Topic: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - page 390. (Read 823878 times)

I dont know what the checksum even means hahah  anyway

and REalistic "test" that a user can try   lets say Mining with this miner on separated Rig on another acount on Suprnova and moving the coins to a New wallet?

Batch file? Unsafe? It's just a text) Unless you are writing an obfuscated js there it shouldn't raise any alarms))

It is supermegalegit)
MD5 Checksum: 78B791482AF88BB3F41E95EF1B6BD266
SHA-1 Checksum: 1F9E9AB94E6995320406A9E2377021DFF48CB8A1
SHA-256 Checksum: 6077707C217DE5926A8DE535050A8DE6349A2862A7EFAF1FBA806C558974A3B1
SHA-512 Checksum: F9F3DCD7622BF793840C76E488B4BFDA0B8B8C17F1C184A11092CC607677B0A6815D3985D09F6C3 E55930FEB2F129E61A22A636D1099589F7F8C185EEE758FBC

But you can get CWI miner, it is even better for older cards (spmod3 for example has lower hashrate on 970 than previous versions).

reason why it is not available from drop box and got deleted? (to many users come on 4mb file Signatum Miners not that many)

any prove that it is legit sp mod 3`?

Hi,

I'm CryptoNoob. Several people had informed me about your post and I wanted to respond to clear things up.

1. I received SPMod3 from a user on the Official Signatum Telegram channel that had sent it to me. I didn't modify anything on it. I simply downloaded it and reuploaded it so that it would help other people out that wanted to see an increase in their hashrate. I did state in my video that it was paid software that normally cost $25, however in the comments I'd stated that I'd made a mistake and that at the time of recording that it actually cost around $127 as SP charges .05 BTC for the software.

2. I've had several people with GTX 1060s have reported that it helped them. If you wasn't noticing an increase in your hashrate, you can always reach out to me or any other member of the Signatum community for help. I'm very active in my comments and I try to help everyone that I can in anyway that I can. The whole reason I started my channel was because I have a lot of faith in Signatum and in the community that stands behind it and wanted to help people who wanted to know how to mine Signatum.

3. By default the batch file does have the Yiimp pool in there. When I received it, it was like that. I advised my viewers to use Yiimp pool as I felt it was easiest for beginners as there was no registration required. I was planning on making a follow-up video on how to mine on registered pools such as SuprNova, but I just haven't gotten around to doing it. I advised that Yiimp Pool did charge a 2% pool fee, but that it was easiest for beginners since they didn't have to worry about creating accounts, setting up workers or anything like that. Not that it's hard to do, but I wanted my viewer to become comfortable with being able to modify the batch files for the settings that best work for them. SuprNova was being buggy for me and several other members of the Signatum community, but only regarding the charts. I can post a screenshot if you wish.

4. Several people within the community and even in my video comments have stated that it worked fine for them and that no viruses were found. I've heard reports that some other mining softwares have been reported as being falsely flagged as viruses. For me Windows Defender showed that it was completely fine, however when try to modify the batch file for the CWI Closed Beta Miner (which I'm currently using), Windows tells me that it could be unsafe. I've never noticed any issues with the SPMod3 file that I did use however.

5. In order to use Yiimp Pool, users need to know their Signatum address as it's the user name when you're modifying your batch file assuming you're using Yiimp Pool. I advised my viewers to change the one that's in there by default to their own and modify other variables such as their intensity setting to best suit the users' individual needs and save the file. There was an address that came with the batch file by default, but it wasn't mine and I'm honestly not sure who's it is.... possibly SP's. I did inform my viewers to change it to their own though.

6. I had heard about the Yiimp Pool hack earlier from within the Signatum community. From what I've heard the hack affected the website directly and didn't involve hacked mining software. I feel really bad for anyone who may have been affected by this hack.

 

When all bytes from one file match all the bytes from another file those files are identical.
You can throw your BS into trash if you think matching bytes means matching their count and not the order.

lol again, for the slow ones - its stupid trivial to spoof a file size to make "all bytes match perfectly". I hold a BS in computer science, you can trust me on this one.

It would be useful to the community to know if another piece of software, claiming to be something he developed, is legit or bugged (as has been seen in the wild). Besides, spmod3 doesn't provide the large margin compared to other miners as it used to. Because a checksum is only useful in identification, and because sp is a long time developer with good standing in the community, I don't see why anyone reasonable wouldn't do such a thing.

All of that is besides the point though. I don't care what was posted or where, I'm just arguing the point of thinking 2 files are equivalent based on file size.

Once again for the slow ones - all bytes match perfectly.
And why would he provide a checksum if you didn't buy his miner? He will send you hash together with an exe when you pay 0.05 BTC )

Well, if I was attaching my trojan to a legit program, I'd spoof it to the byte as well. Tends to fool the ones who think file size comparisons offer any security.

And yes, any developer should willingly supply a checksum. It offers no value other than identification.

Steady volume over 80btc, steady growth, nice buy wall wait until we are listed on more exchanges going to the moon

I compared it with a bought spmod3 miner, prefect byte match. So... you noob))
_sp should give you checksum so you could check if you stole legitimate miner from him or not?

It's stupid trivial to spoof file size (99% of blackhat encryption/packaging/obfuscation tools come standard with size spoof). Only muggles judge software that way. I'm sure sp can provide an md5 or sha hash of his spmod3. Then, one only needs to compare the hash of anything else claiming to be spmod3.

Don't write if you don't know something for sure. Miner linked there is a legit spmod3.
Miner that is a trojan has completely different size and it's not this one.

Has anybody successfully mined this on a mac? I've tried the 3 miners in the master post via wine but I encounter various errors for each. This is more of a teaching myself sort of thing, and I'm really determined to do it.

The only thing that makes it worth it to mine anything is the returns you get...measured by exchange rates

If you're mining for something else you're doing it wrong

You should be mining what's profitable then buying whatever you would have preferred to mine in a world where they were all equally profitable.

As to what it does....You could make that same argument about any coin on here.

Including the "new" BTC

ALways going to be a better coin out there from a fundamentals perspective.

New algo.. is  that all this coin offers or are there other things  that make it 'worth the effort' to mine maybe?

Opportunities like BCC don't happen often.....

And unless this coin hits 6 soon* you should have been buying in at the bottom of BCC not sitting on SIGT

No one could put their coins into exchanges...Only buy the small supply that was already on them

Play small (like grandma at coin machine) = win small . Play big (like a men with balls of steel) = win big  . All or nothing ! Opportunities like SIGT dont happen often , i bet a lot of people like you dumped ETH at 10 cents also 

Or the price would just bottom out and you'd be left with nothing?

And considering hte money I made on BCC...lol

You haev no idea what you're talking about

if you don't include oppurtunity cost you don't know what you're doing.

Sitting on alt coins...lol

Talk about throwing darts at a board

@7wis7edfa7e - with this miner linked in the video one member here got ripped off (at least one) - but this hack was different as it was attacking the wallet from pool directly and not the mining client / user!