Author

Topic: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - page 115. (Read 823882 times)

newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
/snip

I'm not doing your research for you and to imply I should suggests an attempt to derail from the proven facts of this shitcoin which has promoted itself as:
Quote

Yet lacking ANY innovation other than its supposed claim regarding the 'ASIC-resistant' algo, something utterly pointless in a 100-day PoW.

So, again, a coin lacking any innovation, hyping itself on innovation and with a highly-suspect trading volume supported by shill account routinely posting reasons why this coin will moon and why people should most definitely not sell right now.

It is a duck.


Crypto, every one of your 174 pages of posts, all the way back to 2014 are complaints about coins and "scammers". From the very beginning you've shown yourself to be a complete douche whos done nothing but try to shit on everyone in this community. I haven't seen one shred of evidence to back anything you say, except for your word which at this point doesn't amount to shit. You hide behind the anonymity of the web posting whatever drivel you want. I hate to tell you, slander and defemation are causes for legal action. If I were you I would watch what I continue saying against these coins and people without showing any evidence. Eventally someone will get completly fed up with your crap and have at it legally. You can post your opinion, and argue it until the moon comes home, but when you slander or defame and it causes monetary losses or other problems, thats when you get yourself into trouble. Not that you'll listen to anything anyone has to say that is contrary to your own views, but just throwing it out there so its documented. So when it happens to you, I can pull this post back up and throw it in your face. Maybe you wouldn't be so angry with the world if you put down the sandwich, stood up from your keyboard and walked up out of your grandparents basement. You could possibly try to make some "real" friends, other than your WOW online ones and be a much happier and calmer person. If that doesn't work for you I could always fly you out here to DC where I live (at my expense) and sit down for some coffee with a good friend of mine who could help you. Shes a great psychologist and could do wonders for your self esteem and mental health issues. And yes, what im saying isnt slander. I can prove how unstable you are through your 174 pages of posts.
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 264
| Privacy Advocate | Game Theory | Free Thinker |
/snip

I'm not doing your research for you and to imply I should suggests an attempt to derail from the proven facts of this shitcoin which has promoted itself as:
Quote


Yet lacking ANY innovation other than its supposed claim regarding the 'ASIC-resistant' algo, something utterly pointless in a 100-day PoW.

So, again, a coin lacking any innovation, hyping itself on innovation and with a highly-suspect trading volume supported by shill account routinely posting reason why this coin will moon and why people should most definitely not sell right now.

It is a duck.


Well if your pointing to a certain argument has part of your scam accusations, it would be in your best interest to enlighten the rest of us "noobs" otherwise you just sound like a half brain person and im sure your a very inteligent guy...

Again its your opinion... I dont see any evidence there of any scam... Yes its privacy oriented ( we could argue about the real privacy features it provides but in that case you have a long debate ahead with BTC developers ), Market Place and Webwallet are available on tor and the deamon wallet itself uses tor nodes to connect...

And yes it uses a new hashing algo called Skunk... What exacly is the scam here?

p.s. It is a Swan
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
I think CryptoDevil is anoyed with her/him self because it didn't buy in when it was cheaper, honestly i know this coin will grow, with all the developments in such a short time, people which a are buying into Signatum now, will be the ones grateful, in the future.
full member
Activity: 402
Merit: 116
/snip

I'm not doing your research for you and to imply I should suggests an attempt to derail from the proven facts of this shitcoin which has promoted itself as:
Quote


Yet lacking ANY innovation other than its supposed claim regarding the 'ASIC-resistant' algo, something utterly pointless in a 100-day PoW.

So, again, a coin lacking any innovation, hyping itself on innovation and with a highly-suspect trading volume supported by shill account routinely posting reason why this coin will moon and why people should most definitely not sell right now.

It is a duck.


Although I believe it is well within your rights to express your views on the forums. If you are a moderator you should hold yourself to a higher standard than to start slinging mud like this. It makes you look like a power tripping egomaniac man.


With power comes responsibility

just a humble advice from a forum moderator as well.
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
Guru is right, leave this man to his own devices, if lacking technology or innovation means something is a scam, then the whole world is victim to this with everyday items.

If anybody opposes the way CryptoDevil expresses his argument, then it may be a good idea to add him to your ignore list, this is your choice, however.
full member
Activity: 255
Merit: 110
/snip

I'm not doing your research for you and to imply I should suggests an attempt to derail from the proven facts of this shitcoin which has promoted itself as:
Quote


Yet lacking ANY innovation other than its supposed claim regarding the 'ASIC-resistant' algo, something utterly pointless in a 100-day PoW.

So, again, a coin lacking any innovation, hyping itself on innovation and with a highly-suspect trading volume supported by shill account routinely posting reason why this coin will moon and why people should most definitely not sell right now.

It is a duck.


How about just slinking over to the darkest corner of your mom's basement, just behind the water heater, and, as you claim in your profile, pull your little thread for a while. 
member
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
come on, vrybody...
cryptodevil is promoting the coin, we should thank him.
Even bad publicity is publicity : that's communication fundamentals
btw nobody gives a f**k about this old and manipulated forum rating system anymore.
You believe in the coin : invest/support/help devs.
You don't believe in it : you leave and spend you precious time (if you have a life) on another thread.
simple

What do I do if I believe in it and don't have a life?

Instructions unclear.  Undecided
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
/snip

I'm not doing your research for you and to imply I should suggests an attempt to derail from the proven facts of this shitcoin which has promoted itself as:
Quote


Yet lacking ANY innovation other than its supposed claim regarding the 'ASIC-resistant' algo, something utterly pointless in a 100-day PoW.

So, again, a coin lacking any innovation, hyping itself on innovation and with a highly-suspect trading volume supported by shill accounts routinely posting reasons why this coin will moon and why people should most definitely not sell right now.

It is a duck.
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 101
come on, vrybody...
cryptodevil is promoting the coin, we should thank him.
Even bad publicity is publicity : that's communication fundamentals
btw nobody gives a f**k about this old and manipulated forum rating system anymore.
You believe in the coin : invest/support/help devs.
You don't believe in it : you leave and spend you precious time (if you have a life) on another thread.
simple
member
Activity: 168
Merit: 15

Where is this reasoned refutation? I haven't seen any, only spittle-flecked ad-hominem and rage at their scam being exposed.




You simple pretend like you miss my message with a fact that you have no idea what is this coin and dare to judge it.

How about  my facts?

Oh dear, i know the answer. If you cant broke my arguments then dont answer - just exactly the thing you did.


Stop live in 2014/2015 - crypto world is moving forward at the ridiculous hight speed. You knowledge about coins are outdated. Nowadays whitepapper is mean much because everyone can create a good-looking and promising text about a project. The real value is a facts of work. Signatum got it. Revolutionally new algo for gpu's - Skunk (fullname Skunkhash raptor) was added to whattomine list and nicehash in less then 30 days since release. WTM was even forced to redisign their dashboard for whole algos' list to add one more and the did it. Does the monsters of crypto like nicehash and wtm are fools ? I dont think so.

And i dont know you. Who da hell you are to listen your opinion about scam ?  cold facts:

1. You are dont know the subject you are talking about. Learn more information about signatum and not  here. This ANN is forbiden by devs, otherwise here would be 600-700 pages already.

2. Most of your messages are autocratic. You never admit that you was wrong to other people. It means that you are, mmm, unclever, atleast. Clever people could judge realisticly their own opinion and admit if they are worng

3. Most of your messages  on bct are about FUD and scam.

P.S. If you feel yourself better when you can judge other people in internet and claim projects as scam, please, go to the "VEGA coin" thread. Unlikely to SIGT, dev in VEGA coin are real scammer and scam me and 15 other people for crypto. And hundreds of people with a scam pool.

BR
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
The fact that someone is doing something new shouldnt be considered a scam...

But they are not doing something new. This whole "chuck another algo in" act isn't new, it was being done three years ago on numerous copy-pasta coins which were being launched every other minute.

Wouldnt be Ethereum a profitable enough coin to create asics for?
No because Ethereum has always had the goal of switching to PoS at some point. No hardware manufacturer would take the risk of developing and manufacturing an ASIC for it.

The fact that you need to attack other users ( calling them nobbs, scammers, bots, etc )
Those terms aren't used as ad-hominem, they are used as factual labels to describe actual things.
1. The people perpetuating this scam are scammers
2. The people perpetuating this scam are obviously using trading bots to create fake volume
3. The only people falling for this are newbies to cryptocurrencies, otherwise known as 'noobs'.

i dont see many coins that after 2 months of existance have such real aplications for them, not even arguing the potencial use cases of every coin, the fact is that Signatum has built aplications for their coin and to me that is a good sign that they want to keep working and improving their use cases...
Which part of the fact that you can cheaply buy white-label scripts and code to create these things sounds like these people must be legit because they 'created' these things?

1. Zero innovation
2. Absurd hype about utterly pointless 'ASIC resistant' algo for mere 100-day PoW phase
3. Whitepaper which contains nothing of substance other than hyping the pointless algo
4. Insanely high trading volumes for a coin with zero innovation or tech
5. A forum thread with numerous sock-puppet shill accounts which routinely post 'inside information' encouraging people to buy into this nonsense coin

If it looks like a duck...



again and again  Grin his drinking straw  Grin ignoring the marketplace completly and say nothing about that! Where you got the informations about the faked price manpulation on exchanges? any proofs? Zero innovation? what when the 100 day pow is the innovation? ASIC resistant? YOu have do troll vertcoin too because they say 2014 they are asicresistant and they switch the algo to be asic resistant...but i don't see any post from you on the threat
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
Correct me if i'm wrong :
-we don't have the right to be new on this forum.
-we do not have the right to have our own opinion.
-If we disagree, we're just bots or trolls or scammers.
member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
Just as a reminder, seeing as the sock-puppets have been out in force trying to bury this PSA:

WARNING!

As this project has been exposed as a shitcoin scam, those

users who continue to post ad-hominem attacks instead

of attempting to rebut the facts raised exposing the scam

will logically be assumed to be scammer accounts.

WARNING!


Those accounts, particularly ones with the common-theme of only Signatum threads and mining, which indicate they are being used by the scammers to fake interest in the 'project', will soon be marked with negative trust ratings in order to ensure they cannot be used again for other scams.


You have been warned.


We have been warned, your mission to warn us is done, now go away!
Why are you still here? Leave us into oblivion.
We believe in this coin. So go f**k off from this thread finally.
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 264
| Privacy Advocate | Game Theory | Free Thinker |
The fact that someone is doing something new shouldnt be considered a scam...

But they are not doing something new. This whole "chuck another algo in" act isn't new, it was being done three years ago on numerous copy-pasta coins which were being launched every other minute.

Wouldnt be Ethereum a profitable enough coin to create asics for?
No because Ethereum has always had the goal of switching to PoS at some point. No hardware manufacturer would take the risk of developing and manufacturing an ASIC for it.

The fact that you need to attack other users ( calling them nobbs, scammers, bots, etc )
Those terms aren't used as ad-hominem, they are used as factual labels to describe actual things.
1. The people perpetuating this scam are scammers
2. The people perpetuating this scam are obviously using trading bots to create fake volume
3. The only people falling for this are newbies to cryptocurrencies, otherwise known as 'noobs'.

i dont see many coins that after 2 months of existance have such real aplications for them, not even arguing the potencial use cases of every coin, the fact is that Signatum has built aplications for their coin and to me that is a good sign that they want to keep working and improving their use cases...
Which part of the fact that you can cheaply buy white-label scripts and code to create these things sounds like these people must be legit because they 'created' these things?

1. Zero innovation
2. Absurd hype about utterly pointless 'ASIC resistant' algo for mere 100-day PoW phase
3. Whitepaper which contains nothing of substance other than hyping the pointless algo
4. Insanely high trading volumes for a coin with zero innovation or tech
5. A forum thread with numerous sock-puppet shill accounts which routinely post 'inside information' encouraging people to buy into this nonsense coin

If it looks like a duck...



Well if its not something new, and you say it was done 3 years ago, I wasnt around at the time so i cant tell... But if could please name me a few and give me some references soo i can research about it i would deeply apreciate it, soo i can investigate and get to my own conclusions...

Regarding the Ethereum point, i was going to ask you were exacly did they mentioned on their whitepaper any POS consensus mechanism ( because i have never found any reference for that in the whitepaper ), but i think we will get off topic...

Quote
Those terms aren't used as ad-hominem, they are used as factual labels to describe actual things.
1. The people perpetuating this scam are scammers
2. The people perpetuating this scam are obviously using trading bots to create fake volume
3. The only people falling for this are newbies to cryptocurrencies, otherwise known as 'noobs'.

Again this is your opinion based on NO EVIDENCE AT ALL...

Quote
Which part of the fact that you can cheaply buy white-label scripts and code to create these things sounds like these people must be legit because they 'created' these things?

1. Zero innovation
2. Absurd hype about utterly pointless 'ASIC resistant' algo for mere 100-day PoW phase
3. Whitepaper which contains nothing of substance other than hyping the pointless algo
4. Insanely high trading volumes for a coin with zero innovation or tech
5. A forum thread with numerous sock-puppet shill accounts which routinely post 'inside information' encouraging people to buy into this nonsense coin

If it looks like a duck...

1. Can you please show me a coin before Signatum using these hashing functions?
2. Has far has i remember ( and aparently i have been around on this thread longer then you ), there was never a hype about anything related to asics... There was YES related to the development beeing done ( Market PLace and Web Wallet ) and speculation regarding the short POW time...
3. Again i have to say i agree with you... The whitepaper does NOT reflect in any way the work done so far on the coin...
4. Is that a scam evidence? So your telling me just because there is a big volume on a certain coin that has to be fake volume? How can you even say something like that knowingly you cant prove it?
5. Again with such a high number of users coming in everyday from the last maybe 1 year until now, how can you tell they are shills? Again its your opinion with no evidence... I respect but i dont have to accept your opinion based on no evidence has true...

" If it looks like a duck... " It could also be a swan...
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
time will show who is right
full member
Activity: 255
Merit: 110
Listen if you had come here with irrefutable evidence against the coin, other than your opinion then people would of listened, running in the room and creaming "Scam" in big red letters and then "character assassination to all whom oppose" is not anyway to start with your claims.

I don't need irrefutable evidence, I need only suspect that they are scammers.
dictatorial methods against any argument that refutes your claimed opinion
Where is this reasoned refutation? I haven't seen any, only spittle-flecked ad-hominem and rage at their scam being exposed.




OK.  I think I get it now.

You are doing all of this 'I have seen enough to prove I am right' stuff in order to get out of Jury Duty for life. 

Smart move.  Appear in a public setting where a record of your posts can be easily established and retrieved at will - reach some hare-brained conclusion in a few nanoseconds without the aid of any real evidence - then shout in red caps that you alone possess the truth and/or the ability to discern it. 

That is a permanent get out of jury duty move since it portrays you as someone incapable of fair and rational discourse.
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
Listen if you had come here with irrefutable evidence against the coin, other than your opinion then people would of listened, running in the room and creaming "Scam" in big red letters and then "character assassination to all whom oppose" is not anyway to start with your claims.

I don't need irrefutable evidence, I need only suspect that they are scammers.
dictatorial methods against any argument that refutes your claimed opinion
Where is this reasoned refutation? I haven't seen any, only spittle-flecked ad-hominem and rage at their scam being exposed.


full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
You are being ad hominem yourself, can you not see this, by using autocratic, dictatorial methods against any argument that refutes your claimed opinion, by offering negative trust, therefore abusing the right to express opinion.

Listen if you had come here with irrefutable evidence against the coin, other than your opinion then people would of listened, running in the room and creaming "Scam" in big red letters and then "character assassination to all whom oppose" is not anyway to start with your claims.
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0

You have been warned.


Okay kid, you've said your piece. You've clearly demonstrated you have no argument. We 'have been warned' now - thanks for the PSA. Now get on your way. The price has been going up the whole time you've been spreading FUD so it's clearly not working.

Also, stop saying these new accounts are spreading FUD with fake interest in SIGT. Do you not know what FUD means? Your responses are so childish that nobody can possibly take you seriously. I tried to ask you if you had any actual real facts to support this being a scam - you clearly don't. BYE!

noooooo I’ve been warned. Omg!!!! Run for the hills. Fucking snowflake has warned us. Ok batman, go fight your next crusade with whatever coin your think is a scam. How about bytecoin? Flappy coin? 1337?  Some real shit.
member
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
And the whole threatening people with negative ratings, just to prove the insubstantial evidence you have delivered, of the coin being a scam, is pure mindlessness. Who is this guy kim jong un? I hope it is clear to many of the community, that this is nothing more than bullying tactics to force a weak argument across the table.

You are aware that acting in such a manner, already means you have lost, as you could not bring forward a solid case without reprisal, in the form of threats.


Apparently I can't be trusted now because I asked him for evidence  Grin Grin
Jump to: