@adaseb I have seen you present calculations before.
Any idea how to get from target on that screenshot "815367771" (or "3099865b", the hex target given by wallet) to proper target_pow?
Following nbits wiki I thought you just have to build a 48(for 30 first bit) long hex of zeroes, then insert each two bits instead of first three zeroes.
This would result in "00000000000099865b000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", but the target_pow on the screenshot is different.
Any help appreciated.
Topic: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - V3 Hardfork on block 210000 - page 263. (Read 990783 times)
January 27, 2017, 03:20:55 AM
January 27, 2017, 03:20:16 AM
suprnova private pool-server ?
ip 37.187.146.34
port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work
ip 37.187.146.34
port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work
That's definately not a pool since the block target is exactly equal to the difficulty, if it was a pool it would be lower.
lol you people should stop sniffing ports, it's not ready for deployment yet, but yes, that will be the pool. (It's not finding blocks yet)
Target is lower when you submit shares, what you see there is only the update (new block notification) - the miner would ignore that target_pow field.
Ha ha
Told you there was a pool
January 27, 2017, 03:20:03 AM
Don't use that 0.2 Pascalminer for AMD or use any of the CUDA miners.
I think the issue with the 0.2 miner is there is some bug and it keeps doing the same work over and over again with the same nonce. So your speed might be 2000 MH/s per rig but if it does the same work over and over again your effective hashrate might be 1000 MH/s.
It might be good if you only have 2 GPUs per rig but if you got like 6-7x RX 480s it becomes ineffective. Been noticing this behaviour because my crappy 270x OR 3 GPU mini rigs have been finding blocks but my 6 GPUs rigs with R9 290s and RX 480 haven't found a single block.
I don't think its bad luck or variance because when 0.2 Pascalminer was first released last week the difficulty was low and I had a similar issue back then.
I think the issue with the 0.2 miner is there is some bug and it keeps doing the same work over and over again with the same nonce. So your speed might be 2000 MH/s per rig but if it does the same work over and over again your effective hashrate might be 1000 MH/s.
It might be good if you only have 2 GPUs per rig but if you got like 6-7x RX 480s it becomes ineffective. Been noticing this behaviour because my crappy 270x OR 3 GPU mini rigs have been finding blocks but my 6 GPUs rigs with R9 290s and RX 480 haven't found a single block.
I don't think its bad luck or variance because when 0.2 Pascalminer was first released last week the difficulty was low and I had a similar issue back then.
So, what miner we should use - those of us with AMD cards?
January 27, 2017, 03:18:31 AM
suprnova private pool-server ?
ip 37.187.146.34
port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work
ip 37.187.146.34
port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work
That's definately not a pool since the block target is exactly equal to the difficulty, if it was a pool it would be lower.
lol you people should stop sniffing ports, it's not ready for deployment yet, but yes, that will be the pool. (It's not finding blocks yet)
Target is lower when you submit shares, what you see there is only the update (new block notification) - the miner would ignore that target_pow field.
With the amount of money OCMINER will make with his pool he will be able to buy that E46 M3 and get that hot girl.
Imagine he launches the pool with a 10% pool fee...
January 27, 2017, 03:13:33 AM
Can somebody post the download link of Pascal miner v4
Thanks a bunch!
releas from klausT Thanks a bunch!
https://github.com/KlausT/PascalCoin-CUDA/releases
can someone confirm to have found a block with this miner?
January 27, 2017, 03:12:38 AM
suprnova private pool-server ?
ip 37.187.146.34
port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work
ip 37.187.146.34
port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work
That's definately not a pool since the block target is exactly equal to the difficulty, if it was a pool it would be lower.
lol you people should stop sniffing ports, it's not ready for deployment yet, but yes, that will be the pool. (It's not finding blocks yet)
Target is lower when you submit shares, what you see there is only the update (new block notification) - the miner would ignore that target_pow field.
You are going to be a VERY VERY rich man once this pool is launched.
January 27, 2017, 03:09:01 AM
suprnova private pool-server ?
ip 37.187.146.34
port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work
ip 37.187.146.34
port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work
That's definately not a pool since the block target is exactly equal to the difficulty, if it was a pool it would be lower.
lol you people should stop sniffing ports, it's not ready for deployment yet, but yes, that will be the pool. (It's not finding blocks yet)
Target is lower when you submit shares, what you see there is only the update (new block notification) - the miner would ignore that target_pow field.
January 27, 2017, 03:08:39 AM
Can somebody post the download link of Pascal miner v4
Thanks a bunch!
releas from klausT Thanks a bunch!
https://github.com/KlausT/PascalCoin-CUDA/releases
January 27, 2017, 03:07:01 AM
suprnova private pool-server ?
ip 37.187.146.34
port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work
ip 37.187.146.34
port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work
That's definately not a pool since the block target is exactly equal to the difficulty, if it was a pool it would be lower.
January 27, 2017, 03:06:28 AM
suprnova private pool-server ?
ip 37.187.146.34
port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work
ip 37.187.146.34
port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work
What about this URL?
https://pasc.suprnova.cc/
yes, this URL... ocminer work in progress ?
January 27, 2017, 03:06:04 AM
Can somebody post the download link of Pascal miner v4
Thanks a bunch!
edited
I mean do you have the latest version of pascal miner for amd cards? Thanks a lot!
Thanks a bunch!
edited
I mean do you have the latest version of pascal miner for amd cards? Thanks a lot!
January 27, 2017, 03:03:45 AM
20 hours @ 19,600 H/s (AMD) still haven't found a block
Crytocompare says I should have found 360 Pasc a day, so 3.6 blocks.
https://www.cryptocompare.com/mining/calculator/pasc?HashingPower=19600&HashingUnit=MH%2Fs&PowerConsumption=4800&CostPerkWh=0.12
Don't use PascalMiner 0.2 !!!!!!
January 27, 2017, 03:01:36 AM
20 hours @ 19,600 H/s (AMD) still haven't found a block
Crytocompare says I should have found 360 Pasc a day, so 3.6 blocks.
https://www.cryptocompare.com/mining/calculator/pasc?HashingPower=19600&HashingUnit=MH%2Fs&PowerConsumption=4800&CostPerkWh=0.12
January 27, 2017, 02:55:46 AM
new calculator but i don't know is true, http://whattomine.com/coins/172-pasc-pascal?utf8=%E2%9C%93&hr=2650&p=1400&fee=0.0&cost=0.14&hcost=0.0&commit=Calculate
2 days 4hour 15 minute 5 gpu all at 520-550 r9 290 o block is very hard but this calculator is true is really rentable best profit now
2 days 4hour 15 minute 5 gpu all at 520-550 r9 290 o block is very hard but this calculator is true is really rentable best profit now
I still havent tackled the proper target to difficulty formula.
Would love to have a chat with dev about it...
Probably will have to estimate difficulty from Nethash, but I dont like this, its not accurate.
January 27, 2017, 02:55:16 AM
Well this turned into a surprise. Mined a bunch in the beginning. I didn't even think of selling when it first hit an exchange. Wasn't worth much of anything.
Now I wish I would have kept mining it for a few more weeks while the difficulty was significantly lower than it is today. Could have easily gotten a few locks a day for a couple more weeks. Oh well. I'll take my five figure profit and keep the other half of what I mined for now.
Those people that bought at 300 sats. I should have done the same.
Now I wish I would have kept mining it for a few more weeks while the difficulty was significantly lower than it is today. Could have easily gotten a few locks a day for a couple more weeks. Oh well. I'll take my five figure profit and keep the other half of what I mined for now.
Those people that bought at 300 sats. I should have done the same.
Who bought at 300 sats are ridiculously rich now. Poloniex is a miracle exchange over those bitcoin exchanges, poloniex's volume is even larger than Chinese exchanges, top 3 Chinese exchanges have 10k BTC volume, while Pascal got more than 20k BTC volume. Many people make huge money but many lose money, it is trading.
January 27, 2017, 02:51:07 AM
Now i must remember buy coin with new technology and wait 6 month to i will be reach.
January 27, 2017, 02:49:11 AM
Well this turned into a surprise. Mined a bunch in the beginning. I didn't even think of selling when it first hit an exchange. Wasn't worth much of anything.
Now I wish I would have kept mining it for a few more weeks while the difficulty was significantly lower than it is today. Could have easily gotten a few locks a day for a couple more weeks. Oh well. I'll take my five figure profit and keep the other half of what I mined for now.
Those people that bought at 300 sats. I should have done the same.
Now I wish I would have kept mining it for a few more weeks while the difficulty was significantly lower than it is today. Could have easily gotten a few locks a day for a couple more weeks. Oh well. I'll take my five figure profit and keep the other half of what I mined for now.
Those people that bought at 300 sats. I should have done the same.
January 27, 2017, 02:47:59 AM
I don't know if I hitted block, just take a look guys, somebody give me a confirmation.. Thanks
If this is correct that I hitted block, this single gpu of in my remote desktop is luckiest of all!
I've "found" this (56814) block too, man. If this is correct that I hitted block, this single gpu of in my remote desktop is luckiest of all!
January 27, 2017, 02:46:29 AM
suprnova private pool-server ?
ip 37.187.146.34
port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work
ip 37.187.146.34
port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work
January 27, 2017, 02:45:11 AM
Don't use that 0.2 Pascalminer for AMD or use any of the CUDA miners.
I think the issue with the 0.2 miner is there is some bug and it keeps doing the same work over and over again with the same nonce. So your speed might be 2000 MH/s per rig but if it does the same work over and over again your effective hashrate might be 1000 MH/s.
It might be good if you only have 2 GPUs per rig but if you got like 6-7x RX 480s it becomes ineffective. Been noticing this behaviour because my crappy 270x OR 3 GPU mini rigs have been finding blocks but my 6 GPUs rigs with R9 290s and RX 480 haven't found a single block.
I don't think its bad luck or variance because when 0.2 Pascalminer was first released last week the difficulty was low and I had a similar issue back then.
I think the issue with the 0.2 miner is there is some bug and it keeps doing the same work over and over again with the same nonce. So your speed might be 2000 MH/s per rig but if it does the same work over and over again your effective hashrate might be 1000 MH/s.
It might be good if you only have 2 GPUs per rig but if you got like 6-7x RX 480s it becomes ineffective. Been noticing this behaviour because my crappy 270x OR 3 GPU mini rigs have been finding blocks but my 6 GPUs rigs with R9 290s and RX 480 haven't found a single block.
I don't think its bad luck or variance because when 0.2 Pascalminer was first released last week the difficulty was low and I had a similar issue back then.
would be stupid not to take ur advice
now im thinking of changing one rig to ver1 OpenCL miner... hmmmmmm
this would have been nice to know earlier
@pascalcoin can you give us your feedback?
if it was doing the same work, with the same nonce, this would be very easy to spot with the java proxy.
is the nonce identical for each share submitted?
The 0.2 miner doesn't use the proxy.
Too bad there is no testnet, would of been easy to investigate the issue.
Jump to: