No I think $50,000 is well enough to get the project started. Once progress has been proven more funds can be collected through sale of shares.
I don't see how the logic of throwing up 10,000,000 shares worth $1,000,000 up front will generate more(or even the same) level of confidence in people so they feel safe investing. If you generate more confidence, you will get more investors. Maybe even get the full $1,000,000 over time. Staged share releases up to 10,000,000 shares are the best way to go in my opinion.
In the same vein as lower taxes generate a stronger economy by stirring spending, a smaller initial share offering to fund starting the project will generate confidence that funds are not going to be sitting there with no guarantees of a product. People will appreciate and be more willing to invest further into it when they see progress happening at each step. Momentum will build on the project.
The only way you lose is if you're this guy:
The Ger, I think your concerns have been entirely resolved by Driv3n's post below.
Also, $50,000 will get you virtually nothing. That's an unrealistically small amount in my opinion.
Just because some other group took in $2,000,000 doesn't make it fine to "only" ask for $1,000,000 for your own project and think you're giving away a deal. Your view of reality is skewed brah...
This project will get a lot more support both financially and vocally if they tone down the cash cow and stagger their share offerings to source development funds in smaller allotments as I suggested earlier.
500,000 shares initially @ .00025 = 125 BTC
If they can't or won't kickstart this project with $50,000 worth of BTC then I have to question the legitimacy of the project. Once we see significant progress for our funding then perhaps another share offering can be done to get to the next level.
I strongly urge the Blocknet developers though, don't just ask for $1,000,000 because you think you can. I think you can guess where that's going to lead with this community. Be realistic. In all honestly I believe anything more than approx. $500,000 for a working product is cheeky and you are going to have a lot of people looking the other way on this project if you try and pull that amount.
If you are dead set on offering 10,000,000 shares I'd to it in .00015 BTC values.
10,000,000 x .00015 = 1500 BTC x $400 = $600,000
MUCH more reasonable in my opinion.
I see some concern from people asking why the blocknet needs 2500 BTC or why 1 million dollars. Just wanted to clarify that the Blocknet foundation isnt requesting and doesnt need this much it is simply the maximum amount that could be donated during the ITO. I think we all agree that 2500 BTC is an ambitious goal, but its a good idea because if less is donated, the extra shares are destroyed and everyone who donated now has a larger share.
Think about what would happen if the ITO had a max amount of shares that equaled 500 BTC and that total was reached halfway through the ITO, then you'd be left with people upset that they missed the opportunity to buy shares and the Blocknet would lose all that additional funding. So its good that the bar is set high just in case.