news?
The difference here is ionomy took customer funds and said at the start they were being transparent. As of now their definition of transparency matches garzas definition of escrow when he did it himself.
sorry don't have the time to post a proper response, my posts were directed to
The big big difference is Garza was a thief with intent to steal millions, the ION team aren't....... time will of course tell whose right/wrong. Anyone who thinks there is a 1% chance this is a scam should not make any investment or if you can't resist then temper your commit. At this stage irrelevant of intent this like all crypto is a high risk project so stay within your comfort zone
1) My red flag would be end of December if the situation is the same now in January this for me would be a cause for concern. I appreciate it's difficult to set timelines when you try to create something from nothing but that kind of delay without a satisfactory explanation would for me not be good
2) No I don't agree. You see on one side you have people that show interest on the other side the ION team that are holding peoples ICO money. if something is released and it's broken, easily exploited or gives away a competitive advantage to richer more resourced competitors, for good or ill today the risk today just isn't worth it. Plus today I would rather the ICO is spent on moving their business plan forward as opposed to paying for someone to do the PR or taking a developer away from their work to stare at forums
3) The reason I picked Supergiant is they are small development team. Whenever someone says companies like Apple, EA, Samsung keep secrets the response is yes but that is because they are big. I can understand why small companies keep their cards close to their chest. Something is released and it's broken or information given gives a competitor an advantage the big company just takes a big on their share price, they learn then recover. Whereas with a small company the damage can be far worse as the pockets aren't as deep to fund a recovery. What company would you say would be a good benchmark I don't know of any that has seen success and show a level of transparency some people are demanding
here it is december early jan serious red flag
better than nothing i guess