Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing ZKP privacy without trusted setup - page 98. (Read 663229 times)

newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
'No block source available' on my wallet for hours now.

Anything I should do to get the wallet syncing such as adding nodes for example?

Had same issue yesterday, started the wallet in cmd with "-reindex" parameter. Worked for me.

Here is a link for Mac, same parameter to be used for Win7/10.
sr. member
Activity: 447
Merit: 250
'No block source available' on my wallet for hours now.

Anything I should do to get the wallet syncing such as adding nodes for example?
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100
Are there now any good pools?

Supranova is closing and miningpoolhub steals hashrate.
Any pool to mine this coin now?

I've removed the message already, it's not closing

Really glad to hear your pool stays. There are many miners out there who will mine in Suprnova.

@zcoinofficial, hope you guys are able to communicate over some issues. Suprnova is of importance to this land and will be a lot help to the growth of XZC. Pls do lend supports.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
Quote
Proportional (Prop) - The block reward is distributed among miners in proportion to the number of shares they submitted in a round. The expected reward per share depends on the number of shares already submitted in the round.
https://xzc.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=about&action=pool

Yeah...I understand it and can see everything's working as expected.  I just worry about some miners trying things out for a half hour before deciding the estimate is lower than what they wanted.

MPH just shows what you made in the last 24 hours on the Dashboard. It's easy to understand why the figure starts out low.

But "Round earnings est" starting out low can be discouraging for those who don't understand it.

With the difficulty swings and retarget for every block it's not so easy to give proper estimates and I'd encourage users to use a service like whattomine.com for that.

I'll look over the stats again in the evening
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Quote
Proportional (Prop) - The block reward is distributed among miners in proportion to the number of shares they submitted in a round. The expected reward per share depends on the number of shares already submitted in the round.
https://xzc.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=about&action=pool

Yeah...I understand it and can see everything's working as expected.  I just worry about some miners trying things out for a half hour before deciding the estimate is lower than what they wanted.

MPH just shows what you made in the last 24 hours on the Dashboard. It's easy to understand why the figure starts out low.

But "Round earnings est" starting out low can be discouraging for those who don't understand it.
copper member
Activity: 623
Merit: 22
Hello there!

Can anyone explain what the fu** is Atomic swap? )
sr. member
Activity: 382
Merit: 251
Are there now any good pools?

Supranova is closing and miningpoolhub steals hashrate.
Any pool to mine this coin now?

I've removed the message already, it's not closing

It is not closing, then I am back to SNova
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
Quote
Proportional (Prop) - The block reward is distributed among miners in proportion to the number of shares they submitted in a round. The expected reward per share depends on the number of shares already submitted in the round.
https://xzc.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=about&action=pool
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0

The main problem is that there's basically no communication at all from the devs - the znodes were introduced with several changes to the mining consensus:
Mandatory payments to the nodes directly from the pool became necessary where the protocol would reject blocks without those payments immediately.
Usually you introduce such protocol changes to the protocol but don't enforce them at first so every (pool) can make sure they meet the specs and get it running and also do some testing if the transition etc works fine and then you enforce those payments.

Also you should meet some general consensus when integrating such payments into the "getblocktemplate" call but here it was introduced in a uncommon manner and in a non-standard way - which would have clearly could have been done a lot better if there would have been communication before (and after). There are for example still some issues here where MN addresses are changing quickly requiring an update to the template (which is why you see super-long rounds on other pools sometimes) which could be addressed from the coin side by accepting mn payments to the address before the actual address for a transition period (like it's done in dash where all the code for the masternodes come from..). It can also be fixed from the pools side but once you have enough hash you simply don't care about such things anymore i guess Smiley

Next thing is that I was encouraged or a little "forced" to ban botnets a while back with the algo change in mind and with the idea to decentralize the coin - which is a good idea as the botnets are simply controlled by one person who gets the big chunk. However the botnet just moved to a different pool which is not against botnets at all so they keep away hashing fine there and the integration of mtp is also not prioritized .. So it's a fun situation here.. Be fair or be square :-)

At last the pool was simply not profitable anymore because with 2-3 blocks per day with 0% fee it's always hard to keep it running as pools always require some maintenance. The pool would need at least 15% of the nethash (with 1% fee) to keep it pay for itself.

At last a loyal (DCR) miner helped me to keep the server for the pool running and everything is ok however i'm not in par with the devs/shills of the coin.

Now lets talk about commitment Smiley I guess I'm actually a bit overcommited to such things and thats why I'm actually still a bit pissed with the sloppiness (nice said) here. Smiley

Those are certainly all valid points.  And it's unfortunate that other pools are not discouraged from housing the botnets.

One thing I noticed while returning to your pool. It looks like it uses a rather large N for PPLNS?  It might help to mention it on the front page as I expect the masses of casual miners might get discouraged when they see their "Round earnings est" creep up so slowly.  Not sure how much it would help, but I like your pool and want to see it do well. Also...I'm happy to see that I'm currently #4 in hash contribution.  But I'd be even happier to see the pool hash increase significantly.
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
About Fee- I am back with 1% fee :-), you deserve it !.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
Are there now any good pools?

Supranova is closing and miningpoolhub steals hashrate.
Any pool to mine this coin now?

I've removed the message already, it's not closing

Why did you post that the pool was closing initially?
I am now on ahashpool, not sure if I want to go back to supr nova.
You guys don't seem to be committed to anything.

The main problem is that there's basically no communication at all from the devs - the znodes were introduced with several changes to the mining consensus:
Mandatory payments to the nodes directly from the pool became necessary where the protocol would reject blocks without those payments immediately.
Usually you introduce such protocol changes to the protocol but don't enforce them at first so every (pool) can make sure they meet the specs and get it running and also do some testing if the transition etc works fine and then you enforce those payments.

Also you should meet some general consensus when integrating such payments into the "getblocktemplate" call but here it was introduced in a uncommon manner and in a non-standard way - which would have clearly could have been done a lot better if there would have been communication before (and after). There are for example still some issues here where MN addresses are changing quickly requiring an update to the template (which is why you see super-long rounds on other pools sometimes) which could be addressed from the coin side by accepting mn payments to the address before the actual address for a transition period (like it's done in dash where all the code for the masternodes come from..). It can also be fixed from the pools side but once you have enough hash you simply don't care about such things anymore i guess Smiley

Next thing is that I was encouraged or a little "forced" to ban botnets a while back with the algo change in mind and with the idea to decentralize the coin - which is a good idea as the botnets are simply controlled by one person who gets the big chunk. However the botnet just moved to a different pool which is not against botnets at all so they keep away hashing fine there and the integration of mtp is also not prioritized .. So it's a fun situation here.. Be fair or be square :-)

At last the pool was simply not profitable anymore because with 2-3 blocks per day with 0% fee it's always hard to keep it running as pools always require some maintenance. The pool would need at least 15% of the nethash (with 1% fee) to keep it pay for itself.

At last a loyal (DCR) miner helped me to keep the server for the pool running and everything is ok however i'm not in par with the devs/shills of the coin.

Now lets talk about commitment Smiley I guess I'm actually a bit overcommited to such things and thats why I'm actually still a bit pissed with the sloppiness (nice said) here. Smiley
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
Are there now any good pools?

Supranova is closing and miningpoolhub steals hashrate.
Any pool to mine this coin now?

I've removed the message already, it's not closing

Why did you post that the pool was closing initially?
I am now on ahashpool, not sure if I want to go back to supr nova.
You guys don't seem to be committed to anything.
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
Are there now any good pools?

Supranova is closing and miningpoolhub steals hashrate.
Any pool to mine this coin now?

I've removed the message already, it's not closing
Thank you, from beginning I was only mining on your pool and I said many time that I get ~25% more speed on 24hr graphs then MPH, and my profits also match, but I can't understand why 99% choose MPH over your pool, you don't even take Fees- so it's beyond my understanding.
Gonna return my rig back to your pool, thanks for the present :-), Happy New Year!.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Quote
I've removed the message already, it's not closing

 Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
Are there now any good pools?

Supranova is closing and miningpoolhub steals hashrate.
Any pool to mine this coin now?

I've removed the message already, it's not closing
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1002
Are there now any good pools?

Supranova is closing and miningpoolhub steals hashrate.
Any pool to mine this coin now?

https://datapaw.net


How do you know miningpoolhub steals hashrate? Is there any proof of this? I'd like to know  Roll Eyes
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0

1. You could call this coin ZentralCoin since it's the most centralized coin out there, I don't know any other coin more centralized than this in questions of hash and coin distribution / masternodes.


You could still help decrease the centralization by not bowing out of it.  I know many miners (myself included) that would stick with you simply to help the decentralization effort (even more so as MPH seems to have issues reporting hashrate with this).

If you're really calling it quits though, I will go with datapaw.net.
full member
Activity: 142
Merit: 100
Fix your profit! Smiley
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
Wow I can not believe the price today risen drastically with nearly 70%. Take a glance at coinmarketcap, looking like the rocket going to the space.
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100
I remember when this thing was around 5 dollars before i sell the most part, i had 2000 of it, it feels like it was yesterday, i almost got rich, but at least i feel like a trader

That happened to me a few times. Fortunately I made myself committed to XZC a while ago. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.25689394
Pages:
Jump to: