[ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure - page 335.

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: synechist on November 02, 2014, 03:37:50 PM

Quote from: cryptico on November 02, 2014, 03:27:28 PM

Arlyn why there is just you in here doing the block PR with this thread can other people from the other coins manage the thread here while you come a bit in the XC forum?

Are you preapering an over all update for us on the XC forum?

With the thread locked down it is quite difficult to get in touch with each other since there has been not much team presence in there.

I understand that you and Dan are busy with this project but you said as well that this would have not taken away from XC. There are other coins in the block with their PR guys I do not understand why you have to do all the work.

Can you tell us who will manage this thread apart from you and if you have scheduled shift to manage it between the PR people of all the other coins.

This is just not that fair for XC community members but for you also.

I've posted three times in the XC forum today alone.

I'm not gone. I'm right there. It's open on a tab in my browser right now.

The sole reason why I haven't posted more than three times is that there's been minimal conversation after my replies - which is the opposite of what's happened in this thread.

And of course updates are in the pipeline. Major ones, as it happens.

Maybe you just need to get used to the fact that we no longer have a single thread, but an entire forum to ourselves now. It's a lot easier to miss the presence of someone in a new environment of this sort.

I understand I did not want you to take my comment in the wrong way that is why I had changed it in the first part but you replied already.

I still do not think is fair for you to be the only guy in here making the PR there other coins involved in the block-net you should share this role with the other PR guys and I do not say this to mean wrong at all.

It is a lot of work for you as well and I know you are sick.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: cryptico on November 02, 2014, 03:27:28 PM

Arlyn why there is just you in here doing the block PR with this thread can other people from the other coins manage the thread here while you come a bit in the XC forum?

Are you preapering an over all update for us on the XC forum?

With the thread locked down it is quite difficult to get in touch with each other since there has been not much team presence in there.

I understand that you and Dan are busy with this project but you said as well that this would have not taken away from XC. There are other coins in the block with their PR guys I do not understand why you have to do all the work.

Can you tell us who will manage this thread apart from you and if you have scheduled shift to manage it between the PR people of all the other coins.

This is just not that fair for XC community members but for you also.

I've posted three times in the XC forum today alone.

I'm not gone. I'm right there. It's open on a tab in my browser right now.

The sole reason why I haven't posted more than three times is that there's been minimal conversation after my replies - which is the opposite of what's happened in this thread.

And of course updates are in the pipeline. Major ones, as it happens.

Maybe you just need to get used to the fact that we no longer have a single thread, but an entire forum to ourselves now. It's a lot easier to miss the presence of someone in a new environment of this sort.

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Arlyn please do not take this wrong.

May I ask why there is just you in here doing the block PR with this thread can other people from the other coins manage the thread here while you come a bit in the XC forum?

Are you preapering an over all update for us on the XC forum?

With the thread locked down it is quite difficult to get in touch with each other since there has been not much team presence in there.

I understand that you and Dan are busy with this project but you said as well that this would have not taken away from XC. There are other coins in the block with their PR guys I do not understand why you have to do all the work.

Can you tell us who will manage this thread apart from you and if you have scheduled shift to manage it between the PR people of all the other coins.

This is just not that fair for XC community members but for you also.

filflarn

newbie

Activity: 58

Merit: 0

Quote from: youngmike on November 02, 2014, 02:29:20 PM

So this ICO is open forever?

Why invest in something this overpriced and sold without any growth space?

ITO ends Nov 5. As for the other comment it depends on if you believe in the project, the devs, and the tech. if you believe then you'd invest if not then dont.

youngmike

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

So this ICO is open forever?

Why invest in something this overpriced and sold without any growth space?

cryptocointools

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

CryptocoinTools.com

All I want to say is thank you to Dan Metcalf for making his public statement about all this FUD being generated: http://www.atcsecure.com/blog/Official_Statement.pdf

This is a classic example of FUDsters generating as many remarks based on out-of-context information that really have nothing to do with the subject at hand.

I am really encouraged by how synechist and others have continued to keep a calm, cool head when dealing with this as well.

Once, the ITO ends on Nov 4th, I believe we are in for some exciting stuff, as once that happens, the price will be controlled 100% by investors that hold BLOCK, with the remaining portion burned. This will allow for only the true investors and NOT FUDsters to have more weight on the market and outcome of this project as a whole.

Congrats to the community of Blocknet coins as well as the Blocknet team. Thank you for your hard work and cool heads in dealing with this situation.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: oblox on November 02, 2014, 02:02:37 PM

Why the hell do you guys need 850-2500 BTC for something I have read is about 75% done?

It's probably about 2% done.

Look at the OP. It's a major project; the initial development alone will take 9 months.

oblox

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1018

Why the hell do you guys need 850-2500 BTC for something I have read is about 75% done?

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: dannyspk on November 02, 2014, 01:53:52 PM

Wow. XC is bleeeding.

You know what they say: "buy when there's blood on the streets."

dannyspk

sr. member

Activity: 341

Merit: 250

Wow. XC is bleeeding.

00Smurf

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: EmilioMann on November 02, 2014, 01:19:56 PM

Smurf is a child trying to get attention because no one talks about him it as speaking about pookie, trollsroyce and longandshort.
Okay, now I talked about you,
you can stop now with your childish

lol whatever man.

*fixes my fro

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: _mr_e on November 02, 2014, 01:16:15 PM

Quote from: synechist on November 02, 2014, 01:08:32 PM

Quote from: 00Smurf on November 02, 2014, 12:48:50 PM

How were they out of context? They were in chronological order, and pertained to the relevant parts of the conversation.

Now i will say that who ever posted some of the text snippets did indeed post them out of context as they had none of my side of the conversation and it missed conversation both before and after the snippets that was relevant.

What dedicated website? I have not seen one. Now to play the devils advocate who's to say it wasn't launched by someone in the negative towards the shadow community just to paint us in a bad light. How can you prove who did or did not launch a website.

This whole thing stinks of politics. Irrespective of anything "proof of this, proof of that" the only proof anyone should need is Proof of delivery. Let the tech of any coin speak for itself as long as its presented in a truthful manner, and if using opensource code it has the relevant copyrights of the original coders.

And by god this goes for any coins community members if you have an opinion on another coin or techincal specs of a coin or a coins technology, at least back it up with proof or technical papers or find someone that knows about the tech to educate you. There are ways to ask questions and discuss technology with out coming across as trolling or fudding or whatever.

Well said Smurf. I agree completely.

Expect developments in this incipient github: https://github.com/atcsecure/xbridge

Wow, so much code!

Did you notice the word "incipient" above? We'll have an elementary proof of concept in there before the ITO is done.

Furthermore you'll do well to remind yourself that this ITO is in order to fund development. Money first; code after. If you don't like this arrangement, don't buy. Simple.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: RichardT on November 02, 2014, 01:23:14 PM

Quote from: synechist on November 02, 2014, 01:06:26 PM

Quote from: RichardT on November 02, 2014, 01:02:06 PM

Quote from: cryptico on November 02, 2014, 01:00:38 PM

I think enough shit already from newbie accounts.

Every attack from a newbie account should be deleted on the spot.

Yeah, I'm not a newbie account and my post still got deleted.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9414230

Thanks for reposting that elsewhere.

It's in a FUD thread now, which is fitting.

It was deleted because it did not respect the fact that any image - including those Skype screenshots - is as unverifiable as the next.

No case is strengthened by posting screenshots claiming to be more truthful than others.

Now to move on to something more penetrating, the real truth in the center of all of this nonsense is the following:

- Dan publicly announced the roles he played in other coins, but his involvement has been deceptively framed as being illicit.

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/dan-metcalf-publicly-issues-statement-on-accusations-made-against-him

Or it was deleted because it exposed something that you didn't want to be exposed. And yes, I do realize any image could be photoshopped. I'm just pointing out that the one Dan posted more obviously was.

By the way, advertising that statement does not help Dan's case at all. He endorses Prom as "ethical" in the statement. Everyone, even the supporters know that's not true.

Whatever man.

Those screenshots are out already. It's not like I would keep them from being exposed by deleting your post. Seriously.

Dan's statement does help his case. The entire point is that the way Prom, Dan, their relationship, XC, and the Blocknet have been portrayed is deceitful. That's what a smear campaign does.

RichardT

sr. member

Activity: 391

Merit: 250

Quote from: synechist on November 02, 2014, 01:06:26 PM

Quote from: RichardT on November 02, 2014, 01:02:06 PM

Quote from: cryptico on November 02, 2014, 01:00:38 PM

I think enough shit already from newbie accounts.

Every attack from a newbie account should be deleted on the spot.

Yeah, I'm not a newbie account and my post still got deleted.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9414230

Thanks for reposting that elsewhere.

It's in a FUD thread now, which is fitting.

It was deleted because it did not respect the fact that any image - including those Skype screenshots - is as unverifiable as the next.

No case is strengthened by posting screenshots claiming to be more truthful than others.

Now to move on to something more penetrating, the real truth in the center of all of this nonsense is the following:

- Dan publicly announced the roles he played in other coins, but his involvement has been deceptively framed as being illicit.

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/dan-metcalf-publicly-issues-statement-on-accusations-made-against-him

Or it was deleted because it exposed something that you didn't want to be exposed. And yes, I do realize any image could be photoshopped. I'm just pointing out that the one Dan posted more obviously was.

By the way, advertising that statement does not help Dan's case at all. He endorses Prom as "ethical" in the statement. Everyone, even the supporters know that's not true.

EmilioMann

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1028

#mitandopelomundo

Smurf is a child trying to get attention because no one talks about him it as speaking about pookie, trollsroyce and longandshort.
Okay, now I talked about you,
you can stop now with your childish

_mr_e

legendary

Activity: 817

Merit: 1000

Quote from: synechist on November 02, 2014, 01:08:32 PM

Quote from: 00Smurf on November 02, 2014, 12:48:50 PM

How were they out of context? They were in chronological order, and pertained to the relevant parts of the conversation.

Now i will say that who ever posted some of the text snippets did indeed post them out of context as they had none of my side of the conversation and it missed conversation both before and after the snippets that was relevant.

What dedicated website? I have not seen one. Now to play the devils advocate who's to say it wasn't launched by someone in the negative towards the shadow community just to paint us in a bad light. How can you prove who did or did not launch a website.

This whole thing stinks of politics. Irrespective of anything "proof of this, proof of that" the only proof anyone should need is Proof of delivery. Let the tech of any coin speak for itself as long as its presented in a truthful manner, and if using opensource code it has the relevant copyrights of the original coders.

And by god this goes for any coins community members if you have an opinion on another coin or techincal specs of a coin or a coins technology, at least back it up with proof or technical papers or find someone that knows about the tech to educate you. There are ways to ask questions and discuss technology with out coming across as trolling or fudding or whatever.

Well said Smurf. I agree completely.

Expect developments in this incipient github: https://github.com/atcsecure/xbridge

Wow, so much code!

EmilioMann

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1028

#mitandopelomundo

Quote from: ShillAccount on November 02, 2014, 12:52:14 PM

Quote from: synechist on November 02, 2014, 11:38:10 AM

I think the point is that we don't launch smear campaigns.

Recall that XC has simply developed a huge arsenal of tech over five months without a pump and without slandering competitors.

We do not need, and will never resort to, unethical means to compete.

Without a pump? Cmon...we all know you've got bobsurplus in your pockets...

He in every single blocknet coin thread. Explain that.

you must explain to us why the shadowcoin community members talk so ill of BobSurplus if coolstoryteller aka trollsroyce and pookielax31 aka Mr. Boh, the two whales who own 50% of all shadowcoins are or were part of that group?

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: 00Smurf on November 02, 2014, 12:48:50 PM

How were they out of context? They were in chronological order, and pertained to the relevant parts of the conversation.

Now i will say that who ever posted some of the text snippets did indeed post them out of context as they had none of my side of the conversation and it missed conversation both before and after the snippets that was relevant.

What dedicated website? I have not seen one. Now to play the devils advocate who's to say it wasn't launched by someone in the negative towards the shadow community just to paint us in a bad light. How can you prove who did or did not launch a website.

This whole thing stinks of politics. Irrespective of anything "proof of this, proof of that" the only proof anyone should need is Proof of delivery. Let the tech of any coin speak for itself as long as its presented in a truthful manner, and if using opensource code it has the relevant copyrights of the original coders.

And by god this goes for any coins community members if you have an opinion on another coin or techincal specs of a coin or a coins technology, at least back it up with proof or technical papers or find someone that knows about the tech to educate you. There are ways to ask questions and discuss technology with out coming across as trolling or fudding or whatever.

Well said Smurf. I agree completely.

Expect developments in this incipient github: https://github.com/atcsecure/xbridge

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: RichardT on November 02, 2014, 01:02:06 PM

Quote from: cryptico on November 02, 2014, 01:00:38 PM

I think enough shit already from newbie accounts.

Every attack from a newbie account should be deleted on the spot.

Yeah, I'm not a newbie account and my post still got deleted.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9414230

Thanks for reposting that elsewhere.

It's in a FUD thread now, which is fitting.

It was deleted because it did not respect the fact that any image - including those Skype screenshots - is as unverifiable as the next.

No case is strengthened by posting screenshots claiming to be more truthful than others.

Now to move on to something more penetrating, the real truth in the center of all of this nonsense is the following:

- Dan publicly announced the roles he played in other coins, but his involvement has been deceptively framed as being illicit.

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/dan-metcalf-publicly-issues-statement-on-accusations-made-against-him

flashbit

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 505

Holy crap XC rich list has jumped łike 4-5% in the last week or so!

HOLD boys and girls some heavy manipulation happening. Wow!

Topic: [ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure - page 335. (Read 1103293 times)