Topic: [ANN] Iridium (IRD) - People are Power - Community build crypto - page 55. (Read 149821 times)

Why not? is it difficult to release? or is it not necessary in your opinion?

No

Heya guys any plan for implement of masternodes?

Yes it's better to keep hash power decentralised and by the way there are 3 pools ( not 2). You won't earn more or less, just the payments frequency will change.

About the payments bottleneck :

https://ird.uvac.fr send payments with a mixin level 5 and send at 3 addresses max at one time. That mean transactions are untraceable. Furthermore, the pool frontend is backed by ssl (https only) and there is a ssl mining port : your confidentiality is preserved (like monero).

https://irdpool.de send payments with a mixin level 1 and at 2 addresses max at one time and frontend is backed by ssl (https) : you get little privacy but your transactions can be traceable.

http://irdpool.tk send payments with a mixin level 0 and at one address at time, frontend is not encrypted : everyone looking for a little can get informations on each wallets.

But, the counterpart of a higher mixin an max addresses at time is the block size has to be bigger, so sent errors like MixIn count is too big occurs more frequently. Furthermore, max amount of payments can't be very high (less than with no mixin/address) because the block who can handle thoses transaction has to be bigger...

So in the case of ird.uvac.fr, payments are checked every 30 seconds and it get failed payments send attempts until a block is big enough to hold the TXs.
For the user, it delay the payment from 30 secondes minimum to 1 or 2 minutes : it's transparent.

Back to payments bottleneck business :

The problem of a big hashrate for one user is the balance increase fast and if some payments are delayed, there is a point where the balance is too big to be sent. I had the problem with a user : his balance was at 4,8k ! in this case, I have to do manual payments and it's really a pain...

But (and this is the last one ) doing this "force" the average block size to grow, and the bigger is this average, the bigger "big" transactions can be allowed, so I think it's better for the network to have this approach. For the privacy purpose : Everyone sees noon at his door...

I think he's saying it will be better for the pools and network, and less likely to cause you to get stuck payments.  It's better and safer to spread your rigs out.  You won't earn more, but you also won't earn less.  You will earn about the same, but you will help the network grow.

Yes of course, more pools more coins, it's simple math.

What do you mean, i can earn more coin if i mine on 2 pools ?

Can you give me some ? It can be useful for the testnet. 
By the way, 20kH/s on the same pool is bad because it makes bottlenecks for payements.
so if you've got 3 rigs, hope you point one on each pools

I heard dev said had planned to list on the exchange.
It has been a time, but I have not seen the information yet

I have 20% of the Hash power with 3 Rigs, it is insane !  

We need more miners guys, The name is good, the logo is good, wallet works perfectly.

All we need your support.

Mining is open ! Just read the first post.

Hi Dev, first I want to praise the project logo that you make it very good and inspirational. I just saw this post, I think this is a very good project. Is there any chance to mine again?

Haha, your guy same to me, my last mining is 18 Oct 2017, I start to mine it when it first launch. My wallet now have around >20K IRD only, so hope the price not so low when it list on the exchange, $1 should be fine 

So am I :-)

Dev said that he's waiting to be sure there are no issuses before listing.
Lets just wait.
I'm waiting 2 months already. ^_^
Last mined coins 17 Oct 2017.

Dear dev, need Exchange
https://coinsmarkets.com https://tradesatoshi.com/ https://www.southxchange.com/ https://novaexchange.com https://stocks.exchange/trade

sorry, it was a glitch, I deleted unnecessary posts

Ok guys, i am switching all my Rigs on Iridium. Lets revive this project !

No no, HF has fail :-)
but the good news is I found the problem and fix it : At this time, pool, core, wallets and miners are running heavy tests on testnet. I simulate a hard fork and it run smooth. I need to do further tests on the gui wallet and look at the new difficulty adjustment algorithm comportement.

A new hard fork attempt will be scheduled when I'm shure everything will be ok but It's on a good way.

There is no need to create a new thread, Yet. Unless the community wants to have a re-launch, but that is something that needs to be discussed. I have been away for a few days, but I am back now and it looks like the HF has done well and SteveBrush has been busting his ass getting everything updated. Y'all should be thanking him.. A LOT

I am waiting to make sure we don't have any issues before we join an exchange. Best thing to do right now is to send and receive as much IRD as you can. Test that network!