Author

Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 359. (Read 473177 times)

full member
Activity: 194
Merit: 101
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 500
For those too old to know what twitch is - when's the public beta coming?

Beta Testing will come after the Whales & Founders have done alpha testing... rumor is  "making another big push this afternoon/evening"
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
For those too old to know what twitch is - when's the public beta coming?
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
For the record; I just saw the game on livestream twitch shown by a member. So the game exists, it works, that i can conclude.

Honest opinion, how'd it look? Meet your expectations or didn't you see enough to accurately judge?
full member
Activity: 925
Merit: 100
For the record; I just saw the game on livestream twitch shown by a member. So the game exists, it works, that i can conclude.
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 500

I cancelled the ION lottery first draw as did not want ppl to lose too many ION on entry, over a quarter of the 1000 tickets sold tho (in two days since site launch) so that is good and showed interest, there were some late entries I did not add too (All on public spreadsheet). I have refunded everyone with a 100% bonus is coins for ticket purchases so they are all winners. The ION lottery is being redesigned with a smaller pot so better chance to win and also an improved ticket choosing system. Thanks for noticing and stay posted for updates  Grin http://ionlottery.net

Maybe next time, you can throw in a baker's dozen of eggs with the grand prize? Thanks for getting the Shark hooked on gambling with IONs!!!  lucky 13!!! put it all on RED!!!

THIS IS MY 100th POST Smiley
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
ICO rainstorms continue,just come om,it's many other team complete with you
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Chickens will rule the world one day.
So, when is Gravity gonna be released?

I don't care how loyal of a supporter of team ION you are, some chaps have to be getting frustrated.

We are talking about a group of people who stuck with XPY for more than a year after it was obvious to everyone else that it's dead.

They'll stick with ION until the "team" runs out of cash and invents some new trinkets.

You know how over time we watched GAW claim members? There were less... a lot less.
Another project like StakeMiners claimed the same. After I dug into them through Nigel. We all learned not even the "team" they claimed in charge was found hollow full of ghosts.
I feel the same could be imagined for this shit-show. Less developers or personal and members than claimed.

I also can imagine ION dying the same way XPY did through inflation.


In terms of 'membership', I think it's already pretty clear that they don't really have much of an active community. If slack and/or iontalk (the unofficial forum) is a measure of pure membership, there's only at most I'd say 25-30 active contributors to discussion. That's at absolute most. Mostly it's 10-20 regular users on the slack. Granted they have more registered users on the slack channel, but even that's only around the 200 ish mark I think, and I'd be willing to wager a large proportion of those were one time sign ups out of curiosity when the coin/project launched who haven't dipped back in again. As another measure of community activity and engagement, Krumz just this week had to cancel a 'lottery' site he had started just after its launch due to lack of interest.

I've heard various numbers for the amount of staking accounts on the 'ionomy platform' that have been bandied about. I think the last I heard was in the thousands, but it's unclear if that represents individual accounts or number of stakers or what. Again, since at the moment nothing can be done with 'ions' anyway, I'd be willing to bet that at least a chunk of those staking accounts have been forgotten about by their owners due to the projects perceived inactivity.

We don't really know much about the 'team' side of things as they appear to like keeping details very closely guarded, but it was mentioned that they've had to hire additional dev(s) to help build out various features relating to the API for the ionomy platform.

What's really clear though is that this is very much a project with really limited reach at this stage. It has a tiny community, and no one outside of prior GAW investors who transferred over XPY is even aware of its existence; it's telling that even in the pre-ICO launch no major crypto journalism sites (and I use the term journalism very loosely here as they're mostly just glorified blogs/paid article sites) picked up and reported on the launch. When even crypto news sites don't write about you in this field, I think it's fair to say you might need to rethink your approach to PR.

I cancelled the ION lottery first draw as did not want ppl to lose too many ION on entry, over a quarter of the 1000 tickets sold tho (in two days since site launch) so that is good and showed interest, there were some late entries I did not add too (All on public spreadsheet). I have refunded everyone with a 100% bonus is coins for ticket purchases so they are all winners. The ION lottery is being redesigned with a smaller pot so better chance to win and also an improved ticket choosing system. Thanks for noticing and stay posted for updates  Grin http://ionlottery.net
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Do you have any proof to back up your statements? Otherwise it's just false words.

I have no clue who suchmoon or owlcatz is. I don't collude with anyone as much as you'd like that conspiracy theory to hold true. These are my own thoughts and opinions. If you don't agree, I could care less. Don't comment then. If you feel the need to (you like the world to rotate around you, that is glaringly obvious), kindly fuck off.

Progress is being made. Addresses are being released, which is a good thing. WildShark is starting to explain things. Then you come in and write a ramble about some crypto mafia out to destroy everything.

And as usual...you can go fuck yourself you rambling moron.  You never answered my questions I posed to you several pages back. It's probably deleted as ou reported it off topic as you didn't like what it said.

Don't bother, keep him on ignore, and move on. Several have tried to make sense or befriend him in some way.
Go look at his stuff from a year ago and what I've personally posted when he PM'ed me. He will attempt to make up some dumb shit and derail the conversation. He's never given vital or interesting conversation about GAW/ION. Every time someone engages him, we a page or so going nowhere.

Just scroll past him.
Even when he replies to this.
Just move on and ignore is the best.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
WTF cares if wildy is replying questions addressed to the team? => says if nobody of ION team is here to explain you anything.

Wildy came here to share info, rdewilde does the same. Now you moron, try to fock yourself and give yourself negative rating for trying to inform retards like you. This is not opinion, it is fact and the proof are your own statements which makes you from wisdom point of view, to some real cryptobutt => last place of importance in crypto.

I hope such smart guy like you enjoys explanations like "=>" because your level of understanding is lower than Ganza's level of success.

legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
Do you have any proof to back up your statements? Otherwise it's just false words.

I have no clue who suchmoon or owlcatz is. I don't collude with anyone as much as you'd like that conspiracy theory to hold true. These are my own thoughts and opinions. If you don't agree, I could care less. Don't comment then. If you feel the need to (you like the world to rotate around you, that is glaringly obvious), kindly fuck off.

Progress is being made. Addresses are being released, which is a good thing. WildShark is starting to explain things. Then you come in and write a ramble about some crypto mafia out to destroy everything.

And as usual...you can go fuck yourself you rambling moron.  You never answered my questions I posed to you several pages back. It's probably deleted as ou reported it off topic as you didn't like what it said.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
They have most active community members shilling for them, as example suchmoon, cryptobutt or owlcats, all gangbang gang members do shill for them. Who reads >100 pages? Nobody, their intention is to get as many investors to ION where they are saying a lot of bad things about everything else, just not about them or ion. Coincidence? No, it isn't, gangbang gang members are the roots of ION community, they were Ganza investors too until Ganza left them in rain. However, ganza wife implanted some boobs instead of brains, that is btw the reason why some call themself super duper ultra mega hackerzz, lulz Smiley to be correct.

(huh Smiley, hope you smile now because of the last preceding paragraph)

Senior members or even higher know these trolls very well and the only who should read this thread is some newbie Smiley and this newbie is teached to ask hunderds of stupid questions without to behave.

At least suchmoon and pixelpowered seem to have switched some grey cells on, dont know about suchmoon, but pixelpowered for sure.

Everything has 2 sides, what some try to present here in this thread is the worst of their imagination and it sucks, not because they loose their free time on such BS, no, it sucks because they disgrace cryptocommunity and community of bitcointalk which turns always more and more to pure altcoin scammers and instead to help each other on creating usefull projects around blockchain, they try to steal and kick each other. More and more people left bitcointalk or were forced to leave bitcointalk, it is mainly because such trolls like in this thread but more because of administration and moderation who turned pretty blind by questionable, very questionable decisions.

Some who are able could always offer some help, those who cant contribute anything will stay biggest critics here. Suchmoon and co asks for txid's where in the same thread they did not post any, neither they are asking for it. Logical conclusion would be, everything bad that they say about all ION invstors fits actually 100% to themself.

Now this is for me without any logic: scammers and spammers acuse another people in spamming and scamming. Dont know about others, but in most cases there are 3 options, A) jeleaous B) Greddy C) Dumb and dumber.

Why dont you bunch of trolls create your own troll project and try to make something usefull, even if you threat scamming as usefull, you first need to be able to scam someone to gain trust. Who should we trust now? Should we give any weight to your conclusion if they are so one sided and partially stupid? I would suggest to ban you trolls, clean this and other threads and give some honest people a chance to enter cryptocommunity without negative ratings, mobbing, silencing, verbal harrasment, doxxing, identity theft ... (and some other things that these trolls in this thread do/support).

I got, nobody of you even realizes to do mistakes, but you are from Ganza's community and probably even him does not think he has done something wrong. See, there is so much similarity with you boys and girls, ignoring them will not change the facts.

So, when is Gravity gonna be released?

I don't care how loyal of a supporter of team ION you are, some chaps have to be getting frustrated.

We are talking about a group of people who stuck with XPY for more than a year after it was obvious to everyone else that it's dead.

They'll stick with ION until the "team" runs out of cash and invents some new trinkets.

You know how over time we watched GAW claim members? There were less... a lot less.
Another project like StakeMiners claimed the same. After I dug into them through Nigel. We all learned not even the "team" they claimed in charge was found hollow full of ghosts.
I feel the same could be imagined for this shit-show. Less developers or personal and members than claimed.

I also can imagine ION dying the same way XPY did through inflation.


In terms of 'membership', I think it's already pretty clear that they don't really have much of an active community. If slack and/or iontalk (the unofficial forum) is a measure of pure membership, there's only at most I'd say 25-30 active contributors to discussion. That's at absolute most. Mostly it's 10-20 regular users on the slack. Granted they have more registered users on the slack channel, but even that's only around the 200 ish mark I think, and I'd be willing to wager a large proportion of those were one time sign ups out of curiosity when the coin/project launched who haven't dipped back in again. As another measure of community activity and engagement, Krumz just this week had to cancel a 'lottery' site he had started just after its launch due to lack of interest.

I've heard various numbers for the amount of staking accounts on the 'ionomy platform' that have been bandied about. I think the last I heard was in the thousands, but it's unclear if that represents individual accounts or number of stakers or what. Again, since at the moment nothing can be done with 'ions' anyway, I'd be willing to bet that at least a chunk of those staking accounts have been forgotten about by their owners due to the projects perceived inactivity.

We don't really know much about the 'team' side of things as they appear to like keeping details very closely guarded, but it was mentioned that they've had to hire additional dev(s) to help build out various features relating to the API for the ionomy platform.

What's really clear though is that this is very much a project with really limited reach at this stage. It has a tiny community, and no one outside of prior GAW investors who transferred over XPY is even aware of its existence; it's telling that even in the pre-ICO launch no major crypto journalism sites (and I use the term journalism very loosely here as they're mostly just glorified blogs/paid article sites) picked up and reported on the launch. When even crypto news sites don't write about you in this field, I think it's fair to say you might need to rethink your approach to PR.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 254
So gravity out yet?

Whens the next game?

Do we start the 1 month counter?
full member
Activity: 214
Merit: 113
In terms of 'membership', I think it's already pretty clear that they don't really have much of an active community. If slack and/or iontalk (the unofficial forum) is a measure of pure membership, there's only at most I'd say 25-30 active contributors to discussion. That's at absolute most. Mostly it's 10-20 regular users on the slack. Granted they have more registered users on the slack channel, but even that's only around the 200 ish mark I think, and I'd be willing to wager a large proportion of those were one time sign ups out of curiosity when the coin/project launched who haven't dipped back in again. As another measure of community activity and engagement, Krumz just this week had to cancel a 'lottery' site he had started just after its launch due to lack of interest.

I've heard various numbers for the amount of staking accounts on the 'ionomy platform' that have been bandied about. I think the last I heard was in the thousands, but it's unclear if that represents individual accounts or number of stakers or what. Again, since at the moment nothing can be done with 'ions' anyway, I'd be willing to bet that at least a chunk of those staking accounts have been forgotten about by their owners due to the projects perceived inactivity.

We don't really know much about the 'team' side of things as they appear to like keeping details very closely guarded, but it was mentioned that they've had to hire additional dev(s) to help build out various features relating to the API for the ionomy platform.

What's really clear though is that this is very much a project with really limited reach at this stage. It has a tiny community, and no one outside of prior GAW investors who transferred over XPY is even aware of its existence; it's telling that even in the pre-ICO launch no major crypto journalism sites (and I use the term journalism very loosely here as they're mostly just glorified blogs/paid article sites) picked up and reported on the launch. When even crypto news sites don't write about you in this field, I think it's fair to say you might need to rethink your approach to PR.

When they rebranded xpy.io into ionomy.com did the users create new usernames/passwords or did they migrate automatically? I don't know about thousands but they could have a few hundred users that were roped in with lofty promises to rescue XPY back in 2015 and most of those probably moved on long ago.

I wish I could remember, and sadly I can't find any screenshots/archives back to then, but I think if memory serves they had to create new logins on the new 'platform' by a specific date to be migrated over? I may be completely wrong there. Either way I figure probably a significant portion of those users transferred over because there really wasn't much choice, but still aren't 'active'.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
In terms of 'membership', I think it's already pretty clear that they don't really have much of an active community. If slack and/or iontalk (the unofficial forum) is a measure of pure membership, there's only at most I'd say 25-30 active contributors to discussion. That's at absolute most. Mostly it's 10-20 regular users on the slack. Granted they have more registered users on the slack channel, but even that's only around the 200 ish mark I think, and I'd be willing to wager a large proportion of those were one time sign ups out of curiosity when the coin/project launched who haven't dipped back in again. As another measure of community activity and engagement, Krumz just this week had to cancel a 'lottery' site he had started just after its launch due to lack of interest.

I've heard various numbers for the amount of staking accounts on the 'ionomy platform' that have been bandied about. I think the last I heard was in the thousands, but it's unclear if that represents individual accounts or number of stakers or what. Again, since at the moment nothing can be done with 'ions' anyway, I'd be willing to bet that at least a chunk of those staking accounts have been forgotten about by their owners due to the projects perceived inactivity.

We don't really know much about the 'team' side of things as they appear to like keeping details very closely guarded, but it was mentioned that they've had to hire additional dev(s) to help build out various features relating to the API for the ionomy platform.

What's really clear though is that this is very much a project with really limited reach at this stage. It has a tiny community, and no one outside of prior GAW investors who transferred over XPY is even aware of its existence; it's telling that even in the pre-ICO launch no major crypto journalism sites (and I use the term journalism very loosely here as they're mostly just glorified blogs/paid article sites) picked up and reported on the launch. When even crypto news sites don't write about you in this field, I think it's fair to say you might need to rethink your approach to PR.

When they rebranded xpy.io into ionomy.com did the users create new usernames/passwords or did they migrate automatically? I don't know about thousands but they could have a few hundred users that were roped in with lofty promises to rescue XPY back in 2015 and most of those probably moved on long ago.
full member
Activity: 214
Merit: 113
So, when is Gravity gonna be released?

I don't care how loyal of a supporter of team ION you are, some chaps have to be getting frustrated.

We are talking about a group of people who stuck with XPY for more than a year after it was obvious to everyone else that it's dead.

They'll stick with ION until the "team" runs out of cash and invents some new trinkets.

You know how over time we watched GAW claim members? There were less... a lot less.
Another project like StakeMiners claimed the same. After I dug into them through Nigel. We all learned not even the "team" they claimed in charge was found hollow full of ghosts.
I feel the same could be imagined for this shit-show. Less developers or personal and members than claimed.

I also can imagine ION dying the same way XPY did through inflation.


In terms of 'membership', I think it's already pretty clear that they don't really have much of an active community. If slack and/or iontalk (the unofficial forum) is a measure of pure membership, there's only at most I'd say 25-30 active contributors to discussion. That's at absolute most. Mostly it's 10-20 regular users on the slack. Granted they have more registered users on the slack channel, but even that's only around the 200 ish mark I think, and I'd be willing to wager a large proportion of those were one time sign ups out of curiosity when the coin/project launched who haven't dipped back in again. As another measure of community activity and engagement, Krumz just this week had to cancel a 'lottery' site he had started just after its launch due to lack of interest.

I've heard various numbers for the amount of staking accounts on the 'ionomy platform' that have been bandied about. I think the last I heard was in the thousands, but it's unclear if that represents individual accounts or number of stakers or what. Again, since at the moment nothing can be done with 'ions' anyway, I'd be willing to bet that at least a chunk of those staking accounts have been forgotten about by their owners due to the projects perceived inactivity.

We don't really know much about the 'team' side of things as they appear to like keeping details very closely guarded, but it was mentioned that they've had to hire additional dev(s) to help build out various features relating to the API for the ionomy platform.

What's really clear though is that this is very much a project with really limited reach at this stage. It has a tiny community, and no one outside of prior GAW investors who transferred over XPY is even aware of its existence; it's telling that even in the pre-ICO launch no major crypto journalism sites (and I use the term journalism very loosely here as they're mostly just glorified blogs/paid article sites) picked up and reported on the launch. When even crypto news sites don't write about you in this field, I think it's fair to say you might need to rethink your approach to PR.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
So, when is Gravity gonna be released?

I don't care how loyal of a supporter of team ION you are, some chaps have to be getting frustrated.

We are talking about a group of people who stuck with XPY for more than a year after it was obvious to everyone else that it's dead.

They'll stick with ION until the "team" runs out of cash and invents some new trinkets.

You know how over time we watched GAW claim members? There were less... a lot less.
Another project like StakeMiners claimed the same. After I dug into them through Nigel. We all learned not even the "team" they claimed in charge was found hollow full of ghosts.
I feel the same could be imagined for this shit-show. Less developers or personal and members than claimed.

I also can imagine ION dying the same way XPY did through inflation.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
So, when is Gravity gonna be released?

I don't care how loyal of a supporter of team ION you are, some chaps have to be getting frustrated.

We are talking about a group of people who stuck with XPY for more than a year after it was obvious to everyone else that it's dead.

They'll stick with ION until the "team" runs out of cash and invents some new trinkets.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
So, when is Gravity gonna be released?

I don't care how loyal of a supporter of team ION you are, some chaps have to be getting frustrated.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
If you didn't purchase your IONs at the ICO, Now is a good time to stock up on them... Pick up 20K IONs and invest in an ION masternode or for the small investors, buy a couple of Shares in a community masternode at https://ionnode.cf One share is currently a 50 ION investment of $7.50 dollars and is currently paying out approximately 1+ IONs per share per week. Looking for some "small fish" investors to fill the next masternode...

Here is some blockchain information for the last Community Node Payout for 16 Aug:
MN1 Payout (iYQmYLTngqQHeVQzf3nZdDSAYW1wMmD9qC) -  609.50101 IONs
MN2 Payout (iZiGkguV1JiFGCvyCKTPoWSikn5rDcT6Wg) - 517.500075 IONs
MN3 Payout (iiTsA1KMktJgmddiij8kADiak3LKBZyjm2) -  506.00153 IONs
MN4 Payout (iigQptDvFfiTgSiJz1qfJKqxrdzuyJ7jTR) -  540.500015 IONs
Total Payout -  2173.50263 IONs
Daily Average Masternode Reward - 77.62509392857143 IONs @ 15 cents =  $11.64 dollars
Minus 2% Pool Fee - 2130.0325774 IONs divided by 1612 shares =  1.321360159677419 IONs per Share


This payout was performed on Tuesday with MN1 being poped then and MN2-MN4 were poped on Monday. Payouts sent with approxamently 1730 ion distributed. Payouts this week were short due to an error in calculation of the pool fee. The Ionnode Team will compensate this in next weeks payout.

Actual Payout - 1730 IONs divided by 1612 shares = 1.073200992555831 IONs per Share

Let's talk about this: https://www.iontalk.net/t/community-node-payout-for-16-august/184

Why are you promoting a service that you are constantly bitching about?HuhHuh?

@CryptoBuds This data is being presented to show an accurate status of this week's payout to be transparent with block chain data to support my claim & calculations...

Join the Ionomy today and start earning a profit!!!

You make a post to show how the payments aren't accurate and why you are unhappy with it, then you say join the ionomy and start earning a profit. Why would I join something after you just proved they can't even handle payments correctly? Why would a person do that?
Jump to: