Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 431. (Read 473126 times)

Dude, you're awesome! I think we are gonna be great friends!

Why would I want to ignore you? I'd miss out on your your fantastic posts! If there was a follow button, you'd be my first!

I am paid by one of those three, yes. But I'm not gonna tell you which one, I want you to guess!

While running a few masternodes to fulfill their staker obligations sounds ok-ish (if you ignore the whole idiocy of making coins out of thin air as an incentive to keep coins in a web wallet) it still doesn't explain how they're going to handle the mismatch between staker payouts and masternode revenue.

Masternodes produce a variable amount of coins, which depends on how many other masternodes are active. Stakers are paying a certain percentage (i.e. don't depend on how many other masternodes are active), which can be doubled by electrons.

So how would ionomists ensure than only the required amount of coins is generated? What if they don't make enough? What if they make too many? It's not just about the excess coins (they could say "we will not dump them" as an excuse). If they run more masternodes than needed then they're robbing other masternodes of their part of the stake.

Yep it's sure

Yes, I really hope for them they do, especially ganza.

I'm pretty sure Team ION reads everything here. Josh Garza read the GAW/Paycoin thread on Bitcointalk, too.

Why don't you click then on this nice ignore button if you do not like to read what I write? I was polite to you in any way by talking to you and explaning you something, you are still an jerk going for confrontation. Your fockin language and the way you talk makes of you only an fockin methal unstable person which nobody wants to discuss with. And you wonder why they dont come to talk to you? It is simple, you can't talk, you can only fock around and annoy others by your frustration, whatever it caused, I dont care.

I am not an police at all, you guys just dont like if people don't let some freaks like you to bash all the time, you can loose your free time like you currently do, you are with this 0 help to prevent scam, if IoN scam, then you are currently one of the people that makes biggest promotion for them. Are you payed by Joe, Allan or Ganza to make false negative statements, kinda bad publicity? Are you with them under the hood?

So is it safe to assume that the "electrification" of stakers will pull coins from a Masternode controlled by the ION team?

If so, what happens to the coins the Masternodes produce when a staker isn't electrified? Do they get burned?

Has a cold storage address be issued for the holding of the bounty coins?

How is the team paying themselves? From the pre mine?

Adam is too big of a chicken shit to come on here and talk about his own project, so implying that Adam is not here to defend himself is very quite laughable.

You know boki, I kinda like you. Your logic is like none other that I have seen before.

I am very sorry, I didn't know you were the ION thread police. My apologies again. I didn't know that I had to agree with your points or listen to what you say, but that's ok, I now know I must listen to boki, the master of the IOn thread.

If you don't like it, fuckingn block me you annoyin prick. Just for you I am gonna keep shouting and shouting and shouting. If you don't like what I have to say, ignore it.

Sure, I only hope you will do it way better than you did when you dreamed about adam by posting "his" pic. Lol, are you sure that you speak about adam, not joe? Just asking, maybe you are still confused.

Historical facts or not, if you talk to something that was connected to one project, it is offtopic to discuss is in another project.

Can you define what offtopic is and what ontopic is. We can use bitcointalks rules as an start, I think this is the way of how we could agree on what on and what offtopic is. I think this all is ontopic in GAW thread where suchmoon stated so. Why do you spread information everywhere, why dont you concentrate in one thread? Of course it is offtopic here, or do you think we need for every thread 100 copies of it ?

And as last, you only discuss with yourself and neither joe nor adam are here to reply/defend themself.

ION is lead by the team that ran XPY.io. Paycoins of XPY.io users (and other paycoin holders) were "exchanged" into ION. Adam Matlack, one of the leaders of ION, worked with GAW's CTO Joe Mordica, who lied to the public about a mining farm that did not exist. These are historical facts and they are very much on topic here -  I understand that you would rather have them forgotten, but I don't see this happening. The ION blockchain will be watched thoroughly for any shady Paycoin style attempts to scam more money out of gullible cryptocurrency newbies. Lies, deception and intransparency will be reported on. The Paycoin stink will not wash off of ION easily. So behave. Crying for censorship makes you look even more suspicious.

