Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN]ASICMiner Publicly Looking for Potential Customers/Partners for New Chips (Read 54979 times)

legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
This ID is in charge of the sales of AM-GEN3-MINERS.

Our official-miners are coming soon.

All resellers interested in it please msg us for more info.

Phasebird,

Are you an official employee of bitfountain/Asicminer? 

He is.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8079873

Perhaps I could have worded my post more clearly.  Shareholders have been asking for Friedcat to appoint a community liaison for a long time.  It would appear that we may finally have been granted one, but yet it is not widely known and that liaison has not introduced himself to the main thread.  It would appear that not many know he is even here.

This is not the thread for this discussion so I will end by simply suggesting that Phasebird make his position known and give us some idea of the scope of his responsibilities.  It is possible that he is simply as friedcat said, responsible for the re-seller communication and questions regarding the meetup.
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
This ID is in charge of the sales of AM-GEN3-MINERS.

Our official-miners are coming soon.

All resellers interested in it please msg us for more info.

Phasebird,

Are you an official employee of bitfountain/Asicminer? 

He is.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8079873
legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
This ID is in charge of the sales of AM-GEN3-MINERS.

Our official-miners are coming soon.

All resellers interested in it please msg us for more info.

Phasebird,

Are you an official employee of bitfountain/Asicminer?  Are you the community relations person we have been waiting patiently (well, mostly patiently) for?

If so, please introduce yourself on the main thread... We have tons of questions.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
This ID is in charge of the sales of AM-GEN3-MINERS.

Our official-miners are coming soon.

All resellers interested in it please msg us for more info.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Yes "V style" because it is a test board and we left room on the stencil for bigger 1210 caps .
At the moment there are 0603 470nF ones, that can be exchanged with 1206 1uF or 1210 upt to 220uf if needed.
Usualy on the boards we put a lot of pads that way we can exchange components if there is trouble during the test or in production if the there is no stock.
Same way is with part of ICs we can put 2 different footprints of transistor drivers or 2 different footprints of 3.3 and 5 V regs.
The when the production starts we make anew stencil only for the components we are about to place
hero member
Activity: 489
Merit: 500
Immersionist
Here is hex16E ( AM Be200) 16 chip board populated.
Let the sleeples nights with tests begin Cheesy



That looks like quality work marto74!

I hope the different BE200 orientation per row is intentional.

(did you notice the placement of many caps is V style?)

hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
cryptoshark
is there a chance for beautyfull miner from technobit finally?
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Here is hex16E ( AM Be200) 16 chip board populated.
Let the sleeples nights with tests begin Cheesy

hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
WE are finishing our design of a 16 chip mining board with ASIC miner BE200 chips

specs
Our own design HEX 16E miner main specs:
 - 16 BE200 chip board in 2 rows
 - 16 bit Microchip controller with usb control
  - Voltage  to be adjustable by command in the PIC
 - Multi channel power supply
 - power connector PCI-e
- capable to run Overclocked




*greetings BICK Tongue
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
I got tracking  so sample chips are on the way to me Cheesy
Some info about chip sales chanel  in the range of 100 , 500, 1k,  and so would be useful
donator
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1060
between a rock and a block!
Will these chips ever be available to the public; in reasonable quantities ?  
I'm sure www.digikey.com/ or www.jameco.com and others, could sell a fair number.
Any resellers planned for this summer ?
it is planned

canary, if thats not too indiscreet, from whom did you already ordered AMgen3 based products? Rockminer? will you also be reselling AM chips Huh
rockminer.  chip sales channels are being developed. ofcourse, a large order can be placed with ASICMiner directly at any time.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
Will these chips ever be available to the public; in reasonable quantities ?  
I'm sure www.digikey.com/ or www.jameco.com and others, could sell a fair number.
Any resellers planned for this summer ?
it is planned

canary, if thats not too indiscreet, from whom did you already ordered AMgen3 based products? Rockminer? will you also be reselling AM chips Huh
donator
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1060
between a rock and a block!
Will these chips ever be available to the public; in reasonable quantities ? 
I'm sure www.digikey.com/ or www.jameco.com and others, could sell a fair number.
Any resellers planned for this summer ?
it is planned
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
Will these chips ever be available to the public; in reasonable quantities ? 
I'm sure www.digikey.com/ or www.jameco.com and others, could sell a fair number.
Any resellers planned for this summer ?
donator
Activity: 848
Merit: 1005
Some questions...

What is the behaviour if task address is changed while the chip is busy hashing?

What about when address 44 is changed?

How is nonce_mask to be interpreted?

Is there any safeguard against a race clearing r_ready after reading nonce(s)?
For example, the order of events:
  • Host reads nonce from chip
  • Chip finds new nonce
  • Host clears r_ready

1) 2) When the chip is busy hashing the values in task addresses (including 44) cannot be changed.

3) Each 1 in the nonce_mask indicates a nonce for the current job. If the number of nonces exceeds 4, the first ones will be dropped.

4) There aren't safeguards.

For 1) and 2) we suggest a higher SPI clock for better efficiency. Using the difficulty setting larger than 1 could alleviate most hashrate losses caused by 3) and 4).
Hmm, is there any way to tell the chip to abort processing a work then?
Or we just need to wait it out?
The soft reset can be triggered no matter if the chip is working or not. After that you need to reconfigure the PLL though, which will take about 0.2ms.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
Some questions...

What is the behaviour if task address is changed while the chip is busy hashing?

What about when address 44 is changed?

How is nonce_mask to be interpreted?

Is there any safeguard against a race clearing r_ready after reading nonce(s)?
For example, the order of events:
  • Host reads nonce from chip
  • Chip finds new nonce
  • Host clears r_ready

1) 2) When the chip is busy hashing the values in task addresses (including 44) cannot be changed.

3) Each 1 in the nonce_mask indicates a nonce for the current job. If the number of nonces exceeds 4, the first ones will be dropped.

4) There aren't safeguards.

For 1) and 2) we suggest a higher SPI clock for better efficiency. Using the difficulty setting larger than 1 could alleviate most hashrate losses caused by 3) and 4).
Hmm, is there any way to tell the chip to abort processing a work then?
Or we just need to wait it out?
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Any chance I get an answer to my mails and PM's about sample chips , datasheet , pricing etc.
donator
Activity: 848
Merit: 1005
Some questions...

What is the behaviour if task address is changed while the chip is busy hashing?

What about when address 44 is changed?

How is nonce_mask to be interpreted?

Is there any safeguard against a race clearing r_ready after reading nonce(s)?
For example, the order of events:
  • Host reads nonce from chip
  • Chip finds new nonce
  • Host clears r_ready

1) 2) When the chip is busy hashing the values in task addresses (including 44) cannot be changed.

3) Each 1 in the nonce_mask indicates a nonce for the current job. If the number of nonces exceeds 4, the first ones will be dropped.

4) There aren't safeguards.

For 1) and 2) we suggest a higher SPI clock for better efficiency. Using the difficulty setting larger than 1 could alleviate most hashrate losses caused by 3) and 4).
Pages:
Jump to: