Topic: [ANN] [MINT] Mintcoin (POS / 5%) [NO ICO] [Fair distro, community maintained] - page 405. (Read 1369778 times)

no, there are not any successfully minted blocks that correspond to that transaction and that value.  and this transactions that are not shows in my wallet are only a part.


I am so sad, and if I will not receive the stake, I will sell it, so I can find another coin to play.


thanks.

So there are no orphans which correspond to that transaction with a value of 644.805479? Are there any successfully minted blocks that correspond to that transaction and that value?

Also, have you upgraded to wallet v1.7 yet?
I've noticed that only three of my orphan blocks are showing up in my transaction history now (the three shown at the top of my wallet in the screenshot).

Also, do not worry about orphaned blocks, the coins which are put to stake for an orphan block do not lose their coinage so although you do not receive any minted coins from the orphaned block the coins you staked will be restaked with greater coinage until they generate a minted block.

Best regards,
I may be a little slow to respond now as I have to step away from my computer. Hopefully somebody else can help you out soon enough.

yes, you understand the problem, you are right, my wallet only have show two the minted orphan,and the number of mintcoin is not the highlighted transactions. that is to say, there are many transactions(the minted orphan) which are not shown in my wallet. and the fact is the same.

and I have not receive the stake of mintcoin for about ten days, but at the begin, I have receive the stake, suddenly it can not, I do not know the reason.

thanks.

I always find it easier to get an answer to a question on the Reddit subforum:  http://www.reddit.com/r/MintCoin/

A lot less noise, and many questions have already been answered. Check it out.

Should probably wait for somebody more technical to respond, but I will give it a go for now.

It appears these transactions look a lot like how my minted blocks look (same input address as output addresses). Here is one of your transactions: https://i.imgur.com/0NH8dgn.png

and here is one of mine that corresponds to a minted block that was orphaned: https://i.imgur.com/E7DWU4g.png
my wallet showing the minted orphan block: https://i.imgur.com/FSskfH6.png

As you can see, the output values listed for the transaction (in my case 53152.23 and 53152.232011) do not match the actual amount that was being minted on the block (1199.115068). If you look at the total in: 105105.346943 and total out: 106304.462011, the difference between these values (1199.115068) is the amount that was being minted in that block (also the same value as the "fee"). Is it possible that you have a minted (orphan or not) block that corresponds to these transactions? The amount would be 644.805479 for the transaction of yours that I show above.

Sorry if I did not understand the problem/question correctly :/

Edit: Also, the two transactions/blocks you have highlighted are actually the same transaction/block it looks like.
So it looks like you should have either a successfully minted block or an orphaned block with a value of 644.805479

Please help me, plese help me. thanks.


   I have a problem about the stake of mintcoin. My wallet can not have the stake for about ten days.
 
  
   I have check the address at:http://mint.blockx.info/get/address/MqZLAkhN6gK6LAyt4ULB1kK9HnYWAdrkVi
 
   it is as follows:
   Transaction   Block   Approx. Time   Amount   Balance   Currency
09345e1997...   66289   2014-03-01 03:25:35   399999.8   399999.8   MINT
663594885d...   81412   2014-03-04 14:43:14   10000   409999.8   MINT
d5dec03664...   84456   2014-03-05 07:49:20   100000   509999.8   MINT
cbded89d57...   86590   2014-03-05 19:32:14   50000   559999.8   MINT
22eb78c47b...   94129   2014-03-07 13:42:51   0.9366   560000.7366   MINT
a3bb34b9e0...   94236   2014-03-07 14:16:33   525111   1085111.7366   MINT
a055188cc6...   133102   2014-03-16 14:08:01   4.5038   1085116.2404   MINT
2a920185f6...   158096   2014-03-22 08:43:07   202325.48   1287441.7204   MINT
2a920185f6...   158096   2014-03-22 08:43:07   202325.481643   1489767.202043   MINT
2a920185f6...   158096   2014-03-22 08:43:07   (399999.   1089767.402043   MINT
b107cafd30...   176130   2014-03-26 12:15:27   50580.4   1140347.802043   MINT
b107cafd30...   176130   2014-03-26 12:15:27   50580.418082   1190928.220125   MINT
b107cafd30...   176130   2014-03-26 12:15:27   (100000)   1090928.220125   MINT
17d1d374ca...   181869   2014-03-27 20:06:46   265467.95   1356396.170125   MINT
17d1d374ca...   181869   2014-03-27 20:06:46   265467.955205   1621864.12533   MINT
17d1d374ca...   181869   2014-03-27 20:06:46   (525111)   1096753.12533   MINT
fdf7e6e3f0...   183481   2014-03-28 02:23:21   5064.35   1101817.47533   MINT
fdf7e6e3f0...   183481   2014-03-28 02:23:21   5064.350821   1106881.826151   MINT
fdf7e6e3f0...   183481   2014-03-28 02:23:21   (10000)   1096881.826151   MINT
fbe49950af...   188795   2014-03-29 08:23:07   25322.4   1122204.226151   MINT
fbe49950af...   188795   2014-03-29 08:23:07   25322.405479   1147526.63163   MINT
fbe49950af...   188795   2014-03-29 08:23:07   (50000)   1097526.63163   MINT

  you see the red line, it shows the transactions, but when I chick the hash, it shows:
  Outputs
Index   Redeemed at input   Amount   To address   ScriptPubKey
0   Not yet redeemed   0   Unknown   
1   Not yet redeemed   25322.4   MqZLAkhN6gK6LAyt4ULB1kK9HnYWAdrkVi   33:0232...50a0 CHECKSIG
2   Not yet redeemed   25322.405479   MqZLAkhN6gK6LAyt4ULB1kK9HnYWAdrkVi   33:0232...50a0 CHECKSIG
 
   it says that the transactions are redeemed, and my wallet do not show the transactions.
 
   I want to know what happened to my wallet, I have not received the stake for about ten days. I am a lover of mintcoin, but now  I am so sad.
 
  
  Please help me.
 
  thanks.

Thanks, buddy! You too!

ha ha not on your radar? why are you here?

Ok then, I'll stay out and let you guys do whatever it is you are doing. Please do the same for the BlackCoin thread (Sockpuppets included)

P.S. Good luck guys!

Why are you here? To start another mud-fight now that the last has died down? Really, can you guys stop spamming this thread already...  I have some blackcoin, I have some mintcoins. Looks like I will win either way. The reason I stick with the MintCoin community is because we aren't a bunch of mercenaries and because in addition to profits we are working towards goals for the greater good.

Stir the pot? really is that what you call all this. We both know what you guys have been up to. Not just stirring but blending. The funny thing is that BC is very easy to manipulate and sometimes people are even easier. Right?

I didn't add nodes either...doing fine. If people want to add nodes they can find them here:  http://www.reddit.com/r/MintCoin/comments/22awns/please_upgrade_to_17_asap/

+1. Does the .conf need to be edited? I'm a bit confused about the adding nodes part, myself. I haven't added any additional nodes and I've been minting fine.

That's the easy way imo

"You still hadn't even decided if there was an issue at the time."
If by you, you mean the members of the community who are non-technical yet vocal like myself then you are correct. But the dev was already working on it at this time. Like I said before, if nobody had posted in the Mint thread then nobody would have been jumping to conclusions, pointing fingers, or acting like it wasn't a problem because it would have simply been quietly fixed and addressed after the problem was fixed (which is how the whole thing SHOULD have been handled. The dev should have been the only person contacted. I still think it was wrong for people from BC to spread the issue as much as they did, if there is a potential security flaw the last thing you want is to tell everybody so they can freak out about it or try to take advantage of it when it was as easy of a fix as it was).

"All I asked for was more transparency, or more leadership involvment"
I am not the person to provide this as I am not involved on that level, and nobody is obligated to do so. It might help cause some preemptive "hype" in the short term, but how does telling people what is happening before it actually happens going to benefit anybody in the long run? It only provides an opportunity for the idea to be stolen or kicked into the dirt. Or allows for people to prepare for a pump or pre-pump based on the hype. And I am not so sure how this coin is any less transparent than others... Android wallet, MintCoin Fund, advertising campaign have all recently been addressed. Bunch of new merchants added today... If you are looking for a hype machine I think you know where to look.

