Topic: [ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure - page 305. (Read 1103311 times)

Why do you care so much about the timeframe? you haven't even invested.

Once again posting here because main thread os locked AND XC Forum is manually filtering signups so I can't post there even though I've registered(see my aside below the reason for this post).

No payouts on Multipool for a week?

Concerning the forum I think a primary reason why traffic is so low there, especially now that the main thread is locked.  Most people that will go there are people looking to post a question or comment immediately.  They expect to register, but making them wait for manual approval will have a lot of people just saying "fuck it" and not bothering.  If you are going to lock the main thread then take the manual approvals off the forum so people can get in there and talk.  You already have control enough to manage what's posted no need to set roadblocks for people wanting to get involved there.

+1
Let's just start the project

* The ITO will run for 7 days beginning October 29, 2014 at 5am PDT and ending on November 5th 23:59:59 PDT

Can anybody tell me what happens with the coins bought from ploniex market, if the 850 btc are not met? I have bought some over there, because they were too cheap

Oh my bad, I thought that 7 days mean 7 days (as every ordinary ppl), not 7 days and few hours.

DUDE
ICO isn't over yet
Get your time-zone straight  


18hr from now

2 hours after ICO ends and there is still no buy wall on Bittrex..

More FUD incoming.....batten down the hatches!

lmfao I literally lost it. Thanks for the laugh dude 

Lol dude you've got to put the /sarcasm in there for the sheep otherwise you will scare them...

But don't you see - the anonymous group chat, the android wallet, the updates and the bug fixing in real time on IRC, these are all coming from some other person who hides in the shadows and passes all his work over to Dan. He's also called Dan because as we now know there are many Dans. Some of them are American and some English, but none of them can code, except for the secret Dan who is really Arlyn, who pretends not to be able to code much but actually can. He is using his coding skills for evil purposes though there is no doubt about that - the fact that he can spell is all the evidence we need.

Once the Dans have sold their tokens, they will try and fool us by sticking around and pretending to care. They will embellish their lies by releasing code, decentralised mesh anonymity (done  - just to prove my point), and a working blocknet to make us think they are truly genuine. But we will know the truth.

i think the fud campaign was so over the top that by now it had the opposite effect esentially with a majority of block investors. the summary on cryptoarticals illustrates that. We'll see.

this is a little salespitch:
If you believe in this project you will not be able to hold the same % in it in a second funding some time down the road.

the refund widow is a nice gesture but its based on a criminal attempt to discredit the project. Its a wierd situation but i understad that its maintained. I'm confident it will not see a lot of use.

It's fair enough that people that are (in their opinion) "stuck" with BLOCK can trade it back.
You don't want it? Sure, the org will take it of your hands and mark them as not sold in the first place.

About Dan being the coder of XC, come on man, really? XC wallet can send coins anonymously, you can chat anonymously.
There is a mobile wallet (android) being publicly tested. There's a bunch of platforms supported by for the original wallet.

So the results speak for themselves, even if he doesn't know how to code (which seems very farfetched with a linkedin profile indicating his 35 years of experience), then at the very least he knows how to run a business, and quess what? That's exactly what the makes XC stand out from the herd and will outgrow this crypto scene into the real world. I like Dan's vision and the way he produces results.

You comment about holding XC and asking legitimate questions. Then please, coming from a fellow XC holder; enough is enough man.
Let the man focus on the job and drop the undermining questions. This isn't helping us as a community at all.

The whole deal with XC is indeed that it's not open at the moment cos the tech is too valuable for that. You can have a look at Kimmyf's blockexplorer to see that some really advanced stuff happens when you send XC anonymously: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8969324
If you're not convinced there's something there (whoever made it) then just sell the XC and buy back on Rev3 when it's opensourced.

In the meanwhile Dan is looking at business opportunities that might adopt XC as the foundation platform. When this comes to fruition, well... I leave you to speculate what will happen to it.

Thanks

At XC's first month, rev1-, a code review was done with prominent members of the community, I think one was mindfox. Apart from that, battbot has stated multiple times that Dan knows his stuff and is an exceptional coder. Dan himself has stated many times that he has written the code, what features he has added or wants to add in the code, etc etc. Every time some FUD appears, there are always people(like you) who have legitimate concerns, but ask the same over-repeated questions all the time.

Now, if I were Dan, and I obviously had faith in my ability and took a good chunk of my time answering the same old questions, I would definitely get fed up with it to the point that, supposing I was able to read and take into account every single investor's concern, I would just stop answering altogether, take advantage of these SUPER LOW prices and legitimately accumulate my very own personal stash, let my tech deliver after official rev3 release(and then blocknet's as well) and profit from the leading XC's tech hype and probably next BTC rise.

I don't know about you, but I missed the BTC train, I do not intend on missing out on probably the next big thing.

Oh wait ... You are objectively? No.

This is the full statement:

Full disclosure: I am the writer of this article and I work for XC.I believe the account of events to be true and well substantiated. Nonetheless it is important for readers to be aware of my subject position and therefore the scope for reinterpretation that the facts may allow from differing perspectives. No situation is fully determinate and thus no situation only admits of one possible reading. However I stand by the opinions represented in this text and believe them to be faithful to the facts.

omg they issued their view on the campaign and chronologie to  a news site and they decided to publicise it. its just a sign of openness to include the information of the author into this article.

this happenns a million times a day with press releases or news . ever heard of reuters?

It seems they can do what they want now it will be turned against them .

and illodin whats you fucking problem. if he finaly answers your nonsense question you'll come up with a new one. your one of the sneakiest guys in this whole place.

"I am the writer of this article and I work for XC"

But probably americans never heard about objective journalism.

Honestly the Bittrex refund wall is non sense. The 850 BTC are reached, and the deal was if they are reach then the project can start.
Now, we are going to have another 48 h of Drama...
This all smear campaign was non sense and now we are giving it the chance to win !