Tooo much firm believers in here. Yuck
Topic: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes - page 350. (Read 810099 times)
December 23, 2014, 05:34:35 PM
We need fudders to bring liquidity.
Tooo much firm believers in here. Yuck
Tooo much firm believers in here. Yuck
December 23, 2014, 04:51:17 PM
...snip....
If MN,darksend and especially GUI muliti-sig are integrated into Spread wallet,SPR is undoubtly to be on the list of TOP 10 maket cap.
btw: so many proposals in this thread,a roadmap should be sorted out now.
If MN,darksend and especially GUI muliti-sig are integrated into Spread wallet,SPR is undoubtly to be on the list of TOP 10 maket cap.
btw: so many proposals in this thread,a roadmap should be sorted out now.
Really?
You know darksend and instant tx relies on a diverse and distributed community securing the network and putting in the effort to keep master nodes up and updated?
thelonecrouton has also argued (from memory, I'm sure he will correct me) that mining is less important than master nodes, so while solo mining is very attractive and closer to what Satoshi intended, solo mining can be viewed with indifference by some.
To beat DRK, with an effective DRK clone, the best approach would be to advertise SPR as a re-run of DRK for those that missed the launch of DRK. Then climbing the mountain to beat DRK is a little less challenging. The lack of liquidity will remain the issue to moving this project forward in the short-term as Master Nodes are built around proof of service which requires coins.
Then there is the SPR code. Anything of potential value to SPR and DRK can be used by DRK.
Sadly, as you've posted this, I think I'm talking myself out of SPR. Maybe that's the second bottle of Saint-Joseph talking. Let's see what view sobriety brings tomorrow.
December 23, 2014, 04:50:14 PM
It's a good idea.Security is of great importance.
My proposal is a GUI muliti-sig Spread wallet.Nobody has developped a GUI muliti-sig wallet up to date.
Armoury does a reasonably good job of multisig and uses the standard backend (unlike Electrum which uses node.js) but there's a limit to how simple you can make it, it's a cumbersome procedure. If anyone is interested I did some multisig GUI examples for Darkcoin here: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/quick-and-very-dirty-multisig-ui-in-python-qt-new-unimproved-perver.2197/ - I am not a coder and don't speak c++ so can't work it into the standard bitcoin-qt wallet that SPR uses, but it would be easy enough for someone who knew what they were doing.
If time is an issue though I'd rather Mr Spread concentrate on Masternodes and IX.
btw: so many proposals in this thread,a roadmap should be sorted out now.
Cheers 
December 23, 2014, 04:16:36 PM
You guys (maybe) are forgetting that the 66 coin blocks were 10 minutes apart.
December 23, 2014, 03:47:29 PM
It's a good idea.Security is of great importance.
My proposal is a GUI muliti-sig Spread wallet.Nobody has developped a GUI muliti-sig wallet up to date.
Armoury does a reasonably good job of multisig and uses the standard backend (unlike Electrum which uses node.js) but there's a limit to how simple you can make it, it's a cumbersome procedure. If anyone is interested I did some multisig GUI examples for Darkcoin here: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/quick-and-very-dirty-multisig-ui-in-python-qt-new-unimproved-perver.2197/ - I am not a coder and don't speak c++ so can't work it into the standard bitcoin-qt wallet that SPR uses, but it would be easy enough for someone who knew what they were doing.
If time is an issue though I'd rather Mr Spread concentrate on Masternodes and IX.
btw: so many proposals in this thread,a roadmap should be sorted out now.
December 23, 2014, 03:44:03 PM
It's a good idea.Security is of great importance.
My proposal is a GUI muliti-sig Spread wallet.Nobody has developped a GUI muliti-sig wallet up to date.
Armoury does a reasonably good job of multisig and uses the standard backend (unlike Electrum which uses node.js) but there's a limit to how simple you can make it, it's a cumbersome procedure. If anyone is interested I did some multisig GUI examples for Darkcoin here: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/quick-and-very-dirty-multisig-ui-in-python-qt-new-unimproved-perver.2197/ - I am not a coder and don't speak c++ so can't work it into the standard bitcoin-qt wallet that SPR uses, but it would be easy enough for someone who knew what they were doing.
If time is an issue though I'd rather Mr Spread concentrate on Masternodes and IX.
December 23, 2014, 03:36:14 PM
Off-line cold storage and muliti-sig are the best security solutions at present .
December 23, 2014, 03:31:22 PM
Mr Spread, may I propose two feature requests for your consideration:
1. Could the wallet have a startup password, or PIN from drop-down boxes or an on-screen keyboard, or some other method of protection at startup? It has always bothered me that anyone can come along and view my balance and transaction history. (Although I usually store the wallet.dat encrypted when not in use.) It could be set on/off via checkbox or .conf file.
2. Add either a periodic automatic wallet.dat backup to a different directory, or stick a big BACKUP WALLET button on the overview form. Also, on initial startup (or creation of a new address) a popup asking the user if they would like to print the privkey(s) for safekeeping - dumpprivkey is the first thing I do before funding an address and it has saved me several times.
edit: a virtual keyboard option to enter passphrase before sending would also be great.
It's a good idea.Security is of great importance.1. Could the wallet have a startup password, or PIN from drop-down boxes or an on-screen keyboard, or some other method of protection at startup? It has always bothered me that anyone can come along and view my balance and transaction history. (Although I usually store the wallet.dat encrypted when not in use.) It could be set on/off via checkbox or .conf file.
2. Add either a periodic automatic wallet.dat backup to a different directory, or stick a big BACKUP WALLET button on the overview form. Also, on initial startup (or creation of a new address) a popup asking the user if they would like to print the privkey(s) for safekeeping - dumpprivkey is the first thing I do before funding an address and it has saved me several times.
edit: a virtual keyboard option to enter passphrase before sending would also be great.
My proposal is a GUI muliti-sig Spread wallet.Nobody has developped a GUI muliti-sig wallet up to date.
December 23, 2014, 03:16:02 PM
1. Could the wallet have a startup password, or PIN from drop-down boxes, or some other method of protection at startup? It has always bothered me that anyone can come along and view my balance and transaction history. (Although I usually store the wallet.dat encrypted when not in use.) It could be set on/off via checkbox or .conf file.
You mean without any actual encryption, just password for gui? This may create a false sense of security while there will be none, anyone will be able to copy your wallet.dat and see your transactions, unless I misunderstood you. You can use OS level user password for that, I think it is more appropriate and will also protect your other private data such as web browsing history, etc.I meant something like automatic encryption of the wallet.dat file, requiring a password to unlock it before it gets loaded by the QT client or deamon. As I say I do this manually myself already, so it's no big deal for me, but having it built into the GUI/daemon might be more convenient. I appreciate you have limited time though, so just a suggestion.
December 23, 2014, 03:08:09 PM
1. Could the wallet have a startup password, or PIN from drop-down boxes, or some other method of protection at startup? It has always bothered me that anyone can come along and view my balance and transaction history. (Although I usually store the wallet.dat encrypted when not in use.) It could be set on/off via checkbox or .conf file.
You mean without any actual encryption, just password for gui? This may create a false sense of security while there will be none, anyone will be able to copy your wallet.dat and see your transactions, unless I misunderstood you. You can use OS level user password for that, I think it is more appropriate and will also protect your other private data such as web browsing history, etc.2. Add either a periodic automatic wallet.dat backup to a different directory, or stick a big BACKUP WALLET button on the overview form. Also, on initial startup (or creation of a new address) a popup asking the user if they would like to print the privkey(s) for safekeeping - dumpprivkey is the first thing I do before funding an address and it has saved me several times.
This is a good proposal. December 23, 2014, 02:42:06 PM
WTB 25k SPR's.
Any offers?
Any offers?
December 23, 2014, 02:13:55 PM
Mr Spread, may I propose two feature requests for your consideration:
1. Could the wallet have a startup password, or PIN from drop-down boxes or an on-screen keyboard, or some other method of protection at startup? It has always bothered me that anyone can come along and view my balance and transaction history. (Although I usually store the wallet.dat encrypted when not in use.) It could be set on/off via checkbox or .conf file.
2. Add either a periodic automatic wallet.dat backup to a different directory, or stick a big BACKUP WALLET button on the overview form. Also, on initial startup (or creation of a new address) a popup asking the user if they would like to print the privkey(s) for safekeeping - dumpprivkey is the first thing I do before funding an address and it has saved me several times.
edit: a virtual keyboard option to enter passphrase before sending would also be great.
1. Could the wallet have a startup password, or PIN from drop-down boxes or an on-screen keyboard, or some other method of protection at startup? It has always bothered me that anyone can come along and view my balance and transaction history. (Although I usually store the wallet.dat encrypted when not in use.) It could be set on/off via checkbox or .conf file.
2. Add either a periodic automatic wallet.dat backup to a different directory, or stick a big BACKUP WALLET button on the overview form. Also, on initial startup (or creation of a new address) a popup asking the user if they would like to print the privkey(s) for safekeeping - dumpprivkey is the first thing I do before funding an address and it has saved me several times.
edit: a virtual keyboard option to enter passphrase before sending would also be great.
December 23, 2014, 01:14:00 PM
come on chaps: 1,376,181 distribution and no liquidity?
There's perfect liquidity, in all markets, at all times. You just have to pay enough.
When the market will stabilize then the liquidity will be reduced.
December 23, 2014, 12:50:57 PM
http://www.[Suspicious link removed]/index.php?blockexplorer=SPR&top_addresses=100
top 100 rich list ,doesn't change much in the past weeks.
http://www.[Suspicious link removed]/index.php?blockexplorer=SPR&top_addresses=100
thanks.
pretty decent spread, provided a group don't control a load of the addresses.
Mr Spread, from the language use in the white paper, I reckon English is not your native language, so you're a pretty smart guy for having such good English
December 23, 2014, 12:45:04 PM
http://www.[Suspicious link removed]/index.php?blockexplorer=SPR&top_addresses=100
top 100 rich list ,doesn't change much in the past weeks.
http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=SPR&top_addresses=100
thanks.
pretty decent spread, provided a group don't control a load of the addresses.
Mr Spread, from the language use in the white paper, I reckon English is not your native language, so you're a pretty smart guy for having such good English
December 23, 2014, 12:38:42 PM
http://www.[Suspicious link removed]/index.php?blockexplorer=SPR&top_addresses=100
top 100 rich list ,doesn't change much in the past weeks.
http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=SPR&top_addresses=100
December 23, 2014, 12:35:27 PM
...snip...
The 66 > 6 only lasted 2200 blocks, 145,200ish coins. There are 1,300,000+ now, so 90% of coins have been mined at the 6.66 reward.
I would also like to see a disto.
The 66 > 6 only lasted 2200 blocks, 145,200ish coins. There are 1,300,000+ now, so 90% of coins have been mined at the 6.66 reward.
I would also like to see a disto.
thanks. that's good to know.
December 23, 2014, 11:58:14 AM
So I'm thinking of putting in some effort.
Before that:
WTB 100k SPR
100K is really a huge amount,it takes 11 days to mine.Before that:
WTB 100k SPR
You have a large appetite.
22Gh total hashrate!
Would cost you around 15BTC to get that sort of hash for 11days.
15BTC would only buy you around 65,000SPR at 0.00022 (If you could buy that amount at that price)
Good luck, coins
By renting rigs? I doubt its viable.
Is there an explorer to check the SPR distribution? The 66 > 6 reward is somewhat of a concern, but lets see the distribution.
edit
come on chaps: 1,376,181 distribution and no liquidity?
I found one x11 farm owner who was willing to point it at SPR. But getting around 2gh a day is not going to happen.
The 66 > 6 only lasted 2200 blocks, 145,200ish coins. There are 1,300,000+ now, so 90% of coins have been mined at the 6.66 reward.
I would also like to see a disto.
top 100 rich list ,doesn't change much in the past weeks.
December 23, 2014, 11:55:57 AM
So I'm thinking of putting in some effort.
Before that:
WTB 100k SPR
100K is really a huge amount,it takes 11 days to mine.Before that:
WTB 100k SPR
You have a large appetite.
22Gh total hashrate!
Would cost you around 15BTC to get that sort of hash for 11days.
15BTC would only buy you around 65,000SPR at 0.00022 (If you could buy that amount at that price)
Good luck, coins
By renting rigs? I doubt its viable.
Is there an explorer to check the SPR distribution? The 66 > 6 reward is somewhat of a concern, but lets see the distribution.
edit
come on chaps: 1,376,181 distribution and no liquidity?
I found one x11 farm owner who was willing to point it at SPR. But getting around 2gh a day is not going to happen.
The 66 > 6 only lasted 2200 blocks, 145,200ish coins. There are 1,300,000+ now, so 90% of coins have been mined at the 6.66 reward.
I would also like to see a disto.
December 23, 2014, 11:53:00 AM
So I'm thinking of putting in some effort.
Before that:
WTB 100k SPR
100K is really a huge amount,it takes 11 days to mine.Before that:
WTB 100k SPR
You have a large appetite.
22Gh total hashrate!
Would cost you around 15BTC to get that sort of hash for 11days.
15BTC would only buy you around 65,000SPR at 0.00022 (If you could buy that amount at that price)
Good luck, coins
By renting rigs? I doubt its viable.
Is there an explorer to check the SPR distribution? The 66 > 6 reward is somewhat of a concern, but lets see the distribution.
edit
come on chaps: 1,376,181 distribution and no liquidity?
I found one x11 farm owner who was willing to point it at SPR. But getting around 2gh a day is not going to happen.
The 66 > 6 only lasted 2200 blocks, 145,200ish coins. There are 1,300,000+ now, so 90% of coins have been mined at the 6.66 reward.
I would also like to see a disto.
Jump to: