Topic: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" - page 190. (Read 1151369 times)

I'm trying to import a bitcoin qt wallet.dat that suppose to have clams in multiple addresses but Clam wallet still shows 0 balance.

The wallet is fully synced.

What's wrong ?

edit: just to clarify things up, I have created a new wallet in bitcoin core and then imported the private keys that have clams in them, then imported the wallet.dat to the clam client.

Maybe its not the same even if it sounds the same, but seems thats all about dat cryptos lol.

Explains why he had secret labs in Norway working on heavy water and bloom filters.

Maybe, though some think he had cryptorchidism.

Did you know hitler only had a testicle?

Hitler was childless.

my son points out that this exchange could only be made more juvenile by involving hitler in some way

If you really want to take it that way you have a good bunch if you count how much they offered doog for just-dice, after that you can count all the investors that bought their clams and seem pretty much willing to protect their investment.

Everyone on JD know who sold the coins, if u was the buyer then congrats on your 150btc buy. Unless uid 6 on jd change his name to vulturefund no one belives you. If you want loose 0.4% trade against yourself thats fine. Until UID 6 change name to vulturefund you are a liar.

Welp, now anyone that wants to invest can buy in at low costs! Thanks for that large sell! We should all be thanking this person. MOAR STEAK.

   I know...   It's so cheap....   Should be 20M at a minimum    Now who's full of it. 

Thank you for your candour but really, you needn't have gone to the trouble, it was amusingly clear from the outset.

I have to respect the strength of your commitment to the folk tradition of New Year first-fudding but are you sure you read it correctly?

You might want to include a BTC address in the future because if you continue to entertain people with your hilariously lame slapstick fud, you might get some tips (it might work even better if you could find a flouncy costume to wear).

Cheers

Graham

You're gay.

LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES, that's my job and your job.

Maybe I'm lying, but it's not a lie that CLAMS has a value of +2.5 M$ ?¿!

Think about it a moment please, and look what has CLAMS so special to have a value of 2.5M$...

Just telling some lies, and some thruths, who knows...

I wrote a Python script that lets me pipe 'clamd' style RPC commands to it. I was having trouble running up against the maximum shell command length when trying to use clamd to create and send large raw transactions.

It lets me do things like this:


The 50k sell was mostly matched with the 129 BTC buy wall. So you appear to be saying that you just bought 43000 CLAMs from yourself for 129 BTC? That seems like a silly thing to do on an exchange. Couldn't you have come to a private agreement between your various selves off-exchange? Or were you sacrificing the fees to bump CLAM up to 2nd place by daily volume?

Just kidding. We know who sold into that buy wall. It was a Just-Dice investor. I helped him make the withdrawal, and he announced his dump seconds before it happened.

Perhaps that is a JD investor  

Free advice is worth exactly what it costs.

The best trade is your own trade.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4TTedpirFs

Really? The sale was 50k clams actually and it was sold by a just dice investor.

Some advice for you:

Stop wasting your time trying to manipulate people and crypto markets. People like yourself are the lowest of the low and an example of everything wrong in this community. You control nothing outside of your mothers basement.

  Your lies are transparent to anyone paying attention, who happen to know who sold 50K (get your numbers straight if you're gonna lie)

Happy new year CLAM addicted ladies.

I'm here again just to tell you CLAM holders that your coins will have a shitty value within two months, to the 0.0006-0.0007 range. You can take my advise or you can lose your panties, I don't really care cause I'm gonna win big in here.

Just to tell you how we control this shit: That stupid 150 BTC buy wall was from us, and the sell order of +40,000 CLAMS was us too.

Last advice, small fishes get away from this shit, this is our game and you'll be burned if you try to play, specially if you go long.

It's not our choice, but simply it's not fair that this shitcoin has a value of +2.5 M$...

Have a nice year.

After thinking about the idea for using multisig to simulate exchanging crypto and fiat (see the link in my signature for the idea), the best way I can think to do it is in several steps.

1. A party makes an offer, including price, amount, collateral (with a specified txout), an expiration time, boundary information for the window and possible escrows.
2. A counterparty accepts the offer by determining the rest (counterparty collateral and which escrow), writing the full terms in (formal) text, signing the text, and creating a tx with the appropriate 2-of-3 tx with a hash of the contract text in the CLAMspeech. No one signs the tx yet.
3. The party accepts this by adding his/her signature of the contract text.
4. The escrow accepts this by adding his/her signature of the contract text.
Only now do the party and counterparty start signing the tx.
5. One signs the tx.
6. Another signs the tx and publishes it.

The contract text would need to specify that it's void if there's not a tx with the contract hash in the clamspeech published by time X.

Unfortunately, I can't believe very many people would prefer trading with a 6 step process over simply trusting a third party exchange. Unless this could be simplified significantly, it's probably not worth implementing.

---

On the other hand, now that I've started looking into the CLAMour code, I'm imagining other potential uses of CLAMspeech. For example, another proof-of-stake coin could be "merge staked" with clams. Suppose the other coin (which I'll call "othercoin") is also proof-of-stake using its own token. When othercoin stakers make a new block, the block header hash could be published in the CLAMspeech of a coinstake:

othercoin

For the othercoin block to be correct, the timestamp would have to be earlier than the time stamp in the Clams block where its hash was published. Also, the hashes would be required to be published in order.

An advantage of this is that someone couldn't silently make a separate long othercoin fork (since it would be visible in the Clams chain). To be more precise, they couldn't silently stake a separate othercoin history without also silently staking a separate Clams history. It would also rely on timestamps in Clams blocks to prevent attacks by falsely claiming an othercoin time in the future, unless they also attacked Clams this way at the same time.

Would there be any objection to this on the Clams side? It seems like it would give more people a reason to own and stake Clams.

The only downside I can see is that it restricts stakers from making clamour votes. It seems like "othercoin " might only take up about half the CLAMspeech, so people could still vote for some clamours by having a speech like:

clamour othercoin

PS: I now have two testnet clam nodes running. For testing, I need to be able to stake fairly regularly, so it would help if someone could send massive amounts of testnet clams to n422ULsfpah4GEJciZ1uRYMCLgFdGCpBsP and mxHPD9KUvyvezaVC87b2vFrnHaiFnB44mf. Based on the current staking weight on testnet, it looks like approximately 100,000 clams would let me stake a few times an hour.