Author

Topic: [ANN] [NAUT] Nautiluscoin - First Coin w/Stabilization Fund - Digishield - page 216. (Read 901856 times)

hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 500
Community has also grown with the POS difficulties, that's worth mentioning because this thread was fairly quiet before. Does dynamic POS mean people with bigger wallets get more interest?
No, it means that the dividend differs based on external events. Vericoin has something similar, where the more people that stake the higher the payout will be. I'm not sure exactly how they're going to structure it, so I'm really looking forward to more details Smiley

Yes I think that would be a good idea.  The Vericoin system rewards increase for everyone (the percentage goes up) when more people stake.  Would be good to reward holders this way with NAUT.  Also to all the people complaining about price - SHUT UP!  I'm waiting until I can get more NAUT and you'll spoil the ability to buy more coins cheaply:)

Sounds very interesting and I'd love to have some genuine technical innovation behind this coin. I bought more at 12k and I'm more than happy with that btw.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Its ok, you dont need to 'allow me', I will just represent the facts. Their all here, some even on recorded video.

Exhibit A) Stating A public P&D & buy back, of his coin with naut, on an adderess that no longer has the funds: http://youtu.be/UMjrjpCPjpo?t=48m22s  Claimed Fund Address NasWubPMuMaExrP94u6F2jFoeKM154r9up

Exhibit B) Stating he does NOT do P&D's ever, and they are evil and destructive: http://youtu.be/fmb0xQvBGss?t=6m18s

Furthermore, Mr Seaman is not a Journalist, if he was, he would be asking the tough questions, such as " Why are you clearly stating on my video-casts, 2 completely different things "

URL Proof of the statement of the buyback: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annblake-256-dirac-xdq-advanced-finance-616288

Photo of the statement (for the ones that dont want to go to the link)


URL of proof that these coins (Naut) are gone: http://nautinsight.buddylabsapps.com/address/NasWubPMuMaExrP94u6F2jFoeKM154r9up

Photo ( for the ones that dont want to go to the link )



legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
Community has also grown with the POS difficulties, that's worth mentioning because this thread was fairly quiet before. Does dynamic POS mean people with bigger wallets get more interest?
No, it means that the dividend differs based on external events. Vericoin has something similar, where the more people that stake the higher the payout will be. I'm not sure exactly how they're going to structure it, so I'm really looking forward to more details Smiley

Yes I think that would be a good idea.  The Vericoin system rewards increase for everyone (the percentage goes up) when more people stake.  Would be good to reward holders this way with NAUT.  Also to all the people complaining about price - SHUT UP!  I'm waiting until I can get more NAUT and you'll spoil the ability to buy more coins cheaply:)
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Community has also grown with the POS difficulties, that's worth mentioning because this thread was fairly quiet before. Does dynamic POS mean people with bigger wallets get more interest?
No, it means that the dividend differs based on external events. Vericoin has something similar, where the more people that stake the higher the payout will be. I'm not sure exactly how they're going to structure it, so I'm really looking forward to more details Smiley
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
Quote
Maybe Blocktech can also set up a multipool? Anyone knows?

Might just be easier to ask Coinking.io to allow payouts in NAUT.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 500
Is there a reason that nautilus needs to be so steadfastly tied to bryce? There was a serious backlash when the blake coins were tied to NAUT before it had even built up much momentum. After the disaster that happened a few days ago I am finding this to be a strange announcement personally.

I suppose I'm just wondering when nautilus is going to have a chance to have its own brand identity. The price shows other people also feel uncertain, it's taken a right dive after all the work that was put in trying to stabilize it a short time ago.
I think it has more to do with the inflation being about 1% daily.

The dev situation didn't help confidence either. Do you think BK's business plan will be NAUT's brand identity? The Fitch fight was a petty smart move but POS seems to have been a huge distraction since then.
Yeah, it certainly messed things up a bit. As someone who's worked on a few fairly large projects in IT I can understand how tricky it is when a dev is giving you dates, and you're forced to choose between waiting and finding another person for the job. I think everyone can see that though, and as soon as we've got PoS going all of that will be forgotten and the real work will begin. The way I see it the time before PoS is just a way to distribute the coins among investors, as most of the mid-term projects are tied to the PoS implementation. Also, both BK and Bryce confirmed that they'll implement a dynamic PoS code, which will give Naut a technical, as well as economical, selling point.

So to summarize, in a month (?) Naut will hopefully have the following sellingpoints:
* A unique, dynamic PoS algorithm that may or may not be based on PoS 2.0.
* Fast transaction times.
* At least one multipool, that will push the price up and create volume.
* The NSF, which is not only unique to Naut but very hard to replicate because it's based on trust in the team behind it.
* A creator with resources, reputation and connections unheard of in the altcoin market.
* A very dedicated community.

That's a pretty damn good starting point if you ask me, even though I probably missed a couple of things Smiley

Community has also grown with the POS difficulties, that's worth mentioning because this thread was fairly quiet before. Does dynamic POS mean people with bigger wallets get more interest?
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
PoS Update

I have asked Blocktech to take over the PoS implementation.  They have a strong team who can execute my original vision of a dynamic PoS.  As well, they are visible and accessible.

It is my view, that this change will dramatically improve NAUT.


-BK

Very good move.
Would it make sense to make use of BC's POS v2.0 implementation for NAUT. I am not an expert, but I it apparently addresses security vulnerabilities in a pure POS coin.

Also rat4 believes in keeping the QT wallet plain vanilla, without bloating it with features. Which means NAUT can take advantage of POS updates to BC post 2.0.
Just something to think about.
Bryce posted on Twitter that he has a beta version of 2.0  to play with and that he's very impressed. He also said that they'll look at adding the final thing if the timing is right. My guess is that they want to get it out as soon as possible, and it depends on when Blackcoin is done with the update.

Sounds good.
BTW BC's POS v2.0 wallets are already available. It's supposed to kick-in at Block 319000 (sorry I don't know when exactly it is, believe it's very soon)
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Quote
Feel free to dump anytime, plenty of people will catch your cheap coins.

Now that I've calmed down I'm going to try to resist that urge.  Note I don't think Bryce Weiner is stupid or incapable.  I think he has talent but the biggest problem with Bryce Weiner is Bryce Weiner and his post here illustrates the point.  Some people are immediately turned off anything that involves him and you can see that with any of the coins he has worked on.  I hope this time it's different particularly if someone else at blocktech can deal with PR rather than Bryce.
I like Bryce, but I can see why some people don't. I'd invite you to look at it like this though; this isn't Bryces coin, BK will do all the PR and whatnot. Therefore the only thing that's really important is if Bryce, and the rest of Blocktech, are good devs or not. I think even their biggest detractors will have to (grudgingly!) agree that they are.

That's why I'm still in.  My main problem with Bryce is that he scares people away.  I don't personally care what he's like because I'm not trying to be his friend - lol, but unfortunately these days PR seems to be even more important than the product itself these days.

I like Bryce too. If you are concerned about Bryce scaring people away, my response would be that this coin is still very much going to be BK's coin. It's just great to have a resource like Bryce helping out. Welcome Bryce Smiley
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
PoS Update

I have asked Blocktech to take over the PoS implementation.  They have a strong team who can execute my original vision of a dynamic PoS.  As well, they are visible and accessible.

It is my view, that this change will dramatically improve NAUT.


-BK

Very good move.
Would it make sense to make use of BC's POS v2.0 implementation for NAUT. I am not an expert, but I it apparently addresses security vulnerabilities in a pure POS coin.

Also rat4 believes in keeping the QT wallet plain vanilla, without bloating it with features. Which means NAUT can take advantage of POS updates to BC post 2.0.
Just something to think about.
Bryce posted on Twitter that he has a beta version of 2.0  to play with and that he's very impressed. He also said that they'll look at adding the final thing if the timing is right. My guess is that they want to get it out as soon as possible, and it depends on when Blackcoin is done with the update.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
The future is bright with DigiByte.
BlackCoin is also going a similar development... Therefore, we may lose steam here for a while...
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
PoS Update

I have asked Blocktech to take over the PoS implementation.  They have a strong team who can execute my original vision of a dynamic PoS.  As well, they are visible and accessible.

It is my view, that this change will dramatically improve NAUT.


-BK

Very good move.
Would it make sense to make use of BC's POS v2.0 implementation for NAUT. I am not an expert, but I it apparently addresses security vulnerabilities in a pure POS coin.

Also rat4 believes in keeping the QT wallet plain vanilla, without bloating it with features. Which means NAUT can take advantage of POS updates to BC post 2.0.
Just something to think about.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Is there a reason that nautilus needs to be so steadfastly tied to bryce? There was a serious backlash when the blake coins were tied to NAUT before it had even built up much momentum. After the disaster that happened a few days ago I am finding this to be a strange announcement personally.

I suppose I'm just wondering when nautilus is going to have a chance to have its own brand identity. The price shows other people also feel uncertain, it's taken a right dive after all the work that was put in trying to stabilize it a short time ago.
I think it has more to do with the inflation being about 1% daily.

The dev situation didn't help confidence either. Do you think BK's business plan will be NAUT's brand identity? The Fitch fight was a petty smart move but POS seems to have been a huge distraction since then.
Yeah, it certainly messed things up a bit. As someone who's worked on a few fairly large projects in IT I can understand how tricky it is when a dev is giving you dates, and you're forced to choose between waiting and finding another person for the job. I think everyone can see that though, and as soon as we've got PoS going all of that will be forgotten and the real work will begin. The way I see it the time before PoS is just a way to distribute the coins among investors, as most of the mid-term projects are tied to the PoS implementation. Also, both BK and Bryce confirmed that they'll implement a dynamic PoS code, which will give Naut a technical, as well as economical, selling point.

So to summarize, in a month (?) Naut will hopefully have the following sellingpoints:
* A unique, dynamic PoS algorithm that may or may not be based on PoS 2.0.
* Fast transaction times.
* At least one multipool, that will push the price up and create volume.
* The NSF, which is not only unique to Naut but very hard to replicate because it's based on trust in the team behind it.
* A creator with resources, reputation and connections unheard of in the altcoin market.
* A very dedicated community.

That's a pretty damn good starting point if you ask me, even though I probably missed a couple of things Smiley
hero member
Activity: 540
Merit: 500
Now that we are restarting I strongly believe we should use BC's PoSv2. It looks like a huge improvement and they say it is imminent. Is this a possibility Bryce?
sr. member
Activity: 371
Merit: 250
Quote
Feel free to dump anytime, plenty of people will catch your cheap coins.

Now that I've calmed down I'm going to try to resist that urge.  Note I don't think Bryce Weiner is stupid or incapable.  I think he has talent but the biggest problem with Bryce Weiner is Bryce Weiner and his post here illustrates the point.  Some people are immediately turned off anything that involves him and you can see that with any of the coins he has worked on.  I hope this time it's different particularly if someone else at blocktech can deal with PR rather than Bryce.
I like Bryce, but I can see why some people don't. I'd invite you to look at it like this though; this isn't Bryces coin, BK will do all the PR and whatnot. Therefore the only thing that's really important is if Bryce, and the rest of Blocktech, are good devs or not. I think even their biggest detractors will have to (grudgingly!) agree that they are.

That's why I'm still in.  My main problem with Bryce is that he scares people away.  I don't personally care what he's like because I'm not trying to be his friend - lol, but unfortunately these days PR seems to be even more important than the product itself these days.

Honestly, I think the only people he "scares away" are dumb or easily offended. The fact that Vlad doesn't like him is probably a good sign.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 500
Is there a reason that nautilus needs to be so steadfastly tied to bryce? There was a serious backlash when the blake coins were tied to NAUT before it had even built up much momentum. After the disaster that happened a few days ago I am finding this to be a strange announcement personally.

I suppose I'm just wondering when nautilus is going to have a chance to have its own brand identity. The price shows other people also feel uncertain, it's taken a right dive after all the work that was put in trying to stabilize it a short time ago.
I think it has more to do with the inflation being about 1% daily.

The dev situation didn't help confidence either. Do you think BK's business plan will be NAUT's brand identity? The Fitch fight was a petty smart move but POS seems to have been a huge distraction since then.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Is there a reason that nautilus needs to be so steadfastly tied to bryce? There was a serious backlash when the blake coins were tied to NAUT before it had even built up much momentum. After the disaster that happened a few days ago I am finding this to be a strange announcement personally.

I suppose I'm just wondering when nautilus is going to have a chance to have its own brand identity. The price shows other people also feel uncertain, it's taken a right dive after all the work that was put in trying to stabilize it a short time ago.
I think it has more to do with the inflation being about 1% daily.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Is there a reason that nautilus needs to be so steadfastly tied to bryce? There was a serious backlash when the blake coins were tied to NAUT before it had even built up much momentum. After the disaster that happened a few days ago I am finding this to be a strange announcement personally.

I suppose I'm just wondering when nautilus is going to have a chance to have its own brand identity. The price shows other people also feel uncertain, it's taken a right dive after all the work that was put in trying to stabilize it a short time ago.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1534
www.ixcoin.net
Quote
Feel free to dump anytime, plenty of people will catch your cheap coins.

Now that I've calmed down I'm going to try to resist that urge.  Note I don't think Bryce Weiner is stupid or incapable.  I think he has talent but the biggest problem with Bryce Weiner is Bryce Weiner and his post here illustrates the point.  Some people are immediately turned off anything that involves him and you can see that with any of the coins he has worked on.  I hope this time it's different particularly if someone else at blocktech can deal with PR rather than Bryce.

People either love him or hate him but he's the reason I bought NAUT and I'm pleased he's on our side. I did OK mining on his blake pool so can't really complain about his coins.


Blake is not a Bryce coin.

Try ZET and Myriad, two utter failures he pumped even after I clearly pointed out they were frauds.  He lead a lot of people into massive losses as he unloaded coins he bought on the cheap. 

The man is talentless and unscrupulous.  I really can't believe BK couldn't find a real programmer given his resources.  My hope is that Bryce will not touch anything but will instead have the real programmers at blocktech do the job.

BK may not know this but Bryce is not a real programmer - he's a total newbie.  This is a fact!
sr. member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 275
Quote
Feel free to dump anytime, plenty of people will catch your cheap coins.

Now that I've calmed down I'm going to try to resist that urge.  Note I don't think Bryce Weiner is stupid or incapable.  I think he has talent but the biggest problem with Bryce Weiner is Bryce Weiner and his post here illustrates the point.  Some people are immediately turned off anything that involves him and you can see that with any of the coins he has worked on.  I hope this time it's different particularly if someone else at blocktech can deal with PR rather than Bryce.
I like Bryce, but I can see why some people don't. I'd invite you to look at it like this though; this isn't Bryces coin, BK will do all the PR and whatnot. Therefore the only thing that's really important is if Bryce, and the rest of Blocktech, are good devs or not. I think even their biggest detractors will have to (grudgingly!) agree that they are.

That's why I'm still in.  My main problem with Bryce is that he scares people away.  I don't personally care what he's like because I'm not trying to be his friend - lol, but unfortunately these days PR seems to be even more important than the product itself these days.

Personally I think product is more important. In my own development my first goal is always function. Form can always come later if the function is solid. In fact I think that should be a general rule of all development, unfortunately people like pretty shineys... ADD isn't a condition because it's just too damn common to be one.



Don't forget to donate to the Facebook advertisement campaign (by hardcoreprime a.k.a. hcp)
NftgUJjAWDcbCHNpEQD2ASGG5PhP36yVuk

Don't forget to vote
http://www.btc38.com/trade/vote_for_trade.html
https://bter.com/voting
https://hitbtc.com/vote
https://www.swaphole.com/#!voting
http://www.betbycoin.com/coinvotes/

To Do:
Release Proof of Stake Wallet - Being Worked on by Blocktech
Mobile Wallet App - (Doesn't NEED to stake, but would be nice).
Multipool
Official block explorer - The NautInsight one is nice, but it's not marked as official (it wouldn't hurt to have that block explorer moved to the nautiluscoin domain)
Video(s) - Make Nautiluscoin promo videos!
Website update - Front page update
Come up with more plans to get naut into the hands of more people and more in the public eye
Maybe Blocktech can also set up a multipool? Anyone knows?

don't have any idea about it but needs to find out.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Quote
Feel free to dump anytime, plenty of people will catch your cheap coins.

Now that I've calmed down I'm going to try to resist that urge.  Note I don't think Bryce Weiner is stupid or incapable.  I think he has talent but the biggest problem with Bryce Weiner is Bryce Weiner and his post here illustrates the point.  Some people are immediately turned off anything that involves him and you can see that with any of the coins he has worked on.  I hope this time it's different particularly if someone else at blocktech can deal with PR rather than Bryce.
I like Bryce, but I can see why some people don't. I'd invite you to look at it like this though; this isn't Bryces coin, BK will do all the PR and whatnot. Therefore the only thing that's really important is if Bryce, and the rest of Blocktech, are good devs or not. I think even their biggest detractors will have to (grudgingly!) agree that they are.

That's why I'm still in.  My main problem with Bryce is that he scares people away.  I don't personally care what he's like because I'm not trying to be his friend - lol, but unfortunately these days PR seems to be even more important than the product itself these days.

Personally I think product is more important. In my own development my first goal is always function. Form can always come later if the function is solid. In fact I think that should be a general rule of all development, unfortunately people like pretty shineys... ADD isn't a condition because it's just too damn common to be one.



Don't forget to donate to the Facebook advertisement campaign (by hardcoreprime a.k.a. hcp)
NftgUJjAWDcbCHNpEQD2ASGG5PhP36yVuk

Don't forget to vote
http://www.btc38.com/trade/vote_for_trade.html
https://bter.com/voting
https://hitbtc.com/vote
https://www.swaphole.com/#!voting
http://www.betbycoin.com/coinvotes/

To Do:
Release Proof of Stake Wallet - Being Worked on by Blocktech
Mobile Wallet App - (Doesn't NEED to stake, but would be nice).
Multipool
Official block explorer - The NautInsight one is nice, but it's not marked as official (it wouldn't hurt to have that block explorer moved to the nautiluscoin domain)
Video(s) - Make Nautiluscoin promo videos!
Website update - Front page update
Come up with more plans to get naut into the hands of more people and more in the public eye
Maybe Blocktech can also set up a multipool? Anyone knows?
Jump to: