What top mining speeds do you guys get with jminer? I have some new GPUs and I'm getting some silly numbers, just wanna make sure they are correct.
11 disks, 17482 Gb Giga R7870 @ 23 sec
Giga R9 280x @ 19.8 sec
Topic: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000 - page 161. (Read 2170648 times)
September 23, 2015, 12:34:11 PM
Giga R7870 @ 23 sec
Giga R9 280x @ 19.8 sec
September 23, 2015, 12:33:53 PM
You guys needs to fix your Mining Difficulty, i told the dev that he would get exactly this problem and this was a year ago.
If you check your mined coins you already mined 50% of your 2 Billion coins.
Also you need way more advertisement to get more people interest in this project and i mean not who is interested to invest money but to mine coins.
You only have two choices this time, either fix your mining difficulty or change your mining protocol to PoS.
If you check your mined coins you already mined 50% of your 2 Billion coins.
Also you need way more advertisement to get more people interest in this project and i mean not who is interested to invest money but to mine coins.
You only have two choices this time, either fix your mining difficulty or change your mining protocol to PoS.
what's wrong with the difficulty. If miners abandon burst the difficutly gets easier and the remaining miners earn more. if miners flock to burst, the difficulty gets harder and the miners earn less. I see no problem there.
if burst gets worth more, miners get paid more in real terms, and that will attract miners and make the blockchain more secure, if burst gets worth less, miners get paid less in real terms, and that will make some miners go away.. but then... if the market cap is 1mln usd, we only need to make sure it's a lot more expensive than 1mln usd to attack the coin.
when all the coins are mined, miners will live off fees. We may or may not have to make some changes to the size of fees when we get to that point, it will depend on the value of 1 BURST. we can just look at the hash size for the chain at that time, and if the hash size is way too small, we could consider a discussion about increasing the minimum fee to more than one, or perhaps make it possible for miners to not add transactions that have the fee under some level. (not sure if we can do that now)
I think you still don't got it aren't you ? Burstcoin was mined out to 50% already in just one year ! This means your mining difficulty is just to low. In this case you would have mined all your coins in just a total 3 years.
I believe you have things mixed up my friend. How about you go and take a look at a term called 'controlled supply'.
Coin emission has nothing to do with mining difficulty. BURST being 'mined out' in 60 months (IIRC) is by design.
Well, looks like his "design" ain't working.
It is working exactly as designed. You believe that this particular design is not correct/proper/achieving good results and that is perfectly fine
I believe you have things mixed up my friend. How about you go and take a look at a term called 'controlled supply'.
Coin emission has nothing to do with mining difficulty. BURST being 'mined out' in 60 months (IIRC) is by design.
Coin emission has nothing to do with mining difficulty. BURST being 'mined out' in 60 months (IIRC) is by design.
And might be a good reason to release a clone with a different design to possibly attract more miners long-term...
Perhaps, I do not think that there is enough data in crypto to be able to tell what a good emission rate is, or in fact, whether such a deflationary model works at all
. Sure, but you will get more data by releasing clones with different emission rates
And competition is seldom wrong imho. We must realize that Burst does have problems with a decreasing network size, making it more vulnerable to 51% attacks and not attracting investors. Experimenting with clones might be a solution. It doesn't mean we don't believe in the basic technology presented in BUST, quite the contrary in fact, I'd say.
September 23, 2015, 12:16:15 PM
You guys needs to fix your Mining Difficulty, i told the dev that he would get exactly this problem and this was a year ago.
If you check your mined coins you already mined 50% of your 2 Billion coins.
Also you need way more advertisement to get more people interest in this project and i mean not who is interested to invest money but to mine coins.
You only have two choices this time, either fix your mining difficulty or change your mining protocol to PoS.
If you check your mined coins you already mined 50% of your 2 Billion coins.
Also you need way more advertisement to get more people interest in this project and i mean not who is interested to invest money but to mine coins.
You only have two choices this time, either fix your mining difficulty or change your mining protocol to PoS.
what's wrong with the difficulty. If miners abandon burst the difficutly gets easier and the remaining miners earn more. if miners flock to burst, the difficulty gets harder and the miners earn less. I see no problem there.
if burst gets worth more, miners get paid more in real terms, and that will attract miners and make the blockchain more secure, if burst gets worth less, miners get paid less in real terms, and that will make some miners go away.. but then... if the market cap is 1mln usd, we only need to make sure it's a lot more expensive than 1mln usd to attack the coin.
when all the coins are mined, miners will live off fees. We may or may not have to make some changes to the size of fees when we get to that point, it will depend on the value of 1 BURST. we can just look at the hash size for the chain at that time, and if the hash size is way too small, we could consider a discussion about increasing the minimum fee to more than one, or perhaps make it possible for miners to not add transactions that have the fee under some level. (not sure if we can do that now)
I think you still don't got it aren't you ? Burstcoin was mined out to 50% already in just one year ! This means your mining difficulty is just to low. In this case you would have mined all your coins in just a total 3 years.
I believe you have things mixed up my friend. How about you go and take a look at a term called 'controlled supply'.
Coin emission has nothing to do with mining difficulty. BURST being 'mined out' in 60 months (IIRC) is by design.
Well, looks like his "design" ain't working.
It is working exactly as designed. You believe that this particular design is not correct/proper/achieving good results and that is perfectly fine
I believe you have things mixed up my friend. How about you go and take a look at a term called 'controlled supply'.
Coin emission has nothing to do with mining difficulty. BURST being 'mined out' in 60 months (IIRC) is by design.
Coin emission has nothing to do with mining difficulty. BURST being 'mined out' in 60 months (IIRC) is by design.
And might be a good reason to release a clone with a different design to possibly attract more miners long-term...
Perhaps. I do not think that there is enough data in crypto to be able to tell what a good emission rate is, or in fact, whether such a deflationary model works at all
. September 23, 2015, 12:15:13 PM
I believe you have things mixed up my friend. How about you go and take a look at a term called 'controlled supply'.
Coin emission has nothing to do with mining difficulty. BURST being 'mined out' in 60 months (IIRC) is by design.
Coin emission has nothing to do with mining difficulty. BURST being 'mined out' in 60 months (IIRC) is by design.
And might be a good reason to release a clone with a different design to possibly attract more miners long-term...
September 23, 2015, 12:09:56 PM
What top mining speeds do you guys get with jminer? I have some new GPUs and I'm getting some silly numbers, just wanna make sure they are correct.
September 23, 2015, 12:07:14 PM
You guys needs to fix your Mining Difficulty, i told the dev that he would get exactly this problem and this was a year ago.
If you check your mined coins you already mined 50% of your 2 Billion coins.
Also you need way more advertisement to get more people interest in this project and i mean not who is interested to invest money but to mine coins.
You only have two choices this time, either fix your mining difficulty or change your mining protocol to PoS.
If you check your mined coins you already mined 50% of your 2 Billion coins.
Also you need way more advertisement to get more people interest in this project and i mean not who is interested to invest money but to mine coins.
You only have two choices this time, either fix your mining difficulty or change your mining protocol to PoS.
what's wrong with the difficulty. If miners abandon burst the difficutly gets easier and the remaining miners earn more. if miners flock to burst, the difficulty gets harder and the miners earn less. I see no problem there.
if burst gets worth more, miners get paid more in real terms, and that will attract miners and make the blockchain more secure, if burst gets worth less, miners get paid less in real terms, and that will make some miners go away.. but then... if the market cap is 1mln usd, we only need to make sure it's a lot more expensive than 1mln usd to attack the coin.
when all the coins are mined, miners will live off fees. We may or may not have to make some changes to the size of fees when we get to that point, it will depend on the value of 1 BURST. we can just look at the hash size for the chain at that time, and if the hash size is way too small, we could consider a discussion about increasing the minimum fee to more than one, or perhaps make it possible for miners to not add transactions that have the fee under some level. (not sure if we can do that now)
I think you still don't got it aren't you ? Burstcoin was mined out to 50% already in just one year ! This means your mining difficulty is just to low. In this case you would have mined all your coins in just a total 3 years.
I believe you have things mixed up my friend. How about you go and take a look at a term called 'controlled supply'.
Coin emission has nothing to do with mining difficulty. BURST being 'mined out' in 60 months (IIRC) is by design.
September 23, 2015, 09:11:05 AM
You guys needs to fix your Mining Difficulty, i told the dev that he would get exactly this problem and this was a year ago.
If you check your mined coins you already mined 50% of your 2 Billion coins.
Also you need way more advertisement to get more people interest in this project and i mean not who is interested to invest money but to mine coins.
You only have two choices this time, either fix your mining difficulty or change your mining protocol to PoS.
If you check your mined coins you already mined 50% of your 2 Billion coins.
Also you need way more advertisement to get more people interest in this project and i mean not who is interested to invest money but to mine coins.
You only have two choices this time, either fix your mining difficulty or change your mining protocol to PoS.
what's wrong with the difficulty. If miners abandon burst the difficutly gets easier and the remaining miners earn more. if miners flock to burst, the difficulty gets harder and the miners earn less. I see no problem there.
if burst gets worth more, miners get paid more in real terms, and that will attract miners and make the blockchain more secure, if burst gets worth less, miners get paid less in real terms, and that will make some miners go away.. but then... if the market cap is 1mln usd, we only need to make sure it's a lot more expensive than 1mln usd to attack the coin.
when all the coins are mined, miners will live off fees. We may or may not have to make some changes to the size of fees when we get to that point, it will depend on the value of 1 BURST. we can just look at the hash size for the chain at that time, and if the hash size is way too small, we could consider a discussion about increasing the minimum fee to more than one, or perhaps make it possible for miners to not add transactions that have the fee under some level. (not sure if we can do that now)
September 23, 2015, 09:04:28 AM
You guys needs to fix your Mining Difficulty, i told the dev that he would get exactly this problem and this was a year ago.
If you check your mined coins you already mined 50% of your 2 Billion coins.
Also you need way more advertisement to get more people interest in this project and i mean not who is interested to invest money but to mine coins.
You only have two choices this time, either fix your mining difficulty or change your mining protocol to PoS.
If you check your mined coins you already mined 50% of your 2 Billion coins.
Also you need way more advertisement to get more people interest in this project and i mean not who is interested to invest money but to mine coins.
You only have two choices this time, either fix your mining difficulty or change your mining protocol to PoS.
And give us a decent GUI Wallet that can use all of our RAM, CORES and GPU`s to plot files. Plotting 2TB on 1GB out of my 16GB takes forever and this way I`m starting to loose interest in BURST mining. Of course that is what some of you want because some greedy bastards want to mine all BURST by themselves before the big public will join.
I've spoke with him about this problem already.. Burstcoin needs to be easy to get more people interested.
Also Burstdev ? What do you think will happen when you mined all your coins ? You expect to pay your miners with candy's ?
Quote
Of course that is what some of you want because some greedy bastards want to mine all BURST by themselves before the big public will join.
0 - Premine... some people honestly believe they can still fool investors so easy.
There was no premine, and everyone had tools to do mining from day 1. Fair launch as i see it. Nobody owns the burst technology, and there are therefore no investors with ownership in the tech. The only way to invest in burst is to buy some, or to set up mining and keep the coins. It's the same rules for everyone, no way to get a head start, the ones who took a chance and bought drives and set up mining in the beginning got rewarded for taking a big risk, us coming in after, got somewhat less of a reward, but by then it was also a lot easier to get started as ppl shared information about how to go about things. As there are no investors in burst core tech (except those who has invested time to develop stuff), there can be no investors to fool.
It is meant to be somewhat hard to plot files, it is part of the design of the coin. It makes a 51% attack a lot harder to perform, making the coin safer. Even with plain old CPU plotting you can easily fill up a 4TB drive in a few days, so not a problem for the small miner. You can even start mining as soon as you have filled up just a bit of the drive.
September 23, 2015, 08:55:21 AM
What is the relationship of the DevPool and the Developer team?
It is for me strange, that the "developer" cannot code anymore, but still run a pool!
I also wonder about this pool having the highest balance.
It is for me strange, that the "developer" cannot code anymore, but still run a pool!
I also wonder about this pool having the highest balance.
Code:
Pool Statistics
Current time: 2015-09-23 03:02:40 UTC
Block: 145,750
Difficulty: 7,328
Est. Networksize (PB): 7.6839916823289
BURST.MiningHere.com
Pool balance: 86,291
Registered Miners: 537
burst.ninja
Pool balance: 19,850
Registered Miners: 418
burst.poolto.be
Pool balance: 3,779
Registered Miners: 257
cryptomining.farm
Pool balance: 178,750
Registered Miners: 1,597
DevPool v2
Pool balance: 601,809
Registered Miners: 557
mining.tompool.org
Pool balance: 308
Registered Miners: 57
pool.blago
Pool balance: 608
Registered Miners: 118
pool.burstcoin.de
Pool balance: 25,634
Registered Miners: 127
pool.burstcoin.it
Pool balance: 39
Registered Miners: 56
Current time: 2015-09-23 03:02:40 UTC
Block: 145,750
Difficulty: 7,328
Est. Networksize (PB): 7.6839916823289
BURST.MiningHere.com
Pool balance: 86,291
Registered Miners: 537
burst.ninja
Pool balance: 19,850
Registered Miners: 418
burst.poolto.be
Pool balance: 3,779
Registered Miners: 257
cryptomining.farm
Pool balance: 178,750
Registered Miners: 1,597
DevPool v2
Pool balance: 601,809
Registered Miners: 557
mining.tompool.org
Pool balance: 308
Registered Miners: 57
pool.blago
Pool balance: 608
Registered Miners: 118
pool.burstcoin.de
Pool balance: 25,634
Registered Miners: 127
pool.burstcoin.it
Pool balance: 39
Registered Miners: 56
I would guess that the original developer does not have time these months to do non-critical changes to burst, but he probably have just enough time to keep his pools and tech working just fine. It's all voluntary, so there's nothing strange with some silence.
September 23, 2015, 07:01:48 AM
You guys needs to fix your Mining Difficulty, i told the dev that he would get exactly this problem and this was a year ago.
If you check your mined coins you already mined 50% of your 2 Billion coins.
Also you need way more advertisement to get more people interest in this project and i mean not who is interested to invest money but to mine coins.
You only have two choices this time, either fix your mining difficulty or change your mining protocol to PoS.
If you check your mined coins you already mined 50% of your 2 Billion coins.
Also you need way more advertisement to get more people interest in this project and i mean not who is interested to invest money but to mine coins.
You only have two choices this time, either fix your mining difficulty or change your mining protocol to PoS.
And give us a decent GUI Wallet that can use all of our RAM, CORES and GPU`s to plot files. Plotting 2TB on 1GB out of my 16GB takes forever and this way I`m starting to loose interest in BURST mining. Ofcourse that is what some of you want because some greedy basterds want to mine all BURST by themselves before the big public will join.
September 23, 2015, 04:35:30 AM
haitch and Elmit, for fuck sake, start your own damn thread arguing with each other, instead of yet again trashing this one.
Of course, Elmit's "faucet" should not be listed as an official resource. Such posts should be deleted in a moderated thread, if we ever get one.
Haha, that made me laugh Of course, Elmit's "faucet" should not be listed as an official resource. Such posts should be deleted in a moderated thread, if we ever get one.
Great that I make you laugh.
How about to fix your block explorer once a while!!!!
Thats when I laugh, but you cannot hear me, ... lol.
September 23, 2015, 04:34:24 AM
haitch and Elmit, for fuck sake, start your own damn thread arguing with each other, instead of yet again trashing this one.
Of course, Elmit's "faucet" should not be listed as an official resource. Such posts should be deleted in a moderated thread, if we ever get one.
Of course, Elmit's "faucet" should not be listed as an official resource. Such posts should be deleted in a moderated thread, if we ever get one.
I don't see a rational reason why my faucet should not be listed.
YOU do not need to use it, in fact, why should I throw BURSTs at a unemployed psychiatrist, ... lol
September 23, 2015, 04:32:05 AM
What is the relationship of the DevPool and the Developer team?
It is for me strange, that the "developer" cannot code anymore, but still run a pool!
I also wonder about this pool having the highest balance.
It is for me strange, that the "developer" cannot code anymore, but still run a pool!
I also wonder about this pool having the highest balance.
Code:
Pool Statistics
Current time: 2015-09-23 03:02:40 UTC
Block: 145,750
Difficulty: 7,328
Est. Networksize (PB): 7.6839916823289
BURST.MiningHere.com
Pool balance: 86,291
Registered Miners: 537
burst.ninja
Pool balance: 19,850
Registered Miners: 418
burst.poolto.be
Pool balance: 3,779
Registered Miners: 257
cryptomining.farm
Pool balance: 178,750
Registered Miners: 1,597
DevPool v2
Pool balance: 601,809
Registered Miners: 557
mining.tompool.org
Pool balance: 308
Registered Miners: 57
pool.blago
Pool balance: 608
Registered Miners: 118
pool.burstcoin.de
Pool balance: 25,634
Registered Miners: 127
pool.burstcoin.it
Pool balance: 39
Registered Miners: 56
Current time: 2015-09-23 03:02:40 UTC
Block: 145,750
Difficulty: 7,328
Est. Networksize (PB): 7.6839916823289
BURST.MiningHere.com
Pool balance: 86,291
Registered Miners: 537
burst.ninja
Pool balance: 19,850
Registered Miners: 418
burst.poolto.be
Pool balance: 3,779
Registered Miners: 257
cryptomining.farm
Pool balance: 178,750
Registered Miners: 1,597
DevPool v2
Pool balance: 601,809
Registered Miners: 557
mining.tompool.org
Pool balance: 308
Registered Miners: 57
pool.blago
Pool balance: 608
Registered Miners: 118
pool.burstcoin.de
Pool balance: 25,634
Registered Miners: 127
pool.burstcoin.it
Pool balance: 39
Registered Miners: 56
What I wonder about is why mininghere.com is no longer listed in the pools at http://burstcoin.biz/pools? Did someone finally realize your pool is a scam and you're a thief ?
Questions end with a "?"
Obviously you do not have an answer to the question I have.
Regarding your sentence, ending with "?"
You need to ask them how they select pools to be included. However, don't worry, my statistic is accurate and shows all known pools.
Maybe they have no means to gather the information anymore. Maybe they run out of resources. Read the thread here about the problems this site has.
It is not my problem. I got my statistics, I am happy with it and I share it sometimes.
Why not pick another pool to slander? Why do you always pick on mine? Why do you not just troll away!
Edited: And why is it so, that always when you pop up to slander, at the same time a tried DDOS attack is on the way to my pool? Do you think that is coincidence or CONTROLLED by YOUR BOTNET
? Weeks without, months without, just when you say something here, BANG. I think it shows what character you have/are.
1. Yes, questions end with a question mark - aka -> ?
1a. Yes I presume they understood your theft.
2. You don't know how to validate a BURST address but we should trust your stats on all the burst pools - ok.
1b. Maybe they don't want to list scamming, stealing, shitty pools any more. You showed all stats, until the stats showed you were failing to pay; then you took away showing payouts at all; and now you have a pool where you can get no stats on payouts or stats what so ever.
3. No slander - I want the thieving pool shutdown - I assume that realization is why you're no longer listed as a valid pool.
4. I have no botnet, or ddos attack service - it's you and your buddy that run the botnets. Please stop blaming me for your in-ability to maintain a spam site, a theft site and calling you out for the thief/scammer/spammer you are. Lets face it, your site is so far below the radar that no one would bother to DDOS it. The only customers you have are fellow spammers/scammers -and you don't seem to have obtained them ....
7. You cannot even keep a sequence, lol!!! I keep your order, it might better fit to you, ...
3. You are operating a botnet, and and a child porn enterprises. That was your own word, so why deny it?
5. Your solution to verify did not work. I know you gave your best shot, but not good enough.
4. To accuse others as thief is slander. Get your FACTS right.
6. NONE of the pools shows the payout, I repeat it: NONE OF THE POOL SHOWS IT, so I do now the same.
Whats wrong when I do the same as others? WHAT'S WRONG WHEN I DO AS OTHERS?
2. Even your boss Crow told you already that I am not smart enough to run a botnet, ... he is right, I do now know it, and I do not even WANT to know it.
1. I am proud of what I do, WITH my REAL NAME!
I still think that you are just a s****d kid!!!
September 23, 2015, 12:48:56 AM
haitch and Elmit, for fuck sake, start your own damn thread arguing with each other, instead of yet again trashing this one.
Of course, Elmit's "faucet" should not be listed as an official resource. Such posts should be deleted in a moderated thread, if we ever get one.
Haha, that made me laugh Of course, Elmit's "faucet" should not be listed as an official resource. Such posts should be deleted in a moderated thread, if we ever get one.
September 23, 2015, 12:39:55 AM
haitch and Elmit, for fuck sake, start your own damn thread arguing with each other, instead of yet again trashing this one.
Of course, Elmit's "faucet" should not be listed as an official resource. Such posts should be deleted in a moderated thread, if we ever get one.
Of course, Elmit's "faucet" should not be listed as an official resource. Such posts should be deleted in a moderated thread, if we ever get one.
Yep,
Sorry, but any time a scammer like Elmit pops up offering a service that really actually hurts Burst - I'll slap him down.
He asked a non-insane question yesterday and I answered it, he made an insane post today - I'll bite .....
September 23, 2015, 12:36:10 AM
haitch and Elmit, for fuck sake, start your own damn thread arguing with each other, instead of yet again trashing this one.
Of course, Elmit's "faucet" should not be listed as an official resource. Such posts should be deleted in a moderated thread, if we ever get one.
Of course, Elmit's "faucet" should not be listed as an official resource. Such posts should be deleted in a moderated thread, if we ever get one.
September 23, 2015, 12:12:10 AM
What is the relationship of the DevPool and the Developer team?
It is for me strange, that the "developer" cannot code anymore, but still run a pool!
I also wonder about this pool having the highest balance.
It is for me strange, that the "developer" cannot code anymore, but still run a pool!
I also wonder about this pool having the highest balance.
Code:
Pool Statistics
Current time: 2015-09-23 03:02:40 UTC
Block: 145,750
Difficulty: 7,328
Est. Networksize (PB): 7.6839916823289
BURST.MiningHere.com
Pool balance: 86,291
Registered Miners: 537
burst.ninja
Pool balance: 19,850
Registered Miners: 418
burst.poolto.be
Pool balance: 3,779
Registered Miners: 257
cryptomining.farm
Pool balance: 178,750
Registered Miners: 1,597
DevPool v2
Pool balance: 601,809
Registered Miners: 557
mining.tompool.org
Pool balance: 308
Registered Miners: 57
pool.blago
Pool balance: 608
Registered Miners: 118
pool.burstcoin.de
Pool balance: 25,634
Registered Miners: 127
pool.burstcoin.it
Pool balance: 39
Registered Miners: 56
Current time: 2015-09-23 03:02:40 UTC
Block: 145,750
Difficulty: 7,328
Est. Networksize (PB): 7.6839916823289
BURST.MiningHere.com
Pool balance: 86,291
Registered Miners: 537
burst.ninja
Pool balance: 19,850
Registered Miners: 418
burst.poolto.be
Pool balance: 3,779
Registered Miners: 257
cryptomining.farm
Pool balance: 178,750
Registered Miners: 1,597
DevPool v2
Pool balance: 601,809
Registered Miners: 557
mining.tompool.org
Pool balance: 308
Registered Miners: 57
pool.blago
Pool balance: 608
Registered Miners: 118
pool.burstcoin.de
Pool balance: 25,634
Registered Miners: 127
pool.burstcoin.it
Pool balance: 39
Registered Miners: 56
What I wonder about is why mininghere.com is no longer listed in the pools at http://burstcoin.biz/pools? Did someone finally realize your pool is a scam and you're a thief ?
Questions end with a "?"
Obviously you do not have an answer to the question I have.
Regarding your sentence, ending with "?"
You need to ask them how they select pools to be included. However, don't worry, my statistic is accurate and shows all known pools.
Maybe they have no means to gather the information anymore. Maybe they run out of resources. Read the thread here about the problems this site has.
It is not my problem. I got my statistics, I am happy with it and I share it sometimes.
Why not pick another pool to slander? Why do you always pick on mine? Why do you not just troll away!
Edited: And why is it so, that always when you pop up to slander, at the same time a tried DDOS attack is on the way to my pool? Do you think that is coincidence or CONTROLLED by YOUR BOTNET
? Weeks without, months without, just when you say something here, BANG. I think it shows what character you have/are.
1. Yes, questions end with a question mark - aka -> ?
1a. Yes I presume they understood your theft.
2. You don't know how to validate a BURST address but we should trust your stats on all the burst pools - ok.
1b. Maybe they don't want to list scamming, stealing, shitty pools any more. You showed all stats, until the stats showed you were failing to pay; then you took away showing payouts at all; and now you have a pool where you can get no stats on payouts or stats what so ever.
3. No slander - I want the thieving pool shutdown - I assume that realization is why you're no longer listed as a valid pool.
4. I have no botnet, or ddos attack service - it's you and your buddy that run the botnets. Please stop blaming me for your in-ability to maintain a spam site, a theft site and calling you out for the thief/scammer/spammer you are. Lets face it, your site is so far below the radar that no one would bother to DDOS it. The only customers you have are fellow spammers/scammers -and you don't seem to have obtained them ....
September 22, 2015, 11:58:15 PM
What is the relationship of the DevPool and the Developer team?
It is for me strange, that the "developer" cannot code anymore, but still run a pool!
I also wonder about this pool having the highest balance.
It is for me strange, that the "developer" cannot code anymore, but still run a pool!
I also wonder about this pool having the highest balance.
Code:
Pool Statistics
Current time: 2015-09-23 03:02:40 UTC
Block: 145,750
Difficulty: 7,328
Est. Networksize (PB): 7.6839916823289
BURST.MiningHere.com
Pool balance: 86,291
Registered Miners: 537
burst.ninja
Pool balance: 19,850
Registered Miners: 418
burst.poolto.be
Pool balance: 3,779
Registered Miners: 257
cryptomining.farm
Pool balance: 178,750
Registered Miners: 1,597
DevPool v2
Pool balance: 601,809
Registered Miners: 557
mining.tompool.org
Pool balance: 308
Registered Miners: 57
pool.blago
Pool balance: 608
Registered Miners: 118
pool.burstcoin.de
Pool balance: 25,634
Registered Miners: 127
pool.burstcoin.it
Pool balance: 39
Registered Miners: 56
Current time: 2015-09-23 03:02:40 UTC
Block: 145,750
Difficulty: 7,328
Est. Networksize (PB): 7.6839916823289
BURST.MiningHere.com
Pool balance: 86,291
Registered Miners: 537
burst.ninja
Pool balance: 19,850
Registered Miners: 418
burst.poolto.be
Pool balance: 3,779
Registered Miners: 257
cryptomining.farm
Pool balance: 178,750
Registered Miners: 1,597
DevPool v2
Pool balance: 601,809
Registered Miners: 557
mining.tompool.org
Pool balance: 308
Registered Miners: 57
pool.blago
Pool balance: 608
Registered Miners: 118
pool.burstcoin.de
Pool balance: 25,634
Registered Miners: 127
pool.burstcoin.it
Pool balance: 39
Registered Miners: 56
What I wonder about is why mininghere.com is no longer listed in the pools at http://burstcoin.biz/pools? Did someone finally realize your pool is a scam and you're a thief ?
Questions end with a "?"
Obviously you do not have an answer to the question I have.
Regarding your sentence, ending with "?"
You need to ask them how they select pools to be included. However, don't worry, my statistic is accurate and shows all known pools.
Maybe they have no means to gather the information anymore. Maybe they run out of resources. Read the thread here about the problems this site has.
It is not my problem. I got my statistics, I am happy with it and I share it sometimes.
Why not pick another pool to slander? Why do you always pick on mine? Why do you not just troll away!
Edited: And why is it so, that always when you pop up to slander, at the same time a tried DDOS attack is on the way to my pool? Do you think that is coincidence or CONTROLLED by YOUR BOTNET
? Weeks without, months without, just when you say something here, BANG. I think it shows what character you have/are.
September 22, 2015, 11:46:40 PM
What is the relationship of the DevPool and the Developer team?
It is for me strange, that the "developer" cannot code anymore, but still run a pool!
I also wonder about this pool having the highest balance.
It is for me strange, that the "developer" cannot code anymore, but still run a pool!
I also wonder about this pool having the highest balance.
Code:
Pool Statistics
Current time: 2015-09-23 03:02:40 UTC
Block: 145,750
Difficulty: 7,328
Est. Networksize (PB): 7.6839916823289
BURST.MiningHere.com
Pool balance: 86,291
Registered Miners: 537
burst.ninja
Pool balance: 19,850
Registered Miners: 418
burst.poolto.be
Pool balance: 3,779
Registered Miners: 257
cryptomining.farm
Pool balance: 178,750
Registered Miners: 1,597
DevPool v2
Pool balance: 601,809
Registered Miners: 557
mining.tompool.org
Pool balance: 308
Registered Miners: 57
pool.blago
Pool balance: 608
Registered Miners: 118
pool.burstcoin.de
Pool balance: 25,634
Registered Miners: 127
pool.burstcoin.it
Pool balance: 39
Registered Miners: 56
Current time: 2015-09-23 03:02:40 UTC
Block: 145,750
Difficulty: 7,328
Est. Networksize (PB): 7.6839916823289
BURST.MiningHere.com
Pool balance: 86,291
Registered Miners: 537
burst.ninja
Pool balance: 19,850
Registered Miners: 418
burst.poolto.be
Pool balance: 3,779
Registered Miners: 257
cryptomining.farm
Pool balance: 178,750
Registered Miners: 1,597
DevPool v2
Pool balance: 601,809
Registered Miners: 557
mining.tompool.org
Pool balance: 308
Registered Miners: 57
pool.blago
Pool balance: 608
Registered Miners: 118
pool.burstcoin.de
Pool balance: 25,634
Registered Miners: 127
pool.burstcoin.it
Pool balance: 39
Registered Miners: 56
What I wonder about is why mininghere.com is no longer listed in the pools at http://burstcoin.biz/pools? Did someone finally realize your pool is a scam and you're a thief ?
September 22, 2015, 11:33:21 PM
Elmit,
You and Bin Laden - such a classy pair .... should have figured a bottom feeder like you would admire him, you can't do any better than parrot his slander ?
Oh, and BTW -
http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Ronald-Wiplinger/internet/Ronald-Wiplinger-elmitcom-Ronald-agreed-to-complete-our-internet-sites-in-three-months-M-600875
You and Bin Laden - such a classy pair .... should have figured a bottom feeder like you would admire him, you can't do any better than parrot his slander ?
Oh, and BTW -
http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Ronald-Wiplinger/internet/Ronald-Wiplinger-elmitcom-Ronald-agreed-to-complete-our-internet-sites-in-three-months-M-600875
I am not sure why you mention me with the best botnet programmer I know in this forum whom I adore and worship his every post.
Quoting over and over lies does not make it a truth. OR do you have any knowledge about the case you quote?
No idea on the case other than what I read, and your threats to sue me every time I mention it.
Quote
As said before, PLEASE do us all a favour and leave us here alone with BURST. Bother the Singapore water department again. Or talk with your imaginary friend in Singapore.
You and your colleague stop spamming, stop botnet mining, stop stealing mining funds. You asked a reasonable question last night, and I gave you a reasonable answer - I guess you're back off your meds tonight again though. Go take your meds. A (real) coin faucet doesn't require the recipient to spam twitter on your behalf (at a rate of 1/40th of a penny for spam). Start acting like you want to be part of this coin instead of an abuser of this coin.
Jump to: