Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][ARG] Argentum || Secure. Rare. Fast. || Randomized reward system commodity - page 6. (Read 19456 times)

hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
Where my money!!!!?Huh
all coins which were mined above the 426,606 block aren't legit. It means no reason to mine Argentum at this moment till Baritus update the wallet.

I don't understand.  How is cryptopools wrong?
sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 250
Just sent a test transaction to Cryptsy and it never showed up.  Would a support ticket help?

Cryptsy support said
Thank you for responding.
The official block count we have is at 426,606 based on this link: altexplorer.net/chain/Argentum
I don't think Altexplorer has been updated.
member
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
Where my money!!!!?Huh
all coins which were mined above the 426,606 block aren't legit. It means no reason to mine Argentum at this moment till Baritus update the wallet.
sr. member
Activity: 994
Merit: 250
hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
Updating cryptsy tonight



That's the reply I was looking for.  Thanks man!
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1002
OLX
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 108
Just sent a test transaction to Cryptsy and it never showed up.  Would a support ticket help?

Cryptsy support said
Thank you for responding.
The official block count we have is at 426,606 based on this link: altexplorer.net/chain/Argentum
hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
Just sent a test transaction to Cryptsy and it never showed up.  Would a support ticket help?
hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
OLX
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 108
hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
www.multipool.us
Hey guys,

I have the same blockchain that is passed block 426490, but I think whatever coins generated after block 426490 are not accepted by exchanges like cryptsy. They are probably "stuck" on blockchain with block "426490".

The "working" blockchain I could find is here: https://altexplorer.net/chain/Argentum and it is also on a latest block of 426490.

Now, I wounder if blockchain passed 426490 is legit.

Cryptsy probably hasn't patched their wallet yet, so they can't get the new blocks.  Once they patch they should sync to the current longest chain and the new transactions should come in.
OLX
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 108
what happened to Argentum? difficulty 0.01, pools do not work
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Hey guys,

I have the same blockchain that is passed block 426490, but I think whatever coins generated after block 426490 are not accepted by exchanges like cryptsy. They are probably "stuck" on blockchain with block "426490".

The "working" blockchain I could find is here: https://altexplorer.net/chain/Argentum and it is also on a latest block of 426490.

Now, I wounder if blockchain passed 426490 is legit.

There are more peers with this block vs. newer. what do we do?

[my@srv /d2/altcoins]$ argentumd -conf=argentumd.conf getpeerinfo
[
    {
        "addr" : "162.243.226.39",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401150639,
        "lastrecv" : 1401148940,
        "conntime" : 1401102131,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 426490,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "46.119.36.123",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401150639,
        "lastrecv" : 1401149327,
        "conntime" : 1401102131,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 426490,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "54.201.183.106",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401150639,
        "lastrecv" : 1401149025,
        "conntime" : 1401102131,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 426490,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "192.99.44.51",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401150639,
        "lastrecv" : 1401149191,
        "conntime" : 1401102131,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 426490,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "72.78.100.9",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401150639,
        "lastrecv" : 1401149548,
        "conntime" : 1401102210,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 426490,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "89.29.69.214:3326",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401150639,
        "lastrecv" : 1401150640,
        "conntime" : 1401110806,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 434143,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "86.30.167.243:36203",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401150639,
        "lastrecv" : 1401150581,
        "conntime" : 1401124171,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 426490,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "192.99.135.85:49393",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401150639,
        "lastrecv" : 1401150639,
        "conntime" : 1401125395,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 434569,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "176.9.63.136:16543",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401150604,
        "lastrecv" : 1401150639,
        "conntime" : 1401126166,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 434589,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "81.99.241.164:34902",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401150639,
        "lastrecv" : 1401145298,
        "conntime" : 1401144684,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 426490,
        "banscore" : 0
    }
]
[my@srv /d2/altcoins]$

[my@srv /d2/altcoins]$ argentumd -conf=argentumd.conf getinfo
{
    "version" : 1000300,
    "protocolversion" : 1030000,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "blocks" : 435360,
    "connections" : 9,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.06793071,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1392347456,
    "keypoolsize" : 103,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""
}
[my@srv /d2/altcoins]$

how do I force my daemon not to drift away from "main" chain that currently stuck on block "426490"?
Am I lost? Wink
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1052
i handed the solution to you on a golden platter. Upgrade arg to a newer version of the btc/ltc codebase supporting leveldb and then the issue will be fixed

Ahmed

ARG's code has many major differences. It would take much longer than I have available to do the port. That's why I am looking for a solution. I contacted Alpha, Argentum's dev, and asked him to take a look.
hsz
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
This is a reasonable plan, to maximize the convenience
 Grin
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
Since both block explorers are down can ppl please post what block you're at, I want to know if it's safe to reenable this..

MyWl.lt never had the database problem, but I implemented the fix and re-synchronized the block chain. Here's the current status (01:17 PST):

"blocks" : 433542,
"connections" : 16,
"difficulty" : 0.06581028
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
www.multipool.us
Since both block explorers are down can ppl please post what block you're at, I want to know if it's safe to reenable this..
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.
i handed the solution to you on a golden platter. Upgrade arg to a newer version of the btc/ltc codebase supporting leveldb and then the issue will be fixed

Ahmed
Pages:
Jump to: