Topic: [ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure - page 336. (Read 1103311 times)

Yeah, I'm not a newbie account and my post still got deleted.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9414230

Wouldn't be surprised if this one got deleted too.

I think enough shit already from newbie accounts.

Every attack from a newbie account should be deleted on the spot.

Context is everything sir.

I was referring to XC.

Take a look at XC's chart. It's indisputable.


P.S. In a project as big as the Blocknet, every single pumper in crypto will be buying. Of course Bobsurplus is posting. What would you expect? Your post amounts to the following ridiculous claim: "Blocknet is big enough to attract whales; therefore it's a scam!"

Without a pump?  Cmon...we all know you've got bobsurplus in your pockets...

He in every single blocknet coin thread.  Explain that.

How were they out of context? They were in chronological order, and pertained to the relevant parts of the conversation.

Now i will say that who ever posted some of the text snippets did indeed post them out of context as they had none of my side of the conversation and it missed conversation both before and after the snippets that was relevant.

What dedicated website? I have not seen one. Now to play the devils advocate who's to say it wasn't launched by someone in the negative towards the shadow community just to paint us in a bad light. How can you prove who did or did not launch a website.

This whole thing stinks of politics. Irrespective of anything "proof of this, proof of that" the only proof anyone should need is Proof of delivery. Let the tech of any coin speak for itself as long as its presented in a truthful manner, and if using opensource code it has the relevant copyrights of the original coders.

And by god this goes for any coins community members if you have an opinion on another coin or techincal specs of a coin or a coins technology, at least back it up with proof or technical papers or find someone that knows about the tech to educate you. There are ways to ask questions and discuss technology with out coming across as trolling or fudding or whatever.

Smurf: No. Even Prometheus stated that the conversations were presented out of context in order to appear in a different light.

No planned smear campaign? A dedicated website was launched for this.

Furthermore I was privy to several progressive edits of conversations as the people behind this crafted the most negative presentation they could.

I'm not denying you had conversations with Prom; I'm also not denying that you were caught in the middle of a horrible state of affairs.

Lastly I'm not blaming the SDC dev team. As far as I know they were not involved.

But there is absolutely no denying the reality of a smear campaign against Dan, XC, and the Blocknet.

Dan, you have many big and long-term investors including me that have not sold a single XC. Keep your focus on the tech, release ongoing updates and confidence will follow.

Arlyn, please continue doing what your doing - that is staying positive and on focus with ongoing news releases and the rest with follow.

Expect big things to come with XC and BlockNet. Enough said.

Those imgur pics say, " SDC to the moon", "Dan is prob crying". What the fuck is shadowcoin and what do they have against XC...., I've never even heard of that SDC crap. This is so stupid, people on this forum are such a waste.

Cool. just smash the tech in our face.

interesting...

No I can NOT confirm it is legit.  << anything can be photoshopped >>


I'm not going to waste any more time or energy on any this crap, I've got work to do.

They were originally and have always been my skype conversation with Prom, that he has authenticated them with a post in here. There was no planned smear campaign, someone leaked those conversations out of the SDC dev team room without permission when we were discussing whether or not to join Blocknet.

The Dev team can not control community members actions. Every coin community has its different community members. Whether it be BLOCKnet, XC, XST, SDC , BC, DRK,  XMR etc.

My hope here is that the public will learn from this and respond accordingly in future.
Nobody gets to discredit a project dishonestly and successfully repeat the procedure the next time.
Next time we'll all be better at recognising internet trash for what it is.

No-one can ever prove that screenshots like that are legit - at least not without some pretty sophisticated methods that I'm not equipped with.

I'm not trying to establish proof. I see no need to "get revenge" or to punish the proponents of this smear campaign.

We're moving on. There are better things to do than squabble, like creating revolutionary tech.

Can you clarify how did you get this and if you got more?

https://i.imgur.com/EEc9xf2.png

The same things that you said at the beggining regarding the Skype jpgs can be applied for this one also.

Just doing the advocate of the devil here. If they are legit and you got more publish all of them.

I think the point is that we don't launch smear campaigns.

Recall that XC has simply developed a huge arsenal of tech over five months without a pump and without slandering competitors.

We do not need, and will never resort to, unethical means to compete.

if you take a look at sdc thread will see the admin keeps all messages containing fud against other currencies, but deletes all the answers of the supporters of these coins, even those that are merely explanatory and contains nothing against sdc.

It doesnt matter if Shadow is shit, probably it is. The point is that you guys are no better.

Thanks for the feedback I was not aware.

Just to flesh out the claim I've just made, about three weeks ago I was notified that this smear campaign was being planned.

I had access to the screenshots that were leaked a few days ago. Oddly enough they were presented back then as pastebins of IRC chat logs.

Whatever these materials originally were, this smear campaign has been a long time coming and I have no reasonable doubt as to its origins.