Topic: [ANN][BLC] Blakecoin Blake-256 for GPU/FPGA With Merged Mined Pools Stable Net - page 77. (Read 409641 times)

BD, going on vacation?

Just using the eloipool as a private pool is like solo mining and block found will be in the wallets you are mining

all payout methods, accounts and other stuff is done by the front end

yes, all works fine now

but I didnt get about payouts - are they automatic? if yes - how often they happened, if no - do I need run some script for payout?

Thanks to Ignatius a private merged pool setup guide is here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6663084 (also linked in OP if you not seen it yet)

just comment out coinbasercmd its not needed

finally, eloipool works

need some adjustment in authproxy.py if using python 3.4 because of class http.client.HTTPConnection change

last question - do I need some manipulation with coinbasercmd for auto payouts? or I can comment this line out and get some default reward distribution ?

maybe you will help me a bit with it?
I setup all the things on Ubuntu, here what I got in eloipool log

2014-08-13 05:48:36,377 merkleMaker     CRITICAL        Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/qwe/eloipool_Blakecoin/merklemaker.py", line 708, in run
    self.merkleMaker_I()
  File "/home/qwe/eloipool_Blakecoin/merklemaker.py", line 698, in merkleMaker_I
    self.merkleMaker_II()
  File "/home/qwe/eloipool_Blakecoin/merklemaker.py", line 664, in merkleMaker_II
    return self._updateMerkleTree()
  File "/home/qwe/eloipool_Blakecoin/merklemaker.py", line 564, in _updateMerkleTree
    self._updateMerkleTree_I()
  File "/home/qwe/eloipool_Blakecoin/merklemaker.py", line 528, in _updateMerkleTree_I
    r = self._updateMerkleTree_fromTS(TS)
  File "/home/qwe/eloipool_Blakecoin/merklemaker.py", line 493, in _updateMerkleTree_fromTS
    MP = self._CallGBT(TS)
  File "/home/qwe/eloipool_Blakecoin/merklemaker.py", line 343, in _CallGBT
    MP = access.getblocktemplate(self.GBTReq)
  File "/home/qwe/eloipool_Blakecoin/jsonrpc/authproxy.py", line 98, in __call__
    'Content-type' : 'application/json' })
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/http/client.py", line 1065, in request
    self._send_request(method, url, body, headers)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/http/client.py", line 1103, in _send_request
    self.endheaders(body)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/http/client.py", line 1061, in endheaders
    self._send_output(message_body)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/http/client.py", line 906, in _send_output
    self.send(msg)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/http/client.py", line 841, in send
    self.connect()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/http/client.py", line 819, in connect
    self.timeout, self.source_address)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/socket.py", line 499, in create_connection
    sock.bind(source_address)
TypeError: getsockaddrarg: AF_INET address must be tuple, not int


dunno what the problem is...I did commit  bitcoinrpc as recommended coz of bug, but looks like problem is in other place

well i would too but since this is a long term project if it gets de listed it gets delisted

it will not effect me

i realize a lot of people consider a coin not on several exchanges useless however if you look at the coin age of blake coin

and others in the blake 256 system most people are not moving thier coins so I think most people are in for the long haul.


It took bitcoin 5+ years to get any sustained value and I feel the blake 256 system is superior in many ways,

I guess time will tell , I am willing to gamble,  I am holding all blake 256 coins !!


thanks for your support of the project !!

I realize that my statement may have appeared negative towards bittrex, but that was not my intention. I realize and appreciate that bittrex has been one of the few exchanges to support the Blake based coins. If/when I have some spare btc I would be happy to purchase blc from there to keep it listed.

I think the whole community will not let him go from there)

$ 16 commission per day )))

Reply from Bittrex:

I tried my best I will be withdrawing my support for Bittrex once they delist on Friday 

0.1/0.00001401=7138. 7-8 thousand, it is a little.

I think 0.1btc would be closer to 7,000blc if my math is correct. regardless, its a pretty small amount but it just goes to show that few people use bittrex for their blc trading. atomic-trade is currently the preferred exchange for blc, just compare the volume its been around $1,500 per day lately. In fact, if you look at the blakecoin charts here

www.cryptocoincharts.info/v2/pair/blc/btc/atomic-trade/

you can see that trade volume on atomic-trade has increased significantly while all other exchanges have dropped to almost no volume. You can also see here

http://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/atomic-trade/

that blakecoin accounted for 70% of total trade volume on atomic trade in past 24 hours (i was unable to find stats for past week/month etc). I'm sure bittrex must be aware of this, perhaps threatening to delist is just their way of trying to get some traders to move over to their exchange. Of course its ideal to have blc on as many exchanges as possible, but bittrex is the only one loosing out if they delist blakecoin especially with the game stuff right around the corner. At any rate, I'm not worried about it, blakecoin is still going strong and steady as far as i'm concerned 

0.1btc = 10000-15000 blc. This is really nonsense.  I am sometimes so much the swap.

Yeah I sent a message to Bittrex no reply yet but really busy with game dev atm and trading on Bittrex to get their minimum 0.1 BTC per day market volume is not high on my list

I have explained everything to the Bittrex team if they delist its not down to my lack of trying 

 This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest. It may be removed on Aug 15th unless the average trade volume for the last 7 days exceeds 0.1 BTC

go off?

eloipool is the best way and running the mmp for merged is not much more than just running eloipool on its own, setting up MPOS or NOMP to run on top of eloipool is the hard bit but just running eloipool as a private pool is not hard

no hw for now, just config error...used -k blake256 = produce invalid nonce and hw, --blake256 ok

btw, what is current easiest way to setup not merged pool for any blake256 coin? I tried eloipool from your git, a little complicated thing

thx gaalx and BlueDragon747 - sorted.

Enter the address for UMO wallet.

bug in front end just enter all wallet addresses for BLC,PHO,BBTC,XDQ,ELT,UMO (leave unused 1/2 as they are)

looks like you have not entered any wallet addresses thats why it throws an error empty wallet address = duplicate