The PoC verification hashes your account id and nonce from the block and uses that when calculating/checking your deadline. If someone tried to swap out the account id it'd result in a completely different hash and therefore a completely different deadline. Only the account id in the block's reward recipient can receive the block reward.
Coins definitely make you paranoid the more you get fucked by them. I was under the impression in the mining phase the miner finds a specific hash with your account number that it's looking for and then sends it to the wallet, but after it finds it you've pretty much 'solved' things and the answer is submitted to the wallet.
I think several folks posting here are not quite well versed in how math, blockchains, crypto, mining etc... all work in relationship to one another.
we have folks who don't understand what variance is ("luck" in laymens terms) and freak out and start saying things that border on slander and unfounded accusations. albeit, I can concede that lack of knowledge (aka ignorance) easily explains their behavior.
we have folks who don't understand what variance is ("luck" in laymens terms) and freak out and start saying things that border on slander and unfounded accusations. albeit, I can concede that lack of knowledge (aka ignorance) easily explains their behavior.
Week of stats... 360 blocks per day, 2520 per week. 2500 points of data is not by any means a small pool. If things balanced out I should've been hitting ~two blocks per day (this is with 17PB). Law of large numbers (randomness does not make things inherently completely random). Lack of knowledge when it comes to stats is also considered ignorance.
You're not the only one that can fling poo bro and there is plenty of evidence in the BTC forums of backstabbing, scamming, and stealing, including creative ways of doing it that people didn't think could be done in the first place (There are plenty of miners that had hidden 'fees'). That is by no means in short supply. Paranoia in this case is much more helpful then a lack of it as more people can pool their points of data and it can be discussed further. That's the whole reason I brought it to light here. Even if it seems like it's not feasible, if other people have also experienced a similar drop in income after submitting logs to Blago it should be looked at thoroughly. Ignorance would be ignoring such a trend because he's 'reputable', whatever that means in the BTC forums. Because he makes a miner people use and depend on he should receive even more scrutiny as you're essentially giving him access to all your sensitive bits of information.
I found two blocks so far already today just to add more anecdotal evidence after switching to a pool.
that's how I do it, one man army.