I do not see anybody who asks you to remove it, nor complains. I only took time to explain why I disagree with you. You sound frustrated twisting the meaning. First of all, people should decide with their head not listening what people say, even if they listen, they still have to decide. If your way of !!!WARNING!!! the people would have worked, then we wouldn't see $ 500K being posted. How did you save everybody if everbody is scared to say or ask anything that is opposite of your opinion. You use only assumptions and you never miss an opportunity to be loud or bash someone, no matter who it is. Still, Ganza is even not in jail, how's that if you are in everything correct that you assume?

Main mistake is that you think it is ok if you are loud and bash on everybody, it isn't my friend, I would like to build my own opinion, which of course would take in mind all of your accusations.

well, that's a start, i see you are coming around, won't be long before you splurge and get your own masternode :-)

Gotcha!

Ok folks. Any of team IOns potential involvement with the old Paycoin scam is irrelevant. We should not worry about their pasts and just trust what they say now. Follow this advice and your purple rocket will go to the moon. Don't worry if they may have been previously part of a scam (Mordica) and said scammer is a business partner with the leader of ION. That doesn't matter. What matters is that they are nice guys. That's all.

And I never stated "fact", I prefaced with "I believe", same thing as assumption.

I disagree with you. This thread has only with IoN to do and everything paycoin related is offtopic however you twist it. That these two stories have commons or anything like that, is not making an ontopic of it. Actually announcements on bitcointalk should include mainly technical information and not be pretty.

Thats why I said, someone could open an thread, "Was A. M. involved in Paycoins launch or not". Then all discussion that has with that title would be there offtopic.

I never claimed one or the other thing, why do you ask me if it is good enough for me? Your assumption is not good enough for me to be an proof, it is just assumption which I did not deny or discuss. Do you agree?

How much money was spent, who payed what, .... probably you could ask the court to publish some informtaion that is not confident, but I am sure all cases against ganza do have some specific numbers.

The last that does not tell me that he is involved in paycoins launch is, he sues ganza and he went to the court where I do not see investigations agains Adam which should be there for sure if he is involved. But on the other side I have same dillema about Joe, why isn't anybody investigating about him and his contribution, what actual status of the lawsuit? Joe provides info and thats how he gets out clean, WTF, isn't it? But this is happening for real and your warnings here have much less effect than it would have if you warn/talk to correct people about it => court => judge => lawyers.

I hope you understand why I say assumption. The same is for @madness, if you have information that you can publish that will prove your words, please post it. If not, please say that you do assume and do not know.

It definitely isn't off topic. How is Matlack involvement with early Paycoin no relevant? Second, is there blockchain proof that Adam did indeed make those purchases through GAW? Or is him saying what he says good enough for you?

Thanks for the reply, you must be connected to the ION team with that answer.

Anyway, the reason I can believe that he was involved at the beginning of Paycoin is the fact that he is business partners with Joe Mordica. The same guy that ran the data center with fake miners. Garzas #2 guy. The same Garza that "stole" Matlacks large sum of money. Why would you go into business with a person that was so instrumental to your ~$500,000 scam loss?

Did Adam ever provide blockchain proof of his purchases with GAW or was that conveniently off blockchain as well?

Is stated that I believe it is possible for Matlack to have been involved at the beginning of Paycoin. You then stated I lied but didn't explain why except for "well he's just not".

Maybe someone should open an thread about it , suchmoon, what do you say, is it an thread worth? I bet it is

You both ask each other for proof, to proof that the other one lied. Now I would like to see proof of both of you if you continue this useless "prove me" thing.

Beside that it is offtopic, but thread creater seems not to be very experienced

What was Adams involvement in the launch except that he invested 6 numbers? You can bring up this meeting that they had, an lunch. Would be an lunch really proof? Come on, you need something better and I hope this lunch was not your proof.

well he just was not. so, your information source is just wrong. maybe just point us to your information source as you just passing on incorrect information.

You are correct in this, though in Cryptobuds defence the timeline and group names for all of these different entities can be very confusing unless you've been following the GAW/XPY saga since the beginning.

I find it more concerning that Matlack was/still is employed as partner with one of the other rather more culpable ex-GAW employees at Shinner's Prestige Auditing outfit, myself. Does it mean anything? Maybe not. But it's something to bear in mind.