Author

Topic: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com - page 132. (Read 554401 times)

legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1007
Live like there is no tomorrow!
Hi Terk !

When will your Asian server be up?

My user id is 1EeijSR9kPSfSzRPonEwxUxUzyNKrue9AT.My rejection rate on the server is 11% now. It seems high


Sometimes I experience a higher rejection rate than normal, but after a while it's all good again. I'm not sure what is causing that.

I'm mining on the Amsterdam server by the way, and I like it Wink. (Allthough the rewards Always can be better of course Smiley).
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Hi Clevermining,

My BTC address is 163KFFeHfteaHGCCEKquQXAMLgkYPrHh8P and I've been mining for 17 days and showing roughly .13 BTC in expected payouts, but haven't received anything.

I've double-checked the BTC Address from my wallet and this is correct.  Could anyone help and see where my payout might be?

Thanks very much.

When you first connected to CleverMining you used 163KFFeHfteaHGCCEKquQXAMLgkYPrHh8p instead of 163KFFeHfteaHGCCEKquQXAMLgkYPrHh8P and this is how your username was created.

I renamed your username and you should expect payout today.

Sorry for the mistake and appreciate the help.  Copy and paste error from my wallet to my miner config.
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 250
I'm curious, is that canadian server still active? I switched to the us.clevermining.com for over night and just now went back to the ca.clevermining.com. I'm assuming it's still there because I've gotten 3 shares off of it, but just want to be 100% sure. (still learning how things are, this is only my 3rd day at this so far lol)

Canadian server is currently handling all the US traffic. It has proven itself very efficient and its reject ratio are very low for all American miners regardless of west/east location. Even users from west states are having lower rejects and higher accepted hashrate here than they were having using San Francisco server.

This is why I didn't bring back the old servers. There are still there standing as reserve in case any issues happen, but for now we don't use them. I will be deciding about infrastructure changes later this week including probably changing European server to a different one, possibly relaunching Asia server, and deciding what should be the final setup for North America.

Thanks for considering it. When the SF server was online my rejects were lower than the canadian one, but I imagine you probably grab data from the aggregate and not specific users :p. I'd love to have the SF server back up if it can handle the load or DDoses. Something to consider when you decide how to handle North America.

Thanks again for all your hard work. I certain appreciate it along with others who probably don't voice it!
member
Activity: 413
Merit: 10
I am mining with one Gridseed @ 377Kh/s average over the last 2 days as reported by CGminer 3.7.2 (modified).

I often get this message on CGminer: "Rejected untracked stratum share from pool 0"

My location is The Netherlands, so I mine at the EU server which is based on Amsterdam. (ping to IP 188.226.191.138 gives 44ms)

However, the report page indicates: 120.7 kH/s 24-hour Average

Is this value wrong due to the relatively low hashing rate, or does something goes wrong at my side?

I can PM my Bitcoin address if verification is needed.

Thanks for your time.
What frequency are you running it at? I found I can get around 360 kh/s at 850 Mhz. Anything higher than that resulted in higher rejections and showed a lower rate on the pool side. The miners were doing 380kh/s or so but it was less than 200kh/s of actual work done.

Also, make you sure you don't have "--no submit-stales" enabled, as this dropped my hash rate on the pool side as well.
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
I am mining with one Gridseed @ 377Kh/s average over the last 2 days as reported by CGminer 3.7.2 (modified).

I often get this message on CGminer: "Rejected untracked stratum share from pool 0"

My location is The Netherlands, so I mine at the EU server which is based on Amsterdam. (ping to IP 188.226.191.138 gives 44ms)

However, the report page indicates: 120.7 kH/s 24-hour Average

Is this value wrong due to the relatively low hashing rate, or does something goes wrong at my side?

I can PM my Bitcoin address if verification is needed.

Thanks for your time.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Hi Terk !

When will your Asian server be up?

My user id is 1EeijSR9kPSfSzRPonEwxUxUzyNKrue9AT.My rejection rate on the server is 11% now. It seems high
member
Activity: 120
Merit: 10
anyone notice that all the following resolve to the same IP  (192.99.44.159) ?

sf.clevermining.com
ny.clevermining.com
us.clevermining.com
ca.clevermining.com

So I'm guessing you're not going to have any better luck trying these supposed location based subdomains....

Rob



https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6005225
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 522
Hi Clevermining,

My BTC address is 163KFFeHfteaHGCCEKquQXAMLgkYPrHh8P and I've been mining for 17 days and showing roughly .13 BTC in expected payouts, but haven't received anything.

I've double-checked the BTC Address from my wallet and this is correct.  Could anyone help and see where my payout might be?

Thanks very much.

When you first connected to CleverMining you used 163KFFeHfteaHGCCEKquQXAMLgkYPrHh8p instead of 163KFFeHfteaHGCCEKquQXAMLgkYPrHh8P and this is how your username was created.

I renamed your username and you should expect payout today.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Hi Clevermining,

My BTC address is 163KFFeHfteaHGCCEKquQXAMLgkYPrHh8P and I've been mining for 17 days and showing roughly .13 BTC in expected payouts, but haven't received anything.

I've double-checked the BTC Address from my wallet and this is correct.  Could anyone help and see where my payout might be?

Thanks very much.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
And my transaction id is
14c83f1376fa335b897248d67f087d3f8318477103e4e8c199b45c9d0cb10c7e-000



My address is 1ATYrHbHgcDT4ba63JxXeyus1YXtPLSoTf
Thanks

Hey guys,

I just looked at my account and saw that the site had done a payout for 0.03438 and then I synced my wallet to find out that I had only received 0.02478911
Does anyone know why it did that? I am new to this.

Thanks

This is most likely either your wallet error or your mistake.

You need to provide username and transaction ID for anyone to be able to check anything for you.

I think I figured it out. I confused the payout and profit per day..
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
And my transaction id is
14c83f1376fa335b897248d67f087d3f8318477103e4e8c199b45c9d0cb10c7e-000



My address is 1ATYrHbHgcDT4ba63JxXeyus1YXtPLSoTf
Thanks

Hey guys,

I just looked at my account and saw that the site had done a payout for 0.03438 and then I synced my wallet to find out that I had only received 0.02478911
Does anyone know why it did that? I am new to this.

Thanks

This is most likely either your wallet error or your mistake.

You need to provide username and transaction ID for anyone to be able to check anything for you.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
My address is 1ATYrHbHgcDT4ba63JxXeyus1YXtPLSoTf
Thanks

Hey guys,

I just looked at my account and saw that the site had done a payout for 0.03438 and then I synced my wallet to find out that I had only received 0.02478911
Does anyone know why it did that? I am new to this.

Thanks

This is most likely either your wallet error or your mistake.

You need to provide username and transaction ID for anyone to be able to check anything for you.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 522
Hey guys,

I just looked at my account and saw that the site had done a payout for 0.03438 and then I synced my wallet to find out that I had only received 0.02478911
Does anyone know why it did that? I am new to this.

Thanks

This is most likely either your wallet error or your mistake.

You need to provide username and transaction ID for anyone to be able to check anything for you.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
Hey guys,

I just looked at my account and saw that the site had done a payout for 0.03438 and then I synced my wallet to find out that I had only received 0.02478911
Does anyone know why it did that? I am new to this.

Thanks
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 522
Clevermining reject ratio is ridiculous at this moment  Cry

Looks like a perfectly acceptable ~3% reject average.

Check accepted and rejected. Its almost 50/50

This is a known bug. The top line stats counts some weird things as rejects so this is inflated. Your miner software counts correct pool responses as rejects, but as they are not really rejects, it cannot associate it to any job which one of GPUs were working on. So it increases the count in the top line, but doesn't increase number of reject in per-GPU stats.

All actually rejected shares are counted in the per-GPU stats and this is the reliable stats which you should believe in.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Clevermining reject ratio is ridiculous at this moment  Cry

Looks like a perfectly acceptable ~3% reject average.

Check accepted and rejected. Its almost 50/50

That's not how it works. You need to look at the per gpu reject %, not the global. They refer to different things. Your reject rate is around 3%, which is good.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Check accepted and rejected. Its almost 50/50
Are you getting untracked stratum shares or something?  Only the card percentage reject numbers likely matter - the upper number is probably a display error.
sr. member
Activity: 569
Merit: 250
Clevermining reject ratio is ridiculous at this moment  Cry

Looks like a perfectly acceptable ~3% reject average.

Check accepted and rejected. Its almost 50/50
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
anyone notice that all the following resolve to the same IP  (192.99.44.159) ?

sf.clevermining.com
ny.clevermining.com
us.clevermining.com
ca.clevermining.com

So I'm guessing you're not going to have any better luck trying these supposed location based subdomains....

Rob
Terk has posted about this recently.  If I recall correctly, everything is being hosted in at the ca node because accept rates were universally higher there, even for users on the san fran node.

This will likely change in the future, so these subdomains may point to different stratum endpoints again soon.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
anyone notice that all the following resolve to the same IP  (192.99.44.159) ?

sf.clevermining.com
ny.clevermining.com
us.clevermining.com
ca.clevermining.com

So I'm guessing you're not going to have any better luck trying these supposed location based subdomains....

Rob
Jump to: