i cant recall whether this was answered before but can you have multiple miner instances point to a v2 pool mining to the same burst address? i've got a second instance pointed to the pool but have yet to see it submit a valid share. It could just be it hasn't found one yet which is very likely as i've justed started plotting on this second PC. just wanted to check it does work though.
Should be fine. 
Topic: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000 - page 1025. (Read 2170889 times)
September 03, 2014, 09:20:22 PM
September 03, 2014, 09:11:28 PM
i cant recall whether this was answered before but can you have multiple miner instances point to a v2 pool mining to the same burst address? i've got a second instance pointed to the pool but have yet to see it submit a valid share. It could just be it hasn't found one yet which is very likely as i've justed started plotting on this second PC. just wanted to check it does work though.
September 03, 2014, 09:00:44 PM
i have multiple HDD on different computer mining to the same pool generated address (v1) , all the HDD is using exactly the same setting (same nouce starting and ending number) , all of them mining generate the same "generationSignature" and i overlaying ?
Based on what I learned today, most definitely.
Quote
HD 1 C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer.POCMiner generate 4651495086655359966 1 10800000 1000 4
HD 2 C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer.POCMiner generate 4651495086655359966 1 5400000 1000 4
HD 3 C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer.POCMiner generate 4651495086655359966 1 3720000 1000 4
HD 4 C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer.POCMiner generate 4651495086655359966 1 2840000 1000 4
HD 5 C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer.POCMiner generate 4651495086655359966 1 2400000 1000 4
HD 6 C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer.POCMiner generate 4651495086655359966 1 3200000 1000 4
HD 2 C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer.POCMiner generate 4651495086655359966 1 5400000 1000 4
HD 3 C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer.POCMiner generate 4651495086655359966 1 3720000 1000 4
HD 4 C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer.POCMiner generate 4651495086655359966 1 2840000 1000 4
HD 5 C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer.POCMiner generate 4651495086655359966 1 2400000 1000 4
HD 6 C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer.POCMiner generate 4651495086655359966 1 3200000 1000 4
They all overlap
> 4651495086655359966 1 10800000 1000 4
this generates nonces from 1 to (1+ 10800000 -1)
the next one generates the same nonces.
The second one should be:
HD 2 C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer.POCMiner generate 4651495086655359966 10800000 5400000 1000 4
then:
HD 3 C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer.POCMiner generate 4651495086655359966 16200000 3720000 1000 4
I'm afraid you have to delete Your plots on HD2 to HD6 and redo them.
September 03, 2014, 08:56:01 PM
i have multiple HDD on different computer mining to the same pool generated address (v1) , all the HDD is using exactly the same setting (same nouce starting and ending number) , all of them mining generate the same "generationSignature" and i overlaying ?
You need to use different starting nonce on each, any overlap in ranges is wasted space.
please advice , if i have a two indentical hard drives and one of the hard drive has completed to plot and i will copy the disk to the second one it will work ?
or every disk need to be plotted separatelly ?
or every disk need to be plotted separatelly ?
Need to be plotted seperatly. Copying the plot files will just result in both doing the same work and getting the same results.
September 03, 2014, 08:53:15 PM
please advice , if i have a two indentical hard drives and one of the hard drive has completed to plot and i will copy the disk to the second one it will work ?
or every disk need to be plotted separatelly ?
or every disk need to be plotted separatelly ?
September 03, 2014, 08:48:14 PM
will v1 pool be close down ? I am new and mining at v1 pool
v1 pool might get converted to a v2, however it will be up and you will be able to keep using the same plots either way.with v1 i am able to mine using exchange wallet address to generate mining address but v2 i have to download wallet because of pass phase. Am i correct ?
in that case v1 is much more easier to use because i don't need to download and setup wallet and i don't need 1 burst
September 03, 2014, 08:46:19 PM
i have multiple HDD on different computer mining to the same pool generated address (v1) , all the HDD is using exactly the same setting (same nouce starting and ending number) , all of them mining generate the same "generationSignature" and i overlaying ?
September 03, 2014, 08:45:31 PM
will v1 pool be close down ? I am new and mining at v1 pool
v1 pool might get converted to a v2, however it will be up and you will be able to keep using the same plots either way.with v1 i am able to mine using exchange wallet address to generate mining address but v2 i have to download wallet because of pass phase. Am i correct ?
September 03, 2014, 08:42:48 PM
will v1 pool be close down ? I am new and mining at v1 pool
v1 pool might get converted to a v2, however it will be up and you will be able to keep using the same plots either way.with v1 i am able to mine using exchange wallet address to generate mining address but v2 i have to download wallet because of pass phase. Am i correct ?
September 03, 2014, 08:31:54 PM
will v1 pool be close down ? I am new and mining at v1 pool
v1 pool might get converted to a v2, however it will be up and you will be able to keep using the same plots either way. September 03, 2014, 08:27:41 PM
dcct
I can`t understand why miner not mining) I fight with him 4 hours) in 2 different machines.
Someone else have same problem?
I can`t understand why miner not mining) I fight with him 4 hours) in 2 different machines.
Someone else have same problem? September 03, 2014, 08:23:04 PM
what happens in you rename your plots? for example
16036893174223139082_1_1800000_1000
i had to stop it at 500000... to avoid confusing the over lap tool could i rename it to
16036893174223139082_1_500000_1000 ?
16036893174223139082_1_1800000_1000
i had to stop it at 500000... to avoid confusing the over lap tool could i rename it to
16036893174223139082_1_500000_1000 ?
This way its ok. But never change stagger size or starting nonce.
You know you messed up when you get huge huge deadlines.
if i wanted to know the exact nonce it stopped on could i divide the size of the file by like 256 times the stagger level or something so i have a accurate list?
Just divide the size in bytes by 262144, thats the total number of nonces.
September 03, 2014, 08:22:14 PM
will v1 pool be close down ? I am new and mining at v1 pool
September 03, 2014, 08:21:32 PM
How many coins are there now plz? The explorer is loading for me for ever.
September 03, 2014, 08:19:45 PM
what happens in you rename your plots? for example
16036893174223139082_1_1800000_1000
i had to stop it at 500000... to avoid confusing the over lap tool could i rename it to
16036893174223139082_1_500000_1000 ?
16036893174223139082_1_1800000_1000
i had to stop it at 500000... to avoid confusing the over lap tool could i rename it to
16036893174223139082_1_500000_1000 ?
This way its ok. But never change stagger size or starting nonce.
You know you messed up when you get huge huge deadlines.
if i wanted to know the exact nonce it stopped on could i divide the size of the file by like 256 times the stagger level or something so i have a accurate list?
September 03, 2014, 08:18:29 PM
what happens in you rename your plots? for example
16036893174223139082_1_1800000_1000
i had to stop it at 500000... to avoid confusing the over lap tool could i rename it to
16036893174223139082_1_500000_1000 ?
16036893174223139082_1_1800000_1000
i had to stop it at 500000... to avoid confusing the over lap tool could i rename it to
16036893174223139082_1_500000_1000 ?
This way its ok. But never change stagger size or starting nonce.
You know you messed up when you get huge huge deadlines.
September 03, 2014, 08:15:57 PM
what happens in you rename your plots? for example
16036893174223139082_1_1800000_1000
i had to stop it at 500000... to avoid confusing the over lap tool could i rename it to
16036893174223139082_1_500000_1000 ?
16036893174223139082_1_1800000_1000
i had to stop it at 500000... to avoid confusing the over lap tool could i rename it to
16036893174223139082_1_500000_1000 ?
September 03, 2014, 07:53:11 PM
2.72 TB divided by 256 KB, minus a GB or two for miner files.........
I really hate how it is technically 3 trillion bytes in size and they have the balls to tell you that is 3.00 GB instead of the 2.72 GB it actually is.
I really hate how it is technically 3 trillion bytes in size and they have the balls to tell you that is 3.00 GB instead of the 2.72 GB it actually is.
I get about 11400000 nonces on one of them.
Technically 1KB is 1000 Bytes, like 1 kilowatt (KW) is also 1000W, not 1024. Its windows thats using the wrong units here.
On the hard drive I have connected, it shows 3,000,260,562,944 bytes available after formatting.
Hold out 5 GB for free space and miner software, leaving 2,995,260,562,944 bytes available.
11,400,000 times 262,144 (number of bytes in 256 Kb) = 2,988,441,600,000 bytes. It fits!
September 03, 2014, 07:44:28 PM
is there a way to look at the pool and tell how many GB you are utilizing? by the share count or something i have my first TB complete and want to make sure the plots are working
im still curious about this question, does anyone have a way to tell?
September 03, 2014, 07:33:08 PM
2.72 TB divided by 256 KB, minus a GB or two for miner files.........
I really hate how it is technically 3 trillion bytes in size and they have the balls to tell you that is 3.00 GB instead of the 2.72 GB it actually is.
I really hate how it is technically 3 trillion bytes in size and they have the balls to tell you that is 3.00 GB instead of the 2.72 GB it actually is.
I get about 11400000 nonces on one of them.
Technically 1KB is 1000 Bytes, like 1 kilowatt (KW) is also 1000W, not 1024. Its windows thats using the wrong units here.
Jump to: