Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Technobit HEX16B(Bitfury based) 16 chip board design - page 3. (Read 56538 times)

hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
Thanks Gator!

Do you suggest the single rail because it can handle more amps?

I suggest a single rail because it's less likely you'll have overload rail problems or blown rails. The single rail designs are rock solid except maybe a user can ask too much of the cables and melt them (don't ignore hot cables, spread the load to more cables or use thicker cables) Good PSUs have 18AWG  wires, cheap ones may only use 16AWG, and are much easier to melt!

You usually get what you pay for with single rail, a Corsair 750W PSU will have a 62A/744W 12V rail, but that Warlock 900W PSU only has a 696W max on the 12V rail, and someone comes along thinking they can stick 900W on it and it blows up!  Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 361
Merit: 250
Thanks Gator!

Do you suggest the single rail because it can handle more amps?
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
Do you think either of these PSU's can run 3 bitfury boards and 1 coincraft 260 board?

XION AXP-1000K14XE 1000 Watt 80+ Bronze Module ATX
(6 + 12v rails)


Apevia ATX-WA900W Warlock 900-Watt Power Supply
(4 + 12v rails)


You need 36A/432W for Hex8A1-260 (I got one runs at 368W, and one runs at 408W, so they can vary in power requirements a lot!)
and 19A/228W for 3xHex16B (about 75W each)
= Total around 55A/660W

Apevia ATX-WA900W Warlock 900-Watt Power Supply = 4x 25A rails, 58A/696W max on 12V,  maybe cutting it a bit close.

XION AXP-1000K14XE 1000 Watt 80+ Bronze Module ATX = 2x 20A and 4x 30A rails, 75A/900W max on 12V, this is the best of the two.

To avoid disappointment I would use a single 12V rail 62A/750W+ brand name PSU. (Corsair, EVGA, XFX, Seasonic, etc.)

Cheap unknown brands with many rails have a habit of blowing up!
sr. member
Activity: 361
Merit: 250
Do you think either of these PSU's can run 3 bitfury boards and 1 coincraft 260 board?

XION AXP-1000K14XE 1000 Watt 80+ Bronze Module ATX
(6 + 12v rails)


Apevia ATX-WA900W Warlock 900-Watt Power Supply
(4 + 12v rails)
sr. member
Activity: 361
Merit: 250

Martin,

I am complaining because you sent my order to quickly. The website says it can take 4 weeks to send the boards after receipt of chips. You sent my boards the day after receiving my chips.
My order will be completed in approximately 7 days.

Just kidding, thanks for getting my order to me much faster than expected!

Thank you, thank you, thank you!

блaгoдapя, блaгoдapя, блaгoдapя!

hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
3 boards hex16b will draw up to 3x75W
sr. member
Activity: 361
Merit: 250
What's the min PSU needed to run 3 boards?

My 3 bitburner fury's are running on a corsair 750, and I was thinking the technobit boards might have similar power requirements.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
Hey marto74 how long until we see some gen2 bitfury boards running?

I don't think a 25% improvement per chip is enough to make them competitive unless they cut their price so Marto can put 32 chip/110GH on a board or slash the 16 chip board price drastically. Really disappointed they are still at 55nm, could have put 40nm in the same package.

The 4x A1 130GH/s board looks the best right now (8x A1 has cooling requirements not suitable for home use!).

FriedCat is working on a 40nm chip that might be competitive. Was talking similar specs to A1 but at 40nm should make it much cheaper than 28nm.

I see they priced the BitFury 2 test chips at €5. 32x €5 = €160/$220 for about 110GH/s, expect double for other costs and Martos time, would make them about $4/GH per board.
http://www.bitfurystrikesback.com/product/bitfury-55nm-rev2-samples/

I was thinking the same thing. PCB and components do have a fixed cost that will influence the final cost per GH/s very much. Having a 2.5GH/s chip at ~0.7W/GH pushes the 3$/GH limit very much. Paying for more per GH/s is just throwing money on the window. Let's hope for a dump price for the chips!
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
Hey marto74 how long until we see some gen2 bitfury boards running?

I don't think a 25% improvement per chip is enough to make them competitive unless they cut their price so Marto can put 32 chip/110GH on a board or slash the 16 chip board price drastically. Really disappointed they are still at 55nm, could have put 40nm in the same package.

The 4x A1 130GH/s board looks the best right now (8x A1 has cooling requirements not suitable for home use!).

FriedCat is working on a 40nm chip that might be competitive. Was talking similar specs to A1 but at 40nm should make it much cheaper than 28nm.

I see they priced the BitFury 2 test chips at €5. 32x €5 = €160/$220 for about 110GH/s, expect double for other costs and Martos time, would make them about $4/GH per board.
http://www.bitfurystrikesback.com/product/bitfury-55nm-rev2-samples/
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
e

Steve

Wrong setting. It's should be --hexminerc-voltage 1100 --hexminerc-options 16:1500

Check the asics, Gen2 is Avalon A3255-Q48.

I have been putting hexminerb 900 hexminerb 16:540 then hexminera 1500 hexminera 16 540 so your saying leave off second part and add  --hexminerc-voltage 1100 --hexminerc-options 16:1500

Sorry Zich I am a bit off a noob
Steve

Did you own HEX16A too? If not then no need to add command --hexminera-voltage 1460 --hexminerc-options 16:480
Just use:
Code:
sudo nano ./cgminer --hexminerc-voltage 1100 --hexminerc-options 16:1500 --hexminerb-voltage 900 --hexminerb-options 16:540 

Check my previous post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5211950  Grin
full member
Activity: 290
Merit: 100
e

Steve

Wrong setting. It's should be --hexminerc-voltage 1100 --hexminerc-options 16:1500

Check the asics, Gen2 is Avalon A3255-Q48.

I have been putting hexminerb 900 hexminerb 16:540 then hexminera 1500 hexminera 16 540 so your saying leave off second part and add  --hexminerc-voltage 1100 --hexminerc-options 16:1500

Sorry Zich I am a bit off a noob
Steve
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
Also it seems to have one blinking red light


Fast red blinking mean hashing  Smiley
full member
Activity: 290
Merit: 100
Also it seems to have one blinking red light
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
hello all
     I have 2 miners running off of a raspberry pi one is a hex16B which runs around 44 ghs

     The other is suppose to be a Hex16A2 which should run at 24 ghs but I set up voltage to 1500 and options to 16:540 yet it seems to only manage around 7 ghs  1500/705mV not sure how to tell if this is a 16A or 16A2

 Thanks for any help or advice

Steve

Wrong setting. It's should be --hexminerc-voltage 1100 --hexminerc-options 16:1500

Check the asics, Gen2 is Avalon A3255-Q48.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
Hey marto74 how long until we see some gen2 bitfury boards running?

I don't think a 25% improvement per chip is enough to make them competitive unless they cut their price so Marto can put 32 chip/110GH on a board or slash the 16 chip board drastically. Really disappointed they are still at 55nm, could have put 40nm in the same package.

The 4x A1 130GH/s board looks the best right now (8x A1 has cooling requirements not suitable for home use!).

FriedCat is working on a 40nm chip that might be competitive. Was talking similar specs to A1 but at 40nm should make it much cheaper than 28nm.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
Hey marto74 how long until we see some gen2 bitfury boards running?
full member
Activity: 290
Merit: 100
hello all
     I have 2 miners running off of a raspberry pi one is a hex16B which runs around 44 ghs

     The other is suppose to be a Hex16A2 which should run at 24 ghs but I set up voltage to 1500 and options to 16:540 yet it seems to only manage around 7 ghs  1500/705mV not sure how to tell if this is a 16A or 16A2

 Thanks for any help or advice

Steve
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
Marto,

I'm having an unknown issue with one of my technobit hex 16b. It is reporting a problem connecting as a usb device. I'm unsure of the cause, it just stopped working.

I'd like to try to fix it, but if I cannot, may I ship a non-working unit to you for repair?

Thanks!

Batshark

Edit: Got a response through technobit.eu, I'm going to ship 2 units, one unit does not work, the second is working, however there are burned out components on the bottom of the board.

Edit Edit: I'm only going to ship one unit, the one that is completely non-functional Smiley Thanks for quick response by the way!
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
...
Transaction ID # 6YJ26487L1064564J
bye

Confirmed.

Let me publicly acknowledge this: marto74 has given me my full refund.

Some advice to people doing business with TechnoBit/Marto: be patient. VERY patient. Don't be surprised if it takes weeks to get a reply. If all else fails, use this forum to communicate.
Some advice to Marto: DUDE! TALK TO YOUR CUSTOMERS! I can't stress this enough. Answer their emails and contact requests. People don't hate you, they just hate to be left in the dark, because they don't know what's going on. Just answer their emails and everything will be fine. I know you're mainly a tech guy, but communication with customers is EXTREMELY important. Hire some student to answer emails for 1 hour a day. That's all you need. You wouldn't be having any of these complaints if you just talk to them.

That is all. Thank you for keeping your word, even if it took so long.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
God dammit Marto, you said you will give me my refund last week! Where is it?

After I waited for 5 months (for nothing), is it now too hard for you to make a few clicks and send my money back? Are you TRYING to make your business look bad? I honestly don't understand you.
If this takes any longer I'll demand more due to interest rates. You are holding my money for 5 months now.
Transaction ID # 6YJ26487L1064564J
bye
Pages:
Jump to: