"Good morning" everyone. I just woke up after some much-needed sleep. Back to the grind but I wanted to step in and let you know how things were going. A few key prerequisites to having the wallet released needed to be handled one of which being the setup script. Things are looking good, but still I'm not rushing this - only trying to get it taken care of within a shorter time frame. I want to make sure everyone has ample time to prepare their miners etc before just tossing it out into the wild also just to keep it fair. The first 1000 blocks or so are lowered reward anyhow to try to keep that in-tact.
Regards,
syntaks
Topic: [ANN] NeosCoin [NEOS] - with Arbitrush, Multi-Algo, In-wallet trading & More - page 40. (Read 94554 times)
August 20, 2014, 07:17:20 PM
August 20, 2014, 07:12:50 PM
give me MOARRRRRRRRRRRR!
August 20, 2014, 07:12:03 PM
me thank you to mr. 12K seller
August 20, 2014, 07:06:54 PM
THANK YOU FOR THE DUMP WHOEVER THAT WAS!!!!!!!!!!!!
12.5k, 13k nom nom nom.
12.5k, 13k nom nom nom.
+1
Thank you as well. I was happy buying some at 13k
Thanks Again.
August 20, 2014, 07:04:58 PM
THANK YOU FOR THE DUMP WHOEVER THAT WAS!!!!!!!!!!!!
12.5k, 13k nom nom nom.
12.5k, 13k nom nom nom.
August 20, 2014, 07:04:42 PM
These drops are funny... IPO of 10k and some asswipe sells low.
August 20, 2014, 06:55:27 PM
well it seems like some of the 10k buyers have woken up
I think just a whale game..
August 20, 2014, 06:51:09 PM
well it seems like some of the 10k buyers have woken up
August 20, 2014, 06:40:30 PM
August 20, 2014, 06:39:21 PM
Has trading begin?
August 20, 2014, 06:36:14 PM
nice to see BTC rising again. crazy movements this week on btc
August 20, 2014, 05:56:35 PM
I was curious if we could get any more information about off-the-chain anonymous transactions?
If you would want to send a transaction off-the-chain, wouldn't that mean that you'd already have to have the coins in some storage held by a third party? That is, if I want to send 100 coins from my wallet to account X off-the-chain, then the public ledger would still have me as the owner of those 100 coins, and therefore, I could doublespend my coins. However, if my coins were not held in my wallet, but in a third party storage, then they would be accountable for validating this transaction without the blockchain.
Is the above thinking correct or is there another way to allow off-the-chain transactions?
If you would want to send a transaction off-the-chain, wouldn't that mean that you'd already have to have the coins in some storage held by a third party? That is, if I want to send 100 coins from my wallet to account X off-the-chain, then the public ledger would still have me as the owner of those 100 coins, and therefore, I could doublespend my coins. However, if my coins were not held in my wallet, but in a third party storage, then they would be accountable for validating this transaction without the blockchain.
Is the above thinking correct or is there another way to allow off-the-chain transactions?
your transaction won't be on the chain so how can you be identified. is this a genuine question or fud as the answer is in the whitepaper
read more about in the op. that is why i told dev to create graphics so you would understand it better
August 20, 2014, 05:53:53 PM
I was curious if we could get any more information about off-the-chain anonymous transactions?
If you would want to send a transaction off-the-chain, wouldn't that mean that you'd already have to have the coins in some storage held by a third party? That is, if I want to send 100 coins from my wallet to account X off-the-chain, then the public ledger would still have me as the owner of those 100 coins, and therefore, I could doublespend my coins. However, if my coins were not held in my wallet, but in a third party storage, then they would be accountable for validating this transaction without the blockchain.
Is the above thinking correct or is there another way to allow off-the-chain transactions?
If you would want to send a transaction off-the-chain, wouldn't that mean that you'd already have to have the coins in some storage held by a third party? That is, if I want to send 100 coins from my wallet to account X off-the-chain, then the public ledger would still have me as the owner of those 100 coins, and therefore, I could doublespend my coins. However, if my coins were not held in my wallet, but in a third party storage, then they would be accountable for validating this transaction without the blockchain.
Is the above thinking correct or is there another way to allow off-the-chain transactions?
:oThis is the end !!! You exposed the coin !!! Should be sold for a penny, it is useless .... the most is not that funny? Troll ............... 
August 20, 2014, 05:52:11 PM
I was curious if we could get any more information about off-the-chain anonymous transactions?
If you would want to send a transaction off-the-chain, wouldn't that mean that you'd already have to have the coins in some storage held by a third party? That is, if I want to send 100 coins from my wallet to account X off-the-chain, then the public ledger would still have me as the owner of those 100 coins, and therefore, I could doublespend my coins. However, if my coins were not held in my wallet, but in a third party storage, then they would be accountable for validating this transaction without the blockchain.
Is the above thinking correct or is there another way to allow off-the-chain transactions?
If you would want to send a transaction off-the-chain, wouldn't that mean that you'd already have to have the coins in some storage held by a third party? That is, if I want to send 100 coins from my wallet to account X off-the-chain, then the public ledger would still have me as the owner of those 100 coins, and therefore, I could doublespend my coins. However, if my coins were not held in my wallet, but in a third party storage, then they would be accountable for validating this transaction without the blockchain.
Is the above thinking correct or is there another way to allow off-the-chain transactions?
:oThis is the end !!! You exposed the coin !!! Should be sold for a penny, it is useless .... the most is not that funny? Troll ............... August 20, 2014, 05:46:50 PM
I was curious if we could get any more information about off-the-chain anonymous transactions?
If you would want to send a transaction off-the-chain, wouldn't that mean that you'd already have to have the coins in some storage held by a third party? That is, if I want to send 100 coins from my wallet to account X off-the-chain, then the public ledger would still have me as the owner of those 100 coins, and therefore, I could doublespend my coins. However, if my coins were not held in my wallet, but in a third party storage, then they would be accountable for validating this transaction without the blockchain.
Is the above thinking correct or is there another way to allow off-the-chain transactions?
If you would want to send a transaction off-the-chain, wouldn't that mean that you'd already have to have the coins in some storage held by a third party? That is, if I want to send 100 coins from my wallet to account X off-the-chain, then the public ledger would still have me as the owner of those 100 coins, and therefore, I could doublespend my coins. However, if my coins were not held in my wallet, but in a third party storage, then they would be accountable for validating this transaction without the blockchain.
Is the above thinking correct or is there another way to allow off-the-chain transactions?
August 20, 2014, 05:40:23 PM
gotta love that sell wall lol so cute... either u want cheap coins or your completely lost on trading lol...
keep the sell side thin
keep the sell side thin
August 20, 2014, 05:40:09 PM
Where are all gone?
August 20, 2014, 04:56:43 PM
Want to buy at the price of the IPO, it is very strange people ...
August 20, 2014, 04:51:48 PM
Greed has no boundaries...
August 20, 2014, 04:50:41 PM
How tired of these greedy whales ...
Jump to: