seems like too much trouble…
this all sounds very interesting. however, I don’t understand why do we need a coal-backed token?
Topic: [ANN] Karvuon – More Power for the Blockchain Industry - page 48. (Read 6561 times)
seems like too much trouble…
this all sounds very interesting. however, I don’t understand why do we need a coal-backed token?
The idea is not really great ... very relevant at the moment. unfortunately, it will only be available in a very small number of regions. Since it has been said here more than once, the climate still fails (
in Mongolia it cannot fail cos the climate is super warm there I don’t get it: they say they want to mine on green energy but they have a lot of coal and they will use it also. What’s the point in all of this?
It seems like they are too much into profits..sad though.
Why did they choose Ethereum?
can anybody explain whats Karvuon’s Industrial Park?
why do they need so much money anyway?
Did you know that "Karvuon" means Carbon in ancient Greek? But I still can't get why did they choose this name.
I think Karvuon team members made a lot of work analyzing how to launch their future power plants and farms. I appreciate it.
The idea is not really great ... very relevant at the moment. unfortunately, it will only be available in a very small number of regions. Since it has been said here more than once, the climate still fails (
The idea is not really great ... very relevant at the moment. unfortunately, it will only be available in a very small number of regions. Since it has been said here more than once, the climate still fails (
A station with a capacity of 30 kilowatts produces an average of 30,000 kW of energy per year. The most profitable month July is (4200 kW), nominal output in December is (900 kW). Draw up a contract taking into account the commission, say 500 kW per month + unspent energy, until the full cost of the station. After repayment of 10% per annum.
Mongolia is actually a great choice. the only thing that prevents this area from developing is the lack of funds.A station with a capacity of 30 kilowatts produces an average of 30,000 kW of energy per year. The most profitable month July is (4200 kW), nominal output in December is (900 kW). Draw up a contract taking into account the commission, say 500 kW per month + unspent energy, until the full cost of the station. After repayment of 10% per annum.
Mongolia is actually a great choice. the only thing that prevents this area from developing is the lack of funds.
A station with a capacity of 30 kilowatts produces an average of 30,000 kW of energy per year. The most profitable month July is (4200 kW), nominal output in December is (900 kW). Draw up a contract taking into account the commission, say 500 kW per month + unspent energy, until the full cost of the station. After repayment of 10% per annum.
A very urgent topic, such a solution is very good. The only interesting thing is that in the summer there is a good output of energy.
the project can also fix the number of kilowatts taken on dividends, not as a percentage, but as a clear figure. P.S. this is just an advice.
A very urgent topic, such a solution is very good. The only interesting thing is that in the summer there is a good output of energy.
there are already tones of similar projects.. many of them successfully entered the market and took their positions long ago. I think the project will not survive anyway
Do you have any proof that this is a scam?there are already tones of similar projects.. many of them successfully entered the market and took their positions long ago. I think the project will not survive anyway
Do you have any proof that this is a scam?there are already tones of similar projects.. many of them successfully entered the market and took their positions long ago. I think the project will not survive anyway
Do you have any proof that this is a scam? there are already tones of similar projects.. many of them successfully entered the market and took their positions long ago. I think the project will not survive anyway
calm down. its just the start.
there are already tones of similar projects.. many of them successfully entered the market and took their positions long ago. I think the project will not survive anyway
25% bonus token for the initial investors!!! that’s pretty generous
seems like too much trouble…
this all sounds very interesting. however, I don’t understand why do we need a coal-backed token?
coal has a bigger capacity factor.this all sounds very interesting. however, I don’t understand why do we need a coal-backed token?
Jump to: