Topic: [ANN] The First Litecoin PPS Pool (litecoinpool.org) - page 18. (Read 228113 times)

I've not run any of the S9's but the Bitmain software is the same between my RT1-LTC, D9's & L3+'s so safe bet would be yes...

On a side note, where's a good place to point D9's for BTC?

Good Luck, and welcome to the Lite Side!

OK new to the Litecoin world as I am diversifying from BTC

I am currently running 8 S9's mining BTC

Just bought 2 of the Antminer L3+....

Is it the same setup bitmain software (root/root) that the S9's use? Just point at the pools US and US2 pools?

I already have my account and wallet all setup with Litecoin....

Any other tricks or things I should know...

Mine on!

I see you put in the tab for GH ..thanks...just figured it was 'cute'

Hard Rumor: currently is that Bitmain will be releasing for sale a 1.5gh unit @ 1,300 watts. So that means, until this 'supposed' pre-order

at the end of summer to us 'normal folk,' they will drive LTC difficulty up by maybe a much as 20%? (more?) over the Sumer and then IF pre-order sales

at the end of Summer as the rumor states...that would be Oct 2018 in our hands. A current L3+ (3 of them) can play in this 'sandbox' at 2,400 watts

(now) maybe even into fall...IF the price of LTC can keep ahead of LTC difficulty train...

anyway, Pooler...you may have to 'expand' your mining stuff for this particular dump of equipment and difficulty rise...

(unsure how your capacity for the pool works on this kinda thing...for all I know you are golden and it has no effect on you having to upgrade/equip stuff)

Anyway, been hearing this Hard Rumor for awhile now...but no firm proof...just an aside

thanks for the GH tab addition on the www.litecoinpool.org/calc.....them days are a coming...soon it seems!

The last two numbers on your Accepted lines are the diff of the share submitted and the diff setting you're working on.

 [2014-12-23 21:06:21] Accepted 002b8032 RKM 2b pool 1 Diff 1.51k/1.02k
 [2014-12-23 21:06:36] Accepted 003cfdd3 RKM 0f pool 1 Diff 1.07k/1.02k
 [2014-12-23 21:06:42] Accepted 0033bff2 RKM 3g pool 1 Diff 1.27k/1.02k

Ok, I have removed the "=D" statement to try the variable difficulty and see how it works. Is there a way to tell what difficulty the pool has set my little USB miner at in bfgminer?

Was looking at my hash rate (coming) 11,000mh on the pool (seems like a lot, but not a lot maybe)

 ...perhaps another tweak to the calculator to add GH and TH for giggles as toggle options...there?

(yes, it is that high, now hash rate...we can talk in such terms) sigh....

later

brad

And that's using the variable difficulty set by the pool?

My two Gridseed Orbs, putting out a grand total of 722KH/s are running at a difficulty of 256 set by the pool and getting in 3 to 5 shares per second. Your 5MH/s will fit right in.

What would be the best difficulty setting for a USB Miner running about 5MH/s? Will variable difficulty work with this little miner?

1. If you lock your payout address, you should always keep backups of the wallet it's part of.
2. If it's just your laptop's motherboard that died, your hard disk might still be fine. You might still be able to extract it, connect it to another computer, and access your data.
3. If you still need assistance with your pool account, please send an email to support. Don't forget to include your username.

Hey guys, hoping someone can give me some good news here.

So basically this is my situation:
My laptop motherboard died last week (rip) and on it I had a litecoin core wallet that I used as an intermediary to then move to cold storage; I never kept more than 1 LTC on it so I'm not terribly worried about the crypto itself. HOWEVER, I locked my litecoinpool account to that wallet's address so in order to unlock it I need access to the wallet to get the digital signature. While I could make a new account and redirect my miner to it, I'd just prefer not to have to login to 2 litecoinpool accounts every time I want to check out my progress, especially with one of them dead in the water. If I do have to remake a new account this would be my third time doing so, with the original account being impossible to access due to a lost authenticator.

I completely understand the security risks involved with unlocking a payment address, so I'm not expecting anyone to take me at my word. The one thing I could come up with to prove my ownership of the miner (and therefore the account which only ever had 1 miner) is my ability to modify the settings of the miner. I could overclock it or underclock it to a specific mark, or take it offline at a specific time potentially. I could also route the traffic to a new account with a pre-determined account name.

I appreciate any input!

tl;dr - can't access the old payment address anymore because laptop went kaput but I have complete access to the only miner the account has ever run. Hoping there's a way I could verify ownership given those factors.

Hi there,

do you understand why I have these messages on my antminer L3+ kernel log?
Thanks in advance for your help!!!

DaTongue


http://www.image-heberg.fr/files/1523295587824823015.png

As far as I can tell there has been no issue with any of the servers in the last 24 hours.

If  us.litecoinpool.org is dead, I guess I'm being DNS redirected then.

in mine us servers it's still dead, just europe is alive

 us.litecoinpool.org just accepted a share from my miners.

Hello, Is there a problem with the servers? My workers disconnected and the status is "dead"
usa servers are dead
europe server is alive
at least in my l3+, someone else?

Yes. You will almost always see slightly less hash rate as reported by the pool vs what your miner says. This is true on all pools, not just this one.

Hello All.  Sorry if this was already covered in one of the other 59 pages but I have an issue that I am hoping someone can help me with.  

We use Awesome Miner and it is reporting us hashing at around 39k MH/S.  However, we are only reporting at 36 - 37k MH/S on Litecoinpool.

Is this degree of difference pretty normal?

Thanks so much  

$1.13 a day is rough.  So your basically breaking even at current LTC prices.

I guess there is an interesting dynamic that comes into play.  People without cheap power start shutting down their rigs and only the lucky few who have access to the cheapest power can afford to continue operating.  Seems like this sacrifices some of the decentralization since now only the big players keep their rigs running.  Then since it loses decentralization the value may theoretically drop even further leading to a cascade effect?  "the whole works of cyrpto could skunk to tulips" yikes!

Man this stuff seems crazy when you really try to think about all the variables.