Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][CRC] Craftcoin - Portable Minecraft Game Currency w. Economy Plugin - page 26. (Read 92271 times)

legendary
Activity: 1843
Merit: 1338
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread


 (...the chances of finding a block are identical whether that hash is mining at 1 pool or spread across 100 pools.)

What is the point of low hashers mining at a pool if their hashes are not a combined effort toward solving 1 individual block. I guess I still don't understand what pools do that solo-mining doesn't.

With low hashes, solo-mining will likely never give you a payout unless you're one lucky bastard. With a pool you're much more likely to get some payout.

I understand that there is a payout issued with a pool based on contribution. My question is, if we as pool members are actually working together as a team then why not work together on 1 pool rather than 6 or 7? Otherwise if we mine individually then it is the same as solo mining. This question pertains to p2pool and pplns pools. NOT PPS!!

My question is about sharing the work. I don't care about the payments.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Hi,

I just thought of mining some for fun... But for some reason it says "out of sync" in my wallet all the time, also when I put in a pool in "mining" I get the following message: "Miner failed to start. Make sure you have the minerd executable and libraries in the same directory as craftcoin-qt". And yes, the files are all in the same folder. What am I doing wrong?

full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Captain Jack Fenderson


 (...the chances of finding a block are identical whether that hash is mining at 1 pool or spread across 100 pools.)

What is the point of low hashers mining at a pool if their hashes are not a combined effort toward solving 1 individual block. I guess I still don't understand what pools do that solo-mining doesn't.

With low hashes, solo-mining will likely never give you a payout unless you're one lucky bastard. With a pool you're much more likely to get some payout.
legendary
Activity: 1843
Merit: 1338
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread


 (...the chances of finding a block are identical whether that hash is mining at 1 pool or spread across 100 pools.)

What is the point of low hashers mining at a pool if their hashes are not a combined effort toward solving 1 individual block. I guess I still don't understand what pools do that solo-mining doesn't.
legendary
Activity: 1843
Merit: 1338
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread
Well, currently there seem tp be too many pools for the amount of craftcoin miners  Undecided

I must move from the one pool after 36-48 hours of loyalty to the other that obviously has higher loyalty and more miners. Sorry http://crc.scryptmining.com/ I have to go where the possibility is higher with more miners.

Except with PPS it does not matter..You get paid the same regardless of how many-how large the miners there are on the pool   Wink

If the interest in a PPS pool is truly gone, Let me know. No reason for me to keep a pool up nobody is going to use.


I'm using it!  Have had my 500khashes on it for a few days.  Found two blocks. Only 0.01% rejected shares.  I don't see why everyone isn't using it.  It's great because I know I will be paid.  There's no being unlucky.  Dreamwatcher absorbs all the variance.  Guaranteed payouts people!  http://crc.cryptocoinmine.com



I switch from the pplns to the pps, I am user , found a block for the pool 40 minutes ago.  Grin

I find it strange that every time I switch to a pool the main hasher leaves. And then I am back to wondering if my hashing is worth it to keep my whole 100 CRC in my wallet to have value. I guess it would be different if I actually played Minecraft.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100

So really the coin itself isn't the important/interesting thing here anyway, the module is; people could go ahead and use it with real bitcoins instead of mucking around with some obscure newfangled coin, ormaybe litecoin or devcoin or whatever if bitcoins are considered "too valuable" for use in games...

-MarkM-

Hit the problem on the head.


I agree, this is exactly the reason we approached the project from the angle we did.


We WILL get it worked out, the problem is that we don't have the same resources that other devs might have.

Check your PM...
full member
Activity: 121
Merit: 100
Well, currently there seem tp be too many pools for the amount of craftcoin miners  Undecided

I must move from the one pool after 36-48 hours of loyalty to the other that obviously has higher loyalty and more miners. Sorry http://crc.scryptmining.com/ I have to go where the possibility is higher with more miners.

Except with PPS it does not matter..You get paid the same regardless of how many-how large the miners there are on the pool   Wink

If the interest in a PPS pool is truly gone, Let me know. No reason for me to keep a pool up nobody is going to use.


I'm using it!  Have had my 500khashes on it for a few days.  Found two blocks. Only 0.01% rejected shares.  I don't see why everyone isn't using it.  It's great because I know I will be paid.  There's no being unlucky.  Dreamwatcher absorbs all the variance.  Guaranteed payouts people!  http://crc.cryptocoinmine.com
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Well, currently there seem tp be too many pools for the amount of craftcoin miners  Undecided

I must move from the one pool after 36-48 hours of loyalty to the other that obviously has higher loyalty and more miners. Sorry http://crc.scryptmining.com/ I have to go where the possibility is higher with more miners.

All good man, nice to have you aboard while you were.  Hopefully the diff issue gets addressed eventually, and the coin will have a bit more life.


Regarding too many pools for so few miners, it has no affect on anything in terms of finding blocks.  The coin has the same global hashrate, the chances of finding a block are identical whether that hash is mining at 1 pool or spread across 100 pools. Only difference is how payment of finding the coin is split up.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
Well, currently there seem tp be too many pools for the amount of craftcoin miners  Undecided

I must move from the one pool after 36-48 hours of loyalty to the other that obviously has higher loyalty and more miners. Sorry http://crc.scryptmining.com/ I have to go where the possibility is higher with more miners.

Except with PPS it does not matter..You get paid the same regardless of how many-how large the miners there are on the pool   Wink

If the interest in a PPS pool is truly gone, Let me know. No reason for me to keep a pool up nobody is going to use.
legendary
Activity: 1843
Merit: 1338
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread
Well, currently there seem tp be too many pools for the amount of craftcoin miners  Undecided

I must move from the one pool after 36-48 hours of loyalty to the other that obviously has higher loyalty and more miners. Sorry http://crc.scryptmining.com/ I have to go where the possibility is higher with more miners.
legendary
Activity: 1843
Merit: 1338
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread
Most pools keep the TX fees to themselves. P2pools give them to the miners.

The fee's on P2Pools are a bit different than other pools. Any fees that a p2pool has is probabilistic (yes, I had to look up the definition of that word too) Smiley

In other words if your p2pool has a 1% fee then 1% of the shares goes to the pool not 1% of every share. The pool can have periods of bad luck in relation to the fee and get nothing at all but it should average out over time.


Thanks for clearing this up for me.
full member
Activity: 213
Merit: 100
Mining history: BTC->LTC->FTC->CRC:2200kh/s

So really the coin itself isn't the important/interesting thing here anyway, the module is; people could go ahead and use it with real bitcoins instead of mucking around with some obscure newfangled coin, ormaybe litecoin or devcoin or whatever if bitcoins are considered "too valuable" for use in games...

-MarkM-

Hit the problem on the head.

all this has already been done by this coin's dev except it was done with LTC but it ended up making the mine craft market to volatile as you'd have to buy and sell in game based on the price of LTC.  apparently the plug has been tweaked so market volatility doesn't effect ingame prices to much
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
Don't rush, gives me time to pick up some CRC at a slow rate (low market volume) before the diff fix Smiley
full member
Activity: 156
Merit: 100

So really the coin itself isn't the important/interesting thing here anyway, the module is; people could go ahead and use it with real bitcoins instead of mucking around with some obscure newfangled coin, ormaybe litecoin or devcoin or whatever if bitcoins are considered "too valuable" for use in games...

-MarkM-

Hit the problem on the head.


I agree, this is exactly the reason we approached the project from the angle we did.


We WILL get it worked out, the problem is that we don't have the same resources that other devs might have.


legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2154
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
Luckily most coins are alike so given a working module to plug a cryptocurrency into minecraft and/or minecraft clones pretty much any cryptocurrency should be able to work with it with trivially simple changes (port number, maybe, maybe not even that; and cosmetics such as what name/symbol to display).

So really the coin itself isn't the important/interesting thing here anyway, the module is; people could go ahead and use it with real bitcoins instead of mucking around with some obscure newfangled coin, or maybe litecoin or devcoin or whatever if bitcoins are considered "too valuable" for use in games...

-MarkM-

Well, Blindfolded did have a Minecraft server set up with an integrated payment system denominated in LTC. Problem with that was it was right before LTC became valuable. I deposited >1,000 LTC onto the minecraft server, just to find out they would hit a few dollars each in a week or two. After that the server became inactive, because no one wanted to use a coin that was worth that much for game transactions.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250

So really the coin itself isn't the important/interesting thing here anyway, the module is; people could go ahead and use it with real bitcoins instead of mucking around with some obscure newfangled coin, ormaybe litecoin or devcoin or whatever if bitcoins are considered "too valuable" for use in games...

-MarkM-

Hit the problem on the head.
sr. member
Activity: 492
Merit: 250
Luckily most coins are alike so given a working module to plug a cryptocurrency into minecraft and/or minecraft clones pretty much any cryptocurrency should be able to work with it with trivially simple changes (port number, maybe, maybe not even that; and costmetics such as what name/symbol to display).

So really the coin itself isn't the important/interesting thing here anyway, the module is; people could go ahead and use it with real bitcoins instead of mucking around with some obscure newfangled coin, or maybe litecoin or devcoin or whatever if bitcoins are considered "too valuable" for use in games...

-MarkM-

How about IFC, there are so many that nobody needs to worry about coin supply!!!
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1090
Luckily most coins are alike so given a working module to plug a cryptocurrency into minecraft and/or minecraft clones pretty much any cryptocurrency should be able to work with it with trivially simple changes (port number, maybe, maybe not even that; and cosmetics such as what name/symbol to display).

So really the coin itself isn't the important/interesting thing here anyway, the module is; people could go ahead and use it with real bitcoins instead of mucking around with some obscure newfangled coin, or maybe litecoin or devcoin or whatever if bitcoins are considered "too valuable" for use in games...

-MarkM-
full member
Activity: 156
Merit: 100
would be great if we could get a little info what is going on with the rescue of crc. whats the status?


The current status is bleak so far. We have tried a couple changes in a test environment to no avail. However we recently contacted a well known person for the forums to give us a hand, and he has agreed. We will continue to work until the issue is resolved. I understand that people would like to have this going again, I feel the same way, possibly even stronger than most. As soon as we have a definite answer we will pass it on. I personally apologize to anybody that has invested their time, and given us their support. We are comitted to making this project work.


 
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
would be great if we could get a little info what is going on with the rescue of crc. whats the status?
Pages:
Jump to: