Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Triangles [TRI] Now Stable & Working Anonymous Cloak over TOR - ON BITTREX - page 33. (Read 90287 times)

member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
@AltcoinAdam
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
It seems like dev has abandoned us by these posts:

If I can offer to help you guys out - I have a working TOR-ANON in Triangles that can easily be ported over to MACD also.

It will require that a few of you step it up and stake enough coins to be working as super-nodes before and after anon.

worth noticing: When I added ANON to Triangles the price went up so high that everyone sent off their coins to Bittrex and shut off the network behind them, just letting you know that if I help you out - don´t do the same mistake as my peeps did.

I´ll be around.

I can help you guys implement TOR-technology. I have a working TOR on Triangles that can be ported over.

Are there any developers willing to relaunch this coin (even this dev if he hasn't fully abandoned it) by giving us an extra thousand 10 reward blocks of POW and a windows and mac wallet so we can get this chain moving again and breathe some life into the coin?

I bought up a few thousand coins at 1000 satoshi and would be willing to pay 2000 TRI or 3.33% of the new total (60,000) to the developer who does the above.  The community has to agree to this idea before you start work.

We are already on bittrex and coinmarketcap, which is a great head start for any new coin.

Anyone else willing to chip in?  Thoughts on this?

This could easily be a speculative $300,000 coin.  3.33% of $300,000 is $10,000.


As I said earlier - "your" coins do not move because "you" do not stake them, and "you" have messed it all up by building all kinds of shit-wallets here and there instead of staying to the core. Basically - you individually hard-forked it to your death with all these shit-versions of the wallet that I see on the peers.

Damnit, this would all be so much more easy if you guys could hold on to your coins in your wallets at home - or if Bittrex turned staking on from start.

So disappointed about you guys - and you know why?

Because most of you are members with coin-experience from this forum over a long long time - and you all should know better.

Should have know you guys where not mature enough to handle a 0 % premine 0 % instamined Anon-coin yet.

RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE!!

Well, you could save the coin if you hardfork it from the right point, set up a checkpoint and give us another thousand blocks of POW, along with a Windows and Mac wallet.  You only had a Mac wallet in the OP so most people kept their coins on a pool and then sent them to bittrex afterwards.  You need to have an official Windows and Mac wallet.  Anyway, if you're officially abandoning the coin, we can look for another developer.  Are you?

Thanks
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
HAHA funny shit, ok my coins unfortunately have to live in exchanges because I don't have a conputer.

why can't the rest of you just try what the dev is saying? they are active on the forum and offering advice, if you guys plan to take over this coin you will kill it, I invested in this for what it is, be patient stake yer coins, it has a lot of potential as it is.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
keymaker
It seems like dev has abandoned us by these posts:

If I can offer to help you guys out - I have a working TOR-ANON in Triangles that can easily be ported over to MACD also.

It will require that a few of you step it up and stake enough coins to be working as super-nodes before and after anon.

worth noticing: When I added ANON to Triangles the price went up so high that everyone sent off their coins to Bittrex and shut off the network behind them, just letting you know that if I help you out - don´t do the same mistake as my peeps did.

I´ll be around.

I can help you guys implement TOR-technology. I have a working TOR on Triangles that can be ported over.

Are there any developers willing to relaunch this coin (even this dev if he hasn't fully abandoned it) by giving us an extra thousand 10 reward blocks of POW and a windows and mac wallet so we can get this chain moving again and breathe some life into the coin?

I bought up a few thousand coins at 1000 satoshi and would be willing to pay 2000 TRI or 3.33% of the new total (60,000) to the developer who does the above.  The community has to agree to this idea before you start work.

We are already on bittrex and coinmarketcap, which is a great head start for any new coin.

Anyone else willing to chip in?  Thoughts on this?

This could easily be a speculative $300,000 coin.  3.33% of $300,000 is $10,000.


As I said earlier - "your" coins do not move because "you" do not stake them, and "you" have messed it all up by building all kinds of shit-wallets here and there instead of staying to the core. Basically - you individually hard-forked it to your death with all these shit-versions of the wallet that I see on the peers.

Damnit, this would all be so much more easy if you guys could hold on to your coins in your wallets at home - or if Bittrex turned staking on from start.

So disappointed about you guys - and you know why?

Because most of you are members with coin-experience from this forum over a long long time - and you all should know better.

Should have know you guys where not mature enough to handle a 0 % premine 0 % instamined Anon-coin yet.

RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE!!
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 500
maybe, maybe not. if there is, thats probably not too complicated to resolve later in a second step. we will see if and when we get staking "illuminatus" wallets online.

for now, wallets should be compiled with current sources and MIN_PROTO_VERSION set to 70101 in version.h (to prevent accepting connections from "Pyramid" version clients) though.


main obstacle is we have no current mac built and i figure there are some staking wallets with version 70100. if we get these clients to move to 70101 (or "Illuminatus") we probably will have a working blockchain again.


to conclude: first step should be to compile a mac wallet. i dont have the needed environment so someone else has to do it.
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
It seems like dev has abandoned us by these posts:

If I can offer to help you guys out - I have a working TOR-ANON in Triangles that can easily be ported over to MACD also.

It will require that a few of you step it up and stake enough coins to be working as super-nodes before and after anon.

worth noticing: When I added ANON to Triangles the price went up so high that everyone sent off their coins to Bittrex and shut off the network behind them, just letting you know that if I help you out - don´t do the same mistake as my peeps did.

I´ll be around.

I can help you guys implement TOR-technology. I have a working TOR on Triangles that can be ported over.

Are there any developers willing to relaunch this coin (even this dev if he hasn't fully abandoned it) by giving us an extra thousand 10 reward blocks of POW and a windows and mac wallet so we can get this chain moving again and breathe some life into the coin?

I bought up a few thousand coins at 1000 satoshi and would be willing to pay 2000 TRI or 3.33% of the new total (60,000) to the developer who does the above.  The community has to agree to this idea before you start work.

We are already on bittrex and coinmarketcap, which is a great head start for any new coin.

Anyone else willing to chip in?  Thoughts on this?

This could easily be a speculative $300,000 coin.  3.33% of $300,000 is $10,000.

I am willing to assist where i can - compiling win wallets is the least i can do.

- Dev (or some dev) would have to fix the sources so that Clients will sync properly without the need of workarounds again.
- Also its obviously a problem to find someone who can and will compile the Mac wallet.

If these 2 things above happen, we are good to go.

@3angle: Are you finished here or still on board?



Is there a problem with the source other than just too few people staking?
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 500
It seems like dev has abandoned us by these posts:

If I can offer to help you guys out - I have a working TOR-ANON in Triangles that can easily be ported over to MACD also.

It will require that a few of you step it up and stake enough coins to be working as super-nodes before and after anon.

worth noticing: When I added ANON to Triangles the price went up so high that everyone sent off their coins to Bittrex and shut off the network behind them, just letting you know that if I help you out - don´t do the same mistake as my peeps did.

I´ll be around.

I can help you guys implement TOR-technology. I have a working TOR on Triangles that can be ported over.

Are there any developers willing to relaunch this coin (even this dev if he hasn't fully abandoned it) by giving us an extra thousand 10 reward blocks of POW and a windows and mac wallet so we can get this chain moving again and breathe some life into the coin?

I bought up a few thousand coins at 1000 satoshi and would be willing to pay 2000 TRI or 3.33% of the new total (60,000) to the developer who does the above.  The community has to agree to this idea before you start work.

We are already on bittrex and coinmarketcap, which is a great head start for any new coin.

Anyone else willing to chip in?  Thoughts on this?

This could easily be a speculative $300,000 coin.  3.33% of $300,000 is $10,000.

I am willing to assist where i can - compiling win wallets is the least i can do.

- Dev (or some dev) would have to fix the sources so that Clients will sync properly without the need of workarounds again.
- Also its obviously a problem to find someone who can and will compile the Mac wallet.

If these 2 things above happen, we are good to go.

@3angle: Are you finished here or still on board?

legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
It seems like dev has abandoned us by these posts:

If I can offer to help you guys out - I have a working TOR-ANON in Triangles that can easily be ported over to MACD also.

It will require that a few of you step it up and stake enough coins to be working as super-nodes before and after anon.

worth noticing: When I added ANON to Triangles the price went up so high that everyone sent off their coins to Bittrex and shut off the network behind them, just letting you know that if I help you out - don´t do the same mistake as my peeps did.

I´ll be around.

I can help you guys implement TOR-technology. I have a working TOR on Triangles that can be ported over.

Are there any developers willing to relaunch this coin (even this dev if he hasn't fully abandoned it) by giving us an extra thousand 10 reward blocks of POW and a windows and mac wallet so we can get this chain moving again and breathe some life into the coin?

I bought up a few thousand coins at 1000 satoshi and would be willing to pay 2000 TRI or 3.33% of the new total (60,000) to the developer who does the above.  The community has to agree to this idea before you start work.

We are already on bittrex and coinmarketcap, which is a great head start for any new coin.

Anyone else willing to chip in?  Thoughts on this?

This could easily be a speculative $300,000 coin.  3.33% of $300,000 is $10,000.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 500
Nothing will happen until this coin is repaired.

Several people posted compiled wallets, where dev did not make any statement. He is out of this coin and with his triangles, really all of you should know why.

Linux wallet is not passing 9500 (todays build, which is actually not different from previous builds).

If community does not overtake, TRI will be dead if it's not already since couple of days.

Theres only one way to make clients fully sync in one attempt again: dev (or someone) would have to change sources so we dont get a lot of these in debug log:

ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake 7b7e1b49893dcfd725704ad7436adfc1e28e46aab1ef795ba3fc0d74a3e7dd69, hashProof=9af869cccf63fd5ac003b7556509384f34cae69e26fad74dc9a19e9e8e902da1
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 59201dd989ad65f03215226ce2d0d7cc212916df0a97c2726978269b6fe3069b


But thats not crucial for getting the blockchain moving again since https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8075888 works as a workaround.

To get the blockchain moving, we need:

staking(!) clients with min_proto_version set to 70101(!). we need a mac wallet from current sources for that!

win exists, linux works,.....

hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Nothing will happen until this coin is repaired.

Several people posted compiled wallets, where dev did not make any statement. He is out of this coin and with his triangles, really all of you should know why.

Linux wallet is not passing 9500 (todays build, which is actually not different from previous builds).

If community does not overtake, TRI will be dead if it's not already since couple of days.
drm
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
seems this dev is busier posting in other threads on bct and trading other coins than taking care of his own coin..

I was over at QuatlooCoin - amazed by their new invention, something that don´t come along every day around here.


yes..some coins actually put effort in development instead of releasing simple clones without any real support... Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 500
seems this dev is busier posting in other threads on bct and trading other coins than taking care of his own coin..

Seems like the watch has 24h Smiley

I was over at QuatlooCoin - amazed by their new invention, something that don´t come along every day around here.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=711966.0;all

But yes - Triangles - You are always on my mind, or in my behind - which is cool and all Smiley

What you need to do in regards of Triangle is to upgrade to the latest wallet and stake coins.
That will make the network smooth. If none of you stake - the network will be stuck.

I don´t have a premine to stake, so this must be done by the community - specially you hardcore miners who mined the hell out of it during PoW.

There is only so much I can do in this case - so please do what I say - upgrade your wallets or remain in cold storage until things flow again.



by upgrading wallets he means: someone of the Mac users, please make a new built with min_proto_version 70101.

@ dev: maybe add the win wallet i posted yesterday to the OP?
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
keymaker
seems this dev is busier posting in other threads on bct and trading other coins than taking care of his own coin..

Seems like the watch has 24h Smiley

I was over at QuatlooCoin - amazed by their new invention, something that don´t come along every day around here.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=711966.0;all

But yes - Triangles - You are always on my mind, or in my behind - which is cool and all Smiley

What you need to do in regards of Triangle is to upgrade to the latest wallet and stake coins.
That will make the network smooth. If none of you stake - the network will be stuck.

I don´t have a premine to stake, so this must be done by the community - specially you hardcore miners who mined the hell out of it during PoW.

There is only so much I can do in this case - so please do what I say - upgrade your wallets or remain in cold storage until things flow again.

hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 500
if we get enough clients to that point (block 10325, current sources and min_proto_version 70101 - but we need some staking clients!), the blockchain should move again.

this would require a new mac built - someone in for that?

unfortunetely i cant help with the staking part, my coins are stuck @ bittrex.

I am on the most recently uploaded mac client, at 10325, and have some coins in my wallet.  Is there a further update that needs to be done for the mac build?

Dunno, is the most recent mac client built from latest sources? I think, it isnt - at least not the client that was postet in this forum. Thats probably the cause for this issue. Win & Linux wallets now being built with curent sources, Mac client isnt - last change in kernel is probably missing. Same for min_proto_version 70101, probably not set.

But we need to verify that. Or someone builts a mac client with current sources and publishes it.


Devs would also have to update sources so that clients dont get stuck synchronizing the blockchain because they have to verify PoS blocks created by different client versions (what probably happened here) - although this is not crucial for getting the blockchain moving again in the first place.
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 521
No more Rekt and Bust
he's gotta make some btc's like the rest of us  Cheesy
drm
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
seems this dev is busier posting in other threads on bct and trading other coins than taking care of his own coin..
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 521
No more Rekt and Bust
I was synched for a min, mined 2 pos blocks but now stuck again... I'll keep trying.
member
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
if we get enough clients to that point (block 10325, current sources and min_proto_version 70101 - but we need some staking clients!), the blockchain should move again.

this would require a new mac built - someone in for that?

unfortunetely i cant help with the staking part, my coins are stuck @ bittrex.

I am on the most recently uploaded mac client, at 10325, and have some coins in my wallet.  Is there a further update that needs to be done for the mac build?
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 500
if we get enough clients to that point (block 10325, current sources and min_proto_version 70101 - but we need some staking clients!), the blockchain should move again.

this would require a new mac built - someone in for that?

unfortunetely i cant help with the staking part, my coins are stuck @ bittrex.
member
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
Edit: Probably not. Last changes were in kernel so thats likely the issue. Can someone make a Mac and/or Linux built with current sources and upload them (and set min_proto_version to 70101 in version.h - i did that in win32 wallet)?

However when I now simply start the wallet without a specific node, it is synced to 10325 (Block #10325 is now 2 days old) and stay there (in red: "Out of sync"). Is this the case, because no newer node (over block #10325 is online)?


I'm at the same place.  Waiting for dev at this point.
Pages:
Jump to: