Author

Topic: [ANN] [VIA] ★ Viacoin ★ ~ the future of digital currency ~ ★ - page 285. (Read 825850 times)

newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Does this coin payout now?  Or does it begin at 10,000 like originally stated?
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
Revelation, we realize you missed the IPO.

But its ok...you can still buy in. The current prices are ridiculously cheap considering where VIA is headed.

Or you can keep asking irrelevant questions and watch the investors get richer.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
We need Mintpal/Cryptsy! Please add.

Amusing fact: Viacoin's 24h volume (855BTC) is more than Mintpal exchanges entire 24h volume (623BTC).

<3

Cryptsy and Mintpal.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
http://support.bter.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

Ask biggest Chinese altcoin exchange platform bter list viacoin!

send them request guys.


sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
So what is so special about this coin that it gets a nice high volume pump? IPO, PoW... not that interesting.

ELI5? Wink

Good dev, good idea, good vision, good marketing, good launch, good communication, good delivery of goals, good supportive community, good possibilities, good future.
Good dev - how do you know this? For now we just have a clone of bitcoin with some sloppy copy-pasting. Example: https://github.com/viacoin/viacoin/search?q=bitcoin&ref=cmdform

Actually most of these are intentionally left. It's only UI facing stuff that needs to be changed. It means we can keep up to date with pulls without big merge headaches.
There are a couple of UI merges missed, but overall your search is misleading.
I don't think it is misleading as it shows how much/or little effort you put into developing this coin, which is understandable - you don't have incentives to do more.
Imagine a CEO of a firm selling all his shares in his company and then claiming to minority shareholders - I will bring you to the moon because I am rich. The amount of effort you put in coin development is appalling.

Right, but your search is based on incorrect assumptions. Why would you change the names of files, functions and classes when you want to maintain compatibility with upstream?
It's *only* UI, userfacing that matters - and that is 100% intentional.
These are not the name of files and functions. For example, the error message that pops out when one tries to make RPC call to the wallet:
"Error: There is no RPC client functionality in bitcoind anymore. Use the bitcoin-cli utility instead."
The utility name is viacoin-cli, not bitcoin, but you didn't bother changing this error message.
The makefile and testnet are another examples. It has nothing to do with function names.
Doc files as well: https://github.com/viacoin/viacoin/blob/fe95e4d3c556a6ea9afca8f03064bd3ace4776c1/doc/release-notes/release-notes-0.3.20.md
notes on bitcoin everywhere.
And on and on.


Uh-huh, and can you explain why we should be rebranding release notes for versions of the software that are not Viacoin?  I already said there were a couple of IU entries missed, but that is it.
Translated files most certainly do not count either. You are absolutely welcome to make pull requests at the project.
You should invite an independent third party who is more knowledgeable than I am to inspect your source code and give his/her opinion on any innovation. From what I am seeing now is a sloppy copy-paste from bitcoin with zero innovation.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
So what is so special about this coin that it gets a nice high volume pump? IPO, PoW... not that interesting.

ELI5? Wink

Good dev, good idea, good vision, good marketing, good launch, good communication, good delivery of goals, good supportive community, good possibilities, good future.
Good dev - how do you know this? For now we just have a clone of bitcoin with some sloppy copy-pasting. Example: https://github.com/viacoin/viacoin/search?q=bitcoin&ref=cmdform

Actually most of these are intentionally left. It's only UI facing stuff that needs to be changed. It means we can keep up to date with pulls without big merge headaches.
There are a couple of UI merges missed, but overall your search is misleading.
I don't think it is misleading as it shows how much/or little effort you put into developing this coin, which is understandable - you don't have incentives to do more.
Imagine a CEO of a firm selling all his shares in his company and then claiming to minority shareholders - I will bring you to the moon because I am rich. The amount of effort you put in coin development is appalling.

Right, but your search is based on incorrect assumptions. Why would you change the names of files, functions and classes when you want to maintain compatibility with upstream?
It's *only* UI, userfacing that matters - and that is 100% intentional.
These are not the name of files and functions. For example, the error message that pops out when one tries to make RPC call to the wallet:
"Error: There is no RPC client functionality in bitcoind anymore. Use the bitcoin-cli utility instead."
The utility name is viacoin-cli, not bitcoin, but you didn't bother changing this error message.
The makefile and testnet are another examples. It has nothing to do with function names.
Doc files as well: https://github.com/viacoin/viacoin/blob/fe95e4d3c556a6ea9afca8f03064bd3ace4776c1/doc/release-notes/release-notes-0.3.20.md
notes on bitcoin everywhere.
And on and on.


Uh-huh, and can you explain why we should be rebranding release notes for versions of the software that are not Viacoin?  I already said there were a couple of IU entries missed, but that is it.
Translated files most certainly do not count either. You are absolutely welcome to make pull requests at the project.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250

I don't think it is misleading as it shows how much/or little effort you put into developing this coin, which is understandable - you don't have incentives to do more.
Imagine a CEO of a firm selling all his shares in his company and then claiming to minority shareholders - I will bring you to the moon because I am rich. The amount of effort you put in coin development is appalling.

What makes you think he didn't buy any at 0.00010 price?
Or any price.
What makes you think he DID buy? All we know is that the dev SOLD 10mln coins. There is no proof of him buying, although this is something that maybe people want to believe in.
I wonder how much can people stretch their imagination.



Need to sleep, but so interesting watching trex... I bought 10 VIA at 0.00007100 before it went crazy.

I'm assuming he bought more
Because you want to believe. Buying 10 VIA is a joke and clearly the dev didn't think that the price will be this high so it is highly unlikely that he was touching his coin at all.
If the dev has any vested interest in his coin he should publish his wallet address along with normal block explorer so that we can keep track of his vested interest.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
So what is so special about this coin that it gets a nice high volume pump? IPO, PoW... not that interesting.

ELI5? Wink

Good dev, good idea, good vision, good marketing, good launch, good communication, good delivery of goals, good supportive community, good possibilities, good future.
Good dev - how do you know this? For now we just have a clone of bitcoin with some sloppy copy-pasting. Example: https://github.com/viacoin/viacoin/search?q=bitcoin&ref=cmdform

Actually most of these are intentionally left. It's only UI facing stuff that needs to be changed. It means we can keep up to date with pulls without big merge headaches.
There are a couple of UI merges missed, but overall your search is misleading.
I don't think it is misleading as it shows how much/or little effort you put into developing this coin, which is understandable - you don't have incentives to do more.
Imagine a CEO of a firm selling all his shares in his company and then claiming to minority shareholders - I will bring you to the moon because I am rich. The amount of effort you put in coin development is appalling.

Right, but your search is based on incorrect assumptions. Why would you change the names of files, functions and classes when you want to maintain compatibility with upstream?
It's *only* UI, userfacing that matters - and that is 100% intentional.
These are not the name of files and functions. For example, the error message that pops out when one tries to make RPC call to the wallet:
"Error: There is no RPC client functionality in bitcoind anymore. Use the bitcoin-cli utility instead."
The utility name is viacoin-cli, not bitcoin, but you didn't bother changing this error message.
The makefile and testnet are another examples. It has nothing to do with function names.
Doc files as well: https://github.com/viacoin/viacoin/blob/fe95e4d3c556a6ea9afca8f03064bd3ace4776c1/doc/release-notes/release-notes-0.3.20.md
notes on bitcoin everywhere.
And on and on.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100

I don't think it is misleading as it shows how much/or little effort you put into developing this coin, which is understandable - you don't have incentives to do more.
Imagine a CEO of a firm selling all his shares in his company and then claiming to minority shareholders - I will bring you to the moon because I am rich. The amount of effort you put in coin development is appalling.

What makes you think he didn't buy any at 0.00010 price?
Or any price.
What makes you think he DID buy? All we know is that the dev SOLD 10mln coins. There is no proof of him buying, although this is something that maybe people want to believe in.
I wonder how much can people stretch their imagination.



Need to sleep, but so interesting watching trex... I bought 10 VIA at 0.00007100 before it went crazy.

I'm assuming he bought more
hero member
Activity: 635
Merit: 500
already answered earlier in the thread...had the same problem!

Download the qt, go to your electrum and get the private key for your address with coins

Import private key into qt and coins will be transferred Smiley

explained in full here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7917511

Wow he speaks on a thread lol first time I see one of your posts lol
Cheers bro
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
We need Mintpal/Cryptsy! Please add.

Amusing fact: Viacoin's 24h volume (855BTC) is more than Mintpal exchanges entire 24h volume (623BTC).

<3
member
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
We need Mintpal/Cryptsy! Please add.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
So what is so special about this coin that it gets a nice high volume pump? IPO, PoW... not that interesting.

ELI5? Wink

Good dev, good idea, good vision, good marketing, good launch, good communication, good delivery of goals, good supportive community, good possibilities, good future.
Good dev - how do you know this? For now we just have a clone of bitcoin with some sloppy copy-pasting. Example: https://github.com/viacoin/viacoin/search?q=bitcoin&ref=cmdform

Actually most of these are intentionally left. It's only UI facing stuff that needs to be changed. It means we can keep up to date with pulls without big merge headaches.
There are a couple of UI merges missed, but overall your search is misleading.
I don't think it is misleading as it shows how much/or little effort you put into developing this coin, which is understandable - you don't have incentives to do more.
Imagine a CEO of a firm selling all his shares in his company and then claiming to minority shareholders - I will bring you to the moon because I am rich. The amount of effort you put in coin development is appalling.

Right, but your search is based on incorrect assumptions. Why would you change the names of files, functions and classes when you want to maintain compatibility with upstream?
It's *only* UI, userfacing that matters - and that is 100% intentional to avoid merge conflict nightmares.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250

I don't think it is misleading as it shows how much/or little effort you put into developing this coin, which is understandable - you don't have incentives to do more.
Imagine a CEO of a firm selling all his shares in his company and then claiming to minority shareholders - I will bring you to the moon because I am rich. The amount of effort you put in coin development is appalling.

What makes you think he didn't buy any at 0.00010 price?
Or any price.
What makes you think he DID buy? All we know is that the dev SOLD 10mln coins. There is no proof of him buying, although this is something that maybe people want to believe in.
I wonder how much can people stretch their imagination.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100

I don't think it is misleading as it shows how much/or little effort you put into developing this coin, which is understandable - you don't have incentives to do more.
Imagine a CEO of a firm selling all his shares in his company and then claiming to minority shareholders - I will bring you to the moon because I am rich. The amount of effort you put in coin development is appalling.

What makes you think he didn't buy any at 0.00010 price?
Or any price.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
Look at the original thread.  The dev went to self moderated thread only after IPO.  Prior people were free to bring up anything worth noting.  He did it to limit the FUD, but felt it was necessary to keep it unmoderated while people were still deciding to invest coin or not.  Nothing to hide, and people can still bring up any issue in the original thread w/o worry of it being deleted.

So far in this thread, I have deleted one post, because it was an duplicate of a false positive virus warning from Virustotal on the 64bit release. I left the original.
(I know it's false because we're building viacoin on a debian VM using gitian builder which is exactly how Bitcoin Core is built.)

As I said in a previous, trolling and FUDders are necessary like bacteria in the gut. The community agreed self-moderation *WITH CLEAR RULES* was best, which you can see in post #2 after OP. Basically anything goes so long as it's on topic and opinions are backed up with some argument. Spamming will not be tolerated.
Omg, why do you keep flooding your own thread with these useless comments regarding self-moderation. This is NOT a big deal. Cashing out and having no incentives in the coin IS the big deal.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
So what is so special about this coin that it gets a nice high volume pump? IPO, PoW... not that interesting.

ELI5? Wink

Good dev, good idea, good vision, good marketing, good launch, good communication, good delivery of goals, good supportive community, good possibilities, good future.
Good dev - how do you know this? For now we just have a clone of bitcoin with some sloppy copy-pasting. Example: https://github.com/viacoin/viacoin/search?q=bitcoin&ref=cmdform

Actually most of these are intentionally left. It's only UI facing stuff that needs to be changed. It means we can keep up to date with pulls without big merge headaches.
There are a couple of UI merges missed, but overall your search is misleading.
I don't think it is misleading as it shows how much/or little effort you put into developing this coin, which is understandable - you don't have incentives to do more.
Imagine a CEO of a firm selling all his shares in his company and then claiming to minority shareholders - I will bring you to the moon because I am rich. The amount of effort you put in coin development is appalling.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
I gotta problem I was hoping someone could help me with. My password works when I want to open the wallet seed things but when I go to change my password it doesn't recognise it and when I wen I do a test send, after I tap in the password it says exceptions must be old style classes or derived from base exception not none type. When I go to change my password it also doesn't recognise my current one by the looks of it.
Don't get it why does the password work to open the seed phrase thing but not for the other. R my ipo coins jus stuck like that?  Help please Smiley

http://blog.viacoin.org/2014/07/18/wallet-woes.html
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
Look at the original thread.  The dev went to self moderated thread only after IPO.  Prior people were free to bring up anything worth noting.  He did it to limit the FUD, but felt it was necessary to keep it unmoderated while people were still deciding to invest coin or not.  Nothing to hide, and people can still bring up any issue in the original thread w/o worry of it being deleted.

So far in this thread, I have deleted one post, because it was an duplicate of a false positive virus warning from Virustotal on the 64bit release. I left the original.
(I know it's false because we're building viacoin on a debian VM using gitian builder which is exactly how Bitcoin Core is built.)

As I said in a previous, trolling and FUDders are necessary like bacteria in the gut. The community agreed self-moderation *WITH CLEAR RULES* was best, which you can see in post #2 after OP. Basically anything goes so long as it's on topic and opinions are backed up with some argument. Spamming will not be tolerated.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Very interesting coin. I'll be watching  Smiley
Jump to: