Topic: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes - page 189. (Read 810098 times)

Thanks.

I was thinking about spreadcoin constantly the last two weeks. And I will not stop. Something magic about this coin.

it would be great if mr.spread could integrate all gpu and cpu hashing we have into wallet that way we would be sure that all works as it should, and yes im using spreadx11 miner but for now is better for small miners to mine darkcoin on multipools sell them and buy spreadcoin from uberhash spreadcoin miners.

Any comments?

BTW, georgem, I love your idea about 1440 MN.  (http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37.msg790#msg790) Looks like Mr. Spread likes it too.

Yep that is really pleasant to see that this coin recovered quite nicely and that us true believers in this coin were able to snag some more at cheap discount prices thanks to the troll brigade WICKED!! VIVE LE SPREVOLUTION!!!

SPR is on a decent recovery after those Dumps.

BTW, make sure you are using one of the spreadcoin miners. Some people were trying to use regular X11 miners, but thos will not work on spreadcoin, since spreadcoin has a second layer of hashing and signing over the X11 algorithm. If you are using X11 miners, you will never find any blocks.

currently nvidia miner doesn't work on testnet. AMD miner works fine.

1) Calculate average time for finding a block. Net hashrate/your hashrate = average time in minutes. If you have no blocks in more then, let's say, x2 of this time, you can start to worry that you're doing something wrong (or you're very unlucky).

2) I guess you CAN use testnet with ONE gpu for SHORT time to see if you get any blocks whatsoever so your config is OK. But I can't say that for sure... MAYBE that's a bad idea... Maybe we need yet another testnet for miners testing their rigs actually mine some blocks... Hope I don't give an idea for some of our haters and trolls...

I took a hack at trying to figure out what the average mn size might be in SPR given 1440 risk possible MN's.
Since there are currently 1.71 million SPR in circulation and since most holders want to have as many mn's as is possible given total holdings this would imply an average SPR per mn of about 1190 SPR.
Now the distribution of 1440 mn's, if it is similar to the testnet, will be overall similar in size with gradual increases and decreases.
So if you assume a gradual increase and decrease of about 10 SPR in either direction per 100 mn's until all coins in circulation are used up you get a total range of 1120-1260.
The biggest wildcard here will be exactly what % of total coins in circulation will be in mn's... There's no way it'll be anywhere close to 100%, at least not this early in the game.

JL

Oh yes maybe the Score system will prevent the use of multi MN per server. I think it should be prohibited, but this is only my opinion.

I think it would be better for small miners if they didn't have the attention span of a gnat and stopped feeling entitled to instant free money, then whining when they don't get any.

You make just as much or more mining solo long term than you would via a pool.

Yep he definitely is one to make sure that when he sets out to do something he damn well makes sure that he does it  lol Here's to greater things to come from SpreadCoin and to our amazing developer Mr. Spread Cheers

All I can say Mr. Spread delivers what he sets out to do. 

first off all im not here to pun, i like this coin and i bought some but yesterday at this time i put 2 machines with 6 gpus to mine this coin and didnt find any blocks in last 24 hours is this coin become to hard to mine for small miners or i was just to unlucky again this is about 5th time i tried to mine and i set up everything alright but didnt found even one block. I think it should be better for small miners that this coin start to make some official pools for small miners lets say 10 mhs max per same ip/miner so that small miners can have some chance to get some coins 2   .  

I agree, 2000 Darkcoin Masternodes running on 2000 separate machines is a very robust network.

Spread has a voting system though, hopefully it can be modified to give higher scores to machines running fewer Masternodes. Then competition is going to push people trying to run dozens of Masternodes on the same crappy Windows box off the network.

This is early testing, Mr Spread seems to know what he's doing.

Payments rolling in on my VPS nicely:

    {
        "account" : "mn15",
        "address" : "muCckRXnSmCYehpUD6b8ezQtoD88fTZqvF",
        "category" : "immature",
        "amount" : 1.99777350,
        "confirmations" : 72,
        "generated" : true,
        "blockhash" : "ab11bd6e2dec6c674514d41eac13493cc99b3ebd9a1d2a3e203744d1052cd0ac",
        "blockindex" : 0,
        "blocktime" : 1422552526,
        "txid" : "cb234301939e8c5b7dffd825d7cc0434091e028683a18ff110bf538049d39d36",
        "time" : 1422552526,
        "timereceived" : 1422552527
    },
    {
        "account" : "mn6",
        "address" : "mtqqYni2Zjeob4tfvGeogZ7RnY49Qq5k4s",
        "category" : "immature",
        "amount" : 1.99774350,
        "confirmations" : 12,
        "generated" : true,
        "blockhash" : "0fef3f9d2350d2b132f3af3d12ee3b0ef9a7b1b947f1cdb9ad3d22552da494de",
        "blockindex" : 0,
        "blocktime" : 1422555717,
        "txid" : "e11f977e128d63499d217c70bfe8a088d78bd08ab1a880a8d7926e1cb9cbc834",
        "time" : 1422555717,
        "timereceived" : 1422555718
    },
    {
        "account" : "mn9",
        "address" : "mmrfjEL9XZoDGpnTyEm3rNnk1MJAs84Ten",
        "category" : "immature",
        "amount" : 1.99773900,
        "confirmations" : 3,
        "generated" : true,
        "blockhash" : "b38a4db57aa83edf588dd7d501563df59ffe0a6f78e395c540d1d0cd7bb0b907",
        "blockindex" : 0,
        "blocktime" : 1422556590,
        "txid" : "fc82408c12362e695d8ea845dd034c3c57338767f8c7d86a0064732e54e554a9",
        "time" : 1422556590,
        "timereceived" : 1422556592
    },
    {
        "account" : "mn4",
        "address" : "mq4GBfmg5hi9eGu883CruYLKx43oXzmFBQ",
        "category" : "immature",
        "amount" : 1.99773800,
        "confirmations" : 1,
        "generated" : true,
        "blockhash" : "a55c03f509daf7b7b874858cfd249af9a2844be3c481cf2bfe6371dc92bdd547",
        "blockindex" : 0,
        "blocktime" : 1422556999,
        "txid" : "e8179e3651587473cdc342233094e2606acb9f4ae082bbd12a191c334dbb48cb",
        "time" : 1422556999,
        "timereceived" : 1422557000
    }

One thing about the MN :
The fact that you can have 10 MN on the same wallet is not a problem? This is only for testnet or it'll be like this on mainnet?

Normally the MNs should help the network to achieve diferent task, and I don't see how 10 or more MN on the same wallet/deamon/server would help more than only 1 per server.
What I want to say is that this is not really decentralized concept

Kewl...

Think I'll try splitting up that 300 SPR MN into two more "virtual" nodes   

Actually a mix of both - probably closer to half and half.