"P.P.S.  I don't think they started working on it until an official statement went out.  So I think they only took a couple of hours instead of the 3 days since it was a known issue to resolve it."
How can you assume they didn't start working on it until the official statement went out?
3 days since the issue was known? The day after the issue occurred it was fixed. I think you are referring to when rat4 first posted that thread with a different issue, he did not add the 2nd issue or carry out the attack until later.

"P.S. we're talking about BC again?"
Yes we were because IconicExpert, the PR representative from BC, decided to stop by. How nice an interaction that was...  

"All I see is our price slipping (the buy walls are slipping and they're not all real), while clone coins are coming up from behind us."
The price appears to be holding steady around 14 sat, which is impressive considering the amount of FUD that his been going around lately. What clone coin are you speaking of? ECC is down to 4 sat today. Edit: nvm its back up to 5

Best regards

IMPORTANT - were we supposed to delete the blockchain files or just the files in the QT folder when upgrading to 1.7? Getting conflicting answers here... Please advise

I know memory is a finnicky thing, but you can easily go back and check my post.  Before I posted the community didn't even acknowledge there was a problem, it wasn't until a couple of hours until we even got an official statement.  The coin was successfully attacked and no one in the community heard anything from the devs/leadership.  You still hadn't even decided if there was an issue at the time.  It wasn't until there was a fix before some of the zealots+cheerleaders acknowledged there even was an issue as some of you still don't even think anything of it.

All I asked for was more transparency, or more leadership involvment.  Everything is done behind the scenes while you look at some other successful coins where everything is out in the open.

Another user has come forward with the same issues I have, but I guess we're in the minority here. All I see is our price slipping (the buy walls are slipping and they're not all real), while clone coins are coming up from behind us.

P.S. we're talking about BC again?
P.P.S.  I don't think they started working on it until an official statement went out.  So I think they only took a couple of hours instead of the 3 days since it was a known issue to resolve it.

Kergekoin?

Why would integrating a wallet feature create a hard fork? Wallet Control is not part of the algorithm of the coin. HBN was not hard forked for the wallet feature, Tranz added wallet control to newer HBN wallets. Please correct me if I am wrong.

"I came in here telling everyone that we should get this security hole fixed and all I got were the 2-3 salesman, 2-3 zealots just making numerous posts just to bury what I was saying. "

The dev team was working on the issue before anybody came in here screaming warnings. There was no need for the continued reminder of what was going on, it was already being fixed. You may have noticed there were quite a few people coming in here with their "warnings" even after the problem was already being addressed, I would guess most of these people were not interested in the problem being fixed at all but rather at the opportunity to try and use the issue to scare people. There is no point to continually "warning" people of something they are already aware of and working on (not saying everybody on the thread was completely aware or understanding of what was going on, but the dev clearly was and had it fixed within a relatively quick time). If nobody had came in here "warning" people, it would have gotten quietly fixed and it would have been as if it never happened...

"Now the mint team keep mentioning things happening in the background... why the background?"

My guess: because other coins/people steal/crush ideas.

"1) what happened to that multipool we funded as a community?  anyone have any news on that? another scam?"

This is a good question. That multipool has been due back on for a while now, not sure where the person went who was supposed to be setting it up. He did disappear somewhat mysteriously. Possibly a scam. Not sure what you mean by "another" scam, though? On the bright side, a better multipool is available that pays out in Mint: https://hashco.ws/news/

"2) what are some upcoming news that we can be looking forward to?"

You, like me, will have to wait to find this out, because as previously mentioned things are being worked on in the background. But as has been already touched on, some of the things to keep an eye out for are: New wallet capabilities/platforms, MintCoin Fund, marketing campaign, VoS exchange.

"3) some wallet suggestions that help us separate from other coins."

broken_pixel and kergekoin mention a coin control function, which would be nice and I think should be implemented if possible. Although, as beaverslayer points out it might require a hardfork and may not be worth it. I can think of some other possibilities but I don't know if they are being considered atm.