Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 428. (Read 473177 times)

It was never stated anywhere that games would be available upon launch of the coin. But you seem to be very excited, you want everything on day one of the coin launch?

Yes, https://ionomy.com/about/roadmap

You are at step 2) while everyone else is still at 1), but your point is valid. No games, no utility, not worth "anything" (yet).

The rough start before the coin even launched just gives it more of the feel of a coin from the past. Not a good sign. Also, the fact they are launching a "gaming" coin with no games is not smart at all. This is the same situation as XPY, absolutely ZERO utility. Without the games, what is the point of ION?

The evidence of how poorly planned out this project is becomes more apparent every day. With no games the price is just gonna drop, and son the ICO investors will be screwed out of even more money.

Was it stated in the white paper that no games would be available upon launch? Was it stated anywhere in the ICO promotions that games for this "gaming" coin would not be available at launch? This all is super shady, but expected by this team of nice guys.

I have no feeling to discuss with you my investments, but to make you happy, no, I did not and I even do not have an account there currently. What about you?

You only seem not to understand, boy, I talked about bitcointalk rules and you and me and suchmoon and everybody should follow these rules and if you do not like them, open an thread and complain to moderation.

Exactly what you do is banned and there you have, an reason to ban you. You complain that I take it offtopic where I point you to the rules by asking not to go offtopic, you seem to have some broken logic in your head.

Same broken logic makes you breaking next rule of this wonderfull forum. Do you think I work for you or anybody else to report things on? lol, if, then I would do it for community and the way I do it not the way someone dictates me.

Why I am here? Because suchmoon was so wise to attack me for my opinion to stop harrasing bitcointalk members, suchmoon even opened an thread about this issue, which still not closed or renamed, suchmoons new thread is about misleading information and use it against other user (me) . Why? Because I expressed my opinion and top of that, it was missunderstood and flipped around. I am just here because so many people comaplained and were telling there are 9 trolls, bitcointalk is bad, no rules .... thats all not true, there are no 9 trolls, even suchmoon is also serious and nice in replies, I assume we just had an missunderstanding in an bitcointalk manner, I am good with it and it is forgotten.

But you continue to push confrontation , why? What is your goal? Do you think I will stop because you tell me to do so? I do not know, maybe it is really time to ask bitcointalk moderation who are you guys to exclude rules on you and to let you bash on every bitcointalk user, who are ie. you to do it?

---

I do not want to missunderstand. Do you invite me to post there or do you try to assume that me is bitgeek ?

EDIT: I think I got it, but do not understand then why do you link an message? If it is about closing it, then I would say it should have been done much earlier and it was correct to link it to GAW thread (just in case that you only wanted to listen to my opinion)

EDIT2: Maybe before you make another assumption, maybe you really could handle it out NP per PM with me, like I suggested you long time ago. I do not hide myself and have no troubles to tell you who I am. I though you know it, but you constantly repeat yourself with him/her. PM me and ask me what do you want to know before making such pointless accusations, btw why do you do this?

The only rule i break is posting multiple times in a row. I do that when I quote multiple posts at a time, and no mod has ever said anything because I don't have a sig campaign. I will refrain from doing that to keep your panties unbunched.

People have accused me of trolling before, for calling out scams that were obvious to me and all ended up being scams, so if that's why you quoted the rules, you are the one he is posting off topic, and you are keeping some excellent company like all the genius investors of successful companies like Neo and bee, Active Mining, GAW, BFL, and so on.

Back on topic.

Adam Matlack is a developer of ION. Adam Matlack either lost hundreds of thousands of dollars in Paycoin, or was heavily involved in the scam. In one situation he is too stupid to successfully run a coin, in the other he is too scummy. Invest at your own peril.

Rumor has it that the launch has been postponed.

While running a few masternodes to fulfill their staker obligations sounds ok-ish (if you ignore the whole idiocy of making coins out of thin air as an incentive to keep coins in a web wallet) it still doesn't explain how they're going to handle the mismatch between staker payouts and masternode revenue.

Masternodes produce a variable amount of coins, which depends on how many other masternodes are active. Stakers are paying a certain percentage (i.e. don't depend on how many other masternodes are active), which can be doubled by electrons.

So how would ionomists ensure than only the required amount of coins is generated? What if they don't make enough? What if they make too many? It's not just about the excess coins (they could say "we will not dump them" as an excuse). If they run more masternodes than needed then they're robbing other masternodes of their part of the stake.

I disagree with you. This thread has only with IoN to do and everything paycoin related is offtopic however you twist it. That these two stories have commons or anything like that, is not making an ontopic of it. Actually announcements on bitcointalk should include mainly technical information and not be pretty.

Thats why I said, someone could open an thread, "Was A. M. involved in Paycoins launch or not". Then all discussion that has with that title would be there offtopic.

I never claimed one or the other thing, why do you ask me if it is good enough for me? Your assumption is not good enough for me to be an proof, it is just assumption which I did not deny or discuss. Do you agree?

How much money was spent, who payed what, .... probably you could ask the court to publish some informtaion that is not confident, but I am sure all cases against ganza do have some specific numbers.

The last that does not tell me that he is involved in paycoins launch is, he sues ganza and he went to the court where I do not see investigations agains Adam which should be there for sure if he is involved. But on the other side I have same dillema about Joe, why isn't anybody investigating about him and his contribution, what actual status of the lawsuit? Joe provides info and thats how he gets out clean, WTF, isn't it? But this is happening for real and your warnings here have much less effect than it would have if you warn/talk to correct people about it => court => judge => lawyers.

I hope you understand why I say assumption. The same is for @madness, if you have information that you can publish that will prove your words, please post it. If not, please say that you do assume and do not know.

well he just was not. so, your information source is just wrong. maybe just point us to your information source as you just passing on incorrect information.

I retract my statement that Matt Eden is a part of ION. I miss read the link. But looking that link over it does look glaringly obvious that Matlack was involved in the planning of XPY. That should be very worrisome.

CryptoBuds; i'm almost sure I read Team ION saying that the masternode(s) to fund the Ionomy platform stakers are the first to be on the network. The funds for the masternode are lend by the staker-investments, maybe that means what you say Team ION doesnt own the masternode, but it's grey area. Where did you get the info that Team ION will not own any masternodes? Sounds a little bit strange to me.

It's very obvious that you don't like how the discussion in this thread turned out to be, but I can assure you it's fine. You are probably used to heavily censored forums such as Hashtalk, where only the voices of shills and scammers counted. Bitcointalk is not like that. When we see an intransparent, shady altcoin operation such as ION, set up by people who either fell for a scam (Paycoin) or were part of that scam themselves, we talk about it. This is normal, it's what the altcoin section of Bitcointalk is here for, and hopefully we can keep people from throwing their money into this ION garbage.

Aaaaaaahh okkkkkk ....... Richard Nelson ........
But ? Wait ? Yes, I'm not wrong !! 

Thread should be closed if the one who opened does not care, read rule nr.1 please, we may disagree, but that's my opinion, without any connection to anything else then this forum. This does not mean that it can't be continued in an another place, like GAW thread which it clearly fits better in if I look at current discussion.

I hope there is no more need to go offtopic.

Now again an stupid assumption , @suchmoon please confirm that you mean exactly what is stated by Phildo, lol. You assume that I am payed  , I am waiting for your evidence IamSoMrSmart

What about you? Payed by or anybody to post anything? Anywhere? What about you investing into xpy, did you invest ? How much did you loose? What about ion? You deny to answer if you have an account or not, even not if you invested into ion, did you?