Topic: [ANN] [QCN] QuazarCoin | Full privacy&data protection | Egalitarian PoW - page 87. (Read 186566 times)

if we stop to pay any attention on their antics, they will cease to write here

I can't understand what MRO fans are doing here with their trolling and spam posts

I haven't received your PM.
received.

Check PM.

My pool close all port http  if you use http please update your miner.

I can help.
Below is the thread for voting:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/qcn-vote-logo-contest-for-quazarcoin-628693
New thread is below:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/qcn-vote-new-logo-contest-for-quazarcoin-628924

1) It's 24k a day and dropping.

2) The only major difference is that we get high inflation now but low inflation later whilst you get low inflation now and high inflation later.

3) Some thoughts:

You can't call Monero an insta-mine (If we changed the emission curve now then you probably could, but this will never happen). A lot of people know about Monero, old timers in Bitcoin, the troll box on Poloniex, so no one is being left out. The situation with Bytecoin was different, someone mined the same diff for two years undercover (look at Bytecoin block difficulty, they are the same from block 5,000 to 400,000), no new added hashpower.

At the moment the rarity of QCN is it's attraction.

Consider this: if it takes a couple of years for any one of the CryptoNote coins to begin it's descent into reaching mainstream with Bitcoin, then Monero will look more attractive at that time because the inflation will begin to drop off, in contrast QCN will not be dropping off and you will encounter the current problems Monero faces, except it'll be in several years during your main adoption phase.

Thing is, you can easily argue both ways, I have personally been for and against the Monero emission curve and have changed stance quite a lot whilst working out the numbers.

The way you could look at it is like this: If one of these CryptoNote coins becomes mainstream in a month and the world starts using it as a sister currency to Bitcoin, then perhaps QCN will seem more attractive because the early adopters are not being diluted as much. However, if the mainstream adoption phase happens in a couple of years, the inflation of Monero will start to look more attractive in contrast to QCN.

Regarding the economics of coin release, if you come to the conclusion that it's certain that QCN or MRO has the best economics then you're probably wrong.

It's almost an art and a science, hence the different projects trying different things.

I like to discuss this stuff, but when you, Johncitizen, are so sure of your position it shows how little you actually know.

Sorry but I would call that more like a small temporary improvement in distribution rather that "economically superior".

In regards to coin supply, QCN has extremely low inflation. At this rate, Appx 6500 coins mined per day. MRO has 30,000 coins mined a day.

The mining is also designed to transition smoothly over time instead of rapidly dropping the block reward.

That is the basis for the claim.

I don't give a damn about the monero quasar fight , but you said the word "economically". Now can you explain this a bit , how this coins is "economically" superior to the other one , or if it's superior to bitcoin?

Folks, ignore sock puppets from MRO, please. We ignore trolling and spam posts. We don't throw shit into the fan.

User support & infrastructure development of QCN coin are our main goals. QuazarCoin definetely has its strong sides and a great future ahead.

Beyond any doubts we are now competitive, which is why we are a target for provocations but I would like to urge you to disregard them.

Can anyone help me create a vote for a new logo?

Actually, I'm quite knowledgable on the subject.

My above post is entirely correct. There are no lies, only facts. I hold all these coins but its ironic that monero conduct themselves as if they invented the wheel. The quazar dev has made no money off anybody, there are no lies here. All the funds acquired are donated or mined with hard work off the block chain.

It was not said that monero have nothing unique. I think they can build some great software. It is noted that any claim to "flagship" is redundant as its a bytecoin clone. Theres no need to be ashamed of that, most alts are btc clones.

Its interesting that there is a large influx of monero supporters trying to harm this coin. I can understand why. For a coin that is over %5 mined for a few weeks old, there sure would be a lot of bagholders trying to protect their stash. It appears in the best interest to promote monero, its the difference between unloading your coins that you mined for a few dollars - for a couple hundred grand.

It is a curious notion. Why did monero opt for the instamine? Would a fair mining period not have made more sense? Im sure the community would agree on this one. The fancy mining period clearly benefits those in early with great magnitude- it is designed to do so.

You obviously do not know what you are saying. You are repeating lies from other threads about bytecoin and have not been following the economy on either coin nor innovation. Your coin is built on a lie from a dev who has already made a lot of money of all of you. Shame to think this will get any better, the only time you will see QCN update is when Monero updates. Remember that this is not a Bytecoin fork, it is a Monero fork.

To say that Monero has offered nothing unique. Everything that allows you to mine in a pool, gui wallet, what ever it may be, is due to Monero. Please do your homework.

The devs and the community are far more knowledgeable and active.

In close, as I write this QCN is half the price of Monero and it will not get much better. The pools speeds have all dropped and you guys are holding on to what may I ask?

I like MRO
It's happy to see QCN price less then MRO

yes i like QCN more than MRO fully support this coin , i don't think one person can kill community.

It is clear why the dev launched quasar "QuazarCoin was launched May 8, 2014 after discussion in the community, without premine or instamine."

Monero seem to think they are unique. In fact, they cloned Bytecoin, their innovation was = (~80% mined within 4 years instead of 2 years like bytecoin.)

Quasar has a much more logical approach in terms of emissions. Im not sure how well monero will deal with the inflation.

Monero have already perceived Quasar as a threat. I can understand. Quasar is economically superior.

You release a coin fair for everybody to the game, or someone will come along and do a better job. Its quite obvious how bytecoins inflation/instmine worked out for them, nobody wants to use it regardless of the technology. All Monero have done is cloned them and their rapid mining scheme.

and the most unusual purpose of creation a new crypto-currency. As it attracts much attention keep on working on it!

Haha the best answer ever to the questions of such type 

So do I, but I'm not Shiva.

I was trolling them and it has attracted the attention, why not?