come on guys, lets be realistic here
Did you expect a *2000ROI for NXT even though it started with a much worse client?
Wizzard I've seen you around a lot and I expect more from a Sr. member.
You know full well that NXT had no escrow, no pictures, no proof, nothing. It was a big risk. Therefor it deserved a big reward (I will admit 2000x or more is a bit extreme and ridiculous).
What I said still stands, there was very little risk involved in the Qora IPO except for opportunity risk while your funds were tied up in escrow.
Make sure you don't fry your brain with all that highly academical finance analysis... are you even listening to yourself type?!?!?
In what Universe does the valuation of a project depend on the method of funding and NOT its characteristics???
In what world is that not a factor? On one hand you are saying that I don't understand business fundamentals and then on the other hand you are saying something that proves you don't.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk-based_pricing
In simplest terms:
In this instance the loan is the IPO funds, and the interest is your return (or ROI).
Risk is always a factor in determining rewards. There can be no reward without risk. Greater risk, greater reward.... I'm not sure why I had to say that.
Anyway, please stop trying to mince my words now, I'm not trying to detract from the benefit of Qora or its feature set, I'm only questioning the thought process of listening to a group of Qora holders who got together to arbitrarily set a price for Qora, independent of the market.
You obviously have a biased opinion on the matter as you hold Qora and its in your best interests to agree on that price.