There's a big difference between offering each other help while patting each other on the back versus conversations that devolved into scathing abusive attacks.
Read those moved threads and tell us which one do you think deserved ckolivas' judicious moderator ban hammer love tap?
That is a really simplistic view of what has been happening in these forums. Standard SPT referrer program participant tactics seem to be:
1) escalate any remarks mentioning the pre-order nature of the SP30, the lack of any refund or delivery guarantees, and the questions about whether the SP30 will ever recover its cost into mudslinging contests with the first willing participant, then run to the mods to get the comments deleted
2) troll the other hardware threads spreading FUD about Bitmain, KNC and others to a degree far worse than anything that happens in this thread.
Lets not focus on which thread deserved what. Lets focus on the important issue we were discussing: what is the likelihood of the Aug. and Sept. SP30 pre-orders recovering their cost before they operate at a loss.
The burden of proof should be on Spondoolies to show a reasonable case that SP30 retail customers will ROI, not on potential customers to show that it won't.
Please show me proof for the FUD about Bitmain.
I thought this thread is about the SP-Tech company and its miners, not about ROI and not about the case for the customers. Each vendor's thread should be about the vendor and the products, not about financial speculations.
When there are 10 different topics in 10 different areas makes it difficult to find information and follow along.
If an SP30 can bring home 9 bitcoin before it starts losing money then you will ROI. Maybe a year? If not or you will never catch up, then it will never ROI and you'll have a nice BTC machine.
This has been discussed so many times already. As stated before I think there is a small misconception about the bitcoin ROI. Buying and holding 9 bitcoins raises the question of when you exchange them back to fiat or what are you doing with them while mining gives you more options.The way I see it it this:
- Exchange rate doesn't move for 6-12 months:
- Buying and holding makes 0 profit;
- Mining will show a profit because there is less incentive to deploy new hashpower
- Exchange rate goes up (fast or slow):
- Buying and holding will show a profit, but uncertain because of the moment of exchanging. Will you exchange at 1000$, 1200$, 1500$ and so on. If you exchange 3 bitcoin at 1000$ and next month you have a 1200$ rate then you lost some profit there, while mining tends to smooth a bit this;
- Mining will always show a profit if exchange rate goes up. I realize that it will be smaller than buying and holding if the exchange rate will go up fast, but since nobody doesn't know the future I prefer the conservative way instead of the lotto way.
There you have it. Out of 4 possibilities only 3 will show a profit and 2 out of 3 are from mining. It's everyone's choice how he plans his financing. All ROI discussions sums up to the above for me and I feel that it's a very over discussed general subject. Comparing competition offers in terms of pricing and performance is one thing, but the ROI discussions tend to be more a matter of personal preference and speculation than a neutral thing like pure hardware performance.