No, I don't agree. This thread is about ionomy. Matlack is involved in ionomy. Matlack was HEAVILY involved in the failure that is paycoin. I will repeat it over and over again in hopes that some newcomer who has never heard of paycoin knows exactly who they are getting into business with.
This thread is about ionomy -
Mattlack was heavily involved in the failure of paycoin [-] => only assumption => offtopic, has to do with an project called paycoin, GAW thread is an place where it is ontopic too. Where now??? One place please!
You will repeat it over and over
- => which will be over and over only assumtipon until proven and you will be over and over offtopic. If these guys would at least know how to moderate .... I assume your luck they dont
I have no troubles if you post it here, we only needed an clarification what is here ontopic and what is offtopic. Paycion/GAW is offtopic for me in this thread, for suchmoon ionomy is ontopic in GAW thread, why are you confused then?
That is certainly not an assumption. He is on record as saying he lost money to garza. He was a member of the paycoin foundation. he worked with Joe Mordica after it was known that the data center was fraudulent.
If you can't see how these things are relevant to Matlack's character and knowledge and how that impacts the viability of ION, that's fine, but it is most certainly on topic, and will be brought up by me.
Come on, don't jump from one point to another. You are misleaded to think that I do not see the point you are reffering too. I will help you, as thread creator fails by any meaning to take care of the thread.
Suchmoons signature has an great link:
BitcoinTalk rules:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unofficial-list-of-official-bitcointalkorg-rules-guidelines-faq-703657Did you ever look over there, I assume you did, you just do not care to follow them, you even do not want to try, correct?
This is for the thread creator:
1. No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads.If you create an thread, take care about it. If ionomy team never wanted to be represented here, why did you open this thread?2. No off-topic posts.If we do not agree, team bitcointalk can decide whatever they want. I do not plan to ask mods about it as I do not care.3. No trolling.Even me has to laugh about this one, but it is an rule, guess this one will be even harder to speak about if we can't agree on on-/offtopic question12. No duplicate posting in multiple boards (except for re-posting it in the local language boards if it's translated).suchmoon clearly stated that GAW thread is correct place for the accusations we discuss about, here is wrong23. When deciding if a user has broken the rules, the staff have the right to follow their interpretation of the rules.26. Local thread rules, if stated properly when the thread was started, specific enough and don't conflict with the forum rules, have to be followed.Ionomy thread creator did not define any, I assume this one can be ignored, just writing it for the case it is not32. Posting multiple posts in a rowI think this as edition would be usefull, as most here never read bitcointalk rules and now we have such discussions like what is ontopic and what is offtopic.
Q: Why haven't you banned who is an obvious scammer?A: Possible (or real, not for me to decide) scams are not moderated to prevent moderator abuse. If we start picking out which ones we call "scammers" and ban, we would make a lot of decisions based on biased opinions.
Q: Do you moderate/delete (possible) FUD, accusations and untrue information?A: No. We don't have enough time to check every single piece of information and verify the validity of the sources. Also, just like scams - too much room for bias and abuse.
However, trolling isn't allowed. If a user is habitually posting obviously false nonsense just to stir up trouble, then it's considered trolling, which is prohibited. Such cases should be thoroughly documented in the report though (There are tons of reports that just say "trolling", but moderators don't have time to look through each user's post).
Q: Someone insulted me. Why aren't you deleting his post/thread?A: Possible (since we don't have the time or resources to check) insults are also allowed as long as they contain any kind of constructive opinion, info or something else substantial and aren't off-topic. For example, posting something like "you are dumb" will be deleted as it contains no meaningful content. However, if the post is somehwere along the lines of "You are dumb. This is wrong because this website/thread/etc. has explained it's not right", it's in most cases accepted.
Q: What about deleting DOXes?A: Nope, we don't delete them either as long as they are on topic and the information can be obtained legally (no SSNs for example). Why? Because such doxing is just compiling information about a user already available publicly, often via search engines.
@suchmoon: thx for the update
?
, you don't need to go from one extreme to the other, I must admit to like you more now then before. Sarcasm is way better than low level trashtalk.
