What should be hashrate of 280x/7970 and 290 in Lyra2RE?
With my miner (see SIG) about 1100 and about 1700, depending on ram type.
Topic: [ANN] sgminer v5 - optimized X11/X13/NeoScrypt/Lyra2RE/etc. kernel-switch miner - page 61. (Read 877859 times)
June 11, 2015, 05:58:54 AM
With my miner (see SIG) about 1100 and about 1700, depending on ram type.
June 11, 2015, 05:23:56 AM
What should be hashrate of 280x/7970 and 290 in Lyra2RE?
June 11, 2015, 05:20:34 AM
Despite the sgminer saying 16mhs, in reality my effective rate at Nicehash was 14.50mhs.
Also, Xintensity of 1024 produced a lower hashrate at Nicehash than Xintensity of 512 at Nicehash.
I have similar observations.
June 10, 2015, 07:02:00 PM
280x Lyra2RE = 1.1mhs 
June 10, 2015, 06:35:21 PM
I am mining SRC (quarkcoin) on CoinMine Pool with HD 7970s and R-280xs and I am getting more than a fair number of:
"Waiting for work to be available from pools."
Any idea what might be causing this, or what typically causes this?
"Waiting for work to be available from pools."
Any idea what might be causing this, or what typically causes this?
Quote
"xintensity": "2048",
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"gpu-powertune": "0",
"gpu-vddc": "1.10",
"worksize": "64",
"lookup-gap": "0",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-threads": "2",
"gpu-platform": "0",
"api-listen": true,
"api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1/32",
"expiry": "20",
"scan-time": "10",
"gpu-reorder": true
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"gpu-powertune": "0",
"gpu-vddc": "1.10",
"worksize": "64",
"lookup-gap": "0",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-threads": "2",
"gpu-platform": "0",
"api-listen": true,
"api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1/32",
"expiry": "20",
"scan-time": "10",
"gpu-reorder": true
I guess that you use the russian miner. Remove all settings except:
"xintensity": "2048",
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"worksize": "64",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-reorder": true.
You should have better result.
Try this pre-compiled Windows version:
http://cryptomining-blog.com/4945-updated-miner-control-tool-packages-for-amd-and-nvidia-2/
However, I should warn you. I've ran the various versions of modded sgminer through MiningRig monitoring system at various settings.
Despite the sgminer saying 16mhs, in reality my effective rate at Nicehash was 14.50mhs.
Also, Xintensity of 1024 produced a lower hashrate at Nicehash than Xintensity of 512 at Nicehash.
June 10, 2015, 05:40:54 PM
Yes, it is the "russian" miner. Anyway it does seem to just be that pool. When using Yaamp or Nicehash everything is fine.
try --no-extranonce (even if the pool explicitly doesn't require it), may help
Yeah, I thought of that, too. No change. Must just be the pool. Thanks.
June 10, 2015, 05:10:15 PM
Yes, it is the "russian" miner. Anyway it does seem to just be that pool. When using Yaamp or Nicehash everything is fine.
June 10, 2015, 04:45:58 PM
I am mining SRC (quarkcoin) on CoinMine Pool with HD 7970s and R-280xs and I am getting more than a fair number of:
"Waiting for work to be available from pools."
Any idea what might be causing this, or what typically causes this?
"Waiting for work to be available from pools."
Any idea what might be causing this, or what typically causes this?
Quote
"xintensity": "2048",
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"gpu-powertune": "0",
"gpu-vddc": "1.10",
"worksize": "64",
"lookup-gap": "0",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-threads": "2",
"gpu-platform": "0",
"api-listen": true,
"api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1/32",
"expiry": "20",
"scan-time": "10",
"gpu-reorder": true
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"gpu-powertune": "0",
"gpu-vddc": "1.10",
"worksize": "64",
"lookup-gap": "0",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-threads": "2",
"gpu-platform": "0",
"api-listen": true,
"api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1/32",
"expiry": "20",
"scan-time": "10",
"gpu-reorder": true
I guess that you use the russian miner. Remove all settings except:
"xintensity": "2048",
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"worksize": "64",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-reorder": true.
You should have better result.
June 10, 2015, 03:36:36 PM
I am mining SRC (quarkcoin) on CoinMine Pool with HD 7970s and R-280xs and I am getting more than a fair number of:
"Waiting for work to be available from pools."
Any idea what might be causing this, or what typically causes this?
Bad pool, or flaky ISP connection."Waiting for work to be available from pools."
Any idea what might be causing this, or what typically causes this?
Quote
"xintensity": "2048",
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"gpu-powertune": "0",
"gpu-vddc": "1.10",
"worksize": "64",
"lookup-gap": "0",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-threads": "2",
"gpu-platform": "0",
"api-listen": true,
"api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1/32",
"expiry": "20",
"scan-time": "10",
"gpu-reorder": true
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"gpu-powertune": "0",
"gpu-vddc": "1.10",
"worksize": "64",
"lookup-gap": "0",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-threads": "2",
"gpu-platform": "0",
"api-listen": true,
"api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1/32",
"expiry": "20",
"scan-time": "10",
"gpu-reorder": true
On a side note your memclock is way too low you should add another 0 to the end of that.
Huh?
You do realize that most Stratum pools use an extranonce of size 4 (in bytes), and when you take into account the nonce you return is also 4 bytes, you have 2^64 - 1 hashes to do before you run outta work?
By my offhand math, to complete 2^64 - 1 hashes in one hour (86.400s), you would require a hashrate of just under 213504GH/s. No, you read that right. I don't see this happening.
This has lost me ,,,,
LoL
June 10, 2015, 03:33:55 PM
I am mining SRC (quarkcoin) on CoinMine Pool with HD 7970s and R-280xs and I am getting more than a fair number of:
"Waiting for work to be available from pools."
Any idea what might be causing this, or what typically causes this?
Bad pool, or flaky ISP connection."Waiting for work to be available from pools."
Any idea what might be causing this, or what typically causes this?
Quote
"xintensity": "2048",
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"gpu-powertune": "0",
"gpu-vddc": "1.10",
"worksize": "64",
"lookup-gap": "0",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-threads": "2",
"gpu-platform": "0",
"api-listen": true,
"api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1/32",
"expiry": "20",
"scan-time": "10",
"gpu-reorder": true
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"gpu-powertune": "0",
"gpu-vddc": "1.10",
"worksize": "64",
"lookup-gap": "0",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-threads": "2",
"gpu-platform": "0",
"api-listen": true,
"api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1/32",
"expiry": "20",
"scan-time": "10",
"gpu-reorder": true
On a side note your memclock is way too low you should add another 0 to the end of that.
Huh?
You do realize that most Stratum pools use an extranonce of size 4 (in bytes), and when you take into account the nonce you return is also 4 bytes, you have 2^64 - 1 hashes to do before you run outta work?
By my offhand math, to complete 2^64 - 1 hashes in one hour (86.400s), you would require a hashrate of just under 213504GH/s. No, you read that right. I don't see this happening.
This has lost me ,,,,
June 10, 2015, 02:51:37 PM
I am mining SRC (quarkcoin) on CoinMine Pool with HD 7970s and R-280xs and I am getting more than a fair number of:
"Waiting for work to be available from pools."
Any idea what might be causing this, or what typically causes this?
Bad pool, or flaky ISP connection."Waiting for work to be available from pools."
Any idea what might be causing this, or what typically causes this?
Quote
"xintensity": "2048",
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"gpu-powertune": "0",
"gpu-vddc": "1.10",
"worksize": "64",
"lookup-gap": "0",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-threads": "2",
"gpu-platform": "0",
"api-listen": true,
"api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1/32",
"expiry": "20",
"scan-time": "10",
"gpu-reorder": true
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"gpu-powertune": "0",
"gpu-vddc": "1.10",
"worksize": "64",
"lookup-gap": "0",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-threads": "2",
"gpu-platform": "0",
"api-listen": true,
"api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1/32",
"expiry": "20",
"scan-time": "10",
"gpu-reorder": true
On a side note your memclock is way too low you should add another 0 to the end of that.
June 10, 2015, 12:15:03 PM
Bad pool, or flaky ISP connection.
On a side note your memclock is way too low you should add another 0 to the end of that.
Uh, no. Memclock has no affect on hashrate with quarkcoin. Lowering memclock saves energy. As for the 'Waiting for work' it matters not if the memclock is 1500, 1250, 700, or 150.
Any one else have any other ideas?
I wasn't saying memclock was causing your connection issues, that's either a bad pool or bad ISP connection.
June 10, 2015, 12:05:48 PM
Bad pool, or flaky ISP connection.
On a side note your memclock is way too low you should add another 0 to the end of that.
Uh, no. Memclock has no affect on hashrate with quarkcoin. Lowering memclock saves energy. As for the 'Waiting for work' it matters not if the memclock is 1500, 1250, 700, or 150.
Any one else have any other ideas?
June 10, 2015, 11:03:02 AM
I am mining SRC (quarkcoin) on CoinMine Pool with HD 7970s and R-280xs and I am getting more than a fair number of:
"Waiting for work to be available from pools."
Any idea what might be causing this, or what typically causes this?
Bad pool, or flaky ISP connection."Waiting for work to be available from pools."
Any idea what might be causing this, or what typically causes this?
Quote
"xintensity": "2048",
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"gpu-powertune": "0",
"gpu-vddc": "1.10",
"worksize": "64",
"lookup-gap": "0",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-threads": "2",
"gpu-platform": "0",
"api-listen": true,
"api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1/32",
"expiry": "20",
"scan-time": "10",
"gpu-reorder": true
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"gpu-powertune": "0",
"gpu-vddc": "1.10",
"worksize": "64",
"lookup-gap": "0",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-threads": "2",
"gpu-platform": "0",
"api-listen": true,
"api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1/32",
"expiry": "20",
"scan-time": "10",
"gpu-reorder": true
On a side note your memclock is way too low you should add another 0 to the end of that.
June 10, 2015, 11:00:57 AM
I am mining SRC (quarkcoin) on CoinMine Pool with HD 7970s and R-280xs and I am getting more than a fair number of:
"Waiting for work to be available from pools."
Any idea what might be causing this, or what typically causes this?
"Waiting for work to be available from pools."
Any idea what might be causing this, or what typically causes this?
Quote
"xintensity": "2048",
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"gpu-powertune": "0",
"gpu-vddc": "1.10",
"worksize": "64",
"lookup-gap": "0",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-threads": "2",
"gpu-platform": "0",
"api-listen": true,
"api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1/32",
"expiry": "20",
"scan-time": "10",
"gpu-reorder": true
"gpu-engine": "1100",
"gpu-fan": "50-85",
"gpu-memclock": "150",
"gpu-powertune": "0",
"gpu-vddc": "1.10",
"worksize": "64",
"lookup-gap": "0",
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "82",
"temp-target": "72",
"auto-fan": true,
"gpu-threads": "2",
"gpu-platform": "0",
"api-listen": true,
"api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1/32",
"expiry": "20",
"scan-time": "10",
"gpu-reorder": true
June 10, 2015, 09:31:25 AM
I have 270x's with elpida and I get 780kh/s/card I use worksize 64 with 2 threads 1000/1400 eng/mem and intensity 18 however I believe intensity could be set to 14 with similar results. I'm not sure if it makes a difference with Lyra2RE but I'm using the AMD Catalyst 15.5 drivers.
bin might need to be compiled with 14.6-14.7 dlls, at least this is imperative with stock kernel
then you remove dlls and run it on 15.xx without problem
on 280x i use 750/1500 clocks, any higher core clock gives nothing
alas the latest pallas's sgminer gives nothing for 280x as well, just the same as stock kernel
My miner has been developed on omega drivers (14.12) but should lead to similar results on newer drivers.
June 10, 2015, 09:22:26 AM
I have 270x's with elpida and I get 780kh/s/card I use worksize 64 with 2 threads 1000/1400 eng/mem and intensity 18 however I believe intensity could be set to 14 with similar results. I'm not sure if it makes a difference with Lyra2RE but I'm using the AMD Catalyst 15.5 drivers.
bin might need to be compiled with 14.6-14.7 dlls, at least this is imperative with stock kernel
then you remove dlls and run it on 15.xx without problem
on 280x i use 750/1500 clocks, any higher core clock gives nothing
alas the latest pallas's sgminer gives nothing for 280x as well, just the same as stock kernel
My miner has been developed on omega drivers (14.12) but should lead to similar results on newer drivers.
June 10, 2015, 09:19:02 AM
I have 270x's with elpida and I get 780kh/s/card I use worksize 64 with 2 threads 1000/1400 eng/mem and intensity 18 however I believe intensity could be set to 14 with similar results. I'm not sure if it makes a difference with Lyra2RE but I'm using the AMD Catalyst 15.5 drivers.
bin might need to be compiled with 14.6-14.7 dlls, at least this is imperative with stock kernel
then you remove dlls and run it on 15.xx without problem
on 280x i use 750/1500 clocks, any higher core clock gives nothing
alas the latest pallas's sgminer gives nothing for 280x as well, just the same as stock kernel
June 10, 2015, 08:57:27 AM
Which of the two algorithms profit is greater than Quark or Lyra2RE?
With two 7970 do little more than 2 MH/s, but 280x can not in any way make them do more than 180-190kH/s. Where is wrong? This is with algorithm Lyra2RE.
My settings are the same for both types of video cards!
Here it is in my file:
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer.exe -k Lyra2RE -o stratum+tcp://lyra2re.eu.nicehash.com:3342 -u address -p p=1 --intensity 15 --worksize 128 -g 2 --gpu-reorder
With two 7970 do little more than 2 MH/s, but 280x can not in any way make them do more than 180-190kH/s. Where is wrong? This is with algorithm Lyra2RE.
My settings are the same for both types of video cards!
Here it is in my file:
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer.exe -k Lyra2RE -o stratum+tcp://lyra2re.eu.nicehash.com:3342 -u address -p p=1 --intensity 15 --worksize 128 -g 2 --gpu-reorder
What is your gpu memory type? Is that not hynex?
Yes, the problem may be the memories. Memoryinfo says that 7970 have Hynix and 280x with Elpida. Perhaps this is the problem, because only 280x are not working.
Thank you. I know not to agonize over.
elpida surely will be slower, but not as much as you are reporting.
there must be something else going wrong.
you should get between 1050 and 1150 on tahiti cards.
June 10, 2015, 07:57:50 AM
Which of the two algorithms profit is greater than Quark or Lyra2RE?
With two 7970 do little more than 2 MH/s, but 280x can not in any way make them do more than 180-190kH/s. Where is wrong? This is with algorithm Lyra2RE.
My settings are the same for both types of video cards!
Here it is in my file:
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer.exe -k Lyra2RE -o stratum+tcp://lyra2re.eu.nicehash.com:3342 -u address -p p=1 --intensity 15 --worksize 128 -g 2 --gpu-reorder
With two 7970 do little more than 2 MH/s, but 280x can not in any way make them do more than 180-190kH/s. Where is wrong? This is with algorithm Lyra2RE.
My settings are the same for both types of video cards!
Here it is in my file:
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer.exe -k Lyra2RE -o stratum+tcp://lyra2re.eu.nicehash.com:3342 -u address -p p=1 --intensity 15 --worksize 128 -g 2 --gpu-reorder
What is your gpu memory type? Is that not hynex?
Yes, the problem may be the memories. Memoryinfo says that 7970 have Hynix and 280x with Elpida. Perhaps this is the problem, because only 280x are not working.
Thank you. I know not to agonize over.
elpida surely will be slower, but not as much as you are reporting.
there must be something else going wrong.
you should get between 1050 and 1150 on tahiti cards.
Thanks for the help! I will try later!
Jump to: