The project developers took care of the security of their services at the highest level. Biometric data cannot be used by a third party.
Topic: [ANN]🚀 OPTHERIUM🚀 Synergy of Blockchain solutions - page 129. (Read 77238 times)
The project developers took care of the security of their services at the highest level. Biometric data cannot be used by a third party.
We cannot know when and in which countries such laws will be passed. But in many economically developed countries they plan to legalize cryptocurrencies.
Maybe somewhere something is planned. Quote
We cannot know
that. There is a fact that cryptography is not yet integrated into the global financial system. And there is no indication that this will happen in the coming months. The project developers took care of the security of their services at the highest level. Biometric data cannot be used by a third party.
No one can objectively assert about something until it has been tested in real life.
Biometric protection best protects users from themselves
. They do not need to store passwords. It is enough not to lose your fingers or eyes for identification 
.
Biometric protection best protects users from themselves
. They do not need to store passwords. It is enough not to lose your fingers or eyes for identification .And this is good. How many wallets are lost for the simple reason that users have lost their wallets. But services cannot help them with password recovery.
All information are stored decentralise. Hope it will be safety for the user. At least the wallet with biometric protection better than the wallet without biometric protection.
I agree with you. Decentralized data storage and biometric protection are the most reliable. At the moment, nothing better has come up.
The project developers took care of the security of their services at the highest level. Biometric data cannot be used by a third party.
I agree that decentralisation system much more safer then the centralisation one. Every week we get a news about the centralized exchanges were hack but no news about the hack of decentralise exchanges.
Right. I also did not see such news. It turns out that the hackers cannot crack the decentralized database. Well, so far it does not work for them.
If this is the case, then you can safely work with the products of the company OPTHERIUM and not worry that hackers will be able to break them and use the information in the database.
I agree that decentralisation system much more safer then the centralisation one. Every week we get a news about the centralized exchanges were hack but no news about the hack of decentralise exchanges.
Right. I also did not see such news. It turns out that the hackers cannot crack the decentralized database. Well, so far it does not work for them.
With reliable protection, hackers will not be able to hack data, which will prevent or minimize the possibility of intrusions.
If hackers fail to hack the service, they will no longer pay their attention to it. Then the customer deposits will be intact.
With reliable protection, hackers will not be able to hack data, which will prevent or minimize the possibility of intrusions.
If hackers fail to hack the service, they will no longer pay their attention to it. Then the customer deposits will be intact.
No one can objectively assert about something until it has been tested in real life.
Biometric protection best protects users from themselves. They do not need to store passwords. It is enough not to lose your fingers or eyes for identification .
Biometric protection best protects users from themselves
. They do not need to store passwords. It is enough not to lose your fingers or eyes for identification .And this is good. How many wallets are lost for the simple reason that users have lost their wallets. But services cannot help them with password recovery.
All information are stored decentralise. Hope it will be safety for the user. At least the wallet with biometric protection better than the wallet without biometric protection.
Decentralized mean that all information and all data are stored not in one central place but in diffent placas. It is more safe becase hackers can hack one server but to hack many places it is much more hard.
If hackers hack into one server, they will receive only a part of the data of a certain user. For example, to get complete data about one person, you need to crack 10 servers (I came up with the number 10, maybe more or less servers)
If everything happens as you wrote it means we can not worry about the loss of personal data and money. One server is very difficult to hack and several is almost impossible.
No one can objectively assert about something until it has been tested in real life.
Biometric protection best protects users from themselves. They do not need to store passwords. It is enough not to lose your fingers or eyes for identification .
Biometric protection best protects users from themselves
. They do not need to store passwords. It is enough not to lose your fingers or eyes for identification .And this is good. How many wallets are lost for the simple reason that users have lost their wallets. But services cannot help them with password recovery.
All information are stored decentralise. Hope it will be safety for the user. At least the wallet with biometric protection better than the wallet without biometric protection.
Decentralized mean that all information and all data are stored not in one central place but in diffent placas. It is more safe becase hackers can hack one server but to hack many places it is much more hard.
If hackers hack into one server, they will receive only a part of the data of a certain user. For example, to get complete data about one person, you need to crack 10 servers (I came up with the number 10, maybe more or less servers)
That is, if hackers hack one server, then they will only get data from parts of users?
But then all the same, some of the users will lose their savings. Perhaps the information will be distributed in parts between existing blocks? Then none of the users will suffer.
I think that the developers of the OPTHERIUM team have foreseen this moment. They came up with reliable protection for their products. We don't have to worry about our savings.
That is, if hackers hack one server, then they will only get data from parts of users?
But then all the same, some of the users will lose their savings. Perhaps the information will be distributed in parts between existing blocks? Then none of the users will suffer.
The fact that data is stored in several places will significantly complicate hacking the system. This is an important factor for those people who invest their money in the project. No one wants to risk losing their money.
Since the cryptocurrency market appeared, many times users have lost their savings through hacker hacking services. Therefore, users are now primarily interested in the security of new resources.
No one can objectively assert about something until it has been tested in real life.
Biometric protection best protects users from themselves. They do not need to store passwords. It is enough not to lose your fingers or eyes for identification .
Biometric protection best protects users from themselves
. They do not need to store passwords. It is enough not to lose your fingers or eyes for identification .And this is good. How many wallets are lost for the simple reason that users have lost their wallets. But services cannot help them with password recovery.
All information are stored decentralise. Hope it will be safety for the user. At least the wallet with biometric protection better than the wallet without biometric protection.
Decentralized mean that all information and all data are stored not in one central place but in diffent placas. It is more safe becase hackers can hack one server but to hack many places it is much more hard.
The fact that data is stored in several places will significantly complicate hacking the system. This is an important factor for those people who invest their money in the project. No one wants to risk losing their money.
I agree with you. Blockchain and cryptocurrency develops and the states can not stop them. There is only one way for states - start to regulate blockchain technologies and cryptocurrency.
Crypto is now in such a condition that it does not need to be stopped . But we hope that things will change for the better. There has been a real buzz surrounding Bitcoin ETFs lately. The SEC’s disapproval of nine Bitcoin ETF applications in late August and current pending decision to approve or reject the ETFs is shattering the optimistic possibility of a safe, functional, user-friendly cryptocurrency market.
The Optherium Ecosystem: a fully functional, operating platform is already delivering users the benefits of an approved ETF. Instead of waiting days, weeks, or even months for an uncertain decision to be made about ETFs, learn how our available modular ecosystem is ready to provide you the financial freedom you desire today 💸
https://[Suspicious link removed]/dmeSC3P
The Optherium Ecosystem: a fully functional, operating platform is already delivering users the benefits of an approved ETF. Instead of waiting days, weeks, or even months for an uncertain decision to be made about ETFs, learn how our available modular ecosystem is ready to provide you the financial freedom you desire today 💸
https://[Suspicious link removed]/dmeSC3P
I like the fact that the Optherium team cares about its customers and offers functionals that are approved by SEC. Few new projects draw attention to this point.
The project for a long time was able to achieve such results that existing projects can not achieve over the years. I am sure that you will come to success
With reliable protection, hackers will not be able to hack data, which will prevent or minimize the possibility of intrusions.
If hackers fail to hack the service, they will no longer pay their attention to it. Then the customer deposits will be intact.
No one can objectively assert about something until it has been tested in real life.
Biometric protection best protects users from themselves. They do not need to store passwords. It is enough not to lose your fingers or eyes for identification .
Biometric protection best protects users from themselves
. They do not need to store passwords. It is enough not to lose your fingers or eyes for identification .And this is good. How many wallets are lost for the simple reason that users have lost their wallets. But services cannot help them with password recovery.
All information are stored decentralise. Hope it will be safety for the user. At least the wallet with biometric protection better than the wallet without biometric protection.
Decentralized mean that all information and all data are stored not in one central place but in diffent placas. It is more safe becase hackers can hack one server but to hack many places it is much more hard.
Once the important information will be distributed between different blocks, you can not worry and their deposits. OPTHERIUM offers reliable protection.
There has been a real buzz surrounding Bitcoin ETFs lately. The SEC’s disapproval of nine Bitcoin ETF applications in late August and current pending decision to approve or reject the ETFs is shattering the optimistic possibility of a safe, functional, user-friendly cryptocurrency market.
The Optherium Ecosystem: a fully functional, operating platform is already delivering users the benefits of an approved ETF. Instead of waiting days, weeks, or even months for an uncertain decision to be made about ETFs, learn how our available modular ecosystem is ready to provide you the financial freedom you desire today 💸
https://[Suspicious link removed]/dmeSC3P
The Optherium Ecosystem: a fully functional, operating platform is already delivering users the benefits of an approved ETF. Instead of waiting days, weeks, or even months for an uncertain decision to be made about ETFs, learn how our available modular ecosystem is ready to provide you the financial freedom you desire today 💸
https://[Suspicious link removed]/dmeSC3P
I like the fact that the Optherium team cares about its customers and offers functionals that are approved by SEC. Few new projects draw attention to this point.
There has been a real buzz surrounding Bitcoin ETFs lately. The SEC’s disapproval of nine Bitcoin ETF applications in late August and current pending decision to approve or reject the ETFs is shattering the optimistic possibility of a safe, functional, user-friendly cryptocurrency market.
The Optherium Ecosystem: a fully functional, operating platform is already delivering users the benefits of an approved ETF. Instead of waiting days, weeks, or even months for an uncertain decision to be made about ETFs, learn how our available modular ecosystem is ready to provide you the financial freedom you desire today 💸
https://lnkd.in/dmeSC3P
The Optherium Ecosystem: a fully functional, operating platform is already delivering users the benefits of an approved ETF. Instead of waiting days, weeks, or even months for an uncertain decision to be made about ETFs, learn how our available modular ecosystem is ready to provide you the financial freedom you desire today 💸
https://lnkd.in/dmeSC3P
Jump